Can the Cartilaginous Thickness Determine the Risk of Malignancy in Pelvic Cartilaginous Tumors, and How Accurate is the Preoperative Biopsy of These Tumors?

BACKGROUND: Peripheral osteochondral tumors are common, and the management of tumors presenting in the pelvis is challenging and a controversial topic. Some have suggested that cartilage cap thickness may indicate malignant potential, but this supposition is not well validated. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) How accurate is preoperative biopsy in determining whether a peripheral cartilage tumor of the pelvis is benign or malignant? (2) Is the thickness of the cartilage cap as determined by MRI associated with the likelihood that a given peripheral cartilage tumor is malignant? (3) What is local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and disease-specific survival (DSS) in peripheral chondrosarcoma of the pelvis and is it associated with surgical margin? METHODS: Between 2005 and 2022, 289 patients had diagnoses of peripheral cartilage tumors of the pelvis (either pedunculated or sessile) and were treated at one tertiary sarcoma center (the Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK). These patients were identified retrospectively from a longitudinally maintained institutional database. Those whose tumors were asymptomatic and discovered incidentally and had cartilage caps ≤ 1.5 cm were discharged (95 patients), leaving 194 patients with tumors that were either symptomatic or had cartilage caps > 1.5 cm. Tumors that were asymptomatic and had a cartilage cap > 1.5 cm were followed with MRIs for 2 years and discharged without biopsy if the tumors did not grow or change in appearance (15 patients). Patients with symptomatic tumors that had cartilage caps ≤ 1.5 cm underwent removal without biopsy (63 patients). A total of 82 patients (63 with caps ≤ 1.5 cm and 19 with caps > 1.5 cm, whose treatment deviated from the routine at the time) had their tumors removed without biopsy. This left 97 patients who underwent biopsy before removal of peripheral cartilage tumors of the pelvis, and this was the group we used to answer research question 1. The thickness of the cartilage cap was recorded from MRI and measuring to the nearest millimeter, with measurements taken perpendicular in the plane that best allowed the greatest measurement. Patient survival rates were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method with 95% confidence intervals as median observation times to estimate MFS, LRFS, and DSS. RESULTS: Of malignant tumors biopsied, in 49% (40 of 82), the biopsy result was recorded as benign (or was considered uncertain regarding malignancy). A malignant diagnosis was correctly reported in biopsy reports in 51% (42 of 82) of patients, and if biopsy samples with uncertainty regarding malignancy were excluded, the biopsy identified a lesion as being malignant in 84% (42 of 50) of patients. The biopsy results correlated with the final histologic grade as recorded from the resected specimen in only 33% (27 of 82) of patients. Among these 82 patients, 15 biopsies underestimated the final histologic grade. The median cartilage cap thickness for all benign osteochondromas was 0.5 cm (range 0.1 to 4.0 cm), and the median cartilage cap thickness for malignant peripheral chondrosarcomas was 8.0 cm (range 3.0 to 19 cm, difference of medians 7.5 cm; p < 0.01). LRFS was 49% (95% CI 35% to 63%) at 3 years for patients with malignant peripheral tumors with < 1-mm margins, and LRFS was 97% (95% CI 92% to 100%) for patients with malignant peripheral tumors with ≥ 1-mm margins (p < 0.01). DSS was 100% at 3 years for Grade 1 chondrosarcomas, 94% (95% CI 86% to 100%) at 3 years for Grade 2 chondrosarcomas, 73% (95% CI 47% to 99%) at 3 and 5 years for Grade 3 chondrosarcomas, and 20% (95% CI 0% to 55%) at 3 and 5 years for dedifferentiated chondrosarcomas (p < 0.01). DSS was 87% (95% CI 78% to 96%) at 3 years for patients with malignant peripheral tumors with < 1-mm margin, and DSS was 100% at 3 years for patients with malignant peripheral tumors with ≥ 1-mm margins (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: A thin cartilage cap (< 3 cm) is characteristic of benign osteochondroma. The likelihood of a cartilage tumor being malignant increases after the cartilage cap thickness exceeds 3 cm. In our experience, preoperative biopsy results were not reliably associated with the final histologic grade or malignancy, being accurate in only 33% of patients. We therefore recommend observation for 2 years for patients with pelvic osteochondromas in which the cap thickness is < 1.5 cm and there is no associated pain. For patients with tumors in which the cap thickness is 1.5 to 3 cm, we recommend either close observation for 2 years or resection, depending on the treating physician's decision. We recommend excision in patients whose pelvic osteochondromas show an increase in thickness or pain, preferably before the cartilage cap thickness is 3 cm. We propose that surgical resection of peripheral cartilage tumors in which the cartilage cap exceeds 3 cm (aiming for clear margins) is reasonable without preoperative biopsy; the role of preoperative biopsy is less helpful because radiologic measurement of the cartilage cap thickness appears to be accurately associated with malignancy. Biopsy might be helpful in patients in whom there is diagnostic uncertainty or when confirming the necessity of extensive surgical procedures. Future studies should evaluate other preoperative tumor qualities in differentiating malignant peripheral cartilage tumors from benign tumors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study.

Controversies in orthopaedic oncology.

Chondrosarcoma is the second most common surgically treated primary bone sarcoma. Despite a large number of scientific papers in the literature, there is still significant controversy about diagnostics, treatment of the primary tumour, subtypes, and complications. Therefore, consensus on its day-to-day treatment decisions is needed. In January 2024, the Birmingham Orthopaedic Oncology Meeting (BOOM) attempted to gain global consensus from 300 delegates from over 50 countries. The meeting focused on these critical areas and aimed to generate consensus statements based on evidence amalgamation and expert opinion from diverse geographical regions. In parallel, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in oncological reconstructions poses unique challenges due to factors such as adjuvant treatments, large exposures, and the complexity of surgery. The meeting debated two-stage revisions, antibiotic prophylaxis, managing acute PJI in patients undergoing chemotherapy, and defining the best strategies for wound management and allograft reconstruction. The objectives of the meeting extended beyond resolving immediate controversies. It sought to foster global collaboration among specialists attending the meeting, and to encourage future research projects to address unsolved dilemmas. By highlighting areas of disagreement and promoting collaborative research endeavours, this initiative aims to enhance treatment standards and potentially improve outcomes for patients globally. This paper sets out some of the controversies and questions that were debated in the meeting.

Chondrosarcoma of the Femur: Is Local Recurrence Influenced by the Presence of an Extraosseous Component?

BACKGROUND: Chondrosarcoma (CS) is the second most common surgically treated primary malignancy of the bone. The current study explored the effect of the margin and extraosseous tumor component in CS in the femur on local recurrence (LR), LR-free survival (LRFS), and disease-specific survival (DSS). METHODS: Among 202 patients, 115 were in the proximal extremity of the femur, 4 in the corpus of the femur, and 83 in the distal extremity of femur; 105 patients had an extraosseous tumor component. RESULTS: In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, factors significant for decreased LRFS were the extraosseous tumor component (p < 0.001), extraosseous tumor component arising from the superior aspect (p < 0.001), histological grade (p = 0.031), and narrow surgical margin < 3 mm (p < 0.001). Factors significantly affecting DSS were the histological grade (p < 0.001), extraosseous component (p < 0.001), LR (p < 0.001), metastases (p < 0.001), and surgical margin (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In CS of the femur, the presence of an extraosseous tumor component has a predictive role in LRFS, and extraosseous tumor component arising from the superior aspect was significant for decreased LRFS. Wide margins were more commonly achieved when the tumor had only an intraosseous component, and the rate of LR was significantly higher in cases with an extraosseous tumor component. When the extraosseous component arose from the superior aspect of the femur, LR occurred more frequently despite achieving adequate margins.

Pelvic bone sarcomas, prognostic factors, and treatment: A narrative review of the literature.

Primary sarcomas of bone are rare malignant mesenchymal tumors. The most common bone sarcomas are osteosarcoma, Ewing's sarcoma, and chondrosarcoma. The prognosis has improved over the years, but bone sarcomas are still life-threatening tumors that need a multidisciplinary approach for diagnosis and treatment. Bone sarcomas arising in the pelvis present a unique challenge to orthopedic oncologists due to the absence of natural anatomical barriers, the close proximity of vital neurovascular structures, and the high mechanical demands placed on any pelvic reconstruction following the excision of the tumor. While radiotherapy has an important role especially in Ewing's sarcoma and chemotherapy for both Ewing's sarcoma and osteosarcoma, surgery remains the main choice of treatment for all three entities. While external hemipelvectomy has remained one option, the main aim of surgery is limb salvage. After complete tumor resection, the bone defect needs to be reconstructed. Possibilities to reconstruct the defect include prosthetic or biological reconstruction. The method of reconstruction is dependent on the location of tumor and the surgery required for its removal. The aim of this article is to give an insight into pelvic bone sarcomas, their oncological and surgical outcomes, and the options for treatment based on the authors' experiences.