ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Nowadays, the recommended measures for optimal monitoring of axial Spondyloarthritis (ax-SpA) disease activity are either BASDAI and CRP, or ASDAS-CRP. However, there could be a gap between recommendations and daily practice. We aimed to determine the measures collected by rheumatologists in an ax-SpA follow-up visit, and to determine the impact of a meeting (where rheumatologists reached a consensus on the measures to be collected) on the collection of such measures. METHODS: A consensual meeting of a local network of 32 rheumatologists proposed, four months later, to report at least the BASDAI score in the medical file of every ax-SpA patient at every follow-up visit. An independent investigator reviewed the medical files of 10 consecutive patients per rheumatologist, seen twice during the year (e.g. before and after the meeting). The most frequently collected measures were assessed, and then, the frequency of collection before and after the meeting was compared. RESULTS: A total of 456 medical files from 228 patients were reviewed. Treatment (>60%), CRP (51.3%) and total BASDAI (28.5%) were the most reported measures in medical files. Before/After the meeting, the frequencies of collected measures in medical files were 28.5%/51.7%, 51.3%/52.2%, 16.7%/31.6% and 0.9%/6.1% for BASDAI, CRP, BASDAI + CRP and ASDAS, respectively reaching a statistically significance for BASDAI, ASDAS and BASDAI+CRP (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed a low rate of systematic report of the recommended outcome measures in ax-SpA. However, it suggests that a consensual meeting involving practicing rheumatologists might be relevant to improve the implementation of such recommendations.
Subject(s)
Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Rheumatology , Spondylitis, Ankylosing , Adult , Female , France , Health Care Surveys , Health Services Needs and Demand , Health Status Indicators , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/methods , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/organization & administration , Quality Improvement , Rheumatology/methods , Rheumatology/standards , Spondylitis, Ankylosing/diagnosis , Spondylitis, Ankylosing/therapyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Radioactive or chemical synovectomy (synoviorthesis) is widely used as local therapy for inflammatory joint disease in France. The objective of this retrospective study was to compare the efficacy of osmic acid or radiation synovectomy with that of joint lavage for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis with effusions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All study patients met American College of Rheumatology criteria for knee osteoarthritis, which was symptomatic despite conservative therapy including local corticosteroid injections. Fifty-four patients were treated by synoviorthesis (osmic acid, n = 16; yttrium 90, n = 76) and 45 by joint lavage (total 67 lavages). RESULTS: Thirty two per cent of the patients in the synoviorthesis group had a good or excellent outcome after six months. Results were better with yttrium 90 than with osmic acid. Improvements were most marked in patients with chondrocalcinosis. Efficacy was negatively correlated with the femorotibial lesions but not with the patellofemoral lesions. Patients with knee alignment disorders had poorer outcomes. In the joint lavage group, 30% of the knees showed improvements after three months and results were significantly better after three and six months when the lavage was followed by an injection of triamcinolone hexacetonide. No side effects were recorded. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that chemical or radiation synovectomy or joint lavage followed by injection of a delayed-action steroid may be useful for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis with chronic or recurrent effusions.
