Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Language
Publication year range
1.
J Appl Oral Sci ; 23(5): 515-22, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26537722

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the marginal and internal adaptation of individual dental crowns fabricated using a CAD/CAM system (Sirona's BlueCam), also evaluating the effect of the software version used, and the specific parameter settings in the adaptation of crowns. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty digital impressions of a master model previously prepared were acquired using an intraoral scanner and divided into four groups based on the software version and on the spacer settings used. The versions 3.8 and 4.2 of the software were used, and the spacer parameter was set at either 40 µm or 80 µm. The marginal and internal fit of the crowns were measured using the replica technique, which uses a low viscosity silicone material that simulates the thickness of the cement layer. The data were analyzed using a Friedman two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and paired t-tests with significance level set at p<0.05. RESULTS: The two-way ANOVA analysis showed the software version (p<0.05) and the spacer parameter (p<0.05) significantly affected the crown adaptation. The crowns designed with the version 4.2 of the software showed a better fit than those designed with the version 3.8, particularly in the axial wall and in the inner margin. The spacer parameter was more accurately represented in the version 4.2 of the software than in the version 3.8. In addition, the use of the version 4.2 of the software combined with the spacer parameter set at 80 µm showed the least variation. On the other hand, the outer margin was not affected by the variables. CONCLUSION: Compared to the version 3.8 of the software, the version 4.2 can be recommended for the fabrication of well-fitting crown restorations, and for the appropriate regulation of the spacer parameter.


Subject(s)
Computer-Aided Design/standards , Crowns/standards , Dental Marginal Adaptation/standards , Dental Prosthesis Design/standards , Software/standards , Analysis of Variance , Dental Restoration, Permanent/methods , Reference Standards , Reference Values , Reproducibility of Results , Surface Properties
2.
J. appl. oral sci ; J. appl. oral sci;23(5): 515-522, Sept.-Oct. 2015. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS, BBO - Dentistry | ID: lil-764160

ABSTRACT

Objective This study investigated the marginal and internal adaptation of individual dental crowns fabricated using a CAD/CAM system (Sirona’s BlueCam), also evaluating the effect of the software version used, and the specific parameter settings in the adaptation of crowns.Material and Methods Forty digital impressions of a master model previously prepared were acquired using an intraoral scanner and divided into four groups based on the software version and on the spacer settings used. The versions 3.8 and 4.2 of the software were used, and the spacer parameter was set at either 40 μm or 80 μm. The marginal and internal fit of the crowns were measured using the replica technique, which uses a low viscosity silicone material that simulates the thickness of the cement layer. The data were analyzed using a Friedman two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and paired t-tests with significance level set at p<0.05.Results The two-way ANOVA analysis showed the software version (p<0.05) and the spacer parameter (p<0.05) significantly affected the crown adaptation. The crowns designed with the version 4.2 of the software showed a better fit than those designed with the version 3.8, particularly in the axial wall and in the inner margin. The spacer parameter was more accurately represented in the version 4.2 of the software than in the version 3.8. In addition, the use of the version 4.2 of the software combined with the spacer parameter set at 80 μm showed the least variation. On the other hand, the outer margin was not affected by the variables.Conclusion Compared to the version 3.8 of the software, the version 4.2 can be recommended for the fabrication of well-fitting crown restorations, and for the appropriate regulation of the spacer parameter.


Subject(s)
Computer-Aided Design/standards , Crowns/standards , Dental Marginal Adaptation/standards , Dental Prosthesis Design/standards , Software/standards , Analysis of Variance , Dental Restoration, Permanent/methods , Reference Standards , Reference Values , Reproducibility of Results , Surface Properties
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL