Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
BJOG ; 116(13): 1805-8, 2009 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19781042

ABSTRACT

We validated rapid HIV tests among pregnant women in a clinical setting. Field testing was performed using First Response 1,2,3 or Standard Diagnostic and Pareekshak tests. Results were confirmed by third generation HIV ELISA. Discordant or negative, specimens were confirmed by RNA PCR and a fourth generation ELISA test. Sensitivity and specificity were 94.5% (CI: 85.8-98.2) and 100% for First Response; 87.5% (CI: 46.7-99.3) and 100% (CI: 87.7-100%) for Standard Diagnostic and 90.2% (CI: 81.2-95.4) and 100% (CI: 98-100%) for Pareekshak. These sensitivities were lower than laboratory validation which approached 100%. The low-field sensitivity results have implications for Prevention of Mother-to-Child Transmission services.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV-1 , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/prevention & control , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnosis , AIDS Serodiagnosis , Adult , Female , HIV Infections/prevention & control , HIV Infections/transmission , Humans , Point-of-Care Systems , Pregnancy , Prenatal Diagnosis/methods , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL