Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Heliyon ; 10(9): e30703, 2024 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38756588

ABSTRACT

The progression of liver diseases, from viral hepatitis and fatty liver disease to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), is the most representative series of pathological events in liver diseases. While serotonin (5-HT) primarily regulates brain functions such as psychology, mood, and appetite in the central nervous system (CNS), peripheral 5-HT plays a crucial role in regulating tumor development, glucose and lipid metabolism, immune function and inflammatory response related to liver diseases. These peripheral physiological processes involving 5-HT are the key mechanisms driving the development of these liver diseases. This study presents an overview of the existing literature, focusing on the role of 5-HT in HCC, cirrhosis, fatty liver disease, viral hepatitis, and liver injury. In summary, while 5-HT promotes liver regeneration, it can also contribute to the progression of chronic liver disease. These findings indicate the potential for the development and use of 5-HT-related drugs for the treatment of liver diseases, including HCC and cirrhosis.

2.
Int J Surg ; 109(12): 4333-4346, 2023 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37720925

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Robotic platform has been increasingly applied in major hepatectomy. However, the role or advantage of robotic approach comparing with laparoscopic approach in major hepatectomy remains controversial. This meta-analysis compares perioperative outcomes of robotic major hepatectomy (RMH) to laparoscopic major hepatectomy (LMH) for hepatic neoplasms. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched to identify comparative studies compared RMH versus LMH for hepatic neoplasms. The search timeframe was set before May 2023. Main outcomes were mortality, overall morbidities, serious complications, and conversion to open surgery. Secondary outcomes were operative time, intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion, postoperative length of hospital stay, R0 resection, reoperation, and readmission. Studies were evaluated for quality by Cochrane risk of bias tool or Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Data were pooled as odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD). This study was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42023410951). RESULTS: Twelve retrospective cohort studies concerning total 1657 patients (796 RMH, 861 LMH) were included. Meta-analyses showed no significant differences in mortality (OR=1.23, 95% CI=0.50-2.98, P =0.65), overall postoperative complications (OR=0.83, 95% CI=0.65-1.06, P =0.14), operative time (MD=6.47, 95% CI=-14.72 to 27.65, P =0.55), blood transfusion (OR=0.77, 95% CI=0.55-1.08, P =0.13), R0 resection (OR=1.45, 95% CI=0.91-2.31, P =0.12), reoperation (OR=0.76, 95% CI=0.31-1.88, P =0.56), and readmission (OR=0.63, 95% CI=0.28-1.44, P =0.27) between RMH and LMH. Incidence of serious complications (OR=0.60, 95% CI=0.40-0.90, P =0.01), conversion to open surgery (OR=0.41, 95% CI=0.27-0.63, P <0.0001), blood loss (MD=-91.42, 95% CI=-142.18 to -40.66, P =0.0004), and postoperative hospital stay (MD=-0.64, 95% CI=-0.78 to -0.49, P <0.00001) were reduced for RMH versus LMH. CONCLUSIONS: RMH is associated with comparable short-term surgical outcomes and oncologic adequacy compared to LMH when performed by experienced surgeons at large centres. RMH may result in reduced major morbidities, conversion rate, blood loss, and hospital stay, but these results were volatile. Further randomized studies should address the potential advantages of RMH over LMH.


Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Liver Neoplasms , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Humans , Hepatectomy/methods , Robotic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Laparoscopy/methods , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Length of Stay , Operative Time , Treatment Outcome
4.
Cell Death Discov ; 9(1): 115, 2023 Apr 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37019879

ABSTRACT

Hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury (HIRI) is a major complication of liver resection or liver transplantation that can seriously affect patient's prognosis. There is currently no definitive and effective treatment strategy for HIRI. Autophagy is an intracellular self-digestion pathway initiated to remove damaged organelles and proteins, which maintains cell survival, differentiation, and homeostasis. Recent studies have shown that autophagy is involved in the regulation of HIRI. Numerous drugs and treatments can change the outcome of HIRI by controlling the pathways of autophagy. This review mainly discusses the occurrence and development of autophagy, the selection of experimental models for HIRI, and the specific regulatory pathways of autophagy in HIRI. Autophagy has considerable potential in the treatment of HIRI.

5.
Front Oncol ; 13: 1153353, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37056336

ABSTRACT

Background: The relationship between cuproptosis and HCC is still in the exploratory stage. Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have recently been linked to the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the clinical significance of lncRNAs associated with cuproptosis remains unclear. Methods: Based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC) dataset, we identified characteristic prognostic lncRNAs by univariate, LASSO, and multifactorial regression analysis, and constructed a prognostic signature of cuproptosis-related lncRNAs in HCC. The role of lncRNAs were identified through CCK-8, clone formation in Huh-7 cells with high expression of FDX1. Prognostic potential of the characteristic lncRNAs was evaluated in each of the two cohorts created by randomly dividing the TCGA cohort into a training cohort and a test cohort in a 1:1 ratio. Immune profiles in defined subgroups of cuproptosis-related lncRNA features as well as drug sensitivity were analyzed. Results: We constructed a multigene signature based on four characteristic prognostic lncRNAs (AL590705.3, LINC02870, KDM4A-AS1, MKLN1-AS). These four lncRNAs participated in the development of cuproptosis. HCC patients were classified into high-risk and low-risk groups based on the median value of the risk score. The receiver operating characteristic curve area under the curve values for 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival were 0.773, 0.728, and 0.647, respectively, for the training cohort, and 0.764, 0.671, and 0.662, respectively, for the test cohort. Univariate and multifactorial regression analyses indicated that this prognostic feature was an independent prognostic factor for HCC. Principal component analysis plots clearly distinguished between low- and high-risk patients in terms of their probability of survival. Furthermore, gene set enrichment analysis showed that a variety of processes associated with tumor proliferation and progression were enriched in the high-risk group compared with the low-risk group. Moreover, there were significant differences in the expression of immune cell subpopulations, immune checkpoint genes, and potential drug screening, which provided distinct therapeutic recommendations for individuals with various risks. Conclusions: We constructed a novel cuproptosis-associated lncRNA signature with a significant predictive value for the prognosis of patients with HCC. Cuproptosis-associated lncRNAs are associated with the tumor immune microenvironment of HCC and even the efficacy of tumor immunotherapy.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL