Multi-omics and Multi-VOIs to predict esophageal fistula in esophageal cancer patients treated with radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop a prediction model for esophageal fistula (EF) in esophageal cancer (EC) patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), by integrating multi-omics features from multiple volumes of interest (VOIs). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed pretreatment planning computed tomographic (CT) images, three-dimensional dose distributions, and clinical factors of 287 EC patients. Nine groups of features from different combination of omics [Radiomics (R), Dosiomics (D), and RD (the combination of R and D)], and VOIs [esophagus (ESO), gross tumor volume (GTV), and EG (the combination of ESO and GTV)] were extracted and separately selected by unsupervised (analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Pearson correlation test) and supervised (Student T test) approaches. The final model performance was evaluated using five metrics: average area under the receiver-operator-characteristics curve (AUC), accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. RESULTS: For multi-omics using RD features, the model performance in EG model shows: AUC, 0.817 ± 0.031; 95% CI 0.805, 0.825; p < 0.001, which is better than single VOI (ESO or GTV). CONCLUSION: Integrating multi-omics features from multi-VOIs enables better prediction of EF in EC patients treated with IMRT. The incorporation of dosiomics features can enhance the model performance of the prediction.

A novel automated planning approach for multi-anatomical sites cancer in Raystation treatment planning system.

PURPOSE: To develop an automated planning approach in Raystation and evaluate its feasibility in multiple clinical application scenarios. METHODS: An automated planning approach (Ruiplan) was developed by using the scripting platform of Raystation. Radiotherapy plans were re-generated both automatically by using Ruiplan and manually. 60 patients, including 20 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), 20 patients with esophageal carcinoma (ESCA), and 20 patients with rectal cancer (RECA) were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Dosimetric and planning efficiency parameters of the automated plans (APs) and manual plans (MPs) were statistically compared. RESULTS: For target coverage, APs yielded superior dose homogeneity in NPC and RECA, while maintaining similar dose conformity for all studied anatomical sites. For OARs sparing, APs led to significant improvement in most OARs sparing. The average planning time required for APs was reduced by more than 43% compared with MPs. Despite the increased monitor units (MUs) for NPC and RECA in APs, the beam-on time of APs and MPs had no statistical difference. Both the MUs and beam-on time of APs were significantly lower than that of MPs in ESCA. CONCLUSIONS: This study developed a new automated planning approach, Ruiplan, it is feasible for multi-treatment techniques and multi-anatomical sites cancer treatment planning. The dose distributions of targets and OARs in the APs were similar or better than those in the MPs, and the planning time of APs showed a sharp reduction compared with the MPs. Thus, Ruiplan provides a promising approach for realizing automated treatment planning in the future.

Function-Wise Dual-Omics analysis for radiation pneumonitis prediction in lung cancer patients.

Purpose: This study investigates the impact of lung function on radiation pneumonitis prediction using a dual-omics analysis method. Methods: We retrospectively collected data of 126 stage III lung cancer patients treated with chemo-radiotherapy using intensity-modulated radiotherapy, including pre-treatment planning CT images, radiotherapy dose distribution, and contours of organs and structures. Lung perfusion functional images were generated using a previously developed deep learning method. The whole lung (WL) volume was divided into function-wise lung (FWL) regions based on the lung perfusion functional images. A total of 5,474 radiomics features and 213 dose features (including dosiomics features and dose-volume histogram factors) were extracted from the FWL and WL regions, respectively. The radiomics features (R), dose features (D), and combined dual-omics features (RD) were used for the analysis in each lung region of WL and FWL, labeled as WL-R, WL-D, WL-RD, FWL-R, FWL-D, and FWL-RD. The feature selection was carried out using ANOVA, followed by a statistical F-test and Pearson correlation test. Thirty times train-test splits were used to evaluate the predictability of each group. The overall average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, precision, recall, and f1-score were calculated to assess the performance of each group. Results: The FWL-RD achieved a significantly higher average AUC than the WL-RD group in the training (FWL-RD: 0.927 ± 0.031, WL-RD: 0.849 ± 0.064) and testing cohorts (FWL-RD: 0.885 ± 0.028, WL-RD: 0.762 ± 0.053, p < 0.001). When using radiomics features only, the FWL-R group yielded a better classification result than the model trained with WL-R features in the training (FWL-R: 0.919 ± 0.036, WL-R: 0.820 ± 0.052) and testing cohorts (FWL-R: 0.862 ± 0.028, WL-R: 0.750 ± 0.057, p < 0.001). The FWL-D group obtained an average AUC of 0.782 ± 0.032, obtaining a better classification performance than the WL-D feature-based model of 0.740 ± 0.028 in the training cohort, while no significant difference was observed in the testing cohort (FWL-D: 0.725 ± 0.064, WL-D: 0.710 ± 0.068, p = 0.54). Conclusion: The dual-omics features from different lung functional regions can improve the prediction of radiation pneumonitis for lung cancer patients under IMRT treatment. This function-wise dual-omics analysis method holds great promise to improve the prediction of radiation pneumonitis for lung cancer patients.

Improvement Using Planomics Features on Prediction and Classification of Patient-Specific Quality Assurance Using Head and Neck Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Plan.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the utility of a new plan feature (planomics feature) for predicting the results of patient-specific quality assurance using the head and neck (H&N) volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan. Methods: One hundred and thirty-one H&N VMAT plans in our institution from 2019 to 2021 were retrospectively collected. Dosimetric verification for all plans was carried out using the portal dosimetry system integrated into the Eclipse treatment planning system based on the electronic portal imaging devices. Gamma passing rates (GPR) were analyzed using three gamma indices of 3%/3 mm, 3%/2 mm, and 2%/2 mm with a 10% dose threshold. Forty-eight conventional features affecting the dose delivery accuracy were used in the study, and 2,476 planomics features were extracted based on the radiotherapy plan file. Three prediction and classification models using conventional features (CF), planomics features (PF), and hybrid features (HF) combining two sets of features were constructed by the gradient boosting regressor (GBR) and Ridge classifier for each GPR of 3%/3 mm, 3%/2 mm, and 2%/2 mm, respectively. The absolute prediction error (APE) and the area under the curve (AUC) were adopted for assessing the performance of prediction and classification models. Results: In the GPR prediction, the average APE of the models using CF, PF, and HF was 1.3 ± 1.2%/3.6 ± 3.0%, 1.7 ± 1.5%/3.8 ± 3.5%, and 1.1 ± 1.0%/4.1 ± 3.1% for 2%/2 mm; 0.7 ± 0.6%/2.0 ± 2.0%, 1.0±1.1%/2.2 ± 1.8%, and 0.6 ± 0.6%/2.2 ± 1.9% for 3%/2 mm; and 0.4 ± 0.3%/1.2 ± 1.2%, 0.4±0.5%/1.3 ± 1.0%, and 0.3±0.3%/1.2 ± 1.1% for 3%/3 mm, respectively. In the regression prediction, three models give a similar modeling performance for predicting the GPR. The classification results were 0.67 ± 0.03/0.66 ± 0.07, 0.77 ± 0.03/0.73 ± 0.06, and 0.78 ± 0.02/0.75 ± 0.04 for 3%/3 mm, respectively. For 3%/2 mm, the AUCs of the training and testing cohorts were 0.64 ± 0.03/0.62 ± 0.07, 0.70 ± 0.03/0.67 ± 0.06, and 0.75 ± 0.03/0.71 ± 0.07, respectively, and for 2%/2 mm, the average AUCs of the training and testing cohorts were 0.72 ± 0.03/0.72 ± 0.06, 0.78 ± 0.04/0.73 ± 0.07, and 0.81 ± 0.03/0.75 ± 0.06, respectively. In the classification, the PF model has a better classification performance than the CF model. Moreover, the HF model provides the best result among the three classifications models. Conclusions: The planomics features can be used for predicting and classifying the GPR results and for improving the model performance after combining the conventional features for the GPR classification.