Radiation-induced undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma of the breast: a rare but serious complication following breast-conserving therapy. A case report and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) of the breast is an extremely rare, but aggressive subtype of sarcoma that can develop in radiotherapy (RT)-treated breast cancer patients. Due to the low incidence, there are many uncertainties regarding the adequate management of these tumors. We present a rare case of radiation-induced UPS in a 63-year-old woman who had undergone breast conserving therapy for invasive ductal carcinoma of the left breast, six years prior to presentation. CASE PRESENTATION: A 63-year-old woman presented with a rapidly growing left breast mass. She had been diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma of the left breast for which she underwent a left upper outer quadrantectomy and ipsilateral axillary dissection followed by RT, six years previously. During her routine oncologic follow-up, the mammography revealed a dense, nodular opacity with microcalcifications. The breast ultrasound (US) confirmed the presence of the nodule. US-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy was performed and the diagnosis of UPS was made, the reason for which the patient underwent wide local excision of the left breast. CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of RT-induced UPS is challenging and often missed due to the low incidence, long latency period, unspecific imaging findings, and difficulties in clinical and histological detection of these lesions. These tumors should be considered in differential diagnoses of rapidly-growing breast masses in previously RT-treated breast cancer patients, as they can mimic the local recurrence of the primary tumor. Since the prevalence of breast-conserving surgery followed by RT has been increasing, the careful monitoring of at risk patients is of utmost importance, as UPSs are highly aggressive tumors associated with very poor outcomes.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity: role of intraluminal and intraperitoneal postoperative drainage.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Bleeding and staple line leak are the most common postoperative complications of LSG. To prevent and/or to promptly identify such complications, conventional peri-operative protocols imply post-operative gastric decompression (NGT) and staple line drain (IAD). Our aim was to evaluate the role of naso-gastric tube (NGT) and intra-abdominal drain (IAD) in preventing and/or facilitating identification and treatment of post-operative complications after sleeve gastrectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective observational study on two consecutive series has been undertaken to evaluate the real utility of routine placement of NGT and IAD at the end of a LSG to prevent (primary end-point), promptly identify (secondary end-point) and manage (tertiary end-point) bleeding and staple line leakage. Collected outcome data of all consecutive cases, which underwent primary LSG at our Department, were analyzed. The first 100 consecutive patients (group A) received the standard perioperative protocol and the other consecutive 100 (group B) received a fast track protocol (no NGT neither IAD). RESULTS: The two groups were not different in their outcome. Two bleeding occurred in Group A and were conservatively treated. One abscess developed in group B soon after surgery. It was diagnosed by an abdominal CT performed because patients presented fever, leucocitosis and tachycardia. It was successfully treated by percutaneous ultrasound-guided drainage. One fistula occurred in group B after discharge on 30th post-operative day. Fistula was suspected based on fever and tachycardia in absence of any abdominal discomfort and was confirmed by an abdominal CT. The patient was successfully treated in 40 days by endoscopic positioning of a gastric tube-prosthesis and percutaneous ultrasound-guided drainage of abdominal collection. A third patient in group B experienced bleeding suspected due to hemoglobin drop and confirmed by abdominal CT. He also was conservatively treated. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, placement of drains does not facilitate detection of leak, abscess, or bleeding after primary LSG.