Thalamic deep brain stimulation for tourette syndrome increases cortical beta activity.

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the thalamus can effectively reduce tics in severely affected patients with Tourette syndrome (TS). Its effect on cortical oscillatory activity is currently unknown. OBJECTIVE: We assessed whether DBS modulates beta activity at fronto-central electrodes. We explored concurrent EEG sources and probabilistic stimulation maps. METHODS: Resting state EEG of TS patients treated with thalamic DBS was recorded in repeated DBS-on and DBS-off states. A mixed linear model was employed for statistical evaluation. EEG sources were estimated with eLORETA. Thalamic probabilistic stimulation maps were obtained by assigning beta power difference scores (DBS-on minus DBS-off) to stimulation sites. RESULTS: We observed increased beta power in DBS-on compared to DBS-off states. Modulation of cortical beta activity was localized to the midcingulate cortex. Beta modulation was more pronounced when stimulating the thalamus posteriorly, peaking in the ventral posterior nucleus. CONCLUSION: Thalamic DBS in TS patients modulates beta frequency oscillations presumably important for sensorimotor function and relevant to TS pathophysiology.

Chronic Deep Brain Stimulation of the Human Nucleus Accumbens Region Disrupts the Stability of Intertemporal Preferences.

When choosing between rewards that differ in temporal proximity (intertemporal choice), human preferences are typically stable, constituting a clinically relevant transdiagnostic trait. Here we show, in female and male human patients undergoing deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the anterior limb of the internal capsule/NAcc region for treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder, that long-term chronic (but not phasic) DBS disrupts intertemporal preferences. Hierarchical Bayesian modeling accounting for temporal discounting behavior across multiple time points allowed us to assess both short-term and long-term reliability of intertemporal choice. In controls, temporal discounting was highly reliable, both long-term (6 months) and short-term (1 week). In contrast, in patients undergoing DBS, short-term reliability was high, but long-term reliability (6 months) was severely disrupted. Control analyses confirmed that this effect was not because of range restriction, the presence of obsessive-compulsive disorder symptoms or group differences in choice stochasticity. Model-agnostic between- and within-subject analyses confirmed this effect. These findings provide initial evidence for long-term modulation of cognitive function via DBS and highlight a potential contribution of the human NAcc region to intertemporal preference stability over time.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Choosing between rewards that differ in temporal proximity is in part a stable trait with relevance for many mental disorders, and depends on prefrontal regions and regions of the dopamine system. Here we show that chronic deep brain stimulation of the human anterior limb of the internal capsule/NAcc region for treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder disrupts the stability of intertemporal preferences. These findings show that chronic stimulation of one of the brain's central motivational hubs can disrupt preferences thought to depend on this circuit.

Impulsivity and Attention in Obsessive Compulsive and Tic Disorders: Mismatch in Self-Report and Behavioural Data.

Impulsivity is a multidimensional, cross-diagnostic behavioural construct that has been described in various psychiatric disorders including obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and Tourette syndrome (TS). Different interpretations of results in the past have raised the question of heightened impulsivity as an explanatory model for self-described impulsive behaviour, especially in OCD. Our study included 16 patients with OCD, 14 patients with TS, and 28 healthy control subjects (HC). Self-assessed impulsivity was examined by the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11 (BIS-11), and the behavioural test used was the immediate and delayed memory task (IMT/DMT). Significantly heightened self-assessed impulsivity of the patient collective compared to HC could be observed in in only one dimension: lack of attention (χ2 (2) = 24.910, p < 0.001). Post-hoc tests were performed using Bonferroni adjusted alpha levels of 0.0167 per test (0.05/3) and revealed significantly higher scores in patients with OCD (M = 19.57, SD = 2.82), z = 4.292, p < 0.001 as with TS (M = 19.38, SD = 3.62), z = 3.832, p < 0.001 compared to HC (M = 13.78, SD = 3.18). In patients with OCD, correlations between the dimension of obsessive thoughts with a lack of attention in the form of first-order factor cognitive instability could be shown (n = 14, p = 0.024, rs = 0.599) while in patients with TS, tic symptomatology correlated significantly with second-order factor attentional impulsivity (n = 12, p = 0.027, rs = 0.635). In behavioural testing, no significant group differences could be observed either in impulsive behaviour (IMT: χ2 (2) = 4.709, p = 0.824; DMT: χ2 (2) = 0.126, p = 0.939) or in sustained attention (IMT: χ2 (2) = 0.388, p = 0.095; DMT: χ2 (2) = 0.663, p = 0.718). Heightened impulsivity as an explanatory model for the observed lack of attention, especially in patients with OCD, should be questioned and interpretation biases considered in the future. The necessity of a multidimensional approach to the research of impulsivity is underscored by our results.

Internal Capsule/Nucleus Accumbens Deep Brain Stimulation Increases Impulsive Decision Making in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation of the anterior limb of the internal capsule (ALIC)/nucleus accumbens is an effective treatment in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder but may increase impulsive behavior. We aimed to investigate how active stimulation alters subdomains of impulsive decision making and whether respective effects depend on the location of stimulation sites. METHODS: We assessed 15 participants with obsessive-compulsive disorder performing the Cambridge Gambling Task during active and inactive ALIC/nucleus accumbens deep brain stimulation. Specifically, we determined stimulation-induced changes in risk adjustment and delay aversion. To characterize underlying neural pathways, we computed probabilistic stimulation maps and applied fiber filtering based on normative structural connectivity data to identify "hot" and "cold" spots/fibers related to changes in impulsive decision making. RESULTS: Active stimulation significantly reduced risk adjustment while increasing delay aversion, both implying increased impulsive decision making. Changes in risk adjustment were robustly associated with stimulation sites located in the central ALIC and fibers connecting the thalamus and subthalamic nucleus with the medial and lateral prefrontal cortex. Both hot spots and fibers for changes in risk adjustment were robust to leave-one-out cross-validation. Changes in delay aversion were similarly associated with central ALIC stimulation, but validation hereof was nonsignificant. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide experimental evidence that ALIC/nucleus accumbens stimulation increases impulsive decision making in obsessive-compulsive disorder. We show that changes in risk adjustment depend on the location of stimulation volumes and affected fiber bundles. The relationship between impulsive decision making and long-term clinical outcomes requires further investigation.

Deep Brain Stimulation Reduces Conflict-Related Theta and Error-Related Negativity in Patients With Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.

OBJECTIVES: Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a psychiatric disorder with alterations of cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical loops and impaired performance monitoring. Electrophysiological markers such as conflict-related medial frontal theta (MFT) and error-related negativity (ERN) may be altered by clinically effective deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the anterior limb of the internal capsule and nucleus accumbens (ALIC/NAc). We hypothesized that ALIC/NAc DBS modulates electrophysiological performance monitoring markers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients (six male) with otherwise treatment-refractory OCD receiving ALIC/NAc DBS performed a flanker task with EEG recordings at three sessions: presurgery and at follow-up with DBS on and off. We examined MFT, ERN, and task performance. Furthermore, we investigated interrelations with clinical efficacy and then explored the influence of the location of individual stimulation volumes on EEG modulations. RESULTS: MFT and ERN were significantly attenuated by DBS with differences most pronounced between presurgery and DBS-on states. Also, we observed reaction time slowing for erroneous responses during DBS-off. Larger presurgery ERN amplitudes were associated with decreased clinical efficacy. Exploratory anatomical analyses suggested that stimulation volumes encompassing the NAc were associated with MFT modulation, whereas ALIC stimulation was associated with modulation of the ERN and clinical efficacy. CONCLUSION: ALIC/NAc DBS diminished MFT and ERN, demonstrating modulation of the medial frontal performance monitoring system in OCD. Furthermore, our findings encourage further studies to explore the ERN as a potential predictor for clinical efficacy.

Connectomic Deep Brain Stimulation for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.

Obsessive-compulsive disorder is among the most disabling psychiatric disorders. Although deep brain stimulation is considered an effective treatment, its use in clinical practice is not fully established. This is, at least in part, due to ambiguity about the best suited target and insufficient knowledge about underlying mechanisms. Recent advances suggest that changes in broader brain networks are responsible for improvement of obsessions and compulsions, rather than local impact at the stimulation site. These findings were fueled by innovative methodological approaches using brain connectivity analyses in combination with neuromodulatory interventions. Such a connectomic approach for neuromodulation constitutes an integrative account that aims to characterize optimal target networks. In this critical review, we integrate findings from connectomic studies and deep brain stimulation interventions to characterize a neural network presumably effective in reducing obsessions and compulsions. To this end, we scrutinize methodologies and seemingly conflicting findings with the aim to merge observations to identify common and diverse pathways for treating obsessive-compulsive disorder. Ultimately, we propose a unified network that-when modulated by means of cortical or subcortical interventions-alleviates obsessive-compulsive symptoms.

Thalamic deep brain stimulation for Tourette Syndrome: A naturalistic trial with brief randomized, double-blinded sham-controlled periods.

BACKGROUND: There is still a lack of controlled studies to prove efficacy of thalamic deep brain stimulation for Tourette's Syndrome. OBJECTIVES: In this controlled trial, we investigated the course of tic severity, comorbidities and quality of life during thalamic stimulation and whether changes in tic severity can be assigned to ongoing compared to sham stimulation. METHODS: We included eight adult patients with medically refractory Tourette's syndrome. Bilateral electrodes were implanted in the centromedian-parafascicular-complex and the nucleus ventro-oralis internus. Tic severity, quality of life and comorbidities were assessed before surgery as well as six and twelve months after. Short randomized, double-blinded sham-controlled crossover sequences with either active or sham stimulation were implemented at both six- and twelve-months' assessments. The primary outcome measurement was the difference in the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale tic score between active and sham stimulation. Adverse events were systematically surveyed for all patients to evaluate safety. RESULTS: Active stimulation resulted in significantly higher tic reductions than sham stimulation (F = 79.5; p = 0.001). Overall quality of life and comorbidities improved significantly in the open-label-phase. Over the course of the trial two severe adverse events occurred that were resolved without sequelae. CONCLUSION: Our results provide evidence that thalamic stimulation is effective in improving tic severity and overall quality of life. Crucially, the reduction of tic severity was primarily driven by active stimulation. Further research may focus on improving stimulation protocols and refining patient selection to improve efficacy and safety of deep brain stimulation for Tourette's Syndrome.

Performance monitoring in obsessive-compulsive disorder: Insights from internal capsule/nucleus accumbens deep brain stimulation.

BACKGROUND: Symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are partly related to impaired cognitive control processes and theta modulations constitute an important electrophysiological marker for cognitive control processes such as signaling negative performance feedback in a fronto-striatal network. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) targeting the anterior limb of the internal capsule (ALIC)/nucleus accumbens (NAc) shows clinical efficacy in OCD, while the exact influence on the performance monitoring system remains largely unknown. METHODS: Seventeen patients with treatment-refractory OCD performed a probabilistic reinforcement learning task. Analyses were focused on 4-8 Hz (theta) power, intertrial phase coherence (ITPC) and debiased weighted Phase-Lag Index (dwPLI) in response to negative performance feedback. Combined EEG and local field potential (LFP) recordings were obtained shortly after DBS electrode implantation to investigate fronto-striatal network modulations. To assess the impact of clinically effective DBS on negative performance feedback modulations, EEG recordings were obtained pre-surgery and at follow-up with DBS on and off. RESULTS: Medial frontal cortex ITPC, striatal ITPC and striato-frontal dwPLI were increased following negative performance feedback. Decreased right-lateralized dwPLI was associated with pre-surgery symptom severity. ITPC was globally decreased during DBS-off. CONCLUSION: We observed a theta phase coherence mediated fronto-striatal performance monitoring network. Within this network, decreased connectivity was related to increased OCD symptomatology, consistent with the idea of impaired cognitive control in OCD. While ALIC/NAc DBS decreased theta network activity globally, this effect was unrelated to clinical efficacy and performance monitoring.

Deep brain stimulation and sensorimotor gating in tourette syndrome and obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Recent translational data suggest that deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical (CSTC) loops improves sensorimotor gating in psychiatric disorders that show deficient prepulse inhibition (PPI), a robust operational measure of sensorimotor gating. To our knowledge we are the first to investigate this effect in patients with Tourette syndrome (TS). We measured PPI of the acoustic startle reflex in patients with TS (N = 10) or Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) (N = 8) treated with DBS of the centromedian and ventro-oral internal thalamic nucleus and the anterior limb of internal capsule-nucleus accumbens area respectively, and aged- and gender-matched healthy controls (HC). PPI of the DBS groups was measured in randomized order in the ON and OFF stimulation condition. Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference in PPI (%) of patients with TS between ON (M = 20.5, SD = 14.9) and OFF (M = 25.2, SD = 29.7) condition. There were significantly reduced PPI levels in patients with TS in the ON condition compared to HC (M = 49.2, SD = 10.7), but no significant difference in PPI between TS in the OFF condition and HC. Furthermore, we found no significant stimulation or group effect for OCD and HC (OCD ON: M = 57.0, SD = 8.3; OCD OFF: 67.8, SD = 19.6; HC: M = 63.0, SD = 24.3). Our study has a number of limitations. Sample sizes are small due to the restricted patient collective. The study was not controlled for use of psychoactive medication or nicotine. Furthermore, we were not able to assess presurgical PPI measurements. In conclusion, we were able to show that PPI is impaired in patients with TS. This finding is in line with recent translational work. With respect to the OCD cohort we were not able to replicate our previously published data. A disability in sensorimotor gating plays a pivotal role in many psychiatric disorders therefore more research should be conducted to disentangle the potential and limitations of modulating sensorimotor gating via brain stimulation techniques.

Weight Change after Striatal/Capsule Deep Brain Stimulation Relates to Connectivity to the Bed Nucleus of the Stria Terminalis and Hypothalamus.

Weight changes are insufficiently understood adverse events of deep brain stimulation. In this context, exploring neural networks of weight control may inform novel treatment strategies for weight-related disorders. In this study, we investigated weight changes after deep brain stimulation of the ventral striatum/ventral capsule and to what extent changes are associated with connectivity to feeding-related networks. We retrospectively analyzed 25 patients undergoing deep brain stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder or substance dependency. Weight changes were assessed preoperatively and six to twelve months after surgery and then matched with individual stimulation sites and stimulation-dependent functional connectivity to a priori defined regions of interest that are involved in food intake. We observed a significant weight gain after six to twelve months of continuous stimulation. Weight increases were associated with medial/apical localization of stimulation sites and with connectivity to hypothalamic areas and the bed nucleus. Thus, deep brain stimulation of the ventral striatum/ventral capsule influences weight depending on localization and connectivity of stimulation sites. Bearing in mind the significance of weight-related disorders, we advocate further prospective studies investigating the neuroanatomical and neuropsychological underpinnings of food intake and their neuromodulatory therapeutic potential.

Open-label trial of anterior limb of internal capsule-nucleus accumbens deep brain stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder: insights gained.

BACKGROUND: For more than 15 years, deep brain stimulation (DBS) has served as a last-resort treatment for severe treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). METHODS: From 2010 to 2016, 20 patients with OCD (10 men/10 women) were included in a single-centre trial with a naturalistic open-label design over 1 year to evaluate the effects of DBS in the anterior limb of the internal capsule and nucleus accumbens region (ALIC-NAcc) on OCD symptoms, executive functions, and personality traits. RESULTS: ALIC-NAcc-DBS significantly decreased OCD symptoms (mean Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale reduction 33%, 40% full responders) and improves global functioning without loss of efficacy over 1 year. No significant changes were found in depressive or anxiety symptoms. Our study did not show any effect of ALIC-NAcc-DBS on personality traits or executive functions, and no potential outcome predictors were identified in a post hoc analysis. Other than several individual minor adverse events, ALIC-NAcc-DBS has been shown to be safe, but 35% of patients reported a sudden increase in anxiety and anhedonia after acute cessation of stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that ALIC-NAcc-DBS is a well-tolerated and promising last-resort treatment option for OCD. The cause of variability in the outcome remains unclear, and the aspect of reversibility must be examined critically. The present data from one of the largest samples of patients with OCD treated with DBS thus far support the results of previous studies with smaller samples.

Connectivity Profile Predictive of Effective Deep Brain Stimulation in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder is a rapidly developing treatment strategy for treatment-refractory patients. Both the exact target and impact on distributed brain networks remain a matter of debate. Here, we investigated which regions connected to stimulation sites contribute to clinical improvement effects and whether connectivity is able to predict outcomes. METHODS: We analyzed 22 patients (13 female) with treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder undergoing deep brain stimulation targeting the anterior limb of the internal capsule/nucleus accumbens. We calculated stimulation-dependent optimal connectivity separately for patient-specific connectivity data of 10 patients and for 12 additional patients using normative connectivity. Models of optimal connectivity were subsequently used to predict outcome in both an out-of-sample cross-validation and a leave-one-out cross-validation across the whole group. RESULTS: The resulting models successfully cross-predicted clinical outcomes of the respective other sample, and a leave-one-out cross-validation across the whole group further demonstrated robustness of our findings (r = .630, p < .001). Specifically, the degree of connectivity between stimulation sites and medial and lateral prefrontal cortices significantly predicted clinical improvement. Finally, we delineated a frontothalamic pathway that is crucial to be modulated for beneficial outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Specific connectivity profiles, encompassing frontothalamic streamlines, can predict clinical outcome of deep brain stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder. After further validation, our findings may be used to guide both deep brain stimulation targeting and programming and to inform noninvasive neuromodulation targets for obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Cortical Paired Associative Stimulation Influences Response Inhibition: Cortico-cortical and Cortico-subcortical Networks.

BACKGROUND: The ability to stop a suboptimal response is integral to decision making and is commonly impaired across psychiatric disorders. Cortical paired associative stimulation (cPAS) is a form of transcranial magnetic stimulation in which paired pulses can induce plasticity at cortical synapses. Here we used cPAS protocols to target cortico-cortical and cortico-subcortical networks by using different intervals between the paired pulses in an attempt to modify response inhibition. METHODS: A total of 25 healthy volunteers underwent four cPAS sessions in random order 1 week apart: right inferior frontal cortex (IFC) stimulation preceding right presupplementary motor area (pre-SMA) stimulation by 10 or 4 ms and pre-SMA stimulation preceding IFC stimulation by 10 or 4 ms. Subjects were tested on the stop signal task along with the delay discounting task as control at baseline (randomized across sessions and cPAS protocol) and after each cPAS session. RESULTS: The stop signal reaction time showed a main effect of cPAS condition when controlling for age (F3,57 = 4.05, p = .01). Younger subjects had greater impairments in response inhibition when the pre-SMA pulse preceded the IFC pulse by 10 ms. In older individuals, response inhibition improved when the IFC pulse preceded the pre-SMA pulse by 4 ms. There were no effects on delay discounting. CONCLUSIONS: cPAS modified response inhibition through age-dependent long-term potentiation and depression-like plasticity mechanisms via putative cortico-cortical and cortico-subcortical networks. We show for the first time the capacity for cPAS to modify a cognitive process highly relevant to psychiatric disorders.

Dissociable Effects of Subthalamic Stimulation in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder on Risky Reward and Loss Prospects.

Our daily decisions involve an element of risk, a behavioral process that is potentially modifiable. Here we assess the role of the associative-limbic subthalamic nucleus (STN) in obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) testing on and off deep-brain stimulation (DBS) on anticipatory risk taking to obtain rewards and avoid losses. We assessed 12 OCD STN DBS in a randomized double-blind within-subject cross-over design. STN DBS decreased risk taking to rewards (p = 0.02) and greater risk taking to rewards was positively correlated with OCD severity (p = 0.01) and disease duration (p = 0.01). STN DBS was also associated with impaired subjective discrimination of loss magnitude (p < 0.05), an effect mediated by acute DBS rather than chronic DBS. We highlight a role for the STN in mediating dissociable valence prospects on risk seeking. STN stimulation decreases risk taking to rewards and impairs discrimination of loss magnitude. These findings may have implications for behavioral symptoms related to STN DBS and the potential for STN DBS for the treatment of psychiatric disorders.

Progress and challenges in deep brain stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder.

This narrative review summarizes the recent literature on deep brain stimulation for treatment resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder highlighting both progress and challenges of this novel treatment. Common targets of psychiatric deep brain stimulation involve both white matter trajectories (anterior limb of the internal capsule, inferior thalamic peduncle, and medial forebrain bundle) and grey matter subcortical nuclei (nucleus accumbens, nucleus subthalamicus, and bed nucleus of the stria terminalis) each of which have been reported with a relevant beneficial effect on obsessive-compulsive symptoms. The mechanisms of action are only partially understood but increasing evidence points towards network effects involving the prefrontal cortex, the striatum and possibly anxiety-related anatomical structures. Deep brain stimulation is a promising therapeutical technique for otherwise treatment refractory patients, but many major issues are unresolved and thorough investigations are needed. Relevant topics for future investigations include treatment predictors and therapeutical augmentation. An international registry of patients treated with deep brain stimulation could improve our understanding of adverse events and target specific effects. In order to step forward, researchers must face inconvenient questions and outperform the status quo of clinical research in this field.

A step forward in elucidating the mystery of OCD.

Obsessive-compulsive disorder represents one of the most disabling psychiatric disorders. The underlying pathophysiology is not fully understood. In a recent Science article, Ahmari and colleagues enlighten fundamental aspects of obsessive-compulsive disorder by means of optogenetic stimulation, thereby also elucidating the usefulness of SSRI in the treatment for OCD.

Deep brain stimulation for treatment-refractory obsessive compulsive disorder: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Obsessive-compulsive disorder is one of the most disabling of all psychiatric illnesses. Despite available pharmacological and psychotherapeutic treatments about 10% of patients remain severely affected and are considered treatment-refractory. For some of these patients deep brain stimulation offers an appropriate treatment method. The scope of this article is to review the published data and to compare different target structures and their effectiveness. METHODS: PubMed search, last update June 2013, was conducted using the terms "deep brain stimulation" and "obsessive compulsive disorder". RESULTS: In total 25 studies were found that reported five deep brain stimulation target structures to treat obsessive-compulsive disorder: the anterior limb of the internal capsule (five studies including 14 patients), nucleus accumbens (eight studies including 37 patients), ventral capsule/ventral striatum (four studies including 29 patients), subthalamic nucleus (five studies including 23 patients) and inferior thalamic peduncle (two studies including 6 patients). Despite the anatomical diversity, deep brain stimulation treatment results in similar response rates for the first four target structures. Inferior thalamic peduncle deep brain stimulation results in higher response rates but these results have to be interpreted with caution due to a very small number of cases. Procedure and device related adverse events are relatively low, as well as stimulation or therapy related side effects. Most stimulation related side effects are transient and decline after stimulation parameters have been changed. CONCLUSION: Deep brain stimulation in treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder seems to be a relatively safe and promising treatment option. However, based on these studies no superior target structure could be identified. More research is needed to better understand mechanisms of action and response predictors that may help to develop a more personalized approach for these severely affected obsessive compulsive patients.