ABSTRACT
AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of stress and anxiety on the response to non-surgical periodontal treatment (NPT) in patients with chronic periodontitis. METHOD: Sixty-six patients (mean age 46.1 +/- 8 years) were assigned to three groups: control group, probing pocket depth (PPD)
Subject(s)
Anxiety/complications , Periodontitis/therapy , Stress, Physiological/complications , Anxiety/diagnosis , Chronic Disease , Epidemiologic Methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Periodontal Attachment Loss/psychology , Periodontal Attachment Loss/therapy , Periodontal Pocket/psychology , Periodontal Pocket/therapy , Periodontitis/psychology , Stress, Physiological/diagnosis , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
AIM: This case-control study investigates the relationship of stress and anxiety with periodontal clinical characteristics. METHOD: Seventy-nine selected patients (mean age 46.8+/-8 years) were assigned to three groups in accordance with their levels of probing pocket depth (PPD): control group (PPD< or =3 mm, n=22), test group 1 (at least four sites with PPD > or =4 mm and < or =6 mm, n=27) and test group 2 (at least four sites with PPD >6 mm, n=30). An inclusion criterion of the study required that patients presented a plaque index (PI) with a value equal to or larger than 2 in at least 50% of dental surfaces. All subjects were submitted to stress and anxiety evaluations. Stress was measured by the Stress Symptom Inventory (SSI) and the Social Readjustment Rating Scale (SRRS), while the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) was used to assess anxiety. Clinical measures such as PI, gingival index (GI), PPD and clinical attachment level (CAL) were collected. Patient's medical history and socioeconomic data were also recorded. RESULTS: The mean clinical measures (PI, GI, PPD and CAL) obtained for the three groups, were: control group, 1.56+/-0.32, 0.68+/-0.49, 1.72+/-0.54 and 2.04+/-0.64 mm; group 1, 1.56+/-0.39, 1.13+/-0.58, 2.67+/-0.67 and 3.10+/-0.76 mm, group 2, 1.65+/-0.37, 1.54+/-0.46, 4.14+/-1.23 and 5.01+/-1.60 mm. The three groups did not differ with respect to percentage of clinical stress, scores of the SRRS, trait and state anxiety. Frequency of moderate CAL (4-6 mm) and moderate PPD (4-6 mm) were found to be significantly associated with higher trait anxiety scores after adjusting for socioeconomic data and cigarette consumption (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the obtained results, individuals with high levels of trait anxiety appeared to be more prone to periodontal disease.
Subject(s)
Anxiety/complications , Periodontitis/complications , Stress, Physiological/complications , Stress, Psychological/complications , Adult , Aged , Alcohol Drinking , Analysis of Variance , Anxiety/classification , Case-Control Studies , Chronic Disease , Dental Plaque Index , Female , Humans , Linear Models , Male , Middle Aged , Periodontal Attachment Loss/classification , Periodontal Index , Periodontal Pocket/classification , Periodontitis/classification , Smoking , Socioeconomic Factors , Statistics, Nonparametric , Stress, Physiological/classification , Stress, Psychological/classificationABSTRACT
Psychological disturbances may lead patients to neglect oral hygiene. This study investigated whether a number of psychosocial factors (depression, state and trait anxiety, total and average perceived stress, and loneliness) could predict dental plaque levels in patients with adult onset rapidly progressive periodontitis (RPP) and routine chronic adult periodontitis (RCAP), before periodontal treatment. It was also examined whether RPP and RCAP patients differed on plaque and smoking. Plaque was scored in a sample of 6 teeth in each of 80 subjects, 40 with RPP, 40 with RCAP, before psychosocial questionnaire completion. Multiple regression was performed between plaque as the dependent and psychosocial factors, gender, education, form of periodontitis and smoking as independent variables. Only gender contributed significantly to prediction of plaque, t=-2.70, p=0.01, partial regression coefficient -0.37, 95% CI: -0.64 to -0.10, indicating that plaque was on average 0.37 lower for females than males, after adjusting for the other predictor variables. It was confirmed that RPP and RCAP patients did not differ significantly on plaque, univariate t-test(69.99)= 0.65, p=0.13. However, RPP patients smoked significantly more than RCAP patients t(69.72)=2.36, p=0.02. There was also a marginally significant correlation between depression and smoking, r=0.16, p=0.07. One possible reason advanced for the lack of an association between psychosocial factors and plaque, and the absence of a difference in plaque between RPP and RCAP patients is the fact that the patients involved in the present study were seen as secondary referrals. The gender difference in plaque levels and the greater incidence of smoking in RPP patients may be of significance in planning interventions with patients with periodontitis.
Subject(s)
Dental Plaque/complications , Periodontitis/etiology , Smoking/adverse effects , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Anxiety/psychology , Chronic Disease , Depression/psychology , Disease Progression , Educational Status , Female , Forecasting , Humans , Incidence , Loneliness/psychology , Male , Middle Aged , Oral Hygiene , Periodontitis/psychology , Regression Analysis , Sex Factors , Stress, Physiological/complicationsABSTRACT
On the basis of clinical observations, some periodontologists have suggested an association between psychosocial factors such as depression, stress and anxiety, and adult onset rapidly progressive periodontitis (RPP). This study investigated more formally possible associations between a number of relevant psychosocial factors and RPP. The significance of the psychosocial variables was assessed by comparing 3 groups: 50 patients with RPP, 50 patients with routine chronic adult periodontitis (RCAP), and 50 patients without significant periodontal destruction (controls). It was anticipated that the RPP group would show higher levels of psychosocial maladjustment than the RCAP and control groups. A between-subjects multivariate analysis of covariance indicated that the combined psychosocial variables were significantly related to the periodontal diagnosis. 2 psychosocial factors, depression and loneliness, were significant in distinguishing between groups. The RPP group presented significantly increased depression and loneliness compared to the RCAP and control groups. Future research is indicated to further clarify the significance of these psychosocial differences in relation to the onset and progression of RPP.