Cost-effectiveness of robotic vs laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Results from the national prospective trial ROBOCOSTES.

INTRODUCTION: Although several studies report that the robotic approach is more costly than laparoscopy, the cost-effectiveness of robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) over laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) is still an issue. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of the RDP and LDP approaches across several Spanish centres. METHODS: This study is an observational, multicenter, national prospective study (ROBOCOSTES). For one year from 2022, all consecutive patients undergoing minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy were included, and clinical, QALY, and cost data were prospectively collected. The primary aim was to analyze the cost-effectiveness between RDP and LDP. RESULTS: During the study period, 80 procedures from 14 Spanish centres were analyzed. LDP had a shorter operative time than the RDP approach (192.2 min vs 241.3 min, p = 0.004). RDP showed a lower conversion rate (19.5% vs 2.5%, p = 0.006) and a lower splenectomy rate (60% vs 26.5%, p = 0.004). A statistically significant difference was reported for the Comprehensive Complication Index between the two study groups, favouring the robotic approach (12.7 vs 6.1, p = 0.022). RDP was associated with increased operative costs of 1600 euros (p < 0.031), while overall cost expenses resulted in being 1070.92 Euros higher than the LDP but without a statistically significant difference (p = 0.064). The mean QALYs at 90 days after surgery for RDP (0.9534) were higher than those of LDP (0.8882) (p = 0.030). At a willingness-to-pay threshold of 20,000 and 30,000 euros, there was a 62.64% and 71.30% probability that RDP was more cost-effective than LDP, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The RDP procedure in the Spanish healthcare system appears more cost-effective than the LDP.

Recurrence and tumor-related death after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with metabolic syndrome.

Background & Aims: Metabolic syndrome (MS) is a growing epidemic and a risk factor for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study investigated the long-term outcomes of liver resection (LR) for HCC in patients with MS. Rates, timing, patterns, and treatment of recurrences were investigated, and cancer-specific survivals were assessed. Methods: Between 2001 and 2021, data from 24 clinical centers were collected. Overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and cancer-specific survival were analyzed as well as recurrence patterns and treatment. The analysis was conducted using a competing-risk framework. The trajectory of the risk of recurrence over time was applied to a competing risk analysis. For post-recurrence survival, death resulting from tumor progression was the primary endpoint, whereas deaths with recurrence relating to other causes were considered as competing events. Results: In total, 813 patients were included in the study. Median OS was 81.4 months (range 28.1-157.0 months), and recurrence occurred in 48.3% of patients, with a median RFS of 39.8 months (range 15.7-174.7 months). Cause-specific hazard of recurrence showed a first peak 6 months (0.027), and a second peak 24 months (0.021) after surgery. The later the recurrence, the higher the chance of receiving curative intent approaches (p = 0.001). Size >5 cm, multiple tumors, microvascular invasion, and cirrhosis were independent predictors of recurrence showing a cause-specific hazard over time. RFS was associated with death for recurrence (hazard ratio: 0.985, 95% CI: 0.977-0.995; p = 0.002). Conclusions: Patients with MS undergoing LR for HCC have good long-term survival. Recurrence occurs in 48% of patients with a double-peak incidence and time-specific hazards depending on tumor-related factors and underlying disease. The timing of recurrence significantly impacts survival. Surveillance after resection should be adjusted over time depending on risk factors. Impact and implications: Metabolic syndrome (MS) is a growing epidemic and a significant risk factor for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The present study demonstrated that patients who undergo surgical resection for HCC on MS have a good long-term survival and that recurrence occurs in almost half of the cases with a double peak incidence and time-specific hazards depending on tumor-related factors and underlying liver disease. Also, the timing of recurrence significantly impacts survival. Clinicians should therefore adjust follow-up after surgery accordingly, considering timing of recurrence and specific risk factors. Also, the results of the present study might help design future trials on the use of adjuvant therapy following resection.

Harmonizing Definitions and Perspectives in Extreme Liver Surgery: A Delphi Experts Consensus.

OBJECTIVE: To propose to our community a common language about extreme liver surgery. BACKGROUND: The lack of a clear definition of extreme liver surgery prevents convincing comparisons of results among centers. METHODS: We used a two-round Delphi methodology to quantify consensus among liver surgery experts. For inclusion in the final recommendations, we established a consensus when the positive responses (agree and totally agree) exceeded 70%. The study steering group summarized and reported the recommendations. In general, a five-point Likert scale with a neutral central value was used, and in a few cases multiple choices. Results are displayed as numbers and percentages. RESULTS: A two-round Delphi study was completed by 38 expert surgeons in complex hepatobiliary surgery. The surgeon´s median age was 58 years old (52-63) and the median years of experience was 25 years (20-31). For the proposed definitions of total vascular occlusion, hepatic flow occlusion and inferior vein occlusion, the degree of agreement was 97%, 81% and 84%, respectively. In situ approach (64%) was the preferred, followed by ante situ (22%) and ex situ (14%). Autologous or cadaveric graft for hepatic artery or hepatic vein repair were the most recommended (89%). The use of veno-venous bypass or portocaval shunt revealed the divergence depending on the case. Overall, 75% of the experts agreed with the proposed definition for extreme liver surgery. CONCLUSION: Obtaining a consensus on the definition of extreme liver surgery is essential to guarantee the correct management of patients with highly complex hepatobiliary oncological disease. The management of candidates for extreme liver surgery involves comprehensive care ranging from adequate patient selection to the appropriate surgical strategy.

Defining Global Benchmarks for Laparoscopic Right Posterior Sectionectomy/H67: An International Multicenter Study.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to establish global benchmark outcomes indicators for L-RPS/H67. BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive liver resections has seen an increase in uptake in recent years. Over time, challenging procedures as laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomies (L-RPS)/H67 are also increasingly adopted. METHODS: This is a post hoc analysis of a multicenter database of 854 patients undergoing minimally invasive RPS (MI-RPS) in 57 international centers in 4 continents between 2015 and 2021. There were 651 pure L-RPS and 160 robotic RPS (R-RPS). Sixteen outcome indicators of low-risk L-RPS cases were selected to establish benchmark cutoffs. The 75th percentile of individual center medians for a given outcome indicator was set as the benchmark cutoff. RESULTS: There were 573 L-RPS/H67 performed in 43 expert centers, of which 254 L-RPS/H67 (44.3%) cases qualified as low risk benchmark cases. The benchmark outcomes established for operation time, open conversion rate, blood loss ≥500 mL, blood transfusion rate, postoperative morbidity, major morbidity, 90-day mortality and textbook outcome after L-RPS were 350.8 minutes, 12.5%, 53.8%, 22.9%, 23.8%, 2.8%, 0% and 4% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The present study established the first global benchmark values for L-RPS/H6/7. The benchmark provided an up-to-date reference of best achievable outcomes for surgical auditing and benchmarking.

Factors Associated with and Impact of Open Conversion in Laparoscopic and Robotic Minor Liver Resections: An International Multicenter Study of 10,541 Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the increasing widespread adoption and experience in minimally invasive liver resections (MILR), open conversion occurs not uncommonly even with minor resections and as been reported to be associated with inferior outcomes. We aimed to identify risk factors for and outcomes of open conversion in patients undergoing minor hepatectomies. We also studied the impact of approach (laparoscopic or robotic) on outcomes. METHODS: This is a post-hoc analysis of 20,019 patients who underwent RLR and LLR across 50 international centers between 2004-2020. Risk factors for and perioperative outcomes of open conversion were analysed. Multivariate and propensity score-matched analysis were performed to control for confounding factors. RESULTS: Finally, 10,541 patients undergoing either laparoscopic (LLR; 89.1%) or robotic (RLR; 10.9%) minor liver resections (wedge resections, segmentectomies) were included. Multivariate analysis identified LLR, earlier period of MILR, malignant pathology, cirrhosis, portal hypertension, previous abdominal surgery, larger tumor size, and posterosuperior location as significant independent predictors of open conversion. The most common reason for conversion was technical issues (44.7%), followed by bleeding (27.2%), and oncological reasons (22.3%). After propensity score matching (PSM) of baseline characteristics, patients requiring open conversion had poorer outcomes compared with successful MILR cases as evidenced by longer operative times, more blood loss, higher requirement for perioperative transfusion, longer duration of hospitalization and higher morbidity, reoperation, and 90-day mortality rates. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple risk factors were associated with conversion of MILR even for minor hepatectomies, and open conversion was associated with significantly poorer perioperative outcomes.

Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on short-term outcomes after simple and complex minimally invasive minor hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases: A propensity-score matched and coarsened exact matched study.

BACKGROUND: In the last three decades, minimally invasive liver resection has been replacing conventional open approach in liver surgery. More recently, developments in neoadjuvant chemotherapy have led to increased multidisciplinary management of colorectal liver metastases with both medical and surgical treatment modalities. However, the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the surgical outcomes of minimally invasive liver resections remains poorly understood. METHODS: A multicenter, international, database of 4998 minimally invasive minor hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases was used to compare surgical outcomes in patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with surgery alone. To correct for baseline imbalance, propensity score matching, coarsened exact matching and inverse probability treatment weighting were performed. RESULTS: 2546 patients met the inclusion criteria. After propensity score matching there were 759 patients in both groups and 383 patients in both groups after coarsened exact matching. Baseline characteristics were equal after both matching strategies. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with statistically significant worse surgical outcomes of minimally invasive minor hepatectomy. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy had no statistically significant impact on short-term surgical outcomes after simple and complex minimally invasive minor hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases.

Preoperative diagnostic criteria for scleroatrophic gallbladder: A systematic review protocol.

BACKGROUND: Although scleroatrophic gallbladder is a rare condition, it presents significant clinical challenges in diagnosis and management. More agreement is needed on this disorder's diagnostic criteria and optimal management approach. We will conduct a systematic review to summarise the scleroatrophic gallbladder's preoperative diagnostic criteria, including imaging modalities. METHODS: A systematic review will be undertaken using the PRISMA guidelines. The protocol has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024503701). We will search in Medline (via PubMed), Embase, SCOPUS, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to find original studies reporting about scleroatrophic gallbladder or synonymous. Two reviewers will independently screen the titles and abstracts following the eligibility criteria. We will include all types of studies that describe any diagnostic criteria or tools. After retrieving the full text of the selected studies, we will conduct a standardised data extraction. Finally, a narrative synthesis will be performed. The quality of the identified studies will be assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies- 2 tool. DISCUSSION: This systematic review will provide information on the preoperative diagnostic criteria of the scleroatrophic gallbladder and the value of imaging studies in its diagnosis. In addition, this work will aid doctors in the decision-making process for diagnosing scleroatrophic gallbladder and propose treatment approaches to this condition. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: The protocol has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024503701).

Repeated pancreatic resection for pancreatic metastases from renal cell Carcinoma: A Spanish multicenter study (PANMEKID).

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Recurrent isolated pancreatic metastasis from Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) after pancreatic resection is rare. The purpose of our study is to describe a series of cases of relapse of pancreatic metastasis from renal cancer in the pancreatic remnant and its surgical treatment with a repeated pancreatic resection, and to analyse the results of both overall and disease-free survival. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective study of patients undergoing pancreatic resection for RCC pancreatic metastases, from January 2010 to May 2020. Patients were grouped into two groups depending on whether they received a single pancreatic resection (SPS) or iterative pancreatic resection. Data on short and long-term outcome after pancreatic resection were collected. RESULTS: The study included 131 pancreatic resections performed in 116 patients. Thus, iterative pancreatic surgery (IPS) was performed in 15 patients. The mean length of time between the first pancreatic surgery and the second was 48.9 months (95 % CI: 22.2-56.9). There were no differences in the rate of postoperative complications. The DFS rates at 1, 3 and 5 years were 86 %, 78 % and 78 % vs 75 %, 50 % and 37 % in the IPS and SPS group respectively (p = 0.179). OS rates at 1, 3, 5 and 7 years were 100 %, 100 %, 100 % and 75 % in the IPS group vs 95 %, 85 %, 80 % and 68 % in the SPS group (p = 0.895). CONCLUSION: Repeated pancreatic resection in case of relapse of pancreatic metastasis of RCC in the pancreatic remnant is justified, since it achieves OS results similar to those obtained after the first resection.

Estudio del impacto de la pandemia por SARS-CoV-2 en la práctica quirúrgica urgente y electiva en un hospital de tercer nivel / Impact of SARS-COV-2 pandemic on elective and emergency surgery in a university hospital

INTRODUCCIÓN: La pandemia por SARS-CoV-2 ha causado un importante impacto en nuestro medio, con la necesidad de demorar la cirugía programada y urgente. Las cifras referentes a la disminución de la actividad quirúrgica y el impacto del periodo aún no se conocen con exactitud. Se estima una mortalidad de hasta un 20% en los pacientes operados con infección peroperatoria por SARS-CoV-2 MÉTODOS: Del 14/03 al 11/05 del 2020 se han recogido los datos de los pacientes ingresados en el servicio de Cirugía General y Digestiva del Hospital Universitari Dr. Josep Trueta de Girona, para analizar el impacto de la pandemia sobre la cirugía electiva y urgente. RESULTADOS: Durante el periodo de ocupación pico de la Unidad de Medicina Intensiva de nuestro centro (con un máximo de 303,8%), la cirugía electiva y la urgente se redujeron un 93,8% y un 72,7%, respectivamente. La mortalidad de los pacientes operados con infección por SARS-CoV-2 en nuestro estudio (n = 10) fue del 10%; las complicaciones fueron del 80% (siendo graves un 30%). CONCLUSIONES: El presente estudio muestra una reducción global de la actividad quirúrgica tanto electiva como urgente durante la pandemia. La mortalidad global de los pacientes operados con infección por SARS-CoV-2 ha sido baja, pero la tasa de complicaciones graves ha sido superior a la global

INTRODUCTION: SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has caused an important impact in our country and elective surgery has been postponed in most cases. There's not known information about the decreasing and impact on surgery. Mortality of surgical patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection is estimated to be around 20%. METHODS: We conducted prospective data recruitment of people inpatient in our Digestive and General Surgery section of Girona's University Hospital Dr. Josep Trueta from 03/14 to 05/11. Our objective is to analyze the impact that SARS-CoV-2 pandemic over elective and urgent surgery. RESULTS: During the peak occupation of our center Intensive Care Unit (303.8%) there was a reduction on elective (93.8%) and urgent (72.7%) surgery. Mortality of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection who underwent surgery (n=10) is estimated to be a 10%. An 80% of these patients suffer complications (sever complications in 30%). CONCLUSIONS: The actual study shows a global reduction of the surgical activity (elective and urgent) during de SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Global mortality of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection are low, but the severe complications have been over the usual

Recomendaciones de actuación en cirugía oncológica hepatobiliopancreática durante la pandemia COVID-19 / Recommendations on intervention for hepatobiliary oncological surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic

La pandemia por SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) obliga a una reflexión en el ámbito de la cirugía oncológica, tanto sobre el riesgo de infección, de consecuencias clínicas muy relevantes, como sobre la necesidad de generar planes para minimizar el impacto sobre las posibles restricciones de los recursos sanitarios. La AEC hace una propuesta de manejo de pacientes con neoplasias hepatobiliopancreáticas (HBP) en los distintos escenarios de pandemia, con el objetivo de ofrecer el máximo beneficio a los pacientes y minimizar el riesgo de infección por COVID-19, optimizando a su vez los recursos disponibles en cada momento. Para ello es preciso la coordinación de los diferentes tratamientos entre los servicios implicados: oncología médica, oncología radioterápica, cirugía, anestesia, radiología, endoscopia y cuidados intensivos. El objetivo es ofrecer tratamientos eficaces, adaptándonos a los recursos disponibles, sin comprometer la seguridad de los pacientes y los profesionales. (AU)

The SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic requires an analysis in the field of oncological surgery, both on the risk of infection, with very relevant clinical consequences, and on the need to generate plans to minimize the impact on possible restrictions on health resources. The AEC is making a proposal for the management of patients with hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) malignancies in the different pandemic scenarios in order to offer the maximum benefit to patients, minimising the risks of COVID-19 infection, and optimising the healthcare resources available at any time. This requires the coordination of the different treatment options between the departments involved in the management of these patients: medical oncology, radiotherapy oncology, surgery, anaesthesia, radiology, endoscopy department and intensive care. The goal is offer effective treatments, adapted to the available resources, without compromising patients and healthcare professionals safety. (AU)

[Impact of SARS-COV-2 pandemic on elective and emergency surgery in a university hospital]. / Estudio del impacto de la pandemia por SARS-CoV-2 en la práctica quirúrgica urgente y electiva en un hospital de tercer nivel.

Introduction: SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has caused an important impact in our country and elective surgery has been postponed in most cases. There's not known information about the decreasing and impact on surgery. Mortality of surgical patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection is estimated to be around 20%. Methods: We conducted prospective data recruitment of people inpatient in our Digestive and General Surgery section of Girona's University Hospital Dr. Josep Trueta from 03/14 to 05/11. Our objective is to analyze the impact that SARS-CoV-2 pandemic over elective and urgent surgery. Results: During the peak occupation of our center Intensive Care Unit (303.8%) there was a reduction on elective (93.8%) and urgent (72.7%) surgery. Mortality of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection who underwent surgery (n = 10) is estimated to be a 10%. An 80% of these patients suffer complications (sever complications in 30%). Conclusions: The actual study shows a global reduction of the surgical activity (elective and urgent) during de SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Global mortality of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection are low, but the severe complications have been over the usual.

Comment on subvesical bile duct injury resolved by percutaneous drainage / Comentario sobre lesión del conducto subvesical resuelta por drenaje percutáneo

No disponible

Evolución de la cirugía laparoscópica en una unidad hepatobiliar de alto volumen: 150 hepatectomías laparoscópicas consecutivas / Evolution of laparoscopic surgery in a high volume hepatobiliary unit: 150 consecutive pure laparoscopic hepatectomies

Introducción: En comparación con otras áreas quirúrgicas, la resección hepática laparoscópica (RHL) no se ha aplicado de forma generalizada y en la actualidad menos del 20% de las hepatectomías se realiza por vía laparoscópica en todo el mundo. El objetivo de nuestro estudio fue evaluar la aplicabilidad y la proporción de RHL en nuestro departamento. Métodos Los datos de morbimortalidad y supervivencia se extrajeron de una base de datos prospectiva con 749 resecciones hepáticas realizadas durante un período de 10 años en un solo centro. Resultados: Entre 2005 y 2015 se realizaron 150 RHL. En el 87% de los pacientes la indicación fue la presencia de tumores hepáticos primarios o metastásicos. Se realizaron 30 hepatectomías mayores (20%) y el 80% fueron resecciones menores, realizadas en todos los segmentos del hígado. Doce pacientes fueron operados 2veces y 2 pacientes tuvieron una tercera RHL. La proporción de RHL aumentó del 12% en 2011 al 62% en el último año. La tasa de conversión fue del 9%. En general, la tasa de morbilidad fue del 36%, pero solo 1/3 se clasificaron como graves. La tasa de mortalidad a los 90 días fue del 1%. La mediana de estancia fue de 4 días y la tasa de reingresos fue del 6%. Conclusiones: La aplicación de RHL ha sido rápida y progresiva, con resultados de morbimortalidad comparables a las de las series publicadas en la literatura. En los últimos 2 años más de la mitad de las hepatectomías se realiza por vía laparoscópica en nuestro centro (AU)

Introduction: Compared to other surgical areas, laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has not been widely implemented and currently less than 20% of hepatectomies are performed laparoscopically worldwide. The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility, and the ratio of implementation of LLR in our department. Methods: We analyzed a prospectively maintained database of 749 liver resections performed during the last 10-year period in a single centre. Results: A total of 150 (20%) consecutive pure LLR were performed between 2005 and 2015. In 87% of patients the indication was the presence ofprimary or metastatic liver malignancy. We performed 30 major hepatectomies (20%) and (80%) were minor resections, performed in all liver segments. Twelve patients were operated twice and 2 patients underwent a third LLR. The proportion of LLR increased from 12% in 2011 to 62% in the last year. Conversion rate was 9%. Overall morbidity rate was 36% but only one third were classified as severe. The 90-day mortality rate was 1%. Median hospital stay was 4 days and the rate of readmissions was 6%. Conclusions: The implementation of LLR has been fast with morbidity and mortality comparable to other published series. In the last 2 years more than half of the hepatectomies are performed laparoscopically in our centre (AU)

Colangiocarcinoma hiliar: el número de ganglios positivos y la relación ganglios positivos/ganglios totales son un factor pronóstico importante de supervivencia / Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: The number of positive nodes and positive node/total node ratio is a significant prognostic factor for survival

INTRODUCCIÓN: El tratamiento quirúrgico del colangiocarcinoma hiliar representa un verdadero desafío. Múltiples factores pronósticos han sido propuestos. El número de ganglios positivos y la relación ganglios positivos y ganglios totales (G+/Gt) son considerados por algunos autores como los más importantes. MATERIAL Y MÉTODO: Se analiza una serie de 58 pacientes con tumores de Klatskin. Se evalúan los factores pronósticos y la supervivencia con especial interés en el impacto pronóstico del número de ganglios positivos y su relación con los ganglios totales. RESULTADOS: La resecabilidad fue de 78% con una sobrevida a 5 años del 32%. La mediana de ganglios estudiados fue de 9,5. No se encontraron diferencias significativas en varios de los factores pronósticos analizados. La presencia de 2 o más ganglios positivos o una relación G+/Gt ≥ 0,2 resultaron ser factores de mal pronóstico. CONCLUSIÓN: La relación entre ganglios positivos sobre los ganglios totales y el número de ganglios positivos son factores pronósticos importantes

INTRODUCTION: Surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma remains a challenge. Multiple prognostic factors have been proposed. The number of positive nodes and the ratio between positive lymph node and total lymph node (G+/Gt) are considered by some authors as the most important factor. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyzed a series of 58 patients with Klatskin tumors. We evaluated the prognostic factors and survival with emphasis on the prognostic impact of the number of positive nodes and its relation to total lymph nodes. RESULTS: Resectability was 78% with a 5-year survival of 32%. The median number of nodes examined was 9.5. No significant differences were found in several of the proposed prognostic factors. The presence of 2 or more positive nodes or a ratio G+/Gt ≥ 0.2 were found to be poor prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: The relationship between positive lymph nodes and total lymph nodes and the number of positive lymph nodes are important prognostic factors

Resultados de las resecciones hepáticas como tratamiento radical de la hidatidosis hepatica en 50 pacientes. / [Liver resections as radical surgery for hepatic hydatidosis: results in 50 patients].

INTRODUCTION: Among several regions in the world hepatic hydatidosis can be considered endemic. Currently there are many available treatments for this disease, been surgery the most effective one. Surgical procedures can be divided in two main groups, radical and non-radical procedures. The goal of this work is to evaluate the morbidity, mortality and percentage of recurrence in patients treated with hepatectomies, comparing them with other publications. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study was carried out in a series from Spain and Argentina. We analyzed the following data: sex, age, type of resection, associated surgical gestures, presence of liver disease, operative time, blood transfusion, morbidity, mortality, hospital stay, re-hospitalization, recurrence and follow up. Dindo--Clavien classification was used for complications, and International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (IHPBA) Brisbane classification for hepatectomies. Mortality was considered until 90 days after surgery. To evaluate the recurence we only included patients followed over 6 months. RESULTS: Indications for liver resections were performed in patients with cysts larger than 5 centimeters, multiple cysts, large cysts, with bile duct communicated or suspicion of this communication. Five patients required blood transfusions (10

) with a median for these 5 patients of 740 ml and 74 ml for the complete series. The median operative time was 186 minutes (range 45 to 1,050 minutes). Median hospital stay was 7.7 days. Monitoring more than 6 months was conducted in 38 patients. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that hepatic hydatid disease is a multifaceted disease and requires more than one therapeutic approach. Hepatectomy with complete resection of the parasite offers the possibility of doing so in a controlled and safe way by experienced hands, ensuring good results in the treatment of this disease.

Resultados de las resecciones hepáticas como tratamiento radical de la hidatidosis hepatica en 50 pacientes / [Liver resections as radical surgery for hepatic hydatidosis: results in 50 patients].

INTRODUCTION: Among several regions in the world hepatic hydatidosis can be considered endemic. Currently there are many available treatments for this disease, been surgery the most effective one. Surgical procedures can be divided in two main groups, radical and non-radical procedures. The goal of this work is to evaluate the morbidity, mortality and percentage of recurrence in patients treated with hepatectomies, comparing them with other publications. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study was carried out in a series from Spain and Argentina. We analyzed the following data: sex, age, type of resection, associated surgical gestures, presence of liver disease, operative time, blood transfusion, morbidity, mortality, hospital stay, re-hospitalization, recurrence and follow up. Dindo--Clavien classification was used for complications, and International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (IHPBA) Brisbane classification for hepatectomies. Mortality was considered until 90 days after surgery. To evaluate the recurence we only included patients followed over 6 months. RESULTS: Indications for liver resections were performed in patients with cysts larger than 5 centimeters, multiple cysts, large cysts, with bile duct communicated or suspicion of this communication. Five patients required blood transfusions (10

) with a median for these 5 patients of 740 ml and 74 ml for the complete series. The median operative time was 186 minutes (range 45 to 1,050 minutes). Median hospital stay was 7.7 days. Monitoring more than 6 months was conducted in 38 patients. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that hepatic hydatid disease is a multifaceted disease and requires more than one therapeutic approach. Hepatectomy with complete resection of the parasite offers the possibility of doing so in a controlled and safe way by experienced hands, ensuring good results in the treatment of this disease.

La estenosis del tronco celiaco y duodenopancreatectomía cefálica: ¿un riesgo infravalorado? / Celiac artery stenosis and cephalic duodenopancreatectomy: An undervalued risk?

Introducción La estenosis significativa del tronco celiaco habitualmente cursa de forma asintomática. No obstante, cuando se interrumpe la arcada de las arterias pancreatoduodenales, puede producirse isquemia visceral. El objetivo de este estudio es determinar si la estenosis preoperatoria del tronco celiaco es un factor de riesgo de complicaciones en pacientes sometidos a duodenopancreatectomía (DPC). Material y métodos Hemos analizado retrospectivamente a 58 pacientes consecutivos sometidos a DPC. Hemos relacionado la estenosis significativa del tronco celiaco con la evolución posquirúrgica. En todos los casos se ha realizado un estudio mediante tomografía computarizada multidetector (TCDM) de 16 canales en tres fases hepáticas. Hemos revisado la TCDM prequirúrgica centrándonos en la morfología del tronco celiaco, especialmente la presencia o ausencia de estenosis significativa (> 50%).Resultados Encontramos estenosis del tronco celiaco > 50% en 13 pacientes (22%). La mortalidad total fue de 3 pacientes (5%). La morbilidad total fue del 62%. En 16 pacientes (28%) hubo complicaciones graves, de los que 8 (62%) pertenecen al grupo de estenosis significativa del tronco celiaco (p=0,004); 10 pacientes (17%) presentaron fístula pancreática, 5 (38%) vs. 5 (11%) (p=0,036); 14 pacientes (24%) necesitaron reoperación, 7 (54%) vs. 7 (16%) (p=0,009); 7 pacientes (12%) presentaron hemoperitoneo, 4 (31%) vs. 3 (7%) (p=0,038), en los grupos con y sin estenosis del tronco celiaco respectivamente. Conclusiones La estenosis radiológicamente significativa del tronco celiaco es un factor de riesgo de complicaciones graves tras DPC. El estudio del calibre de la AMS con TCDM debería ser sistemático antes de una DPC. Debería valorarse preoperatoriamente la corrección de la estenosis significativa del tronco celiaco (AU)

Introduction Significant celiac trunk or artery stenosis (CAS) is normally asymptomatic. However, when the arteries of the pancreatoduodenal arcade are occluded, it could trigger avisceral ischaemia. The objective of this study is to determine whether preoperative CAS is a risk factor for developing complications in patients subjected to duodenopancreatectomy(DPC). Material and methods: We have retrospectively analysed 58 consecutive patients subjected to DPC. We have associated significant CAS with post-surgical outcome. In all cases a 16-channel multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in three hepatic phases was performed. We have reviewed the pre-surgical MDCT focusing on the morphology of the celiacartery (CA), particularly in the presence or absence of significant stenosis (>50%). Results: We found CAS >50% in 13 patients (22%). The overall mortality was 5% (3 patients). Serious complications developed in 16 (28%) patients, 8 (62%) of whom belonged to the group with significant CAS (P = .004). Ten patients (17%) had a pancreatic fistula, 5 (38%) vs. 5 (11%)(P = .036); Fourteen patients (24%) needed new surgery, 7 (54%) vs. 7 (16%) (P = .009); Seven patients (12%) had a haemoperitoneum, 4 (31%) vs. 3 (7%) (P = .038), in the group with and without CAS, respectively. Conclusions: Significant radiological CAS is a risk factor of serious complications after DPC. The study of the calibre of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) with MDCT should beroutine before a DPC. The correction of a significant CAS should be evaluated preoperatively (AU)

Las hepatectomías mayores en pacientes con colangiocarcinoma e ictericia son seguras / Major hepatectomies are safe in patients with cholangiocarcinoma and jaundice

Introducción En el tumor de Klatskin la única posibilidad de cura es la extirpación quirúrgica radical. No obstante, la resección quirúrgica es difícil. Objetivo El objetivo de este trabajo es valorar la necesidad de drenaje biliar preoperatorio, el índice de resecabilidad, el porcentaje de hepatectomías, la morbimortalidad y la supervivencia a largo plazo. Material y métodos Desde el año 2005 hasta el año 2008, se estudió a 26 pacientes con tumor de Klatskin mediante tomografía computarizada helicoidal con multidetectores y colangiorresonancia magnética en casos especiales. Siete pacientes se consideraron irresecables (27%). A los restantes 19 pacientes se les realizaron 8 hepatectomías izquierdas, 5 derechas y 6 resecciones exclusivamente de la vía biliar con linfadenectomía y hepático yeyunostomía a todos ellos. La resecabilidad fue del 73%, la transfusión del 53% y el drenaje biliar preoperatorio se utilizó en 7 casos (37%). La morbilidad fue del 58% y la mortalidad del 10%. La supervivencia y la recidiva a los 48 meses fueron respectivamente del 63 y del 37%.Al comparar la evolución de los 9 pacientes con bilirrubina inferior a 15mg/dl y los 10 pacientes con bilirrubina superior a 15mg/dl, no hubo diferencias en los datos epidemiológicos. Seis pacientes (67%) con bilirrubina baja frente a un paciente (10%) del grupo de bilirrubina alta habían recibido un drenaje biliar preoperatorio (p=0,02). La bilirrubina del grupo no ictérico era de 4,7±4,3 frente a 22,1±3,9 del grupo con ictericia (p<0,001). No hubo diferencias en la evolución postoperatoria. En conclusión, la resecabilidad y la supervivencia postoperatoria de los pacientes con tumor de Klatskin han mejorado sensiblemente en los últimos años. En casos seleccionados, las hepatectomías mayores en pacientes con ictericia sin desnutrición ni colangitis preoperatoria son seguras (AU)

Background Surgical resection is the only possibility of long term survival in patients with Klatskin tumours. However, surgical resection is a challenging problem and hepatic resection is often necessary. Objective The aim of our study was to assess the need for biliary drainage, resection rate and outcome of hilar cholangiocarcinoma in a single tertiary referral centre. Patients and methods From 2005 to 2008, 26 patients with Klatskin tumours were identified and assessed prospectively with multidetector CT and MR cholangiography in special cases. Seven patients (27%) were deemed to be unresectable in pre-operative staging. A total of 19 surgical procedures were performed, 8 left hepatectomies, 5 right hepatectomies and 6 resections exclusively of the biliary tree. Resection rate was 73%, transfusion rate 53% and preoperative biliary drainage was performed only in 7 cases (37%). Major complications occurred in 11 (58%), including two post-operative deaths (10%).There were no differences in the epidemiological data, when we separately analysed the outcomes of the 9 patients with bilirubin <15mg/dL and the 10 patients with bilirubin >15mg/dL. Biliary drainage was required in 6 (67%) patients in the group with low bilirubin levels vs. 1(10%) in the other group (P=0.02). The mean bilirubin level in the jaundiced group was 22.1±3.9 vs. 4.7±4.3 (P<0.001) in the other group. There were no differences in the postoperative outcome between both groups. Conclusion Resection and survival rates have increased recently but still carries the risk of significant morbidity and mortality. Major hepatectomies in selected patients without percutaneous biliary drainage are safe (AU)

Resultados de la cirugía hepatobiliopancreática en un servicio de cirugía de un hospital de segundo nivel según los GRD durante el bienio 2005-2006 / Results of hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery according to DRG in a level 2 hospital surgery department during the years 2005-2006

Objetivo. Evaluar los resultados de la cirugía hepatobiliopancreática de un servicio de cirugía durante el bienio 2005-2006, mediante los grupos relacionados por el diagnóstico. Materiales y método. Los datos se han obtenido del Registro del Conjunto Mínimo Básico de Datos de los Hospitales de Agudos del CatSalut. Se ha valorado la frecuencia, la estancia y la mortalidad. Los resultados han sido comparados con los 63 hospitales públicos de Cataluña (XHUP) y con los 8 de ellos que pertenecen al Instituto Catalán de la Salud (ICS). Resultados. Se observa, en nuestra área de influencia, una clara tendencia a la referencia para cierto tipo de procedimientos complejos (7-11%), sin superarla proporción poblacional (12%). En nuestro centro, el impacto en las estancias hospitalarias es más evidente en los procedimientos complejos. El ahorro total de recursos de nuestro servicio en el bienio2005-2006 en relación con el grupo de hospitales de la XHUP fue de 2.212 días de estancia hospitalaria, cuyo coste equivale a más de un millón de euros. La frecuencia y los resultados sobre las estancias hospitalarias y la mortalidad de la colecistectomía son los esperados para la población que se atiende como hospital general. La mortalidad en los procedimientos complejos fue la mitad que la observada para el conjunto de hospitales de la XHUP o del ICS. Conclusiones. En la patología hepatobiliopancreática compleja, creemos que la mortalidad y el ahorro de recursos en nuestro centro se deben no sólo al volumen, sino a la especialización y los factores relacionados con la estructura del servicio y el entrenamiento de los cirujanos (AU)

Objective. To assess the results of the hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery of a surgery department during2005-2006 using the diagnostic related groups. Materials and method. The data were obtained from the CMBD-HA of the Catalan Health Service. We assessed the frequency, hospital stay and mortality of the surgical procedures. The results were compared with the 63 public hospitals, and the 8 of them belonging to the Catalan Health Institute. Results. In our area, a clear trend is observed in referrals for certain types of complex procedures on the liver, pancreas and biliary system excluding cholecystectomy with or without associated morbidities(7-11%) without exceeding the population percentage(12%). In our centre, the impact on hospital stay is more evident in complex procedures. The total savings in our centre during the years 2005-2006 compared with the XHUP hospitals group were 2212 days of hospital stay with an equivalent cost saving of more than one million euro. The frequency and the results of hospital stay and mortality of laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy were those expected for the population covered by a general hospital. The mortality in complex procedures was half of that of the whole public network or the ICS centres. Conclusions. In the complex hepatobiliary-pancreatic pathology, the mortality, and cost savings in our centre appear to be the result of, not only the high volume of procedures, but also to specialization and factors related to the structure of the department, and surgeon training (AU)