Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters











Publication year range
1.
Am J Transplant ; 13(4): 954-960, 2013 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23433356

ABSTRACT

Hyperacute kidney rejection is unusual in crossmatch positive recipients of simultaneous liver-kidney transplants (SLKT). However, recent data suggest that these patients remain at risk for antibody-mediated kidney rejection. To further investigate the risk associated with donor-specific alloantibodies (DSA) in SLKT, we studied 86 consecutive SLKT patients with an available pre-SLKT serum sample. Serum samples were analyzed in a blinded fashion for HLA DSA using single antigen beads (median florescence intensity≥2,000=positive). Post-SLKT samples were analyzed when available (76%). Thirty patients had preformed DSA, and nine developed de novo DSA. Preformed class I DSA did not change the risk of rejection, patient or allograft survival. In contrast, preformed class II DSA was associated with a markedly increased risk of renal antibody mediated rejection (AMR) (p=0.006), liver allograft rejection (p=0.002), patient death (p=0.02), liver allograft loss (p=0.02) and renal allograft loss (p=0.045). Multivariable modeling showed class II DSA (preformed or de novo) to be an independent predictor of patient death (HR=2.2; p=0.043) and liver allograft loss (HR=2.2; p=0.044). These data warrant reconsideration of the approach to DSA in SLKT.


Subject(s)
Histocompatibility Antigens Class II/immunology , Isoantibodies/classification , Kidney Transplantation/methods , Liver Failure/mortality , Liver Transplantation/methods , Renal Insufficiency/mortality , Adult , Biopsy , Female , Graft Rejection/immunology , Graft Survival/immunology , Humans , Isoantibodies/blood , Liver Failure/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Registries , Renal Insufficiency/therapy , Risk Factors , Transplantation, Homologous , Young Adult
2.
Br J Surg ; 87(8): 1030-4, 2000 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10931046

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Gunshot wounds of the liver may result in substantial morbidity and death, and optimal management of complex injuries is controversial. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-three patients with civilian gunshot liver injuries were treated during the 10-year period 1986-1995. Demographic, clinical and operative data were recorded. Factors influencing postoperative complications and death were analysed. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-two patients (93 per cent) had single missile injuries and 11 (7 per cent) had shotgun injuries. Three patients were treated non-operatively and 150 patients underwent operation. In 105 patients (70 per cent) the injuries to the liver were minor and required either no treatment (93) or simple suture of bleeding vessels (12). Forty-five patients (30 per cent) had major injuries which were either packed only (26) or required more complex surgical intervention (19). This included resectional debridement (ten), major venous repair (eight) and hepatotomy (one); eight of these patients required packing combined with the procedure. Associated intra-abdominal injuries occurred in 115 patients (77 per cent). The overall mortality rate was 17 per cent (26 patients). Death was directly attributable to the liver injury in 13 patients (8 per cent), 12 of whom died from uncontrolled bleeding. Complications occurred in 63 (51 per cent) of 124 survivors, and correlated with the type and severity of the liver injury and the number of associated injuries. CONCLUSION: Most gunshot liver injuries can be managed by simple surgical techniques. In complex injuries control of major haemorrhage is vital and perihepatic packing may be life saving before undertaking definitive repair of the injury under controlled conditions.


Subject(s)
Liver/injuries , Wounds, Gunshot/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Care/methods , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Retrospective Studies , South Africa/epidemiology , Wounds, Gunshot/mortality
5.
Genève; Comité d’Experts de l’Epidémiologie de l’Onchocercose; 1975. (ONCHO/WP/75.29).
in French | WHO IRIS | ID: who-365471
6.
Geneva; Expert Committee on Epidemiology of Onchocerciasis; 1975. (ONCHO/WP/75.29).
in English | WHO IRIS | ID: who-365470
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL