Pharmaceutical Management of Secondary Hyperparathyroidism and the Role of Surgery: A 5-Year Retrospective Study.

Background and Objectives: Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) poses a common condition among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) due to the chronic stimulation of the parathyroid glands as a result of persistently low calcium levels. As a first option for medical treatment, vitamin D receptor analogs (VDRAs) and calcimimetic agents are generally used. Apart from cinacalcet, which is orally taken, in recent years, another calcimimetic agent, etelcalcetide, is being administered intravenously during dialysis. Materials and Methods: In a 5-year retrospective study between 2018 and 2023, 52 patients undergoing dialysis were studied. The aim of this study is to highlight the possible effects and/or benefits that intravenously administered calcimimetic agents have on CKD patients. A total of 34 patients (65.4%) received cinacalcet and etelcalcetide while parathormone (PTH) and calcium serum levels were monitored on a monthly basis. Results: A total of 29 out of 33 patients (87.9%) that received treatment with etelcalcetide showed a significant decrease in PTH levels, which rose up to 57% compared to the initial values. None of the included patients needed to undergo parathyroidectomy (PTx) due to either extremely high and persistent PTH levels or severe side effects of the medications. It is generally strongly advised that parathyroidectomies should be performed by an expert surgical team. In recent years, a significant decrease in parathyroidectomies has been recorded globally, a fact that is mainly linked to the constantly wider use of new calcimimetic agents. This decrease in parathyroidectomies has resulted in an important decrease in complications occurring in cervical surgeries (e.g., perioperative hemorrhage and nerve damage). Conslusions: Despite the fact that these surgical complications cannot be easily compared to the pharmaceutical side effects, the recorded decrease in parathyroidectomies is considered to be notable, especially in cases of relapse where a difficult reoperation would be considered based on previously published guidelines.

A Unique Case of Appendiceal Intussusception (Inversion): A Case in Bloom.

A 40-year-old female patient presented to a secondary facility with dull lower abdominal pain and a persistent low-grade fever. Her laboratory results showed elevated inflammation markers. A CT scan revealed two abscesses in the lesser pelvic region in direct contact with the apex of the appendix, the posterior wall of the uterus, and the right-side appendages. The patient responded well to intravenous antibiotics, and an MRI scan revealed the cause to be an appendiceal rupture. The patient was scheduled for an appendectomy. The procedure started laparoscopically but had to be converted to an open one with a midline infra-umbilical incision in order to protect the right appendages. A standard appendectomy was conducted, and the histology report revealed rupture of the appendix with concomitant wall inversion in the context of fibrous adhesions as well as obstruction due to a fecalith. Patient recovery and follow-up were excellent. Acute appendicitis, while frequently encountered in surgical practice, can present a diagnostic conundrum when it manifests in an atypical manner. This unique form of inversion appeared to confer a protective role against peritonitis, primarily through the mechanism of obstruction occurring centrally to the rupture. We suggest that this case should be included in current classifications as a partial inversion of the appendix after rupture and inflammation.