ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To describe experiences with contraception counseling training and provision of obstetrics and gynecology residents training in California and Florida. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a mixed-methods study of obstetrics and gynecology residents training across 19 programs (with approximately 428 residents) in California and Florida from September 2022 through February 2023. We asked participants how often they use tiered-effectiveness counseling, their satisfaction with contraception counseling practices, and experiences with witnessing and recognizing contraception coercion. We asked about personal disappointment when patients decline long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) and pressure from faculty to prescribe LARC. To further explore resident contraception counseling education and behaviors, we conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with a subset of 20 survey volunteers. RESULTS: We received survey responses from 155 (36.2%) participants. Most (n = 113 [76.4%]) often or always reported using tiered-effectiveness counseling. While few participants (n = 17 [11.3%]) reported feeling pressure from faculty to convince a patient to keep a LARC, some (n = 34 [22.1%]) reported they often or always feel disappointed when a patient chooses LARC removal, with more Florida participants reporting disappointment (n = 19 [37.3%]) compared to California (n = 15 [14.6%], p = 0.01). We identified two main themes from the telephone interviews. First, residents feel they have limited formal education on how to provide contraceptive counseling and commonly learn these practices by emulating supervising faculty or peer counseling styles. Second, residents are informally taught, through feedback and interactions with supervising faculty and peers, that successful contraception counseling is the ability to convince patients to use highly effective contraception. CONCLUSION: When residents lack formalized contraception counseling education, they adopt counseling behaviors that may not be patient centered. IMPLICATIONS: When obstetrics and gynecology residents lack formalized contraception counseling education, they learn practices that may lead to coercive counseling behaviors during training. Resident education should include recognition and mitigation of contraception coercion and patient-centered counseling both through a formalized curriculum and socialization of trainees during their medical education.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Patients with intrauterine fetal demise (IUFD) are at higher risk of complications when undergoing dilation and evacuation (D&E) compared to patients undergoing abortion for other indications. We aimed to compare baseline characteristics and describe outcomes, including frequencies of complications such as disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and hemorrhage, in patients undergoing D&E for IUFD vs induced abortion, with a goal of identifying associated risk factors for complications. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective matched cohort study of patients undergoing nonemergent D&Es for singleton ≥14-0/7-week IUFD January 1, 2019 to May 31, 2021, matched with two patients undergoing induced second-trimester D&Es by cesarean delivery history, patient age, and gestational age (GA). We collected demographics, history, GA, coagulation studies, quantitative blood loss (QBL), and complications. We calculated descriptive statistics and tested for association using chi-square, Fisher's exact, t, and Wilcoxon's rank sum tests. RESULTS: Of 1390 procedures, 64 patients with IUFD met inclusion criteria and were matched with 128 patients undergoing induced D&E. Eight (12.5%) patients with IUFD and six (4.7%) undergoing induced D&E had hemorrhage (odds ratio [OR] = 2.90, 95% confidence interval [0.96, 8.77]). Six (9.4%) patients with IUFD and none undergoing induced D&E had DIC (OR = 28.56 [1.58, 515.38]). Median QBL was 75.0 mL (50, 162.5) for patients with IUFD vs 110.0 mL (50, 200) for those undergoing induced D&E (p = 0.083). Twelve (18.8%) patients with IUFD vs seven (5.5%) undergoing induced D&E received at least one intervention due to bleeding complications (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: We found a higher DIC frequency but no significant difference in hemorrhage or QBL in IUFD D&E compared to induced abortion. Our IUFD D&E complication frequency is higher than those previously published. IMPLICATIONS: Our results affirm current standards of care for D&E in patients with IUFD. Large referral centers may have higher proportions of complications compared to other sites.