Oxygen therapy in COPD patients with isolated nocturnal hypoxemia; comparison of quality of life and sleep between bronchitis and emphysema phenotype: A prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: COPD is a heterogeneous disease composed by two main phenotypes: bronchitis (COPDb) and emphysema (COPDe) with different clinical presentation, physiology, imaging, response to therapy and decline in lung function. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether nocturnal hypoxemic COPDb and COPDe have a different behaviour during sleep and the effect of nocturnal oxygen supplementation (nO2LT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 75 COPDb and 120 COPDe were enrolled. All patients performed polysomnography, Pittsburgh and Maugeri Foundation Respiratory Failure questionnaire, and pulmonary function before and after six months of nO2LT. RESULTS: At baseline, compared to COPDb, COPDe have decreased sleep efficiency (SE) (67.5±6% vs. 76.9±3% p<0.05) and higher arousals (A/I) (18.1±3 event/h vs. 8.7±1 event/h p<0.05). Oxygen desaturation index (ODI) was increased during REM (7.1±1 event/h vs. 2.3±0.5 event/h p<0.05). nO2LT in COPDe improves SE (77±4% vs. 67.5±6% p<0.05) and decreases A/I (9±5 event/h vs. 18.1±3 event/h p<0.05). ODI during REM (3.5±2 event/h vs. 7.1±1 p<0.05) decreases and quality of life (QoL) improves (MFR-28 total 56±22 vs 45±20 p<0.05), due to an improvement in cognitive abilities (45±30 vs 33±31 p<0.05) and daily activities (61±29 vs 53±21 p>0.05). In COPDb nO2LT reduces ST90 (15±6% vs. 43±8% p<0.05) less than in COPDe (15±6% vs. 8±4% p<0.05); improves A/I (10±2 event/h vs. 8.7±1 p<0.05) and there is no evidence of an improvement in QoL. CONCLUSIONS: Six months of nO2LT improve quality of life in COPDe, not in COPDb. We found a difference in sleep quality between COPDe and COPDb.

A new approach to detect early lung functional impairment in very light smokers.

PURPOSE: The aim of our study is to investigate if lung carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO) measured during effort is able to detect early respiratory functional impairment. METHODS: We enrolled 25 very light smokers and 20 healthy non smokers. Subjects underwent plethysmography, DLCO (single breath technique) and calculated effective pulmonary blood flow (Qc) by rebreathing method. During exercise by cycle ergometer (duration 10±2min; recovery 11±3min) DLCO and Qc were calculated at 25% and 50% of theoretical maximum workload. RESULTS: At baseline lung function and Qc did not differ between groups. DLCO and DLCO/Qc measured during exercise were significantly greater in non smokers (p<0.001); Qc was not statistically different. In very light smokers, DLCO, DLCO/Qc measured during exercise significantly correlated with the number of pack years (r=-0.60 p<0.001; r=-0.58 p<0.05; r=-0.55 p<0.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In very light smokers there is lung function impairment and our data show that DLCO during exercise may reveal this underlying early damage.

Diffusing Pulmonary Capacity Measured During Effort: A Possible Early Marker of Pulmonary Involvement In Systemic Sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Interstitial lung involvement is common and potentially limits the quality of life in patients with systemic limited sclerosis (SScl). OBJECTIVES: To study the lung carbon monoxide diffusion (DLCO) measured during effort in order to identify a possible subclinical impairment. METHODS: We enrolled 20 SScl patients without interstitial lung involement and 20 healthy controls. At enrolment all subjetcs underwent plethysmography, DLCO by single-breath technique, and evaluation of pulmonary blood flow (Qc) with the rebreathing CO2 method. Skin involvement in the SScl patients was rated using the modified Rodman skin score (mRSS). During exercise on a cycle ergometer, DLCO, DLCO/ alveolar volume (Kco) and Qc were calculated at 25% and 50% of predicted maximum workload (25% pmw and 50% pmw). RESULTS: At baseline two groups did not differ in age, body mass index, lung function or Qc. In the controls, DLCO, Kco and DLCO/Qc measured at 25% pmw and 50% pmw were significantly higher than in SScl patients, while Qc was not different. Based on response to effort, SScl patients were divided into two groups: responders, with an increase of DLCO(25%pmw) and DLCO(50%pmw) at least 5% and 10% respectively, and non-responders. The non-responders showed greater skin involvement and significantly reduced DLCO, Kco and DLCO/Qc values at rest than responders. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate effort in SScl patients may reveal a latent impairment in gas diffusion through the alveolar/capillary membrane, thus confirmig that exertional DLCO can identify lung damage at an earlier stage than DLCO at rest.

Acute myocardial infarction versus other cardiovascular events in community-acquired pneumonia.

The aim of the present study was to define the prevalence, characteristics, risk factors and impact on clinical outcomes of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) versus other cardiovascular events (CVEs) in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). This was an international, multicentre, observational, prospective study of CAP patients hospitalised in eight hospitals in Italy and Switzerland. Three groups were identified: those without CVEs, those with AMI and those with other CVEs. Among 905 patients, 21 (2.3%) patients experienced at least one AMI, while 107 (11.7%) patients experienced at least one other CVE. Patients with CAP and either AMI or other CVEs showed a higher severity of the disease than patients with CAP alone. Female sex, liver disease and the presence of severe sepsis were independent predictors for the occurrence of AMI, while female sex, age >65 years, neurological disease and the presence of pleural effusion predicted other CVEs. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher among those who experienced AMI in comparison to those experiencing other CVEs (43% versus 21%, p=0.039). The presence of AMI showed an adjusted odds ratio for in-hospital mortality of 3.57 (p=0.012) and for other CVEs of 2.63 (p=0.002). These findings on AMI versus other CVEs as complications of CAP may be important when planning interventional studies on cardioprotective medications.

Identifying patients at risk of late recovery (≥ 8 days) from acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis and COPD.

OBJECTIVES: To identify factors associated with late recovery (≥ 8 days from exacerbation start) in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis/COPD (AECB/AECOPD). METHODS: An international, observational, non-interventional study in outpatients with AECB/AECOPD who received treatment for their exacerbation with the antibiotic moxifloxacin. Factors analyzed for late recovery included patient demographic characteristics, geographic region and disease severity. Additionally, logistic regression analysis was undertaken to identify factors associated with late recovery. RESULTS: The analysis population was 40,435 patients aged ≥ 35 years, from Asia-Pacific, Europe, the Americas and Middle East/Africa. Most were male (63.1%), mean age 60.4 years and current or ex-smokers (60.6%) with history of ≥ 2 exacerbations in the previous year. Patients who underwent spirometry (n = 6408, 19.7%) had moderate airflow obstruction (mean FEV(1) 1.7 L). Both clinicians and patients reported that moxifloxacin provided clinical improvement in a mean of 3 days and recovery in 6 days. Clinical factors significantly associated with late recovery were: age ≥ 65 years, duration of chronic bronchitis >10 years, cardiac comorbidity, >3 exacerbations in the previous 12 months, current exacerbation type (Anthonisen I/II) and hospitalization in the last 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: In a large cohort of patients, all treated with the same antibiotic for an exacerbation of chronic bronchitis or COPD, the main factors associated with late recovery (≥ 8 days) were: older age, history of frequent exacerbations, current exacerbation type of Anthonisen I/II, history of prior hospitalizations and cardiac comorbid conditions.

Characterisation of exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and COPD in Europe: the GIANT study.

OBJECTIVE: The GIANT study collected information on patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and the effect of treatment with moxifloxacin. METHODS: AECB history, concomitant diseases, moxifloxacin treatment, concomitant medication, clinical symptoms and adverse events were recorded. A questionnaire at the end of treatment recorded the impact on patients' daily lives. RESULTS: Among 9225 patients from eight European countries, marked variation was seen in characteristics including age, smoking history and type of exacerbation. Spirometry use was more common among chest physicians (66.7%) than GPs (15.5%). Patients with Anthonisen type 1 and 2 exacerbations had more frequent exacerbations and these patients experienced a greater impact on daily activities compared with patients with type 3 episodes. Patient symptoms improved with moxifloxacin treatment after a mean (SD) of 3.4 (1.8) days, allowing return to normal daily activities after 5.4 (4.4) days and with full recovery taking 6.5 (3.1) days. CONCLUSIONS: Characteristics of patients with AECB and acute exacerbations of COPD differ among European countries. Spirometry is under-used, particularly in primary care and antibiotic treatment does not always follow current guidelines. Results confirm the efficacy of moxifloxacin in the treatment of AECB in real-life conditions.

[Acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and biofilm]. / Riacutizzazione di bronchite cronica e biofilm.

The lower respiratory tract of patients affected by COPD is constantly colonized by pathogenic microrganisms such as H. influenzae, M. catarrhalis and S. pneumoniae. Role of bacterial colonization of big and small airways in patients affected by COPD is still unclear but it is likely to play a role in directly or indirectly maintaining the vicious circle of infection/inflammation. Colonizer pathogens are capable to stimulate mucus production, to alter the ciliary function by inducing dyskinesia and stasis; in addition, they represent a strong stimulus for neutrophils to come in the airways, which release elastase that, in turn, inhibit the mucus-ciliary function. The same pathogens are responsible for epithelial damage and chronic inflammation, by releasing neutrophilic elastase, leading to the damage progression and obstruction. Recent studies have also shown that infection sustained by H. influenzae is not limited to bronchial mucosa, i.e. surface epithelial cells, but that the pathogen is capable to penetrate cells, so spreading the infection in sub-epithelial cellular layers. In addition, the ability to produce biofilm is another possible defence mechanism which allows them to grow and colonise. Such a mechanism could in part explain the lack of response to antimicrobials and contribute to stimulation of parenchymal inflammatory response, the cause of pathological-anatomic damage which occurs in COPD. The impossibility to eradicate chronic infection and bacterial exacerbations of COPD are likely the elements that promt and worsen obstruction, so determining the disease's progression.

Patient's perception of exacerbations of COPD--the PERCEIVE study.

The evaluation of therapies requires the development of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) that help clinicians to understanding the symptoms, perceptions and feelings of patients with exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). With the aim of obtaining information on the perceptions of patients with COPD, their exacerbations and expectations of treatment, a random telephone contact survey in six countries was performed. From 83,592 households screened, 1100 subjects with symptoms compatible with COPD were identified. The most frequent symptom was shortness of breath (78%). The most frequent complaint was that due to their COPD: "they could not complete the activities they like to do" (54%); 17% (187) of individuals were afraid that their COPD would cripple, or eventually kill them. Exacerbations generated a mean of 5.1 medical visits/year (SD=4.6) with the mean duration of exacerbation symptoms being 10.5 days. Increased coughing was the exacerbation symptom having the strongest impact on well-being (42%). Fifty-five percent of patients declared that quicker symptom relief was the most desired requirement for treatment. New data are provided on the impact of COPD and its exacerbations on the daily life of patients. These data will help to develop PROs designed to evaluate the effectiveness of different therapies for exacerbated COPD.