Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 32(2): 353-363, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37141226

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Radial head arthroplasty (RHA) is commonly used for the treatment of comminuted radial head fractures. Indications as well as implant types continue to evolve. RHA has had good outcomes with midterm longevity. The literature is limited to small case series with varying implant types, and larger studies are needed to determine the optimal implant type and radial head diameter. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of RHA cases performed by 75 surgeons at 14 medical centers in an integrated health care system between 2006 and 2017 was completed. Patient demographics, comorbidities, implant type and head diameter, and indications for revision were recorded. Patients' in-person clinical visit data were recorded. Patients were also contacted via telephone at a minimum of 2 years to obtain abbreviated Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire and Oxford scores. Implant survivorship was also captured within our integrated system. RESULTS: 405 cases met our inclusion criteria. Mean age was 51.5 ± 15.5 years (range 16-88 years) and more common in females (62%). Chart review and telephone follow-up was performed at a mean of 68.9 ± 31.5 months (range 24-146 months). Our study found that revision rate was positively correlated with increasing radial head diameter. A 26-mm head had 7.7 odds of revision compared to a size 18-mm head (95% confidence interval 1.2-150.1). More than 95% of revision cases were performed within the first 36 months of the index procedure. Obese patients had a significantly lower mean postoperative Oxford score (35.5) compared to controls (38.3) (P = .02). There was a significantly higher overall reoperation rate for terrible triad (18.4%) vs. isolated injuries (10.4%) (P = .04). There was no difference between Acumed Anatomic and Evolve radial head implants in overall reoperation, implant revision, postoperative range of motion, or patient-reported outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Risk of revision is directly correlated with implanted radial head diameter. There were no differences in outcomes and complications between the 2 main implants used. Individuals who did not undergo a revision by 3 years' time tend to retain the implant. Terrible triad injuries had a higher all-cause reoperation rate than isolated radial head fractures, but no difference in the rate of RHA revision. These data reinforce the practice of downsizing radial head implant diameter.


Subject(s)
Elbow Joint , Radius Fractures , Female , Humans , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Elbow Joint/surgery , Radius/surgery , Radius/injuries , Radius Fractures/surgery , Arthroplasty , Range of Motion, Articular
2.
Arch Bone Jt Surg ; 10(11): 969-975, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36561227

ABSTRACT

Background: Compare the recurrence rate of paresthesias in patients undergoing primary cubital tunnel surgery in those with and without wrapping of the ulnar nerve with the human amniotic membrane (HAM). Methods: A retrospective investigation of patients undergoing primary cubital tunnel surgery with a minimum 90-day follow-up was performed. Patients were excluded if the nerve was wrapped using another material, associated traumatic injury, simultaneous Guyon's canal release, or revision procedures. Failure was defined as those patients who experienced initial complete resolution of symptoms (paresthesias) but then developed recurrence of paresthesias. Results: A total of 57 controls (CON) and 21 treated with HAM met our inclusion criteria. There was a difference in the mean age of CON (48.4 ± 13.5 years) and HAM (30.6 ± 15) (P< 0.0001). There was no difference in gender mix (P=0.4), the severity of symptoms (P=0.13), and length of follow-up (P=0.084). None of 21 (0%) treated with HAM developed recurrence of symptoms compared to 11 of 57 (19.3%) (P=0.03) (CON). Using a multivariate regression model adjusted for age and procedure type, CON was 24.4 (95% CI=1.26-500, P=0.0348) times higher risk than HAM of developing a recurrence of symptoms. Conclusion: The HAM wrapping used in primary cubital tunnel surgery significantly reduced recurrence rates of paresthesias. Further prospective studies with randomization should be carried out to better understand the role HAM can play in cubital tunnel surgery.

3.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 29(8): 1530-1537, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32713464

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR) has allowed the return of overhead athletes to throwing sports. We describe a new double suspensory (DS) technique using a single tunnel in the ulna and humerus, achieving fixation with adjustable loop buttons. METHODS: Inclusion criteria included skeletally mature baseball players with clinical and magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of UCL insufficiency who failed a trial of structured nonoperative treatment. A total of 36 baseball players underwent DS UCLR, between 2011 and 2017, by 1 surgeon with minimum 2-year follow-up. The graft was fixated with an adjustable button loop on the humeral side and a tension slide technique with a button on the ulnar side. Pre- and postoperative Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic and Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation and postoperative Conway scores were obtained. RESULTS: The mean age was 19.8 ± 4.6 years (range, 14-35 years). All were male. Mean years played before surgery was 14.3 ± 4.6 years (range, 8-28 years). There were 32 (89%) pitchers and 4 (11%) position players. There were 13 (36%) high school, 20 (55%) college, 2 (6%) minor league, and 1 (3%) adult league athletes. The mean follow-up was 55.3 ± 23.7 months (range, 26-97 months). There was significant improvement in Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic (33.2 ± 19.9 to 89.7 ± 15.1, P < .0001) and Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (20.7 ± 16.7 to 93.6 ± 11.9, P < .0001) scores. Using Conway scoring, 25 (69%) had excellent, 5 (14%) good, 3 (8%) fair, and 3 (8%) poor scores. Mean return to play was 9 ± 1.5 months (range, 6-16 months). Only 1 (3%) athlete required a revision surgery and ultimately returned to play and 1 (3%) hardware removal. None developed ulnar nerve symptoms. CONCLUSION: DS fixation for UCLR in baseball players can lead to excellent clinical results and early return to play.


Subject(s)
Baseball/injuries , Collateral Ligament, Ulnar/surgery , Elbow Joint/surgery , Return to Sport , Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Collateral Ligament, Ulnar/injuries , Elbow Joint/diagnostic imaging , Elbow Joint/physiopathology , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Postoperative Period , Reoperation , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL