Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Clin Epidemiol ; 173: 111444, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38944059

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: In pursuit of health equity, the World Health Organization has recently called for more extensive monitoring of inequalities in eye health. Population-based eye health surveys can provide this information, but whether underserved groups are considered in the design, implementation, and reporting of surveys is unknown. We conducted a systematic methodological review of surveys published since 2000 to examine how many population-based eye health surveys have considered underserved groups in their design, implementation, or reporting. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We identified all population-based cross-sectional surveys reporting the prevalence of objectively measured vision impairment or blindness. Using the PROGRESS + framework to identify underserved groups, we assessed whether each study considered underserved groups within 15 items across the rationale, sampling or recruitment methods, or the reporting of participation and prevalence rates. RESULTS: 388 eye health surveys were included in this review. Few studies prospectively considered underserved groups during study planning or implementation, for example within their sample size calculations (n = 5, ∼1%) or recruitment strategies (n = 70, 18%). The most common way that studies considered underserved groups was in the reporting of prevalence estimates (n = 374, 96%). We observed a modest increase in the number of distinct PROGRESS + factors considered by a publication over the study period. Gender/sex was considered within at least one item by 95% (n = 367) of studies. Forty-three percent (n = 166) of included studies were conducted primarily on underserved population groups, particularly for subnational studies of people living in rural areas, and we identified examples of robust population-based studies in socially excluded groups. CONCLUSION: More effort is needed to improve the design, implementation, and reporting of surveys to monitor inequality and promote equity in eye health. Ideally, national-level monitoring of vision impairment and service coverage would be supplemented with smaller-scale studies to understand the disparities experienced by the most underserved groups.


Subject(s)
Health Surveys , Humans , Health Surveys/methods , Health Surveys/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Male , Female , Vulnerable Populations/statistics & numerical data , Prevalence , Blindness/epidemiology , Vision Disorders/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Adult
2.
Eye (Lond) ; 37(8): 1717-1724, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36100709

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Glaucoma is the commonest cause of irreversible blindness worldwide. As it is typically asymptomatic until advanced, the risk of blindness from late presentation is higher than other eye diseases. This study aims to investigate the risk factors for late presentation of primary glaucoma patients. METHODS: We undertook a hospital-based case-control study of a random sample of glaucoma patients from a hospital in Hong Kong. Structured questionnaires and existing information from the electronic patient record were used, and the odds of presenting late were analysed by logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 210 recruited participants, 83 (39.5%) presented with advanced glaucoma unilaterally or bilaterally. The mean age of participants was 61.1 ± 11.9 years, with 110 males (52.4%). Univariate analysis revealed that male sex and primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) have 3.06 (CI95:1.71-5.48; P < 0.001) and 2.47 (CI95:1.11-5.49; P = 0.03) times higher odds of late presentation, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed late presenters were 3.54 (CI95:1.35-9.35; P = 0.01) times more likely to have PACG than primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Patients with elevated baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) also had 1.06 times higher odds of presenting with advanced glaucoma (CI95:1.02-1.11; P = 0.002). Linear regression revealed that PACG patients present with 7.12 mmHg higher IOP than POAG patients (CI95:4.23-10.0; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, a high proportion of glaucoma patients present late in Hong Kong, with gender and type of glaucoma being significant determinants. Our study shows that PACG presents with higher IOP and, along with male gender, are more likely to have advanced disease than POAG.


Subject(s)
Glaucoma, Angle-Closure , Glaucoma, Open-Angle , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Aged , Tonometry, Ocular , Intraocular Pressure , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/diagnosis , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Glaucoma, Angle-Closure/diagnosis , Glaucoma, Angle-Closure/epidemiology , Hong Kong/epidemiology , Blindness
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL