ABSTRACT
Swallow syncope, also known as deglutition syncope, is a relatively rare neurogenic disorder that is triggered by oral intake. When diagnosed, swallow syncope is treatable, but it is challenging to identify without proper history and prior knowledge of this disorder. Here, we describe the case of a 68-year-old female with a complex history who presented to the emergency room with complaints of worsening long-term intermittent lightheadedness and dizziness associated with swallowing. During her hospital stay, the patient was noted to have a high-degree atrioventricular block on telemetry during dinner time. A repeat electrocardiogram (ECG) demonstrated a prolonged P-R interval, and a temporal relationship between swallowing cold water and electrocardiogram (ECG) changes was demonstrated. A diagnosis of swallow syncope was confirmed. Electrophysiology was consulted and a pacemaker was placed. Symptoms of swallow-associated arrhythmias completely resolved after pacemaker implantation. This case illustrates the challenging problem of swallow syncope. While swallow syncope is highly treatable once identified, the challenge lies in identifying the disorder.
ABSTRACT
Multiple Biomarkers have recently been shown to be elevated in COVID-19, a respiratory infection with multi-organ dysfunction; however, information regarding the prognostic value of cardiac biomarkers as it relates to disease severity and cardiac injury are inconsistent. The goal of this meta-analysis was to summarize the evidence regarding the prognostic relevance of cardiac biomarkers from data available in published reports. PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were searched from inception through April 2020 for studies comparing median values of cardiac biomarkers in critically ill versus non-critically ill COVID-19 patients, or patients who died versus those who survived. The weighted mean differences (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) between the groups were calculated for each study and combined using a random effects meta-analysis model. The odds ratio (OR) for mortality based on cardiac injury was combined from studies reporting it. Troponin levels were significantly higher in COVID-19 patients who died or were critically ill versus those who were alive or not critically ill (WMD 0.57, 95% CI 0.43-0.70, p < 0.001). Additionally, BNP levels were also significantly higher in patients who died or were critically ill (WMD 0.45, 95% CI - 0.21-0.69, p < 0.001). Cardiac injury was independently associated with significantly increased odds of mortality (OR 6.641, 95% CI 1.26-35.1, p = 0.03). A significant difference in levels of D-dimer was seen in those who died or were critically ill. CK levels were only significantly higher in those who died versus those who were alive (WMD 0.79, 95% CI 0.25-1.33, p = 0.004). Cardiac biomarkers add prognostic value to the determination of the severity of COVID-19 and can predict mortality.
Subject(s)
Biomarkers/blood , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/diagnosis , Myocardium/metabolism , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cardiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/blood , Cardiovascular Diseases/complications , Creatine Kinase/metabolism , Critical Illness , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/analysis , Humans , L-Lactate Dehydrogenase/metabolism , Natriuretic Peptide, Brain/analysis , Peptide Fragments/analysis , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Background Multiple Biomarkers have recently been shown to be elevated in COVID-19, a respiratory infection with multi-organ dysfunction; however, information regarding the prognostic value of cardiac biomarkers as it relates to disease severity and cardiac injury are inconsistent. Research Question The goal of this meta-analysis was to summarize the evidence regarding the prognostic relevance of cardiac biomarkers from data available in published reports. Study Design and Methods PubMed was searched from inception through April 2020 for studies comparing median values of cardiac biomarkers in critically ill versus non-critically ill COVID-19 patients, or patients who died versus those who survived. The weighted mean differences (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) between the groups were calculated for each study and combined using a random effects meta-analysis model. The odds ratio (OR) for mortality based on cardiac injury was combined from studies reporting it. Results Troponin levels were significantly higher in COVID-19 patients who died or were critically ill versus those who were alive or not critically ill (WMD 0.58, 95% CI 0.42-0.71, p<0.001). Cardiac injury was independently associated with significantly increased odds of mortality (OR 6.641, 95% CI 1.26 - 35.1, p=0.03). No difference in BNP was seen between the two groups. A significant difference in levels of D-dimer was seen in those who died or were critically ill. CK levels were only significantly higher in those who died versus those who were alive (WMD 0.47 95% CI 0.09-0.84, p=0.014). Interpretation Cardiac biomarkers add prognostic value to the determination of the severity of COVID-19 and can predict mortality.