Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 31(4): 304-308, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38242350

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To establish true dimensions of single-use laparoscopic trocars compared with marketed dimensions, calculate corresponding incision sizes, examine what trocar size categories are based on, and outline accessibility of information regarding true dimensions. DESIGN: Descriptive study. SETTING: Laparoscopic disposable trocars available in North America and Europe are marketed in several distinct categories. In practice, trocars in the same-size category exhibit different functionality (ability to introduce instruments/needles and retrieve specimens) and warrant different incision lengths. PATIENTS: Not applicable. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: True dimensions for 125 trocars (bladeless, optical, and balloon) were obtained from 9 vendors covering 8 marketed size categories (3-, 3.5-, 5-, 8-, 10-, 11-, 12-, and 15-mm trocars). On average, true inner cannula diameter was 0.92 mm wider (SD, 0.41 mm; range, 0-2.4 mm) than the marketed size category, with the widest range in the 5 mm category. For 5-mm trocars, mean true inner diameter was 6.1 mm (SD, 0.45; range, 5.5-7.4) and true outer diameter 8.3 mm (SD, 0.71; range, 8.0-10.7). For 12-mm trocars, mean true inner diameter was 13.0 mm (SD, 0.21; range, 12-13.3) and outer diameter 15.3 mm (SD, 0.48; range, 14.4-16.8). Five-mm trocars necessitate a mean incision size of 13.0 mm (SD, 1.1; range, 12.1-16.8) and 12-mm trocars a mean incision of 24.0 mm (SD, 0.75; range, 22.6-26.4). No vendors stated actual diameters on company website or catalog. In one instance the Instructions For Use document contained the true inner diameter. CONCLUSION: Trocar size categories give a false sense of standardization when in actuality there are considerable within-category differences in both inner and outer diameters, corresponding to differences in functionality and required incision sizes. There is no universally applied definition for trocar size categories. Accessibility of information on true dimensions is limited.


Subject(s)
Laparoscopes , Laparoscopy , Humans , Equipment Design , Laparoscopy/methods , Surgical Instruments , Needles
2.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 28(12): 1993-2003.e10, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34252609

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Abdominal entry at the time of laparoscopy is a critical step with a risk of injury to underlying viscera owing to bowel adhesions. Ultrasound can be used as a preoperative tool to assess the slide of viscera underneath the abdominal wall to detect adhesion-free areas. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative visceral slide assessment with ultrasound to detect intra-abdominal adhesions, compared with the gold standard of intraoperative findings. DATA SOURCES: Using Cochrane, Medline PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar electronic databases, 3737 articles were screened in April 2020 using a query that included variations of "adhesions" and "ultrasound." Reference lists of relevant articles were searched for further articles. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Prospective and cross-sectional studies in English that included patients at risk for intra-abdominal adhesions who underwent preoperative ultrasound visceral slide assessment and subsequent intraoperative assessment of adhesions were selected. Two reviewers independently selected 25 articles, extracted data, and assessed bias using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Twenty-five articles reported on 1609 patients and 5812 assessed abdominal areas, with considerable heterogeneity of described abdominal areas and degrees of adhesions. Meta-analysis was performed for 21 studies. The periumbilical area was assessed specifically for bowel adhesions in 890 patients in 12 studies, with a 12.0% bowel adhesion rate. Ultrasound assessment for periumbilical bowel adhesions had a combined sensitivity of 95.9% (95% confidence interval, 82.7%-99.1%), specificity of 93.1% (85.1%-96.9%), positive predictive value of 60.4% (44.2%-74.7%), and negative predictive value of 99.2% (97.9%-99.7%) with low heterogeneity (I2 = 16%). CONCLUSION: Visceral slide assessment with ultrasound has a high negative predictive value for the absence of periumbilical bowel adhesions in patients at risk for adhesions and can function as a useful tool to detect adhesion-free areas to allow for safe laparoscopic entry.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Wall , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Prospective Studies , Tissue Adhesions/diagnostic imaging , Tissue Adhesions/etiology , Ultrasonography
3.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol ; 33(4): 270-278, 2021 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34183550

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In this review, we aim to describe uncommon pathologies that gynecologic surgeons may reasonably encounter on surgical specimens following benign gynecologic surgery. RECENT FINDINGS: Herein, we describe uncommon pathologic findings of the uterus (e.g. squamous morular metaplasia, fibroid variants, stromal tumor of uncertain malignant potential), peritoneum and adnexa (e.g. endosalpingiosis, serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma), endometriosis (e.g. stromal endometriosis, atypical endometriosis), and findings of particular interest in postmenopausal women (e.g. ovarian cortical stromal hyperplasia, tubal metaplasia). The majority of pathologic findings presented in this article are inherently benign, although they can present diagnostic challenges. If properly classified, additional treatment and/or extended follow-up is often not required; exceptions are highlighted. SUMMARY: The gynecologic surgeon may encounter uncommon pathologies during a career. Inherent diagnostic difficulties, as well as nonstandardized or outdated terminology, can introduce further uncertainty. Whenever such a situation arises, the surgeon and pathologist should discuss the diagnosis to ensure appropriate treatment options.


Subject(s)
Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous , Endometriosis , Fallopian Tube Neoplasms , Endometriosis/diagnosis , Endometriosis/surgery , Female , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures , Humans
4.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol ; 32(4): 248-254, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32324711

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs aim to expedite functional recovery and improve surgical outcomes without increasing complications or cost. First championed by colorectal surgeons, ERAS protocols are now widely utilized among surgical subspecialties. The present review focuses on use of ERAS pathways in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (MIGS) and risk factors for suboptimal outcomes in this population. RECENT FINDINGS: Studies across multiple fields has shown benefit to adoption of ERAS protocols. However, lack of protocol standardization among institutions, implementation of interventions as a bundle, varied compliance, and lack of study randomization collectively obscure generalizability of findings from such studies. Emerging data in fact suggest benefits may not translate equally across all populations, cautioning against indiscriminate application of protocols to all surgeries or patients. Thus applicability of ERAS protocols to the MIGS population merits close examination. SUMMARY: ERAS protocols improve postoperative outcomes, satisfaction, and cost of care for most patients undergoing gynecologic surgery. However, modifications to typical ERAS protocols may be beneficial to certain subsets of patients including patients with chronic pelvic pain, opiate dependence, or psychiatric disorders. Identification of risk factors for admission or increased hospital stay may help guide protocol modifications for at-risk groups within the MIGS population.


Subject(s)
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/rehabilitation , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/rehabilitation , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Female , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Humans , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors
5.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 214: 104-108, 2017 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28505564

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To study the prevalence of hysteroscopically evaluated disruptions of the integrity of the uterine wall ('niches') in women with and without a previous cesarean section. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort study was performed in a teaching hospital in the Netherlands. Women seeking hysteroscopic sterilization were included. A hysteroscopic evaluation of the anterior wall of the uterus and cervix to identify the existence of disruptions (niches) was performed in a standard manner. Primary outcome was the presence of a uterine niche, defined as any visible defect, disruption, or concavity (gap) in the anterior wall. Secondary outcome was to develop a registration form of niche features for hysteroscopic evaluation. RESULTS: In total, 713 women were included, 603 without and 110 with a previous cesarean section. In women with a previous cesarean Section 83 (75%) niches were observed using hysteroscopy. Anterior wall disruptions were not observed in women without a cesarean section. The following niche features were identified and incorporated in a registration form: polyps, cysts, myometrium defect, fibrotic tissue, (abnormal) vascular pattern, lateral branches, mucus production inside the defect, and bleeding. CONCLUSION: In a prospective cohort study among women undergoing hysteroscopic sterilization, a uterine niche could be detected by hysteroscopy in 75% of women with a previous cesarean section.


Subject(s)
Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Cicatrix/etiology , Uterus/injuries , Adult , Cicatrix/pathology , Female , Humans , Hysteroscopy , Prospective Studies , Uterus/pathology
6.
BMC Cancer ; 12: 22, 2012 Jan 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22251860

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: RNA from exosomes and other microvesicles contain transcripts of tumour origin. In this study we sought to identify biomarkers of glioblastoma multiforme in microvesicle RNA from serum of affected patients. METHODS: Microvesicle RNA from serum from patients with de-novo primary glioblastoma multiforme (N = 9) and normal controls (N = 7) were analyzed by microarray analysis. Samples were collected according to protocols approved by the Institutional Review Board. Differential expressions were validated by qRT-PCR in a separate set of samples (N = 10 in both groups). RESULTS: Expression profiles of microvesicle RNA correctly separated individuals in two groups by unsupervised clustering. The most significant differences pertained to down-regulated genes (121 genes > 2-fold down) in the glioblastoma multiforme patient microvesicle RNA, validated by qRT-PCR on several genes. Overall, yields of microvesicle RNA from patients was higher than from normal controls, but the additional RNA was primarily of size < 500 nt. Gene ontology of the down-regulated genes indicated these are coding for ribosomal proteins and genes related to ribosome production. CONCLUSIONS: Serum microvesicle RNA from patients with glioblastoma multiforme has significantly down-regulated levels of RNAs coding for ribosome production, compared to normal healthy controls, but a large overabundance of RNA of unknown origin with size < 500 nt.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , Brain Neoplasms/genetics , Glioblastoma/genetics , RNA, Neoplasm/blood , Brain Neoplasms/blood , Gene Expression Profiling , Glioblastoma/blood , Humans , Microarray Analysis , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Subcellular Fractions/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL