ABSTRACT
Objectives: Lung cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide and it is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Despite the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) have improved, the molecular mechanisms of NSCLC are still to be further explored. Materials and Methods: Microarray datasets from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database were selected to identify the candidate genes associated with tumorigenesis and progression of non-small cell lung carcinoma. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified by GEO2R. Protein-protein interaction network (PPI) were used to screen out hub genes. The expression levels of hub genes were verified by GEPIA, Oncomine and The Human Protein Atlas (HPA) databases. Survival analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were performed to value the importance of hub genes in NSCLC diagnosis and prognosis. ENCODE and cBioPortal were used to explore the upstream regulatory mechanisms of hub genes. Analysis on CancerSEA Tool, CCK8 assay and colony formation assay revealed the functions of hub genes in NSCLC. Results: A total of 426 DEGs were identified, including 93 up-regulated genes and 333 down-regulated genes. And nine hub genes (CDC6, KIAA0101, CDC20, BUB1B, CCNA2, NCAPG, KIF11, BUB1 and CDK1) were found to increase with the tumorigenesis, progression and cisplatin resistance of NSCLC, especially EGFR- or KRAS-mutation driven NSCLC. Hub genes were valuable biomarkers for NSCLC, and the overexpression of hub genes led to poor survival of NSCLC patients. Function analysis showed that hub genes played roles in cell cycle and proliferation, and knockdown of hub genes significantly inhibited A549 and SPCA1 cell growth. Further exploration demonstrated that copy number alterations (CNAs) and transcription activation may account for the up-regulation of hub genes. Conclusion: Hub genes identified in this study provided better understanding of molecular mechanisms within tumorigenesis and progression of NSCLC, and provided potential targets for NSCLC treatment as well.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combined treatment with an optimized intense pulsed light (IPL) and a non-ablative fractional laser (NAFL) for facial rejuvenation.Methods A prospective,split-face,randomized,controlled study was conducted.A total of 22 testees with facial photoaging,who aged from 35 to 55 years,were enrolled into this study from the Department of Dermatology of Peking University First Hospital between March and June in 2017.By a random number table,the two sides of each testee's face were randomized to receive combined treatment with optimized IPL immediately followed by non-ablative 1 565 nm Erbium:Glass fractional laser (combined treatment group) or non-ablative 1 565 nm Erbium:Glass fractional laser alone (NAFL group) once every month for 3 sessions.Before the treatment,60 and 90 days after the treatment (1 month after the second and third treatment respectively),photos of the treatment regions were taken,skin physiology parameters (including skin melanin,erythema indices,water content of the stratum corneum,transepidermal water loss [TEWL],skin flexibility and glossiness) were measured,and subjective and objective clinical evaluation was carried out.After each treatment,adverse reactions were assessed by two dermatologists independently,including facial erythema,swelling and crusting,desquamation,pigmentation and pains.Results During the treatment course,1 testee dropped out due to pains,another 1 testee dropped out for personal reasons,and 20 testees completed the treatment and follow-up.The combined treatment group showed significantly decreased melanin indices on days 60 and 90 (152.9 ± 36.9 and 155.0 ± 38.1,respectively) compared with that before the treatment (168.4 ± 41.3,F =5.321,P ＜ 0.05).On day 60,the melanin index was significantly lower in the combined treatment group than in the NAFL group (159.4 ± 35.3,P ＜ 0.05).However,the melanin indices on days 60 and 90 in the NAFL group (159.4 ± 35.3,156.7 ± 36.3) did not significantly differ from that before the treatment (165.9 ± 35.4,P ＞ 0.05).No significant difference was observed between the pre-and post-treatment erythema indices in either of the two groups (both P ＞ 0.05).The water content of the stratum corneum on days 60 and 90 significantly increased compared with that before the treatment in both the combined treatment group (F =21.795,P ＜ 0.001) and NAFL group (F =21.798,P ＜ 0.001),while the TEWL on days 60 and 90 significantly decreased compared with that before the treatment in both the combined treatment group (F =8.848,P =0.001) and NAFL group (F =5.833,P ＜ 0.05).However,there were no significant differences in either of the water content of the stratum corneum or TEWL on days 60 and 90 between the two groups (P ＞ 0.05).On days 60 and 90,the combined treatment group and NAFL group both showed significantly increased skin flexibility (P＜ 0.05,0.001,respectively) and glossiness (both P ＜ 0.001) compared with those before the treatment.On day 90,the skin glossiness in the combined treatment group was higher than that in the NAFL group (P ＜ 0.05).The short-term adverse reactions included transient pain,erythema and swelling which lasted 2-3 days,and slight desquamation.The main adverse reaction was mild local pigmentation,which lasted 2-3 months and then subsided gradually.Conclusion The 3 sessions of treatment with an optimized IPL immediately followed by a 1 565 nm NAFL is clinically superior to those with the NAFL alone for improving the facial pigmentation and skin glossiness,and the adverse reactions are usually transient and mild.