Negative surveillance endoscopy occurs frequently in patients with short-segment non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus.

Surveillance endoscopy of non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (NDBE) that fails to detect intestinal metaplasia (IM), or negative surveillance, is known to occur in clinical practice, although the frequency and possible outcomes in a large cohort in clinical practice is not well described. The goals of this study were to define frequency in which negative surveillance occurs and endoscopic outcomes in a screening cohort of short segment NDBE. A retrospective cohort (n = 184) of patients newly diagnosed with short segment NDBE at an outpatient academic tertiary care center between 2003 and 2011 were reviewed. Only those with one or more surveillance endoscopies were included to define a frequency of negative surveillance. Included patients were further assessed if they had two or more surveillance endoscopies and were classified into groups as sampling error or negative IM on consecutive surveillances based on the results of their surveillance endoscopies. The frequency of a negative surveillance endoscopy in all short-segment NDBE patients was 19.66% (92 endoscopic exams were negative for IM of 468 total surveillance exams). A negative surveillance endoscopy occurred in 40.76% (n = 75) patients. Sampling error occurred in 44.12% and negative IM on consecutive surveillance endoscopies in 55.88% of those with ≥ 2 surveillance endoscopies and an initially negative surveillance exam. The frequency of negative IM on consecutive surveillances was 19.00% of all patients who had two surveillance endoscopies. When the index diagnostic Barrett's esophagus segment length was < 1 cm, 32.14% (18/56) of all patients (with ≥ 2 surveillance endoscopies) had negative IM on consecutive surveillance endoscopies. Negative surveillance occurs frequently in short-segment NDBE. When an initial negative surveillance endoscopy occurs, it may be due to either a sampling error or lack of detectable IM on surveillance exam. When a <1 cm segment of NDBE is diagnosed, a significant proportion of patients may go on to have continuously undetected IM on consecutive surveillance endoscopic exams without intervention.

Dysplasia detection rate of confirmatory EGD in nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus.

Current guidelines for endoscopic surveillance of Barrett's esophagus (BE) recommend that patients with newly diagnosed BE undergo confirmatory esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) to exclude the presence of dysplasia. The extent to which confirmatory endoscopy alters management and detects missed dysplasia in newly diagnosed BE has not been reported. The frequency with which confirmatory endoscopy changed surveillance management in patients with newly diagnosed BE was assessed. A two center cohort analysis was conducted on patients newly diagnosed with BE. The rate of dysplasia on confirmatory endoscopy for patients who had nondysplastic BE was obtained. Demographic and endoscopic variables were assessed for association with dysplasia detection using Firth logistic regression model. Out of the 146 patients newly diagnosed with BE and initially determined to be without dysplasia, 12 had dysplasia on the confirmatory second EGD (8.2%). Eleven of 12 cases with dysplasia on confirmatory endoscopy had long-segment BE (LSBE). Among all the LSBE cases in our cohort, 11 had newly diagnosed dysplasia on confirmatory EGD, 29.7% (11/37). The average number of biopsies obtained from the 11 LSBE cases with dysplasia was comparable with the rest of the LSBE cases without dysplasia (6.73 and 5.42, respectively, P-value 0.205). The rate of dysplasia detection in short-segment BE (SSBE) was much lower, 0.95% (1 out of 105). There were no cases of high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or cancer detected in any SSBE case. HGD was detected on confirmatory EGD in two cases, both were LSBE. Segment length was the only statistically significant factor to predict the presence of dysplasia on confirmatory endoscopy (odds ratio 9.158, P. 0.008). Confirmatory EGD in newly diagnosed LSBE had significant rate of dysplasia detection (29.7%) in this cohort. Among patients with SSBE, there was a low rate of dysplasia detection with confirmatory EGD, less than 1% of cases. No additional cases of HGD or esophageal carcinoma in SSBE cases were detected. This suggests that the yield of confirmatory EGD is greater in patients with LSBE.

Microbial bioburden in endoscope reprocessing and an in-use evaluation of the high-level disinfection capabilities of Cidex PA.

Most endoscopy clinics use 2% glutaraldehyde as a high-level disinfectant for reprocessing flexible endoscopes. However, even with contact times greater than 30 minutes, survival of organisms has been documented. We compared the high-level disinfection capabilities of glutaraldehyde (45-minute immersion) with a new peracetic acid germicide (20- to 25-minute immersion). Channels, valve housings, and outer sheaths were sampled to quantify bioburden levels after a patient procedure, after manual cleaning, and after disinfection. Total mean bioburden after clinical use was greater than 6 log10 colony-forming units (CFU). Manual cleaning reduced the bioburden by means of 4.7 log10 CFU (gastroscopes) and 6.2 log10 CFU (colonoscopes). High-level disinfection with the new product was achieved in five of six (product stressed by EPA Reuse Test) and 7 of 10 (product stressed by dilution and organic load) successfully disinfected endoscopes, whereas glutaraldehyde achieved it in 4 of 10 (product stressed by dilution and organic load). We conclude that the new peracetic acid product (20- and 25-minute contact time) is at least as effective as glutaraldehyde (45-minute contact time) for reducing the bioburden of vegetative aerobic organisms in endoscopes.