Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Provides Better Short- and Long-Term Outcomes Than Open Esophagectomy in Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has been increasingly performed for locally advanced esophageal cancer in place of open transthoracic esophagectomy (OE). This study explored the significance of MIE for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), focusing mainly on the depth of primary esophageal tumors. METHODS: This study retrospectively assessed short- and long-term outcomes of patients who underwent esophagectomy for ESCC from 2005 through 2021. The inverse probability of the treatment-weighting (IPTW) method was used to compare the outcomes between OE and MIE. The outcomes also were evaluated in the subgroups stratified by cT category. RESULTS: Among 1117 patients, 447 (40%) underwent OE and 670 (60%) underwent MIE. After IPTW adjustment, the incidence of any postoperative complications was significantly higher in the OE group than in the MIE group (60.8% vs 53.7%; p = 0.032), whereas the R0 resection rate was significantly higher in the MIE group (98.6% vs 92.7%; p < 0.001). The MIE group showed better 3 year overall and cancer-specific survival than the OE group (p < 0.001). The incidence of locoregional recurrence within the surgical field was significantly more frequent in the OE group (p < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis stratified by cT category, the R0 resection rate was significantly higher and the incidence of locoregional recurrence was lower in the MIE group among the patients with cT3-4 tumors. In the patients with cT1-2 tumors, MIE showed no significant benefit over OE. CONCLUSIONS: For the patients with cT3-4 tumors, MIE showed fewer postoperative complications, better locoregional control, and better prognosis than OE. Compared with OE, MIE is beneficial, especially for locally advanced ESCC.

Anatomical factor associated with thoracic procedural difficulty in robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Robotic surgical systems with full articulation of instruments, tremor filtering, and motion scaling can potentially overcome the procedural difficulties in endoscopic surgeries. However, whether robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) can overcome anatomical difficulties during thoracoscopic esophagectomy remains unclear. This study aimed to clarify the anatomical and clinical factors that influence the difficulty of RAMIE in the thoracic region. METHODS: Forty-five patients who underwent curative-intent RAMIE with upper mediastinal lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer were included. Using preoperative computed tomography images, we calculated previously reported anatomical indices to assess the upper mediastinal narrowness and vertebral body projections in the middle thoracic region. The factors influencing thoracic operative time were then investigated. RESULTS: During the thoracic procedure, the median operative time was 215 (124-367) min and the median blood loss was 20 (5-190) mL. Postoperatively, pneumonia, anastomotic leakage, and recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy occurred in 17.8%, 2.2%, and 6.7% of the patients, respectively. The multiple linear regression model revealed that a narrow upper mediastinum and greater blood loss during the thoracic procedure were significant factors associated with a prolonged thoracic operative time (P = 0.025 and P < 0.001, respectively). Upper mediastinal narrowing was not associated with postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: A narrow upper mediastinum was significantly associated with a prolonged thoracic operative time in patients with RAMIE.

Fully robotic side-to-side stapled anastomosis provides less anastomotic leakage than conventional minimally invasive approach in Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluates surgical outcomes of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (ILE) for esophageal and esophagogastric cancer, with the comparison of the robotic approach (RA) and the conventional minimally invasive approach (CA). METHODS: Selected patients who underwent minimally invasive ILE for esophageal cancer were included between January 2017 and December 2023. We retrospectively investigated the patients' background characteristics and the short-term surgical outcomes. RESULTS: In this period, among a total of 840 esophagectomies, 81 patients (9.6%) underwent minimally invasive ILE, consisting of 24 cases with RA and 57 with CA. The major indications for ILE were adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus or esophagogastric junction and patients with prior head and neck cancer treatment. Among these thoracic approaches, there were no significant differences in the patients' indications and characteristics, including age, histology, tumor location, clinical TNM stage, and preoperative therapy. Compared with the CA group, no anastomotic leakage was observed in the RA group (17.5% vs. 0, p = .035). Rates of total postoperative complications and length of hospital stay also tended to be reduced in the RA group but did not reach significance. CONCLUSION: In the Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with a side-to-side linear-stapled anastomosis, the fully robotic approach has the potential to powerfully reduce anastomotic leakage compared to the conventional minimally invasive approach.

Gastric conduit reconstruction after esophagectomy.

A high risk of complications still accompanies gastric conduit reconstruction after esophagectomy. In this narrative review, we summarize the technological progress and the problems of gastric conduit reconstruction after esophagectomy. Several types of gastric conduits exist, including the whole stomach and the narrow gastric tube. The clinical outcomes are similar between the two types of conduits. Sufficient blood supply to the conduit is mandatory for a successful esophageal reconstruction. Recently, due to the availability of equipment and its convenience, indocyanine green angiography has been rapidly spreading. When the blood perfusion of the planning anastomotic site is insufficient, several techniques, such as the Kocher maneuver, pedunculated gastric tube with duodenal transection, and additional microvascular anastomosis, exist to decrease the risk of anastomotic failure. There are two different anastomotic sites, cervical and thoracic, and mainly two reconstructive routes, retrosternal and posterior mediastinal routes. Meta-analyses showed no significant difference in outcomes between the anastomotic sites as well as the reconstructive routes. Anastomotic techniques include hand-sewn, circular, and linear stapling. Anastomoses using linear stapling is advantageous in decreasing anastomosis-related complications. Arteriosclerosis and poorly controlled diabetes are the risk factors for anastomotic leakage, while a narrow upper mediastinal space and a damaged stomach predict leakage. Although standardization among the institutional team members is essential to decrease anastomotic complications, surgeons should learn several technical options for predictable or unpredictable intraoperative situations.

Effectiveness of Combination Chemotherapy With Docetaxel, Nedaplatin, and 5-Fluorouracil for Advanced and Recurrent Esophageal Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Chemotherapy and immunotherapy have been recently developed as potentially useful first-line treatments for unresectable, advanced, or recurrent esophageal cancer. We performed a retrospective study of the therapeutic effectiveness of triplet chemotherapy with docetaxel, nedaplatin, and 5-fluorouracil therapy for advanced, recurrent, and unresectable advanced esophageal cancer at our hospital and compared the regimen's results with those of current and possible future treatment options. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study cohort comprised 101 patients who received docetaxel, nedaplatin, and 5-fluorouracil for advanced or recurrent esophageal cancer at Gunma University from May 2008 to December 2017. We retrospectively evaluated the results of this combination chemotherapy and postulated future treatment strategies. RESULTS: The overall response and disease control rates, the latter including stable disease, for docetaxel, nedaplatin, and 5-fluorouracil were 33.6% and 61.4%, respectively. The median overall survival and progression-free survival were 12.26 months and 5.1 months, respectively. In patients with recurrence, the median overall and progression-free survivals were 14.97 months (449 days) and 5.1 months (152 days), respectively. No study patients developed acute kidney injury and there were no treatment-related deaths. However, leukopenia and neutropenia were frequent hematologic toxicities. CONCLUSION: Treatment with docetaxel, nedaplatin, and 5-fluorouracil for advanced or recurrent esophageal cancer is particularly useful for recurrent cases and has the advantage of not causing severe renal dysfunction.

Efficacy of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for aorto-esophageal fistula due to esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aorto-esophageal fistula (AEF) due to esophageal cancer (EC) is a life-threatening condition characterized by sudden hemorrhage, which often causes sudden death. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for AEF due to EC, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched the MEDLINE (PubMed) databases, the Cochrane Library databases, Ichushi-Web (the databases of the Japan Medical Abstract Society), and CiNii (Academic information search service of the National Institute of Information from Japan) from January 2000 to November 2023 for articles about TEVAR for an emergent aortic hemorrhage (salvage TEVAR [S-TEVAR]), and the prophylactic procedure (P-TEVAR). Six studies (140 cases) were eligible for meta-analysis. The 90-day mortality of S-TEVAR and P-TEVAR was 40% (95% CI 23-60, I2 = 36%) and 8% (95% CI 3-17, I2 = 0%), respectively. Post-S-TEVAR hemorrhagic and infectious complications were 17% (95% CI 3-57, I2 = 71%) and 20% (95% CI 5-57, I2 = 66%), respectively. Post-P-TEVAR hemorrhagic and infectious complications were 2% (95% CI 0-10, I2 = 0%) and 3% (95% CI 1-12, I2 = 0%), respectively. TEVAR for AEF due to EC may be a useful therapeutic option to manage or prevent hemorrhagic oncological emergencies.

Usefulness of the preoperative inflammation-based prognostic score and the ratio of visceral fat area to psoas muscle area on predicting survival for surgically resected adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.

BACKGROUND: Sarcopenic obesity is associated with gastrointestinal cancer prognosis through systemic inflammation. However, in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG), the relationship between the inflammation-based prognostic score (IBPS), muscle loss, visceral fat mass, and prognosis has not been sufficiently evaluated. We investigated the prognostic value of the preoperative IBPS and the visceral fat area ratio to the psoas muscle area (V/P ratio) in patients with AEG undergoing surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 92 patients with AEG who underwent surgery. The prognostic value of the preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio, systemic inflammation response index, C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio, prognostic nutritional index, modified Glasgow Prognostic Score, and V/P ratio at the third lumbar vertebra was investigated using univariate and multivariate survival analyses. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis revealed that a high pathological stage (p = 0.0065), high PLR (p = 0.0421), and low V/P ratio (p = 0.0053) were independent prognostic factors for poor overall survival (OS). When restricted to patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m2, a high V/P ratio was a poor prognostic factor (p = 0.0463) for OS. Conversely, when restricted to patients with BMI < 25 kg/m2, a low V/P ratio was a poor prognostic factor (p = 0.0021) for OS. CONCLUSIONS: Both PLR and V/P ratios may be useful prognostic biomarkers in surgical cases of AEG. V/P ratio and BMI may provide an accurate understanding of the muscle and fat mass's precise nature and may help predict AEG prognosis.

McKeown Versus Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy for Patients with a History of Total Pharyngolaryngectomy: A Comparison Study.

BACKGROUND: Oncologic esophagectomy in patients with a history of total pharyngolaryngectomy (TPL) is challenging. There are two different esophagectomy procedures: total esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis (McKeown) and subtotal esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis (Ivor-Lewis). Differences in outcomes between McKeown and Ivor-Lewis esophagectomies for patients with this history remain unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 36 patients with a history of TPL who underwent oncologic esophagectomy and compared the clinical outcomes between the procedures. RESULTS: Twelve (33.3%) and 24 (66.7%) patients underwent McKeown and Ivor-Lewis esophagectomies, respectively. McKeown esophagectomy was more frequently performed for the supracarinal tumors (P = 0.002). Other baseline characteristics, including the history of radiation therapy, were comparable between the groups. Postoperatively, the incidences of pneumonia and anastomotic leakage were higher in the McKeown group than in the Ivor-Lewis group (P = 0.029 and P < 0.001, respectively). Neither tracheal necrosis nor remnant esophageal necrosis was observed. The overall and recurrence-free survival rates were comparable between the groups (P = 0.494 and P = 0.813, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: When performing esophagectomy for patients with a history of TPL, if it is oncologically acceptable and technically available, Ivor-Lewis is preferable over McKeown esophagectomy for avoiding postoperative complications.

Prognostic significance of circulating basophil counts in patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

PURPOSE: Recent reports have suggested that basophils influence allergic reactions and tumor immunity. In this study, we aimed to elucidate the association between preoperative circulating basophil (CB) counts and the outcomes of patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. METHODS: A total of 783 consecutive patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer were eligible. The clinicopathological factors and prognoses were compared between the groups stratified by the preoperative counts of CB. RESULTS: There were more advanced clinical T and N stages in the low CB group than in the high CB group (P = 0.01 and = 0.04, respectively). The incidences of postoperative complications were comparable between the groups. The low CB count was associated with unfavorable overall and recurrence-free survivals (P = 0.04 and 0.01, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, low CB count was one of the independent prognostic factors for poor recurrence-free survival (HR 1.33; 95% CI 1.04-1.70; P = 0.02). In addition, hematogenous recurrence occurred more frequently in the low CB group than in the high CB group (57.6% vs. 41.4%, P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: A preoperative low CB count was an unfavorable prognosticator in patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Robotic-Assisted Esophagectomy: Current Situation and Future Perspectives.

Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) has been rapidly spreading worldwide as a novel minimally invasive approach for esophageal cancer. This narrative review aimed to elucidate the current situation and future perspectives of RAMIE for esophageal cancer. References were searched using PubMed and Embase for studies published up to 8 April 2023. Search terms included "esophagectomy" or "esophageal cancer" and "robot" or "robotic" or "robotic-assisted." There are several different uses for the robot in esophagectomy. Overall complications are equivalent or may be less in RAMIE than in open esophagectomy and conventional (thoracoscopic) minimally invasive esophagectomy. Several meta-analyses demonstrated the possibility of RAMIE in reducing pulmonary complications, although the equivalent incidence was observed in two randomized controlled trials. RAMIE may increase the number of dissected lymph nodes, especially in the left recurrent laryngeal nerve area. Long-term outcomes are comparable between the procedures, although further research is required. Further progress in robotic technology combined with artificial intelligence is expected.

Field carcinogenesis and biological significance of the potential of the bystander effect: carcinogenesis, therapeutic response, and tissue regeneration.

The "bystander effect" is a transmission phenomenon mediating communication from target to non-target cells, as well as cell-to-cell interactions between neighboring and distantly located cells. In this narrative review, we describe the fundamental and clinical significance of the bystander effect with respect to cell-to-cell interactions in carcinogenesis, therapeutic response, and tissue regeneration. In carcinogenesis, the bystander effect mediates communications between tumor microenvironments and non-malignant epithelial cells and has been suggested to impact heterogeneous tumorigenic cells in tumors and cancerized fields. In therapeutic response, the bystander effect mediates communications between drug-sensitive and drug-resistant cells and may transmit both drug efficacy and resistance. Therefore, control of therapeutic response transmission via the bystander effect might offer a promising future cancer treatment. Finally, in tissue regeneration, circulating cells and stromal cells may differentiate into various cells for the purpose of tissue regeneration under direction of the bystander effect arising from surrounding cells in a defective space. We hope that the findings we present will promote the development of innovative cancer therapies and tissue regeneration methodologies from the viewpoint of cell-to-cell interactions through the bystander effect.

Preoperative evaluation of oral hygiene may predict the overall survival of patients with esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Previously, the association between tooth loss and prognosis after esophagectomy was reported; however, the presence of periodontal disease has not been assessed. This study investigated the association between the degree of oral hygiene, as evaluated by tooth loss and periodontal disease, and the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer. METHODS: A total of 163 esophageal cancer patients who underwent surgery with perioperative oral care and examination were enrolled. We assessed the periodontal pocket depth for the presence of periodontal disease and established a periodontal pocket index, defined as the sum of the periodontal pocket depth of the remaining tooth divided by the total count of the remaining teeth. Patients were divided into three groups: Group A (tooth loss < 13 and periodontal pocket index < 3.67); Group B (tooth loss < 13 and periodontal pocket index ≥ 3.67); and Group C (tooth loss ≥ 13). Overall survival and cancer-specific survival were analyzed, and a multivariate analysis was performed. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the 5-year overall survival rates between the groups (A:B:C = 74.8%:62.8%:50.5%; p = 0.0098), but not in the 5-year cancer-specific survival rates (A:B:C = 80.2%:64.2%:62.2%; p = 0.0849). In multivariate analysis, oral hygiene (tooth loss < 13 and periodontal pocket index ≥ 3.67 + tooth loss ≥ 13; p = 0.041) was a significant independent poor prognostic factor for overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Oral evaluation, focusing on tooth loss and periodontal disease, is meaningful in predicting the long-term prognosis of postoperative esophageal cancer patients.

Impact of Systemic Autoimmune Diseases on Treatment Outcomes and Radiation Toxicities in Patients with Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Receiving Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: A Matched Case-Control Analysis.

We aimed to evaluate the impact of systemic autoimmune diseases (SADs) on treatment outcomes and radiation toxicities following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We queried an institution-based database on patients with SADs treated with SBRT for lung cancer between 2001 and 2016 (SAD group). Each patient was matched to three controls without SADs. The primary outcomes of interest were the overall survival (OS) and local control rate (LCR). The secondary outcomes were radiation toxicities of grades ≥2 (≥G2). Twelve patients with SADs were matched to 36 controls. The median follow-up duration was 3.6 years. There was a significant intergroup difference in the OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.11, 95% confidence incidence [CI]: 1.82−9.27, p < 0.001) and LCR (HR: 15.97, 95% CI: 2.89−88.29, p < 0.001). However, there were no significant intergroup differences in the odds of acute (odds ratio [OR]: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.02−8.91, p = 0.550) and late (OR: 2.20, 95% CI: 0.32−15.10, p = 0.422) ≥G2 radiation pneumonitis. No other ≥G2 toxicities were identified. In conclusion, although radiation toxicities are not enhanced by SADs, SADs are risk factors of poor prognosis following SBRT for stage I NSCLC.

Anatomy-based prediction method for determining ipsilateral lung doses in postoperative breast radiation therapy assisted by diagnostic computed tomography images.

Background: This study aimed to investigate whether ipsilateral lung doses (ILDs) could be predicted by anatomical indexes measured using diagnostic computed tomography (CT) prior to the planning stage of breast radiation therapy (RT). Materials and methods: The thoracic diameters and the length of lines drawn manually were measured on diagnostic CT images. The parameters of interest were the skin maximum lung distance (sMLD), central lung distance (CLD), Haller index (HI), and body mass index (BMI). Lung dose-volume histograms were created with conformal planning, and the lung volumes receiving 5-40 Gy (V5-V40) were calculated. Linear regression models were used to investigate the correlations between the anatomical indexes and dose differences and to estimate the slope and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: A total of 160 patients who had undergone three-dimensional conformal RT after breast-conserving surgery were included. Univariable analysis revealed that the sMLD (p < 0.001), CLD (p < 0.001), HI (p = 0.002), and BMI (p < 0.001) were significantly correlated with the V20. However, multivariable analysis revealed that only the sMLD (slope: 0.147, p = 0.001, 95% CI: 0.162-0.306) and CLD (0.157, p = 0.005, 0.048-0.266) were strongly correlated with the V20. The p-value for the sMLD was the lowest among the p-values for all indexes, thereby indicating that the sMLD had the best predictive power for ILD. Conclusions: sMLD and CLD are anatomical markers that can be used to predict ILD in whole breast RT. An sMLD > 20.5 mm or a CLD > 24.3 mm positively correlated with a high ILD.

Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy With Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and 5-Fluorouracil (DCF-RT) for Patients With Potentially Resectable Esophageal Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: We evaluated the long-term outcome of docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil as combination chemoradiotherapy (DCF-RT) for patients with potentially resectable esophageal cancer (EC) in clinical settings. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with potentially resectable thoracic EC were included in this study. Chemotherapy consisted of intravenous docetaxel at 50 mg/m2 (day 1), CDDP at 60 mg/m2 (day 1), and 5-FU at 600 mg/m2 (days 1 to 4), repeated every four weeks for two cycles along with radiotherapy (60 Gy in 30 fractions). Potentially resectable esophageal cancer was defined as clinical stage (cStage) I, II, III, and IV with supraclavicular lymph node metastasis [M1(Lym)]. RESULTS: The overall complete response (CR) rate was 88.5%. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates for cStage I, cStage II-III, and IV [M1(lym)] patients were 79.5%, 76.2%, and 50.0%, respectively. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 acute toxicities were leucopenia (85.7%), neutropenia (78.5%), and febrile neutropenia (FN) (21.4%). The rate of any grade 3 or 4 late toxicity was 7.7%. CONCLUSION: DCF-RT demonstrated a satisfactory CR rate and OS with a higher rate of FN for potentially resectable thoracic EC patients. Prophylactic treatment with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor and antibiotics may be appropriate supportive care for patients undergoing DCF-RT.

Changes in the Gustave Roussy Immune Score as a Powerful Prognostic Marker of the Therapeutic Sensitivity of Nivolumab in Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Identification of positive biomarkers for the effects of nivolumab on patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) is significant. The Gustave Roussy Immune Score (GRIm-s) is associated with therapeutic resistance of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in other cancers. This multicenter, retrospective study was designed to analyze the association of GRIm-s with therapeutic sensitivity of nivolumab in patients with AGC. METHODS: We reviewed 58 patients with AGC treated with nivolumab from October 2017 to November 2018 at five participating institutions. We performed blood tests before the start of nivolumab and after administration of two courses. We evaluated the correlation between the best overall response and GRIm-s. Additionally, we focused on the changes in GRIm-s before the start of nivolumab and after administration of two courses. RESULTS: Of the 58 patients, 21 (36.2%) were classified into the disease control (DC) group and 37 (63.8%) into the progressive disease (PD) group. GRIm-s before nivolumab treatment did not correlate with the best therapeutic response (p = 0.086). However, GRIm-s after two courses of nivolumab showed that significantly more PD cases were in the high-risk group (p < 0.0001). After two courses of nivolumab, overall survival was significantly worse in the high-risk group (p < 0.0001). For progression-free survival, the high-risk group had a significantly worse prognosis both before (p = 0.04) and after two courses of nivolumab treatment (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: GRIm-s after two courses of nivolumab and its changes compared to pretreatment values proved beneficial in predicting nivolumab sensitivity.