ABSTRACT
The anti-PD-1 antibodies nivolumab and pembrolizumab are active in metastatic melanoma; however, there is limited data on combining anti-PD-1 antibody and radiotherapy (RT). We sought to review clinical outcomes of patients receiving RT and anti-PD-1 therapy. All patients receiving anti-PD-1 antibody and RT for metastatic melanoma were identified. RT and systemic treatment, clinical outcome, and toxicity data were collected. Fifty-three patients were included; 35 patients received extracranial RT and/or intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and 21 received whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) (three of whom also received SRS/extracranial RT). Patients treated with extracranial RT or SRS received treatment either sequentially (RT then anti-PD-1, n = 11), concurrently (n = 16), or concurrent "salvage" treatment to lesions progressing on anti-PD-1 therapy (n = 15). There was no excessive anti-PD-1 or RT toxicity observed in patients receiving extracranial RT. Of six patients receiving SRS, one patient developed grade 3 radiation necrosis. In 21 patients receiving WBRT, one patient developed Stevens-Johnson syndrome, one patient developed acute neurocognitive decline, and one patient developed significant cerebral edema in the setting of disease. Response in irradiated extracranial/intracranial SRS lesions was 44% for sequential treatment and 64% for concurrent treatment (p=0.448). Likewise there was no significant difference between sequential or concurrent treatment in lesional response of non-irradiated lesions. For progressing lesions subsequently irradiated, response rate was 45%. RT and anti-PD-1 antibodies can be safely combined, with no detectable excess toxicity in extracranial sites. WBRT and anti-PD-1 therapy is well tolerated, although there are rare toxicities and the role of either anti-PD-1 or WBRT in the etiology of these is uncertain.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Recent phase III clinical trials have established the superiority of the anti-PD-1 antibodies pembrolizumab and nivolumab over the anti-CTLA-4 antibody ipilimumab in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced melanoma. Ipilimumab will be considered for second-line treatment after the failure of anti-PD-1 therapy. METHODS: We retrospectively identified a cohort of 40 patients with metastatic melanoma who received single-agent anti-PD-1 therapy with pembrolizumab or nivolumab and were treated on progression with ipilimumab at a dose of 3 mg kg(-1) for a maximum of four doses. RESULTS: Ten percent of patients achieved an objective response to ipilimumab, and an additional 8% experienced prolonged (>6 months) stable disease. Thirty-five percent of patients developed grade 3-5 immune-related toxicity associated with ipilimumab therapy. The most common high-grade immune-related toxicity was diarrhoea. Three patients (7%) developed grade 3-5 pneumonitis leading to death in one patient. CONCLUSIONS: Ipilimumab therapy can induce responses in patients who fail the anti-PD-1 therapy with response rates comparable to previous reports. There appears to be an increased frequency of high-grade immune-related adverse events including pneumonitis that warrants close surveillance.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Melanoma/drug therapy , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Ipilimumab , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The conduct of clinical trials should be an integral part of routine patient care. Treating patients in trials incurs additional costs over and above standard of care (SOC), but the extent of the cost burden is not known. We undertook a retrospective cost attribution analysis to quantitate the treatment costs associated with cancer clinical trial protocols conducted over a 2 year period. METHODS: All patients entered into oncology (non-haematology) clinical trials involving investigational medicinal products in 2009 and 2010 in a single UK institution were identified. The trial protocols on which they were treated were analysed to identify the treatment costs for the experimental arm(s) of the trial and the equivalent SOC had the patient not been entered in the trial. The treatment cost difference was calculated by subtracting the experimental treatment cost from SOC cost. For randomised trials, an average treatment cost was estimated by taking into account the number of arms and randomisation ratio. An estimate of the annual treatment costs was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 357 adult oncology patients were treated on 53 different trial protocols: 40 phase III, 2 randomised II/III and 11 phase II design. A total of 27 trials were academic, non-commercial sponsored trials and 26 were commercial sponsored trials. When compared with SOC, the average treatment cost per patient was an excess of £431 for a non-commercial trial (range £6393 excess to £6005 saving) and a saving of £9294 for a commercial trial (range £0 to £71,480). There was an overall treatment cost saving of £388,719 in 2009 and £496,556 in 2010, largely attributable to pharmaceutical company provision of free drug supplies. CONCLUSION: On an average, non-commercial trial protocols were associated with a small per patient excess treatment cost, whereas commercial trials were associated with a substantially higher cost saving. Taking into account the total number of patients recruited annually, treatment of patients on clinical trial protocols was associated with considerable cost savings across both the non-commercial and commercial portfolio.
Subject(s)
Clinical Trials as Topic/economics , Neoplasms/economics , Neoplasms/therapy , Biomedical Research/economics , Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic/economics , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic/economics , Health Care Costs , Humans , Medical Oncology/economics , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/economics , Retrospective Studies , United KingdomABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT) on neural cells is important when tumours are within or adjacent to the nervous system. The purpose of this study was to investigate PDT using the photosensitiser, meta-tetrahydroxyphenyl chlorin (mTHPC), on rat neurons and satellite glia, compared with human adenocarcinoma cells (MCF-7). METHODS: Fluorescence microscopy confirmed that mTHPC was incorporated into all three cell types. Sensitivity of cells exposed to mTHPC-PDT (0-10 microg ml(-1)) was determined in a novel 3-dimensional collagen gel culture system. Cell death was quantified using propidium iodide and cell types were distinguished using immunocytochemistry. In some cases, neuron survival was confirmed by measuring subsequent neurite growth in monolayer culture. RESULTS: MCF-7s and satellite glia were significantly more sensitive to PDT than neurons. Importantly, 4 microg ml(-1) mTHPC-PDT caused no significant neuron death compared with untreated controls but was sufficient to elicit substantial cell death in the other cell types. Initially, treatment reduced neurite length; neurons then extended neurites equivalent to those of untreated controls. The protocol was validated using hypericin (0-3 microg ml(-1)), which caused neuron death equivalent to other cell types. CONCLUSION: Neurons in culture can survive mTHPC-PDT under conditions sufficient to kill tumour cells and other nervous system cells.
Subject(s)
Mesoporphyrins/adverse effects , Neurons/drug effects , Photochemotherapy/adverse effects , Photosensitizing Agents/pharmacology , Animals , Cell Line, Tumor , Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , In Vitro Techniques , Microscopy, Fluorescence , Neuroglia/drug effects , Radiation Tolerance , Rats , Rats, Sprague-DawleyABSTRACT
Mutations in the ERBB2 gene were recently found in approximately 2% of primary non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) specimens; however, little is known about the functional consequences and the relevance to responsiveness to targeted drugs for most of these mutations. Here, we show that the major lung cancer-derived ERBB2 mutants, including the most frequent mutation, A775insYVMA, lead to oncogenic transformation in a cellular assay. Murine cells transformed with these mutants were relatively resistant to the reversible epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor erlotinib, resembling the resistant phenotype found in cells carrying the homologous mutations in exon 20 of EGFR. However, the same cells were highly sensitive to the irreversible dual-specificity EGFR/ERBB2 kinase inhibitor HKI-272, as were those overexpressing wild-type ERBB2. Finally, the NSCLC cell line, Calu-3, overexpressing wild-type ERBB2 owing to a high-level amplification of the ERBB2 gene were highly sensitive to HKI-272. These results provide a rationale for treatment of patients with ERBB2-mutant or ERBB2-amplified lung tumors with HKI-272.