ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cervical pregnancy is a rare condition that can become life-threatening if heavy bleeding occurs. CASE: Grace (pseudonym) is a 32-year-old woman who was admitted to hospital at approximately 6 weeks' gestational age after several days of heavy bleeding. Ultrasonographic examination revealed the presence of cervical pregnancy. She received multiple doses of methotrexate with folinic acid rescue, and did not require surgical intervention. Nine months after the resolution of the cervical pregnancy, Grace again became pregnant. She had an uncomplicated gestation and a normal vaginal delivery of a healthy baby at term. CONCLUSION: Multiple-dose methotrexate with folinic acid rescue was a safe option for the medical treatment of ectopic cervical pregnancy in this case. Long-term toxicity studies and case reports are required to provide more information regarding safety and for clinicians to individualize treatment regimens.
Subject(s)
Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal/therapeutic use , Leucovorin/therapeutic use , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Pregnancy, Ectopic/drug therapy , Adult , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy, Ectopic/complications , Safety , Treatment Outcome , Uterine Hemorrhage/etiologyABSTRACT
This study assesses the health-related quality-of-life (HRQL) effects of chorionic villi sampling (CVS) and genetic amniocentesis (GA), including both process and outcomes of prenatal diagnosis. The HRQL of 126 women participating in a randomized controlled clinical trial of CVS versus GA in Toronto and Hamilton, Ontario, was assessed in four interviews at weeks 8, 13, 18, and 22 of pregnancy. Statistical analyses included analysis of variance, repeated measures analysis of covariance, chi-square, Fisher's exact test, Student's t-tests, and paired t-tests. Utility scores for patients undergoing CVS exceeded those for GA patients at week 18 (p = 0.04). Utility scores for hypothetical health states did not differ significantly by trial arm. CVS results in slightly improved HRQL during prenatal diagnosis. This advantage needs to be weighed against the high disutility patients attach to infrequent outcomes associated with pregnancy losses, equivocal diagnoses, and diagnostic inaccuracy.