Prognostic value of hemoglobin-to-red cell distribution width ratio in cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: The hemoglobin-to-red cell distribution width ratio (HRR) has emerged as a novel integrative biomarker predictive of overall and disease-free survival in cancer patients. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of HRR in the cancer population. Methods: A literature search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE from inception to 1 July 2021, to collect studies assessing the prognostic value of HRR in cancer patients. The primary and secondary end points were all-cause mortality and occurrence of disease progression or relapse, respectively. A meta-analytic approach was employed to estimate the pooled hazard ratio with 95% CI by fitting random-effects models. Results: A total of 11 retrospective cohort studies representing 2985 cancer patients were included. Compared with patients with high HRR, patients with low HRR had a twofold risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 2.29; 95% CI: 1.76-2.98; p < 0.0001). There was substantial heterogeneity in the association of HRR with mortality across the studies (I2: 66.8%; 95% CI: 35.3-82.9%; p = 0.0014). Similarly, low HRR was associated with a twofold risk of disease progression or relapse (hazard ratio: 2.19; 95% CI: 1.74-2.76; p < 0.0001). No significant heterogeneity was observed (I2: 16.8%; 95% CI: 0.0-60.7%; p = 0.30). Conclusion: Low HRR was associated with mortality and disease progression or relapse in patients with cancer. Further studies are required to standardize the HRR cutoff value and investigate whether HRR can be incorporated into risk assessment models for predicting adverse prognosis in cancer patients.

Hemoglobin and red cell distribution width are both widely available and routinely measured in blood tests. The hemoglobin-to-red cell distribution width ratio has recently been introduced as a new potential marker for predicting the clinical course and outcome in patients with various types of cancer. In the present meta-analysis of 11 studies representing 2985 cancer patients, the authors showed that cancer patients with a lower hemoglobin-to-red cell distribution width ratio were more likely to experience disease progression or relapse and had a greater mortality risk.

Association between red blood cell distribution width and mortality and severity among patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Emerging evidence has underscored the potential usefulness of red blood cell distribution width (RDW) measurement in predicting the mortality and disease severity of COVID-19. This study aimed to assess the association of the plasma RDW levels with adverse prognosis in COVID-19 patients. A comprehensive literature search from inception to September 2020 was performed to harvest original studies reporting RDW on admission and clinical outcomes among patients hospitalized with COVID-19. RDW levels were compared between cases (patients who died or developed more severe symptoms) and controls (patients who survived or developed less severe symptoms). A total of 14,866 subjects from 10 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Higher levels of RDW were associated with adverse outcomes in COVID-19 patients (mean differences = 0.72; 95% CI = 0.47-0.97; I2 = 89.51%). Deceased patients had higher levels of RDW compared to patients who survived (mean differences = 0.93; 95% CI = 0.63-1.23; I2 = 85.58%). Severely ill COVID-19 patients showed higher levels of RDW, as opposed to patients classified to have milder symptoms (mean differences = 0.61; 95% CI = 0.28-0.94; I2 = 82.18%). Elevated RDW levels were associated with adverse outcomes in COVID-19 patients. This finding warrants further research on whether RDW could be utilized as a simple and reliable biomarker for predicting COVID-19 severity and whether RDW is mechanistically linked with COVID-19 pathophysiology.

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection managed with a conservative or revascularization approach: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment approach for spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: The study aims to compare in-hospital and long-term clinical outcomes of SCAD patients initially managed with medical therapy (conservative approach) versus percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting (revascularization approach) based on published data. METHODS: We identified relevant studies by performing a systematic search in the Ovid MEDLINE and Embase databases. Studies with N at least 10 that report in-hospital outcomes [death, myocardial infarction (MI) and revascularization] or long-term outcomes (death, MI, revascularization, SCAD recurrence, and heart failure) were included. Risk difference between conservative and revascularization approach was estimated with the inverse variance-weighted method in a fixed-effect or random-effect model. RESULTS: A total of 22 nonrandomized, observational studies were analyzed (N = 1435). Compared with the initial revascularization approach, the conservative approach was associated with a comparable risk of in-hospital outcomes [risk difference: death, -0.61% (95% confidence interval, -2.13-0.91%), P = 0.43; MI, -0.99% (-4.65-2.67%), P = 0.60; revascularization, -3.02% (-8.79-2.75%), P = 0.31] and long-term outcomes [death, -0.06% (-2.33-2.20%), P = 0.96; MI, 0.96% (-2.35-4.27%), P = 0.57; revascularization, -3.31% (-7.63-1.02%), P = 0.13; SCAD recurrence, 3.75% (-2.05-9.55%), P = 0.21; heart failure, -0.01% (-3.13-3.11%), P = 0.99]. There was no significant heterogeneity across these studies. CONCLUSION: Pooled results suggest that SCAD patients initially managed with a conservative strategy may have similar in-hospital and long-term outcomes compared with those who received revascularization in the absence of ongoing ischemia or left main artery involvement. More data from prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings.