ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) is an aggressive non-Hodgkin T cell lymphoma commonly driven by NPM-ALK. AP-1 transcription factors, cJUN and JUNb, act as downstream effectors of NPM-ALK and transcriptionally regulate PDGFRß. Blocking PDGFRß kinase activity with imatinib effectively reduces tumor burden and prolongs survival, although the downstream molecular mechanisms remain elusive. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a transgenic mouse model that mimics PDGFRß-driven human ALCL in vivo, we identify PDGFRß as a driver of aggressive tumor growth. Mechanistically, PDGFRß induces the pro-survival factor Bcl-xL and the growth-enhancing cytokine IL-10 via STAT5 activation. CRISPR/Cas9 deletion of both STAT5 gene products, STAT5A and STAT5B, results in the significant impairment of cell viability compared to deletion of STAT5A, STAT5B or STAT3 alone. Moreover, combined blockade of STAT3/5 activity with a selective SH2 domain inhibitor, AC-4-130, effectively obstructs tumor development in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: We therefore propose PDGFRß as a novel biomarker and introduce PDGFRß-STAT3/5 signaling as an important axis in aggressive ALCL. Furthermore, we suggest that inhibition of PDGFRß or STAT3/5 improve existing therapies for both previously untreated and relapsed/refractory ALK+ ALCL patients.
Subject(s)
Lymphoma, Large-Cell, Anaplastic , Receptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor beta , STAT3 Transcription Factor , STAT5 Transcription Factor , Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase , Animals , Carcinogenesis/metabolism , Cell Line, Tumor , Humans , Lymphoma, Large-Cell, Anaplastic/genetics , Lymphoma, Large-Cell, Anaplastic/pathology , Mice , Phosphorylation , Receptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor beta/metabolism , Receptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor beta/pharmacology , STAT3 Transcription Factor/metabolism , STAT5 Transcription Factor/genetics , Signal TransductionABSTRACT
The blood system serves as a key model for cell differentiation and cancer. It is orchestrated by precise spatiotemporal expression of crucial transcription factors. One of the key master regulators in the hematopoietic systems is PU.1. Reduced levels of PU.1 are characteristic for human acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and are known to induce AML in mouse models. Here, we show that transcriptional downregulation of PU.1 is an active process involving an alternative promoter in intron 3 that is induced by RUNX transcription factors driving noncoding antisense transcription. Core-binding factor (CBF) fusions RUNX1-ETO and CBFß-MYH11 in t(8;21) and inv(16) AML, respectively, activate the PU.1 antisense promoter that results in a shift from sense toward antisense transcription and myeloid differentiation blockade. In patients with CBF-AML, we found that an elevated antisense/sense transcript and promoter accessibility ratio represents a hallmark compared with normal karyotype AML or healthy CD34+ cells. Competitive interaction of an enhancer with the proximal or the antisense promoter forms a binary on/off switch for either myeloid or T-cell development. Leukemic CBF fusions thus use a physiological mechanism used by T cells to decrease sense transcription. Our study is the first example of a sense/antisense promoter competition as a crucial functional switch for gene expression perturbation by oncogenes. Hence, this disease mechanism reveals a previously unknown Achilles heel for future precise therapeutic targeting of oncogene-induced chromatin remodeling.
Subject(s)
Core Binding Factor Alpha 2 Subunit/genetics , Core Binding Factor beta Subunit/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Leukemic , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/genetics , Trans-Activators/genetics , Antisense Elements (Genetics)/genetics , Cell Line, Tumor , Gene Fusion , Humans , Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/genetics , Promoter Regions, Genetic , RUNX1 Translocation Partner 1 Protein/genetics , Tumor Cells, CulturedABSTRACT
Essential thrombocythemia (ET) is currently diagnosed either by the British Committee of Standards in Haematology (BCSH) criteria that are predominantly based on exclusion and not necessarily on bone marrow (BM) morphology, or the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria that require BM examination as essential criterion. We studied the morphological and clinical features in patients diagnosed according either to the BCSH (n=238) or the WHO guidelines (n=232). The BCSH-defined ET cohort was re-evaluated by applying the WHO classification. At presentation, patients of the BCSH group showed significantly higher values of serum lactate dehydrogenase and had palpable splenomegaly more frequently. Following the WHO criteria, the re-evaluation of the BCSH-diagnosed ET cohort displayed a heterogeneous population with 141 (59.2%) ET, 77 (32.4%) prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis (prePMF), 16 (6.7%) polycythemia vera and 4 (1.7%) primary myelofibrosis. Contrasting WHO-confirmed ET, the BCSH cohort revealed a significant worsening of fibrosis-free survival and prognosis. As demonstrated by the clinical data and different outcomes between WHO-diagnosed ET and prePMF, these adverse features were generated by the inadvertent inclusion of prePMF to the BCSH group. Taken together, the diagnosis of ET without a scrutinized examination of BM biopsy specimens will generate a heterogeneous cohort of patients impairing an appropriate clinical management.
Subject(s)
Bone Marrow/pathology , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Thrombocythemia, Essential/diagnosis , Academies and Institutes , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biopsy , Bone Marrow Examination , Humans , L-Lactate Dehydrogenase/blood , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Splenomegaly , World Health Organization , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although implantation of a central venous device such as a Port-a-Cath was initially considered safe, extravasation rates up to 4.7% have been reported. Therefore, the objective of this study was to propose a structured procedure for the management of extravasation of a cytotoxic treatment. METHODS: A total of eight patients were evaluated after port extravasation of epirubicin (n = 3), platinum compounds (n = 3), paclitaxel (n = 1), or trabectedin (n = 1) into the subcutaneous space. Immediate explantation of the port was performed in combination with a "Subcutaneous Wash-Out Procedure" (SWOP). When removal of the port was delayed, débridement and flap coverage were performed as necessary. Epirubicin concentrations present in the samples obtained during surgical intervention were subsequently analysed using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Patients were followed for at least six months and were examined for sequelae such as pain, induration, redness, and limited movement. RESULTS: All three patients whose extravasation event was detected during chemotherapy administration benefited from SWOP with acceptable side effects (e.g., erythema). The analysis of epirubicin concentrations demonstrated the active removal of relevant amounts of the compound by wound rinsing. In contrast, late detection of extravasation led to major débridement and flap coverage in four out of five patients. A high body mass index (BMI) value was associated with all of the patients that experienced port extravasation. CONCLUSION: Depending on when Port-a-Cath extravasations into subcutaneous tissue are detected, different treatments are appropriate. When extravasation is detected early, the SWOP was found to be beneficial.