ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Our aim was to update evidence-based and consensus-based recommendations for the surgical and interventional management of blunt or penetrating injuries to the chest in patients with multiple and/or severe injuries on the basis of current evidence. This guideline topic is part of the 2022 update of the German Guideline on the Treatment of Patients with Multiple and/or Severe Injuries. METHODS: MEDLINE and Embase were systematically searched to May and June 2021 respectively for the update and new questions. Further literature reports were obtained from clinical experts. Randomised controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, cross-sectional studies and comparative registry studies were included if they compared interventions for the surgical management of injuries to the chest in patients with multiple and/or severe injuries. We considered patient-relevant clinical outcomes such as mortality, length of stay, and diagnostic test accuracy. Risk of bias was assessed using NICE 2012 checklists. The evidence was synthesised narratively, and expert consensus was used to develop recommendations and determine their strength. RESULTS: One study was identified. This study compared wedge resection, lobectomy and pneumonectomy in the management of patients with severe chest trauma that required some form of lung resection. Based on the updated evidence and expert consensus, one recommendation was modified and two additional good practice points were developed. All achieved strong consensus. The recommendation on the amount of blood loss that is used as an indication for surgical intervention in patients with chest injuries was modified to reflect new findings in trauma care and patient stabilisation. The new good clinical practice points (GPPs) on the use of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in patients with initial circulatory stability are also in line with current practice in patient care. CONCLUSION: As has been shown in recent decades, the treatment of chest trauma has become less and less invasive for the patient as diagnostic and technical possibilities have expanded. Examples include interventional stenting of aortic injuries, video-assisted thoracoscopy and parenchyma-sparing treatment of lung injuries. These less invasive treatment concepts reduce morbidity and mortality in the primary surgical phase following a chest trauma.
ABSTRACT
The aim of this article is to present the importance of a structured and situation-adapted approach based on the diagnostic and therapeutic strategy in the interdisciplinary treatment of 54 patients with deep sternal wound infections (DSWI) after cardiac surgical interventions and the results achieved. The patients were 41 men and 13 women with an average age of 65.1 years, who developed a DSWI after a cardiac surgical intervention during the period 2003-2016. The treatment strategy included a thorough debridement including the removal of indwelling foreign material, the reconstruction with a stable re-osteosynthesis after overcoming the infection and if necessary, situation-related surgical flaps for a defect coverage with a good blood supply and mandatory avoidance of dead spaces. A total of 146 operations were necessary (average 2.7 operations/patient, range 1-7 operations). In 24.1â¯% of the cases a one-stage approach could be carried out. In 41 patients negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) with programmed sponge changing was used for wound conditioning (mean 5 changes, standard deviation, SD±â¯5.6 changes over 22 days, SD±â¯23.9 days, change interval every 3-4 days in 40.7% of the cases). In 33 patients a bilateral myocutaneous pectoralis major flap was used, in 4 patients a vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap and in 7 patients both were carried out. A total of 43 osteosynthesis procedures were carried out on the sternum with fixed-angle titanium plates. Of the patients 7 died during intensive care unit treatment (total mortality 13â¯%, nâ¯= 5, 9.3â¯% ≤â¯30 days) or in the later course. Of the patients 47 (87.1â¯%) could be discharged with a cleansed infection. In 2 patients the implant was removed after 2 years due to loosening.
Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Foreign Bodies , Male , Humans , Female , Aged , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Clinical Protocols , Fracture Fixation, Internal , Intensive Care UnitsABSTRACT
Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) may be considered as a rescue attempt for highly selected patients with refractory cardiac arrest and potentially reversible etiology. Currently there are no randomized, controlled studies on eCPR, and valid predictors of benefit and outcome which might guide the indication for eCPR are lacking. Currently selection criteria and procedures differ across hospitals and standardized algorithms are lacking. Based on expert opinion, the present consensus statement provides a proposal for a standardized treatment algorithm for eCPR.
Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Heart Arrest , Consensus , Heart Arrest/therapy , Humans , Patient SelectionABSTRACT
Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) may be considered as a rescue attempt for highly selected patients with refractory cardiac arrest and potentially reversible etiology. Currently there are no randomized, controlled studies on eCPR, and valid predictors of benefit and outcome which might guide the indication for eCPR are lacking. Currently selection criteria and procedures differ across hospitals and standardized algorithms are lacking. Based on expert opinion, the present consensus statement provides a proposal for a standardized treatment algorithm for eCPR.
Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/methods , Heart Arrest/therapy , Algorithms , Consensus , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/methods , HumansABSTRACT
An update of the S3- guidelines for treatment of cardiac surgery patients in the intensive care unit, hemodynamic monitoring and cardiovascular system was published by the Association of Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF) in January 2018. This publication updates the guidelines from 2006 and 2011. The guidelines include nine sections that in addition to different methods of hemodynamic monitoring also reviews the topic of volume therapy as well as vasoactive and inotropic drugs. Furthermore, the guidelines also define the goals for cardiovascular treatment. This article describes the most important innovations of these comprehensive guidelines.
Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures/standards , Critical Care/standards , Thoracic Surgery/standards , Cardiovascular Agents/therapeutic use , Germany , Guidelines as Topic , Hemodynamic Monitoring , HumansABSTRACT
A growing number of patients with increasingly complex or specialized diseases are being treated in hospitals worldwide. The treatment requirements of some of these patients are exceeding the capacity of standard nursing units. However, the severity of these diseases or the treatment requirements for these specific clinical pictures do not always justify admission to an intensive care unit. For this reason, an increasing number of special units (intermediate care units) are being set up to offer highly specialized treatment and close monitoring, in order to fulfil an intermediate role between the standard care unit and the intensive care unit. The recommendations of the German Interdisciplinary Association for Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (DIVI) on the personnel, capacity, equipment and structure of these units are intended to provide the framework for the setting up and operation of intermediate care units in collaboration with experts on both an evidence-based and an expert-based basis (where scientific evidence is not available). Where only minimal or indirect evidence is available, patient safety is paramount in the formulation of the recommendation.
Subject(s)
Emergency Medicine , Intensive Care Units , Intermediate Care Facilities , Critical Care , HumansABSTRACT
The reimbursement of intensive care and nursing services in the German health system is based on the diagnosis-related groups (G-DRG) system. Due to the lack of a central hospital planning, the GDRG system has become the most important influence on the development of the German health system. Compared to other countries, intensive care in Germany is characterized by a high number of intensive care beds, a low nurse-to-patient ratio, no official definition of the level of care, and a minimal available data set from intensive care units (ICUs). Under the given circumstances, a shortage of qualified intensive care nurses and physicians is currently the largest threat for intensive care in Germany. To address these deficiencies, we suggest the following measures: (1) Integration of ICUs into the levels of care which are currently developed for emergency centers at hospitals. (2) Mandatory collection of structured data sets from all ICUs including quality criteria. (3) A reform of intensive care and nursing reimbursement under consideration of adequate staffing in the individual ICU. (4) Actions to improve ICU staffing and qualification.