A retrospective survey to establish institutional diagnostic reference levels for CT urography examinations based on clinical indications: preliminary results.

Objective. To establish institutional diagnostic reference levels (IDRLs) based on clinical indications (CIs) for three- and four-phase computed tomography urography (CTU).Methods. Volumetric computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol), dose-length product (DLP), patients' demographics, selected CIs like lithiasis, cancer, and other diseases, and protocols' parameters were retrospectively recorded for 198 CTUs conducted on a Toshiba Aquilion Prime 80 scanner. Patients were categorised based on CIs and number of phases. These groups' 75th percentiles of CTDIvoland DLP were proposed as IDRLs. The mean, median and IDRLs were compared with previously published values.Results. For the three-phase protocol, the CTDIvol(mGy) and DLP (mGy.cm) were 22.7/992 for the whole group, 23.4/992 for lithiasis, 22.8/1037 for cancer, and 21.2/981 for other diseases. The corresponding CTDIvol(mGy) and DLP (mGy.cm) values for the four-phase protocol were 28.6/1172, 30.6/1203, 27.3/1077, and 28.7/1252, respectively. A significant difference was found in CTDIvoland DLP between the two protocols, among the phases of three-phase (except cancer) and four-phase protocols (except DLP for other diseases), and in DLP between the second and third phases (except for cancer group). The results are comparable or lower than most studies published in the last decade.Conclusions. The CT technologist must be aware of the critical dose dependence on the scan length and the applied exposure parameters for each phase, according to the patient's clinical background and the corresponding imaging anatomy, which must have been properly targeted by the competent radiologist. When clinically feasible, restricting the number of phases to three instead of four could remarkably reduce the patient's radiation dose. CI-based IDRLs will serve as a baseline for comparison with CTU practice in other hospitals and could contribute to national DRL establishment. The awareness and knowledge of dose levels during CTU will prompt optimisation strategies in CT facilities.

BMI-Based organ doses in endovascular aneurysm repair interventions utilising Monte Carlo simulation.

In this study, the effect of body-mass-index (BMI) on organ doses (ODs) during infrarenal endovascular-aneurysm-repair (EVAR) procedures was evaluated. Patient- and intra-operative data from fifty-nine EVAR procedures were inserted into VirtualDose-IR software to calculate ODs. For overweight, obesity class-I and obesity class-II, ODs were up to 147%, 412% and 775% higher than those for normal weight-patients, respectively. A large variation was observed in ODs published in literature mainly due to the differences in the software and the technical parameters used for the calculations.

FACTORS INFLUENCING FLUOROSCOPY TIME IN ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT OF ABDOMINAL ANEURYSMS: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY.

Patients who undergo endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) may require prolonged radiation exposure affected by several factors. The objectives of this study were to document fluoroscopy time (FT) during EVAR and identify possible factors that influence it. A retrospective analysis of a 180 patients' database with abdominal infrarenal aortic aneurysms submitted to EVAR during a 7-y period was performed. The FT is evaluated regarding risk factors and comorbidities, graft type and patient-related, clinical and technical parameters. FT's median (interquartile range) was 1011 (698-1500) s. Excluder and C3 Excluder were associated with significantly lower FT values when compared with other grafts. Hypertension, dyslipidemia, age ≥ 70 y, maximum aneurysm diameter ≥ 6 cm and procedure duration ≥2 h resulted in higher FT values. A significantly lower FT was found for the operations performed in the 7th y of the study's period compared with the previous 6 y, mainly because of the use of Excluder or C3 Excluder grafts. However, these grafts did not show any significant difference in FT values during the 7 y. A significant correlation between FT with age and procedure duration was found. Nevertheless, procedure duration is a poor FT predictor in linear and logistic regressions, although is significantly correlated with FT. Dyslipidemia, procedure duration and graft type are independent predictors of FT larger than the median, whereas only the procedure duration is a predictor for FT larger than the 75th percentile value. The identified factors regarding radiation protection issues should be considered when contemplating abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, however, without compromising the procedure's efficacy. Further work is necessary to identify more potential anatomical, clinical and technical factors affecting procedures' complexity and FT and patient radiation dose during EVAR interventions.

Non-dynamic and multiphase CT protocols for parathyroid glands imaging: a review of technical parameters, radiation dose and diagnostic accuracy.

INTRODUCTION: Our purpose was to review the scientific literature and collect information regarding clinical and technical parameters of different single- or multiphase CT protocols, their diagnostic performance and patient dose during parathyroid imaging. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: PubMed and Scopus databases were searched for studies investigating the diagnostic performance of CT in detecting parathyroid lesions and the corresponding patients' dose. The following information was retrieved for each article: CT system, number, combination and time interval between phases, scanning length, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values, contrast enhancement in Hounsfield Units (HUs), technical and exposure parameters, and dose indices. Fifty studies published during the last sixteen years (2005-2021) were reviewed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A large discrepancy in the number and combination of phases, as well as clinical and technical parameters of the CT protocols was indicated. The variations in patients' doses are mainly due to scanners' technology, number and combination of phases, the extent of scanning length, technical parameters (tube voltage, tube current modulation, pitch, reconstruction algorithms), and patient-related parameters. Technical parameters are not always adjusted appropriately to the clinical question or patient size. These variations indicate a large potential to optimize dose during parathyroid imaging without compromising diagnostic performance. The potential is to decrease the number of phases or use low tube voltage protocols, tube current modulation, iterative reconstruction, and reduce the scanning length during some phases. CONCLUSIONS: The reporting results could inform researchers about the current status of CT parathyroid imaging and guide their future efforts to optimize both patients' dose and corresponding image quality.

Organs' absorbed dose and comparison of different methods for effective dose calculation in computed tomography of parathyroid glands.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate organs' absorbed dose from the two-phase CT of parathyroid glands, effective dose (ED) based on three different methods, and compare the dose values with those reported by other published protocols. METHODS: Volumetric-computed-tomography-dose-index (CTDIvol), dose-length-product (DLP), and the corresponding scan length during each phase of a parathyroid protocol were recorded, for seventy-six patients. One k-factor, and two different k-factors for the neck and chest area were used to estimate the ED from DLP. A Monte Carlo software, VirtualDoseCT, was also used for the estimation of organs' absorbed dose and ED. RESULTS: Two-phase parathyroid CT resulted in a mean ED of 3.93 mSv, 4.29 mSv and 4.21 mSv according to the one k-factor, two k-factors, and VirtualDoseCT methods, respectively. The two k-factors method resulted in a slight overestimation of 1.9% in total ED compared to VirtualDoseCT. No statistically significant difference was found in ED values between these methods (Wilcoxon test, p > 0.05), except for female patients in the pre-contrast phase. The organs inside the scanning field of view (SFOV) received the following doses: thymus 23.3 mGy, lungs 11.5 mGy, oesophagus 9.2 mGy, thyroid 6.9 mGy, and breast 6.3 mGy. The ED and organs' dose (OD) values were significantly lower in the pre-contrast than in the arterial phase (Wilcoxon test, p < 0.001). A statistically significant difference was observed between male and female patients for the pre-contrast phase (Mann-Whitney test, p < 0.05), regarding the ED values obtained with the two k-factors method and VirtualDoseCT software. CONCLUSIONS: The two k-factors method could be applied for the ED estimation in clinical practice, if appropriate software is not available. An extensive range of ED values derived from the literature, mainly depending on the acquisition protocol parameters and the estimation method.

DOSIMETRIC EVALUATION OF THE TWO-PHASE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IN PARATHYROID GLANDS IMAGING.

This study evaluates the patient radiation dose from the two-phase protocols of two different computed tomography (CT) systems and compares this with that delivered by the other similar protocols previously published. Two hundred and fourteen patients with primary hyperparathyroidism were included in the study with a two-phase CT scan between 2008 and 2020 by using a Toshiba Aquilion Prime 80 and a GE Light Speed 16. The standard 'neck' or a modified 'parathyroid' protocol was used. The patient dose was evaluated in terms of volumetric computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol), dose length product (DLP) and effective dose (ED) per acquisition protocol and CT system. CTDIvol and DLP were recorded retrospectively, while the ED was calculated based on DLP and an appropriate conversion coefficient. Comparisons of patient dose between the two protocols and two CT systems and the corresponding published values were established. A significantly lower patient dose (40.2-43.2%) than the GE system (p < 0.0001) resulted from the Toshiba system. The 'parathyroid' protocol resulted in a 6.5-9.6% lower patient dose than the standard 'neck' protocol. Compared with the literature, the lowest ED value (3.6 mSv) was observed since this protocol consists of a lowered tube voltage of 100 kVp, a reduced scan length for the pre-contrast phase and implementation of an iterative reconstruction algorithm.

KERMA-AREA PRODUCT, ENTRANCE SURFACE DOSE AND EFFECTIVE DOSE IN ABDOMINAL ENDOVASCULAR ANEURYSM REPAIR.

This study aims to evaluate patient radiation dose during fluoroscopically guided endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) procedures. Fluoroscopy time (FT) and kerma-area product (KAP) were recorded from 87 patients that underwent EVAR procedures with a mobile C-arm fluoroscopy system. Effective dose (ED) and organs' doses were calculated utilising appropriate conversion coefficients based on the recorded KAP values. Entrance surface dose (ESD) was calculated based on KAP values and technical parameters. The mean FT was 22.7 min (range 6.4-76.8 min), resulting in a mean KAP of 36.6 Gy cm2 (range 2.0-167.8 Gy cm2), a mean ED of 6.2 mSv (range 0.3-28.5 mSv) and a mean ESD of 458 mGy (range 26-2098 mGy). The corresponding median values were 17.4 min, 25.6 Gy cm2, 4.4 mSv and 320 mGy. The threshold of 2 Gy for skin erythema was exceeded in two procedures for a focus-to-skin distance (FSD) of 40 cm and six procedures when an FSD of 30 cm was considered. The highest doses absorbed by the adrenals, kidneys, spleen and pancreas and ranged between 3.7 and 313.3 mGy (average 66.8 mGy), 3.3 and 285.1 mGy (average 60.8 mGy), 1.3 and 111.1 mGy (average 23.7 mGy), 1.1 and 92.1 mGy (average 19.6 mGy), respectively. A wide range of patient doses was reported in the literature. The radiation dose received by the patients was comparative or lower than most of the previously reported values. However, higher doses can be revealed due to the X-ray system's non-optimum use and extended FTs, mainly affected by complex clinical conditions, patients' body habitus and vascular surgeon experience. The large variation of patient doses highlights the potential to optimise the EVAR procedure by considering the balance between the radiation dose and the required image quality. Additional studies need to be conducted in increasing the vascular surgeons' awareness regarding patient dose and radiation protection issues during EVAR procedures.

Factors affecting radiation exposure in endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Radiation exposure during endovascular repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) is a potential issue. Several studies have identified factors affecting radiation exposure, although they are limited. The aim of this study was to identify independent factors affecting radiation exposure in patients with AAA undergoing standard EVAR. METHODS: Forty-eight consecutive patients underwent elective EVAR for infrarenal AAA managed between April 2019 and April 2020. Fluoroscopy time (FT) and kerma area product (KAP) were the main outcome measures. RESULTS: Median (interquartile range) FT and KAP values were 1018 (653-1619) s and 2.68 (2.08-3.81) mGy·m2, respectively. C3 Excluder graft use and main body insertion site from the right femoral were associated with significantly lower FT. Coronary artery disease, endografts with two docking limbs, AAA diameter, neck angle and length, procedure duration, contrast amount, and hospitalization were associated with significantly higher FT. Neck angle was the single independent perioperative factor related to FT higher than the median value observed in the study (P=0.004, odds ratio: 1.073, 95% confidence interval: 1.023-1.126). The use of the C3 Excluder device was associated with lower KAP. AAA diameter, neck angle, procedure duration, contrast medium amount and postoperative hospitalization were associated with higher KAP. AAA diameter was the single independent factor related to KAP higher than the median value observed in the study (P=0.013, odds ratio: 3.73, 95% confidence interval: 1.32-10.56). CONCLUSIONS: This study has identified factors affecting radiation exposure during standard EVAR for infrarenal AAAs. These factors should be taken into account when contemplating AAA repair.

PATIENT SIZE INDICES AND DOSE IN FLUOROSCOPICALLY GUIDED LUMBAR DISCECTOMY AND FUSION: A PRELIMINARY STUDY.

Patient dose values varied significantly during interventional procedures, mainly due to the patient size, operators' choices and clinical complexity. In this study, the effect of applying a previously described and validated size-correction method to normalise kerma-area product (KAP) and average KAP rate values of the whole procedure (KAP rate) and isolate variations in dose due to the patient size and complexity, during lumbar discectomy and fusion (LDF) procedures, was investigated. Fluoroscopy time (FT), KAP, KAP rate and patient size data (weight, height and equivalent diameter) were recorded, for 96 patients who underwent single or multilevel LDF procedures by three senior neurosurgeons, defining three different patient groups (surgeon 1, surgeon 2, surgeon 3). Simple linear regression and coefficients of determination were used to investigate the relationship between uncorrected and corrected KAP and KAP rate values and patient size indices in these groups. The results showed that the size correction decreased the influence of patient size and could contribute to the isolation of the variations in patient dose due to the patient size. From this point of view, dose surveys during lumbar spine interventions may include dosimetric data from all patients independently of their body size and not only for standard-sized patients, providing the advantage of accessible data collection for the establishment of local dose reference levels and optimisation purposes, within the framework of the radiation protection program in the Neurosurgery Department.

LOW BMI PATIENT DOSE IN DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY.

In this study, the radiation dose received by 364 low body mass index (BMI) adult patients undergoing chest, abdomen, lumbar spine, kidneys and urinary bladder (KUB) and pelvis X-ray examinations in an X-ray room with a digital radiography system was evaluated. The patients' kerma area product (KAP) values were recorded, and the entrance surface air kerma (ESAK) was calculated based on the X-ray tube output, exposure parameters and technical data. The 75th percentiles of the distribution of ESAK and KAP values were also estimated. The dose values were compared with the corresponding values for normal patients obtained from a previous survey in our hospital, as well as with the national and UK diagnostic reference levels (DRLs). The correlation of dose values with patient size metrics (mass, height, BMI) was also investigated. A statistically significant difference was found in KAP and the ESAK values between low BMI and normal patients (Mann-Whitney test, p < 0.05), for all examinations studied. The percentage difference for chest PA, chest LAT, abdomen PA, lumbar spine AP, lumbar spine LAT, pelvis AP and KUB AP examinations was 40, 36, 48, 68, 57, 46 and 67% for median KAP and 26, 43, 52, 48, 19, 44 and 51% for median ESAK, respectively. The corresponding 75th percentiles for low BMI patients were 0.065, 0.349, 0.683, 1.54, 3.92, 1.11, 0.67 mGy and 0.042, 0.218, 0.450, 0.280, 0.598, 0.597, 0.267 Gycm2 in terms of ESAK and KAP values, respectively. They were 74-90% lower compared to the national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs), 35-84% and 58-82% compared to the UK DRLs, for ESAK and KAP values, respectively. Regarding the gender of the patients, no statistically significant difference was found in the dose values between female and male patients (Mann-Whitney test, p > 0.05), for all examinations studied. A statistically significant correlation was found between ESAK and KAP values with BMI for KUB AP, pelvis AP, lumbar spine AP, lumbar spine LAT and chest PA, while for chest LAT examinations, only the ESAK were significantly correlated with BMI. They also significantly correlated with the mass for KUB AP, lumbar spine LAT, abdomen PA and chest PA examinations, while no significant correlation was found between the dose values and patients' height. It can be concluded that the low BMI patients received a significantly reduced radiation dose compared to normal patients. Additional studies need to be conducted for these patient groups, which could contribute to the further development of a radiation protection culture in diagnostic radiography.

DO THE BMI AND SURGEON INFLUENCE THE PATIENT DOSE IN FLUOROSCOPICALLY GUIDED LUMBAR DISCECTOMY AND FUSION?☆.

A survey was conducted to evaluate the role of the surgeon and the patients' body size, on patient radiation dose in fluoroscopically guided lumbar discectomy and fusion (LDF) procedures. Fluoroscopy time (FT), kerma area product (KAP), cumulative dose (CD), as well as anatomical and technical data were recorded for 100 patients, who underwent single or multi-level posterior LDF, which was carried out by three senior neurosurgeons utilising a C-arm fluoroscopy system. The patients were divided into three groups based on the body mass index (BMI) values (normal, overweight, obese) and the neurosurgeon that performed each procedure (surgeon 1, surgeon 2, surgeon 3). Entrance surface dose (ESD) was estimated based on KAP values and exposure data, while the effective dose (ED) was estimated utilising the KAP values and appropriate conversion coefficients. The mean FT, KAP, CD, ESD and ED values were 11.7 s, 0.65 Gy cm2, 2.96 mGy, 11.7 mGy and 0.08 mSv for normal patients, 22.1 s, 0.94 Gy cm2, 4.27 mGy, 21.4 mGy and 0.11 mSv for overweight patients and 67.7 s, 3.59 Gy cm2, 17.79 mGy, 107.2 mGy and 0.44 mSv for obese patients. The corresponding values were 21.5 s, 0.77 Gy cm2, 3.51 mGy, 17.5 mGy, 0.09 mSv for the first, 23.0 s, 1.44 Gy cm2, 6.52 mGy, 30.2 mGy, 0.18 mSv for the second and 14.2 s, 0.64 Gy cm2, 2.91 mGy, 17.0 mGy, 0.08 mSv for the third surgeon. Overweight patients received 83% and 38% higher ESD and ED, while obese patients 816% and 450%, compared to normal patients, respectively. The CD values should be implemented with caution, as a skin dose indicator, for all patient sizes. The weight-FT product could be useful in estimating KAP during LDF procedures. The third surgeon achieved the lowest dose values. Although the first surgeon had the same FT with the second surgeon, the corresponding dose values were decreased by 50%. The differences in FT, KAP, CD and ED values among the groups of patients studied were not statistically significant (Kruskal-Wallis test, p > 0.05), although the p-values were close to the threshold of statistical significance. The pairwise comparisons showed statistically significant differences for KAP, CD and ED values between obese and normal patients and between surgeon 1 and surgeon 3 (Mann-Whitney test, p < 0.05). The ESD values showed statistically significant differences among the BMI-based groups and among the surgeon-based groups studied (Kruskal-Wallis test, p < 0.05). This fact can be attributed to the better implementation of the fluoroscopy system technical parameters concerning the patients' size, clinical conditions and complexity of the procedures. Training and awareness of neurosurgeons on radiation protection issues are of critical importance; however, further studies should be performed towards optimisation procedures regarding patient dose.

PATIENT DOSES IN COMMON DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY EXAMINATIONS.

A local survey was conducted, to evaluate the radiation dose to adult patients who underwent diagnostic X-ray examinations. Patient-related and technical data were recorded, in 1504 patients, for each of the 11 individual projections, of the 7 most common examinations performed in an X-ray room, with 1 digital radiography system. The patient entrance surface air kerma (ESAK) and the effective dose (ED) were calculated based on the X-ray tube output and the exposure parameters, as well as utilisation of suitable conversion coefficients, respectively. The 75th percentiles of the distribution of the ESAK and kerma area product (KAP) values were also established. The mean, median and 75th percentiles were compared with the national reference levels and the most common values reported at the European level through the DOSE DATAMED II project. The corresponding ED values were also compared with the average values reported for all European countries. The mean ESAK, KAP and ED values along with the uncertainty U values for chest PA, chest LAT, cranium AP, cranium LAT, cervical spine AP, cervical spine LAT, lumbar spine AP, lumbar spine LAT, pelvis AP, abdomen AP, kidneys and urinary bladder (KUB) AP were 0.12 (0.001) mGy, 0.66 (0.023) mGy, 1.01 (0.034) mGy, 0.69 (0.098) mGy, 0.72 (0.014) mGy, 0.63 (0.011) mGy, 4.12 (0.050) mGy, 5.74 (0.082) mGy, 2.57 (0.024) mGy, 1.94 (0.017) mGy, 2.47 (0.073) mGy, and 0.09 (0.001) Gy cm2, 0.38 (0.012) Gy cm2, 0.32 (0.009) Gy cm2, 0.27 (0.052) Gy cm2, 0.17 (0.004) Gy cm2, 0.21 (0.006) Gy cm2, 1.18 (0.018) Gy cm2, 1.86 (0.023) Gy cm2, 1.41 (0.012) Gy cm2, 1.27 (0.010) Gy cm2, 1.28 (0.038) Gy cm2, as well as 0.01 (0.0001) mSv, 0.05 (0.0016) mSv, 0.02 (0.0006) mSv, 0.01 (0.0012) mSv, 0.03 (0.0008) mSv, 0.03 (0.0006) mSv, 0.26 (0.0038) mSv, 0.17 (0.0022) mSv, 0.20 (0.0016) mSv, 0.23 (0.0018) mSv, 0.23 (0.0068) mSv, respectively. The 75th percentiles along with the uncertainty U values for chest PA, chest LAT, cranium AP, cranium LAT, cervical spine AP, cervical spine LAT, lumbar spine AP, lumbar spine LAT, pelvis AP, abdomen AP, kidneys and urinary bladder (KUB) AP were 0.14 (0.006) mGy, 0.88 (0.031) mGy, 1.22 (0.049) mGy, 0.94 (0.098) mGy, 0.93 (0.027) mGy, 0.78 (0.013) mGy, 5.16 (0.073) mGy, 7.24 (0.134) mGy, 2.96 (0.047) mGy, 2.59 (0.036) mGy, 3.07 (0.116) mGy, as well as 0.10 (0.0006) Gy cm2, 0.51 (0.017) Gy cm2, 0.37 (0.020) Gy cm2, 0.33 (0.040) Gy cm2, 0.23 (0.007) Gy cm2, 0.26 (0.011) Gy cm2, 1.50 (0.036) Gy cm2, 2.26 (0.035) Gy cm2, 1.61 (0.023) Gy cm2, 1.67 (0.017) Gy cm2, 1.56 (0.069) Gy cm2, in terms of ESAK and KAP values, respectively. The results were significantly lower compared with the national reference levels, the most common DRL values reported at the European level and other previously reported dose values. Patient dose surveys could contribute towards optimising radiation protection for patients, therefore, highlighting the necessity to increase the awareness and knowledge of the radiation dose in conjunction with the required image quality.

PATIENT DOSE IN DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY UTILISING BMI CLASSIFICATION.

Dose audit is important towards optimisation of patients' radiation protection in diagnostic radiography. In this study, the effect of the body mass index (BMI) on radiation dose received by 1869 adult patients undergoing chest, abdomen, lumbar spine, kidneys and urinary bladder (KUB) and pelvis radiography in an X-ray room with a digital radiography system was investigated. Patients were categorised into three groups (normal, overweight and obese) based on the BMI values. The patients' entrance surface air kerma (ESAK) and the effective dose (ED) were calculated based on the X-ray tube output, exposure parameters and technical data, as well as utilising appropriate conversion coefficients of the recorded kerma area product (KAP) values. The local diagnostic reference levels (LDRLs) were established at the 75th percentile of the distribution of ESAK and KAP values. Statistically, a significant increase was found in ESAK, KAP and ED values, for all examinations, both for overweight and obese patients compared to normal patients (Mann-Whitney test, p < 0.0001). Regarding the gender of the patients, a statistically significant increase was found in the dose values for male patients compared to female patients, except for the chest LAT examinations (Mann-Whitney test, p = 0.06). The percentage increase for chest PA, chest LAT, abdomen AP, lumbar spine AP, lumbar spine LAT, pelvis AP and KUB AP in overweight patients was 75%, 100%, 136%, 130%, 70%, 66% and 174% for median ESAK, 67%, 81%, 135%, 134%, 85%, 63% and 172% for median KAP, as well as 89%, 54%, 146%, 138%, 82%, 57% and 183% for median ED values, respectively. For obese patients, the corresponding increases were 200%, 186%, 459%, 345%, 203%, 150% and 785% for median ESAK, 200%, 185%, 423%, 357%, 227%, 142% and 597% for median KAP, as well as 222%, 156%, 446%, 363%, 218%, 136% and 625% for median ED. The corresponding LDRLs for overweight patients were 0.17 mGy, 1.21 mGy, 3.74 mGy, 7.70 mGy, 7.99 mGy, 4.07mGy, 5.03 mGy and 0.13 Gy cm2, 0.69 Gy cm2, 2.35 Gy cm2, 2.10 Gy cm2, 2.59 Gy cm2, 2.13 Gy cm2, 2.49 Gy cm2 in terms of ESAK and KAP values, respectively, while in the case of obese patients were 0.28 mGy, 1.82 mGy, 7.26 mGy, 15.10 mGy, 13.86 mGy, 6.89 mGy, 13.40 mGy and 0.21 Gy cm2, 1.10 Gy cm2, 4.68 Gy cm2, 4.01 Gy cm2, 4.80 Gy cm2, 3.27 Gy cm2, 6.02 Gy cm2, respectively. It can be concluded that overweight and obese patients received a significantly increased radiation dose. Careful adjustment of imaging protocols is needed for these patients to reduce patient dose, while keeping the image quality at an acceptable level. Additional studies need to be conducted for these patient groups, that could further contribute to the development of radiation protection culture in diagnostic radiography.

OPTIMISATION OF PATIENT DOSE AND IMAGE QUALITY IN FLUOROSCOPICALLY GUIDED CERVICAL SPINE SURGERY: A PHANTOM-BASED STUDY.

The purpose of the current study was to provide useful data, which may help neurosurgeons to manage the patient dose and image quality in spinal surgery procedures, utilising a phantom and a test object. The kerma area product, cumulative dose (CD) and entrance surface dose (ESD) rate on the phantom and image intensifier were measured, for selectable fields of view (FOVs), fluoroscopy modes, two geometric magnifications and various phantom thicknesses. The images were subjectively evaluated regarding low-contrast detectability and high-contrast resolution. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), high-contrast spatial resolution (HCSR) and figure of merit (FOM) values were also estimated. The ESD rates increased with increasing phantom thickness, when using electronic or geometric magnification, continuous or high-definition fluoroscopy (HDF). The observers' evaluation showed relatively slight changes in image quality when pulsed fluoroscopy was used. SNR, CNR and HCSR values decreased with increasing phantom thicknesses, while remained almost constant when using pulsed fluoroscopy. SNR and HCSR improved in HDF, while the CNR remained almost constant only for the FOVs 23 and 17 cm. By applying electronic magnification, this resulted in improved HCSR. FOM values decreased in HDF, with increasing phantom thickness and using electronic magnification. For the 'thinnest' patients, CD may overestimate skin dose by 25% than the actual values. Geometric magnification resulted in improved FOM, especially for low-dose fluoroscopy and FOV 23 cm. The knowledge of the increments in dose values, image quality and FOM indices concerning phantom thickness may help neurosurgeons to optimise spinal surgery procedures by selecting the appropriate operational parameters, which could contribute toward the establishment of a radiation protection culture.

Institutional (local) diagnostic reference levels in fluoroscopically guided spine surgery.

In this study, institutional (local) diagnostic reference levels (LDRLs) and action levels (ALs) for spine interventional procedures are reported. Fluoroscopy time (FT), kerma area product (KAP), cumulative dose (CD), as well as anatomical, clinical and technical factors affecting procedure complexity were recorded for 156 patients who underwent cervical and thoraco-lumbar interventions. Patient entrance surface dose (ESD), effective dose (ED), thyroid absorbed dose and gonadal dose were also estimated, based on KAP measurements. The LDRLs and ALs were calculated as the 75th and 10th percentile of FT, KAP and CD values for the total group of patients, as well as utilizing the weight banding method and the size correction method. For the total distribution of patients, the LDRLs for cervical and thoraco-lumbar interventions are 0.15min and 0.29min for FT values, 0.10Gycm2 and 0.71Gycm2 for KAP values, as well as 0.47mGy and 3.24mGy for CD values, respectively. The corresponding ALs are 0.03min and 0.03min, 0.01Gycm2 and 0.07Gycm2, as well as 0.05mGy and 0.33mGy for FT, KAP and CD values, respectively. The age and treated levels had a significant influence on the reference dose values only for cervical interventions, whereas none of the other included factors showed statistically significant association for both cervical and thoraco-lumbar interventions. The weight banding method resulted to reference values comparable to those obtained for the whole group of patients, while the size correction method resulted to lower values. The mean ESD values were 1.58mGy (range 0.02-13.58mGy) for cervical and 23mGy (range 0.004-390.3mGy) for thoraco-lumbar interventions. The corresponding mean ED values were 0.012mSv (range 0.001-0.097mSv) and 0.124mSv (range 0.00002-2.11mSv), respectively. The mean thyroid and gonadal doses were 0.14mGy (range 0.002-1.12mGy) and 0.044mGy (range 0.000003-1.56mGy), respectively. The LDRLs and ALs reported could contribute in the effort for establishing national DRLs and for increasing neurosurgeons awareness regarding patient dose and radiation protection issues during spine interventional procedures.

Patient Dose in Fluoroscopically Guided Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Cervical discectomy and fusion (CDF) is a minimally invasive procedure, where the accurate placement of the implants is accomplished using fluoroscopic guidance. Therefore, the evaluation of the radiation dose becomes mandatory. The purpose of the current study was to assess patient dose during fluoroscopically guided anterior and/or posterior CDF procedures. Thirty-three patients undergoing single or multiple-level CDF were studied using a mobile C-arm system. Data regarding fluoroscopy time (FT), air kerma area product (KAP) and cumulative dose (CD) were recorded. Patient entrance surface dose (ESD), thyroid absorbed dose and effective dose (ED) were calculated from KAP measurements, utilizing the CALDoseX software. The average FT was 0.12 min (range 0.02-0.48 min), resulting to a KAP value of 0.21 Gy cm2 (range 0.01-1.46 Gy cm2) and a CD value of 0.96 mGy (range 0.04-6.58 mGy). The ESD ranged between 0.08 and 13.58 mGy (average 1.95 mGy), the ED between 0.001 and 0.097 mSv (average 0.015 mSv), while the dose absorbed by the thyroid ranged between 0.01 and 1.12 mGy (average 0.194 mGy). The dose associated with the CDF procedure is very low, comparable to that delivered by a lateral X-ray radiograph of the cervical spine. However, higher doses can be revealed, due to the non-optimum use of the X-ray system and extended FTs, mainly affected by complex clinical conditions, as well as the experience of the neurosurgeon. Additional studies need to be conducted for further investigation of the patient dose from the CDF procedure.