Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
J Hum Nutr Diet ; 29(5): 549-75, 2016 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27272325

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The first British Dietetic Association (BDA) guidelines for the dietary management of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in adults were published in 2012. Subsequently, there has been a wealth of new research. The aim of this work was to systematically review the evidence for the role of diet in the management of IBS and to update the guidelines. METHODS: Twelve questions relating to diet and IBS were defined based on review of the previous guideline questions, current evidence and clinical practice. Chosen topics were on healthy eating and lifestyle (alcohol, caffeine, spicy food, elimination diets, fat and fluid intakes and dietary habits), milk and dairy, dietary fibre, fermentable carbohydrates, gluten, probiotics and elimination diets/food hypersensitivity. Data sources were CINAHL, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Medline, Scopus and Web of Science up to October 2015. Studies were assessed independently in duplicate using risk of bias tools specific to each included study based on inclusion and exclusion criteria for each question. National Health and Medical Research Council grading evidence levels were used to develop evidence statements and recommendations, in accordance with Practice-based Evidence in Nutrition Global protocol used by the BDA. RESULTS: Eighty-six studies were critically appraised to generate 46 evidence statements, 15 clinical recommendations and four research recommendations. The IBS dietary algorithm was simplified to first-line (healthy eating, provided by any healthcare professional) and second-line [low FODMAP (fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols) to be provided by dietitian] dietary advice. CONCLUSIONS: These guidelines provide updated comprehensive evidence-based details to achieve the successful dietary management of IBS in adults.


Subject(s)
Diet, Healthy , Evidence-Based Medicine , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/diet therapy , Adult , Dietary Carbohydrates/metabolism , Dietary Carbohydrates/therapeutic use , Dietary Supplements , Dietetics , Dysbiosis/drug therapy , Dysbiosis/microbiology , Dysbiosis/physiopathology , Dysbiosis/prevention & control , Fermentation , Healthy Lifestyle , Humans , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/etiology , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/microbiology , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/prevention & control , Meta-Analysis as Topic , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Societies, Scientific , United Kingdom
2.
J Hum Nutr Diet ; 29(5): 576-92, 2016 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27265510

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Probiotics are often taken by individuals with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Which products are effective is unclear, despite an increasing research base. This project will systematically review which strain- and dose- specific probiotics can be recommended to adults with IBS to improve symptoms and quality of life (QoL). It is part of a broader systematic review to update British Dietetic Association guidelines for the dietary management of IBS in adults. METHODS: CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, Medline, Scopus and Web of Science were searched for systematic reviews (SRs) of randomised controlled trial (RCT)s recruiting adults with IBS comparing probiotic intervention with placebo. AMSTAR, risk of bias and diet bias tools were used to appraise methodological quality. Symptom and QoL data were appraised to develop probiotic-specific evidence statements on clinically meaningful and marginal outcomes in various settings, graded clinical practice recommendations and practical considerations. RESULTS: Nine systematic reviews and 35 RCTs were included (3406 participants) using 29 dose-specific probiotic formulations. None of the RCTs were at low risk of bias. Twelve out of 29 probiotics (41%) showed no symptom or QoL benefits. Evidence indicated that no strain or dose specific probiotic was consistently effective to improve any IBS symptoms or QoL. Two general clinical practice recommendations were made. CONCLUSIONS: Symptom outcomes for dose-specific probiotics were heterogeneous. Specific probiotic recommendations for IBS management in adults were not possible at this time. More data from high-quality RCTs treating specific symptom profiles are needed to support probiotic therapy in the management of IBS.


Subject(s)
Evidence-Based Medicine , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/diet therapy , Precision Medicine , Probiotics/therapeutic use , Quality of Life , Adult , Dietetics , Dysbiosis/diet therapy , Dysbiosis/microbiology , Dysbiosis/physiopathology , Dysbiosis/prevention & control , Humans , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/etiology , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/microbiology , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/prevention & control , Probiotics/adverse effects , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Reproducibility of Results , Review Literature as Topic , Societies, Scientific , United Kingdom
3.
J Hum Nutr Diet ; 25(3): 260-74, 2012 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22489905

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic debilitating functional gastrointestinal disorder. Diet and lifestyle changes are important management strategies. The aim of these guidelines is to systematically review key aspects of the dietary management of IBS, with the aim of providing evidence-based guidelines for use by registered dietitians. METHODS: Questions relating to diet and IBS symptom management were developed by a guideline development group. These included the role of milk and lactose, nonstarch polysaccharides (NSP), fermentable carbohydrates in abdominal bloating, probiotics and empirical or elimination diets. A comprehensive literature search was conducted and relevant studies from January 1985 to November 2009 were identified using the electronic database search engines: Cinahl, Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, Scopus and Web of Science. Evidence statements, recommendations, good practice points and research recommendations were developed. RESULTS: Thirty studies were critically appraised. A dietetic care pathway was produced following a logical sequence of treatment and formed the basis of these guidelines. Three lines of dietary management were identified. first line: Clinical and dietary assessment, healthy eating and lifestyle management with some general advice on lactose and NSP. Second line: Advanced dietary interventions to improve symptoms based on NSP, fermentable carbohydrates and probiotics. Third line: Elimination and empirical diets. Research recommendations were also identified relating to the need for adequately powered and well designed randomised controlled trials. CONCLUSIONS: These guidelines provide evidence-based details of how to achieve the successful dietary management of IBS.


Subject(s)
Dietetics/standards , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/diet therapy , Nutrition Therapy/standards , Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted , Dietary Fiber/therapeutic use , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Lactose , Probiotics , Societies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...