Prevalence and impact of fertility concerns in young women with breast cancer.

Survey data from the Mayo Clinic Breast Disease Registry were used to assess fertility counseling and fertility preservation strategies in a modern cohort of young women with breast cancer. One hundred respondents were identified who were under age 50 at the time of breast cancer diagnosis and who expressed interest in future childbearing near the time of diagnosis and/or 1 year later. Ninety-three percent of the 81 respondents to the year one survey recalled fertility counseling prior to cancer treatment. Most who reported a high level of fertility concern declared that this concern had impacted their treatment decisions, often shortening their planned duration of endocrine therapy. Approximately half had taken steps to preserve future fertility, and a third had used a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist either alone or combined with another method (e.g., embryo or oocyte cryopreservation).

In Their Own Words, "Waiting Sucks:" A Qualitative Study of Medical Testing-Related Anxiety in Patients with Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This qualitative study sought to learn from patients with cancer -- in their own words -- about anxiety associated with medical testing. METHODS: Patients with cancer or a history of cancer were recruited from an oncology clinic. After oral consent, each was interviewed in person. A semi-structured interview guide was used to help focus the interviews. Interviews were then recorded, transcribed, and analyzed with rigorous qualitative methods. RESULTS: Twenty patients are the focus of this report, which highlights 2 main themes from the data. The first is that anxiety related to medical testing is a real entity. Although not all patients experienced it, those who did described it as such ("I was a little apprehensive." "It's the anticipation." "I don't think it bothers me until I get near the time for testing."). The second theme focused on coping. Patients offered insight on how to cope ("So I just deal with it and work." "And don't let myself sink into a pity pot …." "See your scan as a tool instead of … instead of um … a death sentence, I suppose."). CONCLUSION: In patients with cancer, the anxiety from medical testing is real, could perhaps be mitigated by sharing coping methods from patient to patient, and merits further study.

Understanding "Patient refuses" among 90+ year old patients with cancer or presumed cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Patients who are 90+ years of age are a growing - but understudied - group at risk for cancer. Because many of these patients are undertreated (with no tissue/cytologic diagnosis), we sought to better understand how such decisions are arrived upon. METHODS: This study focused on patients between 2007 and 2017. None had received cancer therapy. Medical records were reviewed for quotations relevant to decision-making and analyzed qualitatively. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients (median age 93 years) with a cancer diagnosis/presumed diagnosis were identified; most were women (82%) with an average of six co-morbidities (dementia occurred in approximately one-third). The primary qualitative theme was a keen appreciation on the part of all stakeholders of the gravity of the decision to forgo a cancer work-up/therapy, with four subthemes: 1) substantial, detailed medical information about the patient's medical condition ("600 mL of yellow, hazy fluid with an LDH [lactate dehydrogenase] level greater than 450 …"); 2) complex discussions about the risks and benefits of no biopsy and/or no cancer treatment ("[the patient] would not prefer to have the quality of any remaining time ruined with salvage chemo and radiation"); 3) the inclusion of multiple individuals in decision-making ("I had a lengthy discussion with the patient and her daughter;" "I spoke by phone with one of my pathology colleagues"); and 4) patient-voiced decision-making ("I want to die."). CONCLUSION: Healthcare providers appear to understand the seriousness of no cancer-directed therapy and no work-up in patients 90 years of age and older. Neither ageism nor nihilism was observed.

Patient and Clinician Satisfaction With Diabetes Group Visits in Community Health Centers.

Diabetes group visits (GVs) have been shown to improve glycemic control and quality of care. However, little is known about the patient and clinician experience. We trained staff to conduct a 6-month GV intervention at six community health centers (CHCs) for adults with uncontrolled diabetes. Patient satisfaction was analyzed using postintervention surveys. Clinician satisfaction was analyzed through pre and posttraining surveys and 1:1 semistructured interviews. Twenty-seven staff and clinicians were trained. Fifty-one adult patients were enrolled and 90% reported high satisfaction with the program. Patients enjoyed longer visits with peer support and felt better equipped to manage barriers to diabetes control. 88% of staff reported that they enjoyed taking part in the program and noted improved team morale, professional development, and increased interdisciplinary collaboration. Perceived challenges of GVs included time investment for a new program, integration into workflow, and staff turnover. Patient and staff satisfaction was high across multiple domains. Staff noted many benefits but reported challenges with patient recruitment and retention as well as the time needed to implement GVs.

Metastatic or suspected metastatic cancer in patients 90 years of age or older: A single-institution, multi-site study.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic cancer in nonagenarians and those older is rare and understudied. Here we explored whether these patients appear to benefit from antineoplastic therapy and whether outcomes differ based on whether or not untreated patients had a histologic/cytologic confirmation of cancer. METHODS: In this single-institution, multi-site study, we reviewed 10 years of consecutive medical records of patients 90+ years of age with a histologic/cytologic cancer diagnosis and metastatic cancer or, alternatively, a presumed metastatic cancer diagnosis. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients are the focus with a median age of 93 years (range: 90, 103 years). Patients fell into 3 groups: 1) no tissue/cytologic cancer diagnosis and no treatment (=23); 2) tissue/cytologic diagnosis but no treatment (n = 21); and 3) cancer treatment rendered (n = 24). The median survival in groups 1,2, and 3 was 5 weeks (95% confidence interval (CI): 2, 11 weeks), 9 weeks (95% CI: 3, 23 weeks), and 60 weeks (95% CI: 38 weeks, not yet reached), respectively. For those patients in group 3 who received cancer therapy, chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery were administered in 11 (16%), 6 (9%), and 4 (6%), respectively. Fourteen received other cancer therapy: hormonal therapy (n = 6), targeted therapy (n = 6), and immunotherapy (n = 2). Only one patient experienced an adverse event that required hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Although these older patients likely received cancer treatment on a selective basis, such treatment was associated with improved survival and was well-tolerated. However, based on survival outcomes, one might question whether to put patients through a biopsy, if they have limited therapeutic options.