ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Finding the balance between the reduction in ischemic events and bleeding complications is crucial for the success of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The activated clotting time (ACT) is used routinely worldwide to monitor and titrate anticoagulation therapy with unfractionated heparin (UFH) during the procedure. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to test the accuracy of ACT measurements from the guiding catheter compared to the arterial access sheath. METHODS: Patients undergoing PCI with UFH therapy were prospectively enrolled. Blood samples were drawn from the coronary guide catheter and the arterial access sheath. ACT values were determined in the same ACT machine, and potential interactions with clinical variables were analyzed. RESULTS: The study included 331 patients with post PCI ACT measurements. The mean ACT value of the catheter samples was statistically higher than the arterial access sample [294 ± 77 s Vs. 250 ± 60 s, p < 0.001]. The mean difference between the guiding catheter and the arterial line sheath samples was 43 ± 27 s (P < 0.001). We found that in 101/331 [30 %] patients the ACT from the guiding catheter was above 250 s, while from the access sheath it was below 250 s. Notably, in 40/331 [12 %] the ACT from the guiding catheter was above 200 s, while from the access sheath it was below 200 s. CONCLUSIONS: Large proportion of patient may be considered to have therapeutic ACT if measured from guide catheter during PCI, while the corresponding ACT from arterial sheath is subtherapeutic. This difference may have clinical and safety significance.
ABSTRACT
Aims: A substantial proportion of the patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have none of the of standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRFs): hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolaemia and smoking. The aim of this analysis was to compare clinical outcomes after PCI according to the number of SMuRFs. Methods: Patients with an indication for a PCI were stratified based upon the number of SMuRFs: 0, 1, 2 or 3-4. The primary outcome was target lesion failure (TLF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction or clinically driven target lesion revascularization at 1-year. Inverse weighted propensity score (IWPS) adjustment was performed to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics. Results: The prevalence of SMuRFs was: 0 SMuRF 16.4 %; 1 SMuRF 27.8 %; 2 SMuRFs 34.7 % and 3-4 SMuRFs 21.1 %. Patients without SMuRFs were younger, more likely to be male and had less complex coronary artery disease. The incidence of TLF increased with the number of SMuRFs: 2.65 %, 2.75 %, 3.23 %, and 4.24 %, Ptrend < 0.001. The relative risk (RR) for a TLF was 60 % higher (95 % confidence interval 1.32-1.93, p < 0.01) for patients with 3-4 SMuRFs compared to patients without SMuRFs. The trend remained (Ptrend < 0.01) after IWPS with TLF rates of 2.88 %, 2.64 %, 2.88 % and 3.65 %. The RR for a TLF was 27 % higher (95 % CI 1.05-1.53, p < 0.01). Conclusion: The incidence of clinical events at 1-year increased with the number of SMuRFs. While patients without SMuRFs have a relatively favourable risk profile, more research is needed to optimize therapeutic management in the majority of patients.
ABSTRACT
Risk models to estimate percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) mortality have limited value in complex high-risk patients. However, it was improved by a recently developed bedside model to predict in-hospital mortality using data from the American College of Cardiology CathPCI Registry that included 706,263 patients. The median risk-standardized in-hospital mortality rate was 1.9%. In an attempt to validate this model in patients admitted because of acute coronary ischemia to predict in-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year mortality, we applied the proposed risk score to the study population of the Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Survey (ACSIS). This study was conducted for 2 months in 2018 and included all patients admitted to 25 coronary care units and cardiology departments in Israel. The ACSIS included 1,155 patients admitted because of acute myocardial infarction and who underwent PCI. In-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year mortality were 2.3%, 3.1%, and 6.2%, respectively. The CathPCI risk score yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94 to 0.99) for in-hospital mortality; 0.96 (95% CI 0.94 to 0.98) for the 30-day mortality, and 0.88 (95% CI 0.83 to 0.93) for the 1-year mortality. The current model also included frail patients, and those with aortic stenosis, refractory shock, and after cardiac arrest. In conclusion, the CathPCI Registry risk score was validated using data from the ACSIS. Because the ACSIS population comprised patients with acute ischemia including those with high-risk features this model demonstrates a wider scope of application compared with previous ones. In addition, the model seems to be suitable to predict also the 30-day and 1-year mortality.
Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome , Myocardial Infarction , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Humans , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Registries , Acute Coronary Syndrome/epidemiology , Hospital Mortality , Risk Assessment , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Despite early and currently effective epicardial coronary recanalization, the mortality rate after mechanical complication (MC) remains high, especially in cardiogenic shock. There is an increase in the use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with cardiogenic shock and MC, however, evidence is still scarce and most studies exclude patients with mechanical complications. METHODS: Using the National Inpatient Sample database from 2015 to 2018 to identify patients with AMI, we aimed to determine the predictors and outcomes of patients with MC, subtypes and the use of MCS. RESULTS: We identified 2,427,315 patients with AMI; 2345 (0.1 %) developed MC and of them 1320 (56.3 %) received MCS. Regarding subtypes, 960 (40.9 %) had ventricular septal rupture (VSR), 540 (23.0 %) papillary muscle rupture (PMR), 530 (22.6 %) pseudoaneurysm, and 315 (13.4 %) free wall rupture (FWR). Mortality was 12 times higher (OR: 11.663, CI: 10.582-12.855, p < 0.001) in patients with MC compared to patients without MC (49.7 % vs. 4.6 %, p < 0.001) and all subtypes of MC showed a significant increase in mortality. The use of MCS was associated with decreased mortality in PMR (46.2 % to 34.8 %, p = 0.009) and pseudoaneurysm (64.7 % to 42.1 %, p < 0.001), however, with higher mortality in VSR. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of MC after an AMI is very low, nonetheless the in-hospital mortality rate remains very high. It tends to occur more in older patients and with fewer comorbidities. The subtype with the highest frequency and highest mortality was VSR. The use of mechanical circulatory support was associated with better survival in PMR and pseudoaneurysm, but not overall survival.
Subject(s)
Aneurysm, False , Heart Valve Diseases , Myocardial Infarction , Ventricular Septal Rupture , Humans , Aged , Shock, Cardiogenic/diagnosis , Shock, Cardiogenic/therapy , Shock, Cardiogenic/complications , Risk Factors , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Myocardial Infarction/complications , Heart Valve Diseases/complications , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Background: Treatment of right coronary artery (RCA) aorto-ostial (AO) lesions with bare-metal stents and first-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) was associated with worse outcomes. This study aimed to assess the effect of RCA-AO stenting with current-generation DES on the clinical outcome. Methods: The large all-comer, multicontinental e-ULTIMASTER registry included 37,198 patients of whom 4775 underwent ostial and proximal RCA percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using the Ultimaster stent (Terumo). The primary clinical end point was 1-year target lesion failure (TLF), a composite of cardiac death; target vessel-related myocardial infarction; or clinically indicated target lesion revascularization. Results: We compared 591 (12.4%) patients who underwent RCA-AO PCI with 4184 (87.6%) patients who underwent proximal RCA PCI. The RCA-AO group included more men and recorded significantly more comorbidities and more complex coronary anatomy. After propensity matching, the primary end point TLF occurred in 4.49% of the RCA-AO group compared with 3.00% of the proximal RCA group (P = .06). Target vessel revascularization (3.29% vs 1.90%; P = .03) and stent thrombosis (1.23% vs 0.42%, P = .01) were significantly higher among patients with RCA-AO lesions than those among patients with proximal RCA lesions. All-cause mortality was similar between the groups (2.97% vs 2.26%; P = .30). Conclusions: The treatment of RCA-AO with DES is feasible, with similar rates of TLF but with an increased risk of target vessel revascularization and stent thrombosis.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The heart team approach is highly advocated for in treatment decision making in patients with multivessel disease (MVD). Nevertheless, many centers lack on-site cardiac surgical services (CSS)/formal heart team. Our local alternative is of remote surgical consultation without a structured image sharing platform. In our understanding, the incidence of anatomical complete revascularization (ACR) under this daily practice, and its clinical impact, has not been discussed before. METHODS: We analyzed 477 consecutive patients who were surgically revascularized between January 2009 and March 2018 for MVD, after remote surgical consultation. Unstable, late arrival, and ST elevation patients were excluded (n = 163). ACR was considered grafting all anatomic lesions > 50%. Syntax score (SS) calculation and ACR categorization were determined by an independent interventionalist using diagnostic angiograms and available operative reports (n = 267). Patients' outcomes were assessed in relation to multiple clinical variables including troponin result and the revascularization status. RESULTS: Three hundred and fourteen patients were included. Mean age was 64 years, and mean SS-II was 27.3 ± 11. At the 4-year follow-up, the observed mortality (11.8% and 12.9%, with troponin-positive and -negative groups, respectively), myocardial infarction (11.8%), and repeat revascularization (9.8%) were higher than those predicted using a nomogram depicting the predicted 4-year mortality as a function of the SYNTAX II Score (5.3%, 8.8%, and 3.5%, respectively, p = 0.02). ACR was reported in 33% of 267 available patients' reports. After multivariate adjustment ACR was the only variable associated with a significant increase in 4-year mortality (12.3% vs. 6.7%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Partial revascularization in the absence of on-site CSS and a structured heart team platform is a frequent occurrence. Not surprisingly, this occurrence was associated with a higher risk for mid-term mortality. An upfront, structured, virtual, heart team interface is mandatory to particularly prioritize the completeness of revascularization when considering the optimal revascularization mode.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Morphine use for patients presenting with NSTE-ACS is associated with excess mortality. However, the role of morphine in STE-ACS is ill characterized. We have recently confirmed direct prothrombotic effect of morphine using murine models. We sought to explore whether morphine use in STE-ACS patients, used to be scheduled for downstream P2Y12 blockers, is negatively associated with procedural and clinical outcomes. METHODS: A single-center, observational retrospective analysis enrolling 130 non-randomized stable patients sustaining STE-ACS as their first manifestation of coronary disease, who presented between December 2010 and June 2013. All were managed by early invasive approach. Of study patients, 55 were treated by morphine, and 75 were not. All were administered downstream P2Y12 blockers according to an already abandoned local policy. Outcomes evaluated included TIMI grade flow, thrombus burden, ST-segment resolution, myocardial function by echocardiography, and cardiovascular death. RESULTS: Morphine administration was associated with a significantly higher incidence of impaired final TIMI grade flow (TIMI < 3, 40% vs 4%, P < .05), lower incidence of ST-segment resolution >70% (40.7% vs 76.5%, P < .05), and a higher incidence of moderate or severe systolic dysfunction (48.1% vs 29.1%, P < .05) compared with morphine naive patients. Interestingly, the overall mortality rate was higher in the morphine-treated group (18% vs 5.3%, P < .05). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Morphine administration combined with the downstream P2Y12 blockers practice signify a group with a higher occurrence of impaired myocardial reperfusion and cardiovascular death despite established on-time primary angioplasty.
Subject(s)
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction , Thrombosis , Animals , Coronary Angiography , Humans , Mice , Morphine Derivatives/therapeutic use , Myocardial Reperfusion , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnostic imaging , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/drug therapy , Thrombosis/etiology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
The mortality of women with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) exceeds that of men, supposedly the result of older age and co-morbidities. Patients with STEMI can be transported directly to the catherization lab by the emergency medical service (EMS) or to the emergency department (ED) by the EMS, a regular ambulance, or independently. This raises the question whether gender disparity in the transport of patients with STEMI may affect time to therapy and consequently explain the disparate outcome in men and women with STEMI. We analyzed a large nationwide registry of prospectively-recorded patients with acute coronary syndromes in order to determine if there is a survival gap between men and women with STEMI, and to assess the gender-related effect of admission pathway on time intervals and 5-year mortality. Study population included 2,740 patients with STEMI who underwent primary percutaneous coronary interventions, comprising 464 women (17%, median-70 years) and 2,276 men (83%, median-58 years). The unadjusted 5-year mortality of women was higher compared with men (26.4% vs 15.6%, p = 0.001) but adjustment abrogated this survival difference. Regardless of adjustment, the 5-year mortality of patients with STEMI admitted directly to the catherization lab or to the ED by EMS was similar for men and women but significantly lower in the directly admitted patients (p <0.028). In contrast, admission to the ED by non-EMS was associated with markedly worse survival among women. These results indicate that women suspected of STEMI benefit from transportation by the EMS and should use this pathway exclusively to reach the hospital.
Subject(s)
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Time FactorsABSTRACT
Iatrogenic aortocoronary dissection (IACD) occurs mainly during procedures involving the right coronary artery (RCA) and can result in disabilities, the need for urgent complex surgery, and even death. The risk factors for IACD are ill characterized, and the best management strategy is questionable; thus, there is a need to evaluate the characteristics, treatment options, and outcomes of patients with IACD of the RCA. We searched medical databases for publications on IACD of the RCA to present the characteristics of the procedures, management, and outcomes. We report 142 cases of IACD of the RCA, reported between 1973 and 2021. The mean age of the patients was 63.0 years, 81 (57%) were men, 75 (52.8%) presented with stable angina, and 29 (20.4%) had chronic total occlusion of the RCA. The most used catheter shapes were Judkins right (42%) and Amplatz left (25%), and most (56%) catheters were used during percutaneous coronary interventions. Guiding catheters were used in 38% (19/50) of diagnostic procedures when IACD occurred. A catheter size of ≤5F was used in only 3 cases. The catheter size was 6F in 22% of the cases, >6F in 23%, and not reported in 52%. A high-grade dissection (Dunning class III) occurred in 54% (77/142) of the cases. Stenting of the RCA ostium was performed in 88 (62%) of the cases, conservative treatment in 25 (18%), and surgery in 40 (28%) (aortic root repair [5%], coronary artery bypass grafting and aortic root repair [11%], and coronary artery bypass grafting alone [10%]). The mortality rate was 6.5% (5/77) among patients with class III dissection. Each patient should be considered independently. The most frequent intervention was to seal the dissection with a stent in the ostial RCA. However, in select cases published in the literature, a conservative approach was a feasible and successful option.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The treatment of myopericarditis is different than that of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, since their clinical presentation is frequently similar it may be difficult to distinguish between these entities despite a disparate underlying pathogenesis. Myopericarditis is primarily an inflammatory disease associated with high C-reactive protein (CRP) and relatively low elevated troponin concentrations, while AMI is characterized by the opposite. We hypothesized that evaluation of the CRP/troponin ratio on presentation to the emergency department could improve the differentiation between these two related clinical entities whose therapy is different. Such differentiation should facilitate triage to appropriate and expeditious therapy. METHODS: We evaluated the CRP/troponin ratio on presentation among patients consecutively included in a large single center registry that included 1898 consecutive patients comprising 1025 ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, 518 Non-STEMI (NSTEMI) patients, and 355 patients diagnosed on discharge as myopericarditis. CRP and troponin were sampled on admission in all patients and their ratio was assessed against discharge diagnosis. ROC analysis of the CRP/troponin ratios evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of myopericarditis against all AMI, STEMI, and NSTEMI patients. RESULTS: Median admission CRP/troponin ratios were 84, 65, and 436 mg×ml/liter×ng in STEMI, NSTEMI and myopericarditis groups, respectively (p<0.001) demonstrating good differentiating capability. The Receiver-operator-curve of admission CRP/troponin ratio for diagnosis of myopericarditis against all AMI, STEMI, and NSTEMI patients yielded an area-under-the curve of 0.74, 0.73, and 0.765, respectively. CRP/troponin ratio>500 resulted in specificity exceeding 85%, and for a ratio>1000, specificity>92%. CONCLUSION: The CRP/troponin ratio can serve as an effective tool to differentiate between myopericarditis and AMI. In the appropriate clinical context, the CRP/troponin ratio may preclude further evaluation.
Subject(s)
C-Reactive Protein/analysis , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Myocarditis/diagnosis , Troponin/analysis , Adult , Aged , Diagnosis, Differential , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/blood , Myocarditis/bloodABSTRACT
Background Shortening the pain-to-balloon (P2B) and door-to-balloon (D2B) intervals in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is essential in order to limit myocardial damage. We investigated whether direct admission of PPCI-treated patients with STEMI to the catheterization laboratory, bypassing the emergency department, expedites reperfusion and improves prognosis. Methods and Results Consecutive PPCI-treated patients with STEMI included in the ACSIS (Acute Coronary Syndrome in Israel Survey), a prospective nationwide multicenter registry, were divided into patients admitted directly or via the emergency department. The impact of the P2B and D2B intervals on mortality was compared between groups by logistic regression and propensity score matching. Of the 4839 PPCI-treated patients with STEMI, 1174 were admitted directly and 3665 via the emergency department. Respective median P2B and D2B were shorter among the directly admitted patients with STEMI (160 and 35 minutes) compared with those admitted via the emergency department (210 and 75 minutes, P<0.001). Decreased mortality was observed with direct admission at 1 and 2 years and at the end of follow-up (median 6.4 years, P<0.001). Survival advantage persisted after adjustment by logistic regression and propensity matching. P2B, but not D2B, impacted survival (P<0.001). Conclusions Direct admission of PPCI-treated patients with STEMI decreased mortality by shortening P2B and D2B intervals considerably. However, P2B, but not D2B, impacted mortality. It seems that the D2B interval has reached its limit of effect. Thus, all efforts should be extended to shorten P2B by educating the public to activate early the emergency medical services to bypass the emergency department and allow timely PPCI for the best outcome.
Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary , Cardiology Service, Hospital , Emergency Service, Hospital , Long Term Adverse Effects/mortality , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction , Time-to-Treatment , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/adverse effects , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/methods , Cardiac Catheterization/methods , Cardiac Catheterization/statistics & numerical data , Cardiology Service, Hospital/standards , Cardiology Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Service, Hospital/standards , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Israel/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Mortality , Pain Management/methods , Pain Management/standards , Patient Admission/standards , Patient Admission/statistics & numerical data , Quality Improvement , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/mortality , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/physiopathology , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/surgery , Time-to-Treatment/organization & administration , Time-to-Treatment/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
This research reviews the performance of a commercial personal fast neutron dosimetry system that has recently been installed in the External Dosimetry Laboratory at Soreq Nuclear Research Center (SNRC). Different kinds of neutron sources like ${}{}^{\mathbf{241}}\boldsymbol{Am}$-Be, ${}{}^{\mathbf{252}}\boldsymbol{Cf}$ and some neutron generators are used in the industry as well as in some research institutes and reactors. The workers in these places need to be regularly monitored for neutron radiation. These workers' individual neutron doses have been estimated at SNRC until recently by a 30-year-old in-house-made system based on the CR-39 ® solid state nuclear track (SSNT) detector technology. Last year, a new Landauer CR-39 ® neutron dosimetry system was adopted, the Neutrak system. This system employs a standard etching technique using NaOH solution, and measures the SSNT dosimeters automatically and in a repeatable manner. This paper reviews the performance of Landauer's commercial personal neutron dosimetry system. The system performance shows excellent results in terms of linearity, repeatability, robustness, etch parameters sensitivity and detection threshold.
Subject(s)
Neutrons , Radiometry , Equipment Design , Humans , Radiation DosageABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Previous studies, published before the advent of primary reperfusion, described the electrocardiographic features of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) caused by total diagonal artery occlusion, as demonstrated at pre-discharge coronary angiography. We aimed to assess the electrocardiographic and echocardiographic features in STEMI unequivocally attributed to a diagonal lesion in the era of primary coronary intervention. METHODS: The electrocardiograms and echocardiograms of patients sustaining STEMI caused by diagonal artery involvement were compared with those of patients with STEMI attributed to proximal or mid left anterior descending artery (LAD) lesions. ST-segment deviations were measured at four different points in each lead and analyzed against TIMI flow and SNuH score. The electrocardiographic and echocardiographic features of each group were mapped. RESULTS: In contrast to previous studies claiming an ever-present incidence of at least 1-mm ST-segment elevation in leads I and aVL with diagonal STEMI, we report 86% of any ST-elevation in leads I, aVL and V2 (64-71% for ST-elevation >1 mm). Both higher SNuH score and pre-intervention TIMI flow were associated with larger lateral ST-elevations (85.7% and 86.4-95.5%, respectively). Higher prevalence of ST-depression in the inferior leads reflecting reciprocal changes was observed in patients with diagonal-induced STEMI (57-76% vs. 24-51% in LAD obstructions, p <0.05). CONCLUSION: The most sensitive and predictive sign for acute ischemia was any degree of ST-deviation measured 1 mm beyond the J point. ST-elevations in I, aVL and V2, sparing V3-V5, strongly favor isolated diagonal lesion. Proximal LAD lesion lacking ST-segment elevations in leads I and aVL is primarily due to wraparound LAD anatomy.
Subject(s)
Electrocardiography , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Coronary Angiography/methods , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/surgeryABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To assess the relationship between preprocedural anticoagulation use and clinical and angiographic outcomes. BACKGROUND: For patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the optimal timing of anticoagulant administration remains uncertain. METHODS: Patients enrolled in the TOTAL trial were stratified based on whether or not they had received any parenteral anticoagulant prior to randomization and PCI. Baseline and procedural characteristics were compared. For one-year clinical outcomes, Cox proportional modeling adjusted on a propensity score was used to analyze differences between groups. Angiographic endpoints were analyzed by logistic regression models adjusted for propensity scores. RESULTS: In the trial, 10,064 patients were enrolled and underwent PCI. Preprocedural anticoagulation was used in 6,381 patients (63%).The most common anticoagulant was intravenous unfractionated heparin (5,188, 81%). Patients who received preprocedural anticoagulation had higher rates of TIMI-2-3 or TIMI-3 flow and lower grades of thrombus prior to PCI. Pretreatment with anticoagulation was associated with lower use of bailout thrombectomy, GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and intra-aortic balloon pump. After adjustment, preprocedural anticoagulation was associated with lower rates of CABG and minor bleeding at 1 year but there were no significant differences in death, stroke, recurrent MI, cardiogenic shock, or congestive heart failure. CONCLUSIONS: Preprocedural anticoagulation is associated with improved flow and reduced thrombus in the IRA prior to PCI, less bailout thrombectomy during PCI but no difference in death, recurrent infarction, or heart failure at 1 year.
Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Administration, Intravenous , Aged , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Coronary Angiography , Databases, Factual , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Heart Failure/mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/mortality , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Recurrence , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Shock, Cardiogenic/mortality , Stroke/mortality , Stroke/prevention & control , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
STEMI patients admitted urgently to the hospital but experience early complete resolution of both ischemic symptoms and ST-elevations on the electrocardiogram are diagnosed as transient STEMI (TSTEMI). Current evidence indicates that primary intervention is plausible but in certain circumstances intervention can be delayed. We sought to examine whether there is a time limit to such a delay that may affect long-term outcome. Study population included prospectively admitted TSTEMI patients whose demographics, pertinent medical history, and clinical and angiographic features were recorded. Study patients were divided by the median time interval from admission to intervention and their characteristics and long-term survival were compared. Study population comprised 260 consecutive patients (age: 57±10 years, men: 84%) diagnosed as TSTEMI who were included from January 2000 to June 2019, which represent 6% of all STEMI patients. Coronary angiography was performed in 254 patients. The median time interval from admission to angiography was 17 hours (IQR: 7.2 to 38.7 hours). Early (<17 hours from admission) and late (>17 hours from admission) study groups were comparable. One patient died during admission and 41 throughout the long follow-up period of 8.5 ± 5.2 years (median: 8.2 years, IQR: 3.4 to 13.1). Mortality of early-treated TSTEMI patients (11.2%) was significantly lower than of the late-treated patients (21.6%, p <0.04). The Kaplan-Meier curve demonstrated a clear tendency toward improved survival in early-treated TSTEMI patients (p <0.09). In conclusion, the present data suggest that TSTEMI patients should be treated, if not by primary coronary intervention, then at least within 17 hours from admission to achieve better long-term outcome.
Subject(s)
Hospital Mortality , Myocardial Ischemia/therapy , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/mortality , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Aged , Cohort Studies , Coronary Angiography/methods , Female , Humans , Israel , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Ischemia/diagnostic imaging , Myocardial Ischemia/mortality , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/mortality , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnostic imaging , Survival Analysis , Syndrome , Time-to-Treatment , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Rotational atherectomy (RA) has been traditionally performed via the transfemoral approach, mostly utilizing large guide catheters (≥7 Fr), which can accommodate the passage of large burrs (≥1.75 mm). However, contemporary data show that using smaller sheath and catheter sizes reduces the risk of procedural access-site related complications. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of performing RA using smaller burrs and subsequently smaller-sized sheath catheters. METHODS: A total of 220 patients underwent RA procedures between January 2011 and July 2017. We compared 162 patients who underwent RA using a maximal burr size of 1.5 mm (small-burr group) with 58 patients who underwent RA using burrs >1.5 mm in diameter (large-burr group). Clinical, procedural, safety, and feasibility data were evaluated and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of the two groups were quite similar other than a higher prevalence of smoking (21.0% vs 5.2%; P<.01) and a lower body weight (80.9 ± 17.5 kg vs 86.8 ± 17.2 kg; P=.03) in the small-burr group vs the large-burr group. The indications for the procedure for the small-burr group vs large-burr group were stable angina in 53% vs 62%, unstable angina in 16% vs 17%, non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (MI) in 26% vs 17%, and ST-elevation MI in 3.7% vs 3.4%, respectively (P=NS for all). The target-vessel (TV) diameter was significantly larger in the large-burr group vs the small-burr group (3.5 ± 0.3 mm vs 3.2 ± 0.5 mm, respectively; P<.01). Importantly, a sheath size >6 Fr was used in 56.0% of the small-burr group vs 89.5% of the large-burr group (P<.01). Moreover, in 53% of the small-burr group, a guide catheter >6 Fr was used. Radial access was used in 33% of the small-burr group and 17% of the large-burr group (P=.03). Procedural success was achieved in 93% of the small-burr group and 100% of the large-burr group (P=.07). CONCLUSION: In the majority of cases, RA can be successfully performed using smaller-sized burrs while achieving a high procedural success rate. Notably, our study also highlights the overuse of large sheaths and catheters to deliver small burrs. These results further support the contemporary strategy of using 6 Fr guide catheters, thereby increasing the possibility of using the radial approach for more complex interventional procedures.
Subject(s)
Atherectomy, Coronary/instrumentation , Catheters , Coronary Vessels/surgery , Myocardial Ischemia/surgery , Aged , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging , Equipment Design , Female , Humans , Male , Myocardial Ischemia/diagnosis , Retrospective StudiesSubject(s)
Cardiac Catheterization , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Artery Disease/physiopathology , Coronary Circulation , Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Vessels/physiopathology , Coronary Artery Disease/therapy , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Models, Anatomic , Models, Cardiovascular , Pilot Projects , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Coronary angiography and intervention to saphenous venous grafts (SVGs) remain challenging. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and safety of the radial approach compared to femoral access in a large cohort of patients undergoing SVG angiography and intervention. METHODS: Data from 1,481 patients from Canada, United States, and Spain who underwent procedures between 2010 and 2016 were collected. Patients must have undergone SVG coronary angiography and/or intervention. Demographics, procedural data, and in-hospital complications were recorded. RESULTS: Procedures were undertaken by either the radial (n = 863, 211 intervention) or femoral (n = 618, 260 intervention) approach. The mean number of SVGs per patient was similar between groups (radial 2.3 ± 0.7 vs femoral 2.6 ± 1.1, P = .61), but the radial group required a fewer number of catheters (2.6 ± 1.7 vs 4.1 ± 1.1, P < .001). Fluoroscopy time was comparable between groups, and there was a trend toward lower contrast volume in the radial group (P = .045). Overall, the total dose of heparin was significantly higher in the radial group (P < .001); however, radial patients experienced significantly less access-site bleeding complications (P < .001). Outpatients undergoing radial SVG interventions had a higher likelihood of a same-day discharge home (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Radial access for SVG angiography and intervention is safe and feasible, without increasing fluoroscopy time. In experienced centers, radial access was associated with fewer catheters used, lower contrast volume, and lower rate of vascular access-site bleeding complications. Moreover, outpatients undergoing SVG percutaneous coronary intervention though the radial approach had a higher likelihood of a same-day discharge home.
Subject(s)
Coronary Angiography/methods , Femoral Artery , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , Radial Artery , Saphenous Vein/diagnostic imaging , Aged , Body Mass Index , Canada , Coronary Artery Bypass , Feasibility Studies , Female , Fluoroscopy/statistics & numerical data , Hematoma/etiology , Humans , Male , Operative Time , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/instrumentation , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/statistics & numerical data , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Postoperative Hemorrhage/etiology , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Safety , Saphenous Vein/transplantation , Spain , United StatesABSTRACT
Personal care products and pharmaceuticals have been reported in various concentrations in the effluent of municipal sewage treatment plants (STP). Although they are generally found in the nanogram to microgram per liter range, many of them might have adverse health effects on humans at these concentrations. Conventional treatments applied at the STP are unable to effectively remove most of these recalcitrant compounds, thus there is a necessity for development of alternative treatment techniques. In this article, the efficiency of enzymatic treatment using soybean peroxidase in treating some commonly found micropollutants is discussed. The target compounds were, two phenolic surfactant breakdown products, nonylphenol and octylphenol, two antimicrobial agents, Triclosan and sulfamethoxazole and three phenolic steroids. The effects of the most important parameters pH, enzyme concentration and peroxide concentration have been evaluated for each compound. The treatment of synthetic wastewater was shown to be effective (≥95% removal), except for sulfamethoxazole, in concentration ranges of 10 s of µM at neutral pH with 2-5 mU/L of catalytic activity and 2-3 molar equivalents of hydrogen peroxide. The effectiveness of the treatment has also been determined for lower concentrations (6-9 nM) which approximate those in real wastewater. A matrix effect was found in the treatment of Triclosan in spiked real wastewater indicating that re-optimization of important parameters for STP treatment would be required to achieve high removal efficiency. A reverse-phase, solid-phase extraction technique was used to concentrate target analytes in real wastewater, enabling chromatographic detection by UV absorbance.