Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Aten. prim. (Barc., Ed. impr.) ; 53(10): 102128, dic. 2021. graf, tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-208543

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: Estimar la prevalencia y analizar los factores asociados al síndrome de fragilidad en adultos ≥70 años, pertenecientes a un centro de salud de Asturias. Diseño: Estudio observacional transversal. Emplazamiento: Centro de Salud El Llano, Asturias. Participantes: Adultos ≥70 años. Mediciones principales: La fragilidad se definió por la presencia de ≥3 criterios del fenotipo de fragilidad de Fried. Variables secundarias: características sociodemográficas, estado de salud, estado funcional, estado cognitivo-afectivo y riesgo social. Se realizó un análisis bivariante y regresión logística. Resultados: Se incluyeron 408 participantes con una edad media de 79,8 (DE 6,6) años, el 59,1% eran mujeres. La prevalencia de fragilidad fue del 27,7% y del 44,9% para la prefragilidad. El perfil sociodemográfico es de una mujer (77%), de elevada edad (>84 años) (50,4%), sin estudios (65,5%), viuda (48,7%), con bajo nivel económico (47,8%) y en riesgo social (OR: 3,3; IC 95%: 2,5-4). Los factores que se asociaron estadísticamente con el síndrome de fragilidad fueron: comorbilidad alta (OR: 2,7; IC 95%: 1,5-5), polimedicación (OR: 1,9; IC 95%: 1,3-3), percepción de la calidad de vida con la salud (OR: 0,95; IC 95%: 0,93-0,97); deambulación alterada (OR: 17,9; IC 95%: 7,1-45,3), apoyo para la marcha (OR: 10,5; IC 95%: 4,7-23,4), alto riesgo de caídas (OR: 6,4; IC 95%: 3,8-10,8), dependencia para las ABVD (OR: 4; IC 95%: 2,4-6,6), AIVD (OR: 9,7; IC 95%: 4,7-20), discapacidad (OR: 37,7; IC 95%: 52,2-274,5), deterioro cognitivo (OR: 4,1; IC 95%: 1,8-9,3) y depresión (OR: 4,8; IC 95%: 2,7-8,7). Conclusiones: La fragilidad es un síndrome multifactorial de elevada prevalencia en los mayores de 70 años, en el que además de los criterios de fragilidad de Fried deben de ser analizados aspectos del estado de salud, funcionales, cognitivos-afectivos y sociales.(AU)


Objective: To estimate the prevalence and analyze the factors associated with frailty syndrome, in adults ≥70 years old, belonging to a health center in Asturias. Design: Observational cross-sectional study. Participants: Adults ≥70 years of age. Site: Health Centre of Llano (Asturias). Main measurements: Frailty was defined by the presence of ≥3 criteria of Fried's frailty phenotype. Secondary variables: sociodemographic characteristics, health status, functional status, cognitive-affective status and social risk. A bivariate analysis and logistic regression were performed. Results: Four hundred eight participants were included, with a mean age of 79.8 (SD 6.6), 59.1% female. The prevalence of frailty was 27.7% and 44.9% for pre-frailty. The sociodemographic profile is that of a woman (77%), of high age (>84 years) (50.4%), without studies (65.5%), widow (48.7%) with low economic status (47.8%) and at social risk (OR: 3.3; 95% CI: 2.5-4). Factors that were statistically associated with frailty syndrome were: high comorbidity (OR: 2.7; 95% CI: 1.5-5), polypharmacy (OR: 1.9; 95% CI: 1.3-3), perception of quality of life with health (OR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.93-0.97), impaired ambulation (OR: 17.9; 95% CI: 7.1-45.3), support for walking (OR: 10.5; 95% CI: 4.7-23.4), high risk of falls (OR: 6.4; 95% CI: 3.8-10.8), ABVD (OR: 4; 95% CI: 2.4-6.6), AIVD (OR: 9.7; 95% CI: 4.7-20), disability (OR: 37.7; 95% CI: 52.2-274.5), cognitive impairment (OR: 4.1; 95% CI: 1.8-9.3) and depression (OR: 4.8; 95% CI: 2.7-8.7). Conclusions: Frailty is a multifactorial syndrome, with a high prevalence in those over 70 years of age, in which, in addition to Fried's criteria of frailty, aspects of health, functional, cognitive-affective and social status must be analyzed.(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Frailty , Prevalence , Health Centers , Multivariate Analysis , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Health Status , Aging , Frail Elderly , Spain , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health of the Elderly
2.
Aten Primaria ; 53(10): 102128, 2021 12.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34560377

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence and analyze the factors associated with frailty syndrome, in adults ≥70 years old, belonging to a health center in Asturias. DESIGN: Observational cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Adults ≥70 years of age. SITE: Health Centre of Llano (Asturias). MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Frailty was defined by the presence of ≥3 criteria of Fried's frailty phenotype. Secondary variables: sociodemographic characteristics, health status, functional status, cognitive-affective status and social risk. A bivariate analysis and logistic regression were performed. RESULTS: Four hundred eight participants were included, with a mean age of 79.8 (SD 6.6), 59.1% female. The prevalence of frailty was 27.7% and 44.9% for pre-frailty. The sociodemographic profile is that of a woman (77%), of high age (>84 years) (50.4%), without studies (65.5%), widow (48.7%) with low economic status (47.8%) and at social risk (OR: 3.3; 95% CI: 2.5-4). Factors that were statistically associated with frailty syndrome were: high comorbidity (OR: 2.7; 95% CI: 1.5-5), polypharmacy (OR: 1.9; 95% CI: 1.3-3), perception of quality of life with health (OR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.93-0.97), impaired ambulation (OR: 17.9; 95% CI: 7.1-45.3), support for walking (OR: 10.5; 95% CI: 4.7-23.4), high risk of falls (OR: 6.4; 95% CI: 3.8-10.8), ABVD (OR: 4; 95% CI: 2.4-6.6), AIVD (OR: 9.7; 95% CI: 4.7-20), disability (OR: 37.7; 95% CI: 52.2-274.5), cognitive impairment (OR: 4.1; 95% CI: 1.8-9.3) and depression (OR: 4.8; 95% CI: 2.7-8.7). CONCLUSIONS: Frailty is a multifactorial syndrome, with a high prevalence in those over 70 years of age, in which, in addition to Fried's criteria of frailty, aspects of health, functional, cognitive-affective and social status must be analyzed.


Subject(s)
Frailty , Hodgkin Disease , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Bleomycin , Dacarbazine , Doxorubicin , Female , Frail Elderly , Frailty/epidemiology , Geriatric Assessment , Humans , Male , Prevalence , Quality of Life , Social Status , Vinblastine
3.
Aten. prim. (Barc., Ed. impr.) ; 52(6): 400-409, jun.-jul. 2020. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-201996

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVO: Evaluar la efectividad de la implantación de un programa de mindfulness y autocuidados en atención primaria para el abordaje del trastorno mental común. DISEÑO: Estudio cuasiexperimental no controlado, no aleatorizado, con medidas repetidas. EMPLAZAMIENTO: Siete centros de salud del Área V del Principado de Asturias entre 2014 y 2018. PARTICIPANTES: Sujetos entre 18-75 años, con trastornos de ansiedad, depresivos y adaptativos mixtos, sin enfermedad mental grave. Muestreo no probabilístico por conveniencia. Intervención: Nueve sesiones grupales semanales de 90min, práctica diaria y sesiones de refuerzo al mes, 3, 6 y 12 meses. Mediciones principales: Medidas antes-después, evaluadas por cuestionarios validados y autoadministrados, a medio plazo (3-6 meses) y largo plazo (>12 meses) de las variables: ansiedad rasgo/ansiedad estado (Cuestionario de ansiedad estado-rasgo -STAI-); ansiedad/depresión (Escala de Ansiedad y Depresión de Goldberg -GHQ28-), atención plena (Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire -FFMQ-), reducción del tratamiento farmacológico (preguntas abiertas). RESULTADOS: Muestra final de 314 sujetos. Se halló una diferencia de medias estadísticamente significativa en los 3 periodos de seguimiento respecto a los valores basales para todas las escalas/subescalas. Hubo una reducción en la toma de medicación basal de ansiolíticos/antidepresivos del 54,3% en el seguimiento a largo plazo (p < 0,001). CONCLUSIONES: Una disminución moderada de los síntomas, junto con la reducción de la medicación, indican que la intervención en mindfulness dirigida por enfermeras de atención primaria puede ser una opción de tratamiento para el trastorno mental común en este nivel asistencial


OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of the implementation of a mindfulness and self-care program to treat common mental health disorders in primary care. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental non-controlled, non-randomised study, with repeated measurements. SETTING: Seven health centres, in area V of the Principality of Asturias, between 2014 and 2018. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects between 18-65 years with mixed anxiety, depressive, and adaptive disorders, with no serious mental disease. Non-probabilistic convenience sampling was used. Intervention: A group intervention was made, consisting of 9 weekly sessions of 90 min, daily practice, and reinforcement sessions at one month, 3, 6, and 12 months. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Pre-post measurements using validated and self-administered questionnaires; medium-term (3-6 months) and long-term (>12 months) of the variables: trait anxiety/state anxiety (Status-Trait Anxiety Questionnaire -STAI-); anxiety/depression (Goldberg Anxiety and Depression Scale -GHQ28-), mindfulness (Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire -FFMQ-), reduction of pharmacological treatment (open questions). RESULTS: The study included a final sample of 314 subjects. A statistically significant difference in means was found in the 3 follow-up periods as regards the baseline values for all the scales/subscales. There was a reduction of 54.3% in the taking of anxiolytic/antidepressant baseline medication in the long-term follow-up (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: A moderate reduction of the symptoms, together with the reduction of the medication, indicate that the intervention of mindfulness supervised by the primary care nurse can be a treatment option for the mental disorders common in this level of care


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Self Care/methods , Mindfulness , Primary Health Care , Depression/nursing , Anxiety/nursing , Surveys and Questionnaires , Program Evaluation , Effectiveness
4.
Aten Primaria ; 52(6): 400-409, 2020.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32247530

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of the implementation of a mindfulness and self-care program to treat common mental health disorders in primary care. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental non-controlled, non-randomised study, with repeated measurements. SETTING: Seven health centres, in area v of the Principality of Asturias, between 2014 and 2018. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects between 18-65 years with mixed anxiety, depressive, and adaptive disorders, with no serious mental disease. Non-probabilistic convenience sampling was used. INTERVENTION: A group intervention was made, consisting of 9 weekly sessions of 90min, daily practice, and reinforcement sessions at one month, 3, 6, and 12 months. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Pre-post measurements using validated and self-administered questionnaires; medium-term (3-6 months) and long-term (>12 months) of the variables: trait anxiety/state anxiety (Status-Trait Anxiety Questionnaire -STAI-); anxiety/depression (Goldberg Anxiety and Depression Scale -GHQ28-), mindfulness (Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire -FFMQ-), reduction of pharmacological treatment (open questions). RESULTS: The study included a final sample of 314 subjects. A statistically significant difference in means was found in the 3 follow-up periods as regards the baseline values for all the scales/subscales. There was a reduction of 54.3% in the taking of anxiolytic/antidepressant baseline medication in the long-term follow-up (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: A moderate reduction of the symptoms, together with the reduction of the medication, indicate that the intervention of mindfulness supervised by the primary care nurse can be a treatment option for the mental disorders common in this level of care.


Subject(s)
Mindfulness , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Anxiety/therapy , Anxiety Disorders , Depression/therapy , Humans , Middle Aged , Primary Health Care , Self Care , Young Adult
5.
Enferm. clín. (Ed. impr.) ; 28(3): 154-161, mayo-jun. 2018. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-175277

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVO: Identificar la relación y el comportamiento de la autorregulación, autoeficacia y locus control en la regulación del peso, en población adulta con obesidad, sobrepeso y normopeso. MÉTODO: Se realizó un estudio transversal en el Centro de Salud del Coto (Gijón) entre el 1 de abril al 30 de julio de 2015. La muestra estuvo formada por personas entre 18-65 años que contaran con un registro del índice de masa corporal en los dos últimos años. Los criterios de exclusión fueron: enfermedad médica grave, trastornos de la alimentación o mujeres embarazadas. Se midieron variables conductuales: autorregulación del peso corporal (Inventario de autorregulación del peso corporal), autoeficacia percibida en la regulación del peso (Inventario autoeficacia percibida en la regulación del peso) y locus control en la regulación del peso (Inventario Locus control en la regulación del peso). Variables antropométricas: peso (kg) y talla (m), índice de masa corporal. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 106 PARTICIPANTES: 32 con obesidad, 28 con sobrepeso y 46 con normopeso. Se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre los 3 grupos de estudio para las variables escala total de autoeficacia (F = 61,77; p < 0,01), escala total de autorregulación (F = 45,97; p < 0,01), locus control interno (F = 13,92; p = 0,019), locus control otros poderosos (F = 9,21; p < 0,01) y locus control azar (F = 3,50; p = 0,011). CONCLUSIONES: La existencia de una relación entre el índice de masa corporal y las variables conductuales de autoeficacia, autorregulación y locus control, plantea a los profesionales sanitarios la necesidad de incluir los factores psicológicos o conductuales en cualquier actividad preventiva y de intervención dirigida al control del peso


OBJECTIVE: To identify the relationship and behaviour of the variables of self-control, self-efficacy and locus control in weight regulation of obese, overweight and normal weight adults. METHOD: Transversal study undertaken in the Health Centre of El Coto (Gijón) from 1st April to 30th July 2015. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects between 18-65 years of age with a body mass index recording within the last two years. Exclusions: serious medical illness, eating disorders or pregnant women. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Behavioural variables: self-regulation of body weight (Inventory of self-control of body weight), perceived self-efficacy in weight regulation (Inventory of perceived self-efficacy in weight regulation) and locus control in weight regulation (Inventory of locus control in weight regulation). Anthropometric variables: weight (kg) and height (m), body mass index. RESULTS: One hundred and six participants were included: 32 were obese, 28 overweight and 46 normal weight. Significant differences were found between the 3 study groups for total scale of self-efficacy (F = 61.77; p<.01), total scale of self-regulation (F = 45.97; p < .01), internal locus control (F = 13.92; p =.019), other weighty influences of locus control (F = 9.21; p < .01) and random locus control (F = 3.50; p =.011). CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between body mass index and behavioural variables of self-efficacy, self-regulation and locus control, suggests the need for healthcare professionals to include psychological factors of behaviour in any preventive action and intervention directed at weight control


Subject(s)
Humans , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Health Behavior , Overweight/psychology , Self Efficacy , Self-Control , Cross-Sectional Studies , Internal-External Control , Obesity/psychology
6.
Enferm Clin (Engl Ed) ; 28(3): 154-161, 2018.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29699767

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To identify the relationship and behaviour of the variables of self-control, self-efficacy and locus control in weight regulation of obese, overweight and normal weight adults. METHOD: Transversal study undertaken in the Health Centre of El Coto (Gijón) from 1st April to 30th July 2015. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects between 18-65 years of age with a body mass index recording within the last two years. EXCLUSIONS: serious medical illness, eating disorders or pregnant women. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Behavioural variables: self-regulation of body weight (Inventory of self-control of body weight), perceived self-efficacy in weight regulation (Inventory of perceived self-efficacy in weight regulation) and locus control in weight regulation (Inventory of locus control in weight regulation). Anthropometric variables: weight (kg) and height (m), body mass index. RESULTS: One hundred and six participants were included: 32 were obese, 28 overweight and 46 normal weight. Significant differences were found between the 3 study groups for total scale of self-efficacy (F=61.77; p<.01), total scale of self-regulation (F=45.97; p<.01), internal locus control (F=13.92; p=.019), other weighty influences of locus control (F=9.21; p<.01) and random locus control (F=3.50; p=.011). CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between body mass index and behavioural variables of self-efficacy, self-regulation and locus control, suggests the need for healthcare professionals to include psychological factors of behaviour in any preventive action and intervention directed at weight control.


Subject(s)
Health Behavior , Overweight/psychology , Self Efficacy , Self-Control , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Internal-External Control , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity/psychology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL