Comparison of once- and twice-daily dosing of fluticasone propionate 200 micrograms per day administered by diskus device in patients with asthma treated with or without inhaled corticosteroids.

BACKGROUND: There are limited published data regarding the efficacy of once- versus twice-daily administration of flutica-sone propionate. OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to evaluate the effectiveness of fluticasone propionate powder 200 microg/d administered as a once- or twice-daily dosage regimen in patients who were currently being treated with bronchodilators only (BD patients) and in patients who required inhaled corticosteroids for maintenance treatment of asthma (ICS patients). METHODS: Five hundred seventy patients were randomly assigned to receive one of the following inhaled treatments through the Diskus device (Glaxo Wellcome, Research Triangle Park, NC) for 12 weeks: fluticasone propionate 100 microg twice daily (FP100BID) or 200 microg once daily (FP200QD) or placebo. RESULTS: BD patients treated with FP100BID, FP200QD, and placebo had mean increases in FEV(1) from baseline to end point of 0. 49 L, 0.37 L, and 0.21 L, respectively (P <.001, FP100BID vs placebo; P =.05, FP200QD vs placebo). ICS patients treated with FP100BID and FP200QD had mean increases in FEV(1) of 0.27 L and 0.11 L, respectively, compared with a decrease in FEV(1) of -0.08 L with placebo (P <.001, FP100BID vs placebo; P =.023, FP200QD vs placebo). BD patients treated with FP100BID and FP200QD had mean increases in morning peak expiratory flow from baseline to end point of 31 L/min and 27 L/min, respectively, compared with a 1 L/min increase in patients treated with placebo. ICS patients treated with FP100BID had a mean increase in morning peak expiratory flow (from baseline to end point) of 18 L/min compared with mean decreases of -3 L/min and -12 L/min in the FP200QD and placebo groups, respectively. More patients were withdrawn from placebo (26% and 48%, in BD and ICS patients, respectively) than from fluticasone propionate (7%-9% [BID-QD] and 18%-32% [BID-QD], in BD and ICS patients, respectively) because of failure to meet predetermined asthma stability criteria. CONCLUSION: The efficacies of FP100BID and FP200QD were comparable with regard to improvement in pulmonary function and asthma stability in BD patients. In ICS patients, asthma control was maintained with FP200QD, whereas FP100BID provided greater improvements in pulmonary function and asthma stability.

Comparison of ipratropium bromide 0.03% with beclomethasone dipropionate in the treatment of perennial rhinitis in children.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of ipratropium bromide 0.03% (IB) with beclomethasone dipropionate 0.042% (BDP) in the treatment of perennial rhinitis in children. METHODS: Thirty-three children with nonallergic perennial rhinitis (NAPR) and 113 with allergic perennial rhinitis (APR) were randomly assigned to either IB or BDP for 6 months in a single-blind, multicenter protocol in which the physician was blinded to treatment. At each visit, patients and physicians rated symptom control of rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, and sneezing. Patients also completed quality of life questionnaires at baseline and after 6 months of therapy. RESULTS: Both treatments showed a significant improvement in control of rhinorrhea, congestion, and sneezing compared with baseline over the 6 months of treatment (P < .05). Only for the control of sneezing was BDP consistently better than IB (P < .05). Among the patients given IB, 61% to 73% assessed the control of rhinorrhea as good or excellent on different study visit days, 43% to 60% similarly rated the control of nasal congestion, and 39% to 43% the control of sneezing. The results for BDP were 68% to 78% for the control of rhinorrhea, 55% to 72% for the control of nasal congestion, and 54% to 68% for the control of sneezing. Quality of life assessment documented that both drugs significantly reduced interference with daily activities and disturbance of mood due to rhinorrhea compared with baseline (P < .05). Both treatments were well tolerated with IB causing less nasal bleeding and irritation than BDP. CONCLUSIONS: Ipratropium bromide was safe and effective in controlling rhinorrhea and diminishing the interference by rhinorrhea in school attendance, concentration on school work, and sleep. Ipratropium bromide was as effective as BDP in the control of rhinorrhea and showed a relatively good effect on congestion. Patient and physician assessment favored BDP in the control of sneezing.

Effectiveness of short-course therapy (5 days) with grepafloxacin in the treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.

Three hundred eighty-nine patients were enrolled in a double-masked, multicenter, randomized clinical trial comparing the clinical and bacteriologic efficacies and safety of a 5-day course (n = 195) versus a 10-day course (n = 194) of grepafloxacin 400 mg once daily in the treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (ABECB). Patients in the 5-day treatment group received placebo on days 6 through 10. Bacteriologic assessments were based on cultures of sputum specimens obtained before and, when possible, during and after treatment. Organisms were isolated from the pretreatment sputum specimens of 332 of 388 (86%) patients, the primary pathogens being Haemophilus parainfluenzae, Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Staphylococcus aureus (29%, 19%, 4%, 5%, and 5% of isolates, respectively). Among isolates tested for beta-lactamase production, results were positive in 25% of H influenzae isolates and 90% of M catarrhalis isolates. Forty-two percent of S pneumoniae isolates demonstrated reduced susceptibility (intermediate or high-level resistance) to penicillin. A satisfactory clinical outcome (cure or improvement) was achieved in 83% (128 of 155) and 81% (122 of 150) of clinically evaluable patients treated with grepafloxacin for 5 or 10 days, respectively. Pathogens were eradicated or presumed eradicated in 77% (106 of 138) and 80% (98 of 123) of bacteriologically evaluable patients treated with grepafloxacin for 5 or 10 days, respectively. The 2 treatment groups were equivalent with respect to both clinical and bacteriologic efficacy, and no statistically significant differences in the incidence of drug-related adverse events were seen between the 2 groups. Substantial symptom relief was evident with both treatment regimens by the first during-treatment measurement, which occurred between days 3 through 5. These results indicate that treatment with 400 mg grepafloxacin once daily for 5 days is as well tolerated and effective as treatment for 10 days in patients with ABECB. The lower cost compared with a 10-day regimen and the increased likelihood that patients will complete the entire shorter, once-daily regimen make the 5-day grepafloxacin regimen a useful therapeutic option in the treatment of ABECB.

Preseasonal, once daily triamcinolone acetonide nasal aerosol for seasonal allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Seasonal allergic rhinitis is a common and distressing illness for which treatment is often inadequate. There is a clinical need for safe and effective therapeutic options, including preseasonal treatment, to manage many of these patients. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to evaluate the clinical effects of preseasonal administration of triamcinolone acetonide nasal aerosol in the management of this illness. METHODS: This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel group study involved otherwise healthy subjects with a 2-year consecutive history of ragweed-induced seasonal allergic rhinitis. Patients were asymptomatic when randomized to receive 220 micrograms triamcinolone acetonide or placebo nasal aerosol (n = 56 each) once daily for 6 weeks, beginning at least 1 week before significant ragweed pollen was airborne. RESULTS: Triamcinolone acetonide was significantly (P < .001) more effective than placebo in preventing nasal symptoms as determined by mean placebo-adjusted nasal index scores. Patients in the triamcinolone acetonide group had significantly (P < or = .0004) lower scores in the severity of individual nasal symptoms and the overall mean nasal index score. Severity of ocular symptoms was reduced more in the triamcinolone acetonide than in the placebo group (not significant). Physicians' and patients' global evaluations of efficacy favored triamcinolone acetonide, with statistically significant between-group differences in moderate or complete prevention of rhinitis symptoms. The incidence of adverse effects was similar in the two groups, with the most common being headache and increased rhinitis. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that preseasonal administration of triamcinolone acetonide nasal aerosol is safe and effective for managing seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Efficacy and safety of triamcinolone acetonide aqueous nasal spray in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: In order to accommodate increasing patient preferences a new aqueous formulation of triamcinolone acetonide nasal spray was developed for the relief of symptoms associated with seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis. OBJECTIVE: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily triamcinolone acetonide aqueous nasal spray (220 micrograms/day) with placebo in relieving the symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis due to ragweed. METHODS: One hundred forty patients received either a once daily 220-microgram dose of triamcinolone acetonide aqueous nasal spray or placebo for 2 weeks. Patients evaluated the severity of seasonal allergic rhinitis symptoms daily for 2 weeks according to a 4-point scale (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe). Physician and patient global evaluations of overall treatment effectiveness were assessed at the end of the treatment period. RESULTS: Patients receiving triamcinolone acetonide aqueous nasal spray, 220 micrograms/day, had significantly (P < .05) greater improvements in all rhinitis symptoms at weeks 1 and 2 and overall for the 2-week treatment period compared with the placebo group. A significant (P = .006) improvement in the nasal index occurred as early as 12 hours after the first dose of triamcinolone acetonide aqueous nasal spray. Both patients and physicians reported a greater overall improvement in symptoms for the triamcinolone acetonide aqueous nasal spray group. There were no differences between the two treatment groups in the incidence of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed that a 220-microgram dose of triamcinolone acetonide aqueous nasal spray, administered once daily for 2 weeks, is well tolerated and reduces effectively the severity of symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis due to ragweed.

Double-strength beclomethasone dipropionate (84 micrograms/spray) aqueous nasal spray in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: The use of intranasally administered corticosteroid sprays is an established treatment option for seasonal allergic rhinitis. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study, 438 patients with moderate to severe symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis were treated for 4 weeks with double-strength beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) aqueous nasal spray (84 micrograms/spray: BDP-ds), once daily; regular-strength BDP (42 micrograms/spray: BDP-rs), twice daily; high-strength BDP (336 micrograms/spray: BDP-hs), once daily; or placebo. BDP-hs was included as a safety comparison group. All treatments were given as two sprays per nostril. RESULTS: Physician-rated nasal symptom scores were significantly improved in all three active treatment groups compared with those of the placebo group within the initial 3 days of treatment. Improvement was maintained throughout the 4-week treatment period. BDP-ds and BDP-rs were equivalent at all time points. The BDP-ds, BDP-rs, and BDP-hs groups had greater numbers of patients with a good or excellent therapeutic response at end point than the placebo group. All treatments were well-tolerated, and no unexpected adverse events were reported. No effects on laboratory evaluations or vital signs were evident for any treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that BDP-ds given once a day and BDP-rs given twice a day in the same total daily dose are comparably safe and effective in the treatment of patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

A 12-week dose-ranging study of fluticasone propionate powder in the treatment of asthma.

Fluticasone propionate (FP) administered via metered-dose inhaler is a potent corticosteroid effective in the treatment of asthma. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of FP powder administered via a breath-activated inhaler (Diskhaler), a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study was conducted in adolescent and adult patients (n = 331) with mild-to-moderate asthma previously treated with beta 2-agonist therapy alone. Patients received FP powder 50, 100, or 250 micrograms or placebo twice daily for 12 weeks. FP-treated patients compared with placebo-treated patients had significantly (p < 0.001) greater improvements in morning predose forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (21-22% increase vs. 9%). Improvement in morning peak flow rate were also significantly (p < 0.001) greater with FP than with placebo (8-10% increase vs. 2% increase). There was also a significant overall treatment difference in the frequency of inhaled albuterol use (p < 0.001) and number of nighttime awakenings due to asthma (p = 0.005). There were no statistically significant difference among the FP treatment groups in any outcome measure. Physicians' global assessments also indicated significant (p < 0.001) differences in efficacy, with 67-74% of FP-treated patients rated as having "effective" or "very effective" treatment compared with 41% of placebo-treated patients. Significant beneficial effects of FP were observed in lung function and diary card parameters after just 1 week of treatment. Adverse events were similar across treatment groups and primarily related to local irritation. Effect on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function was minimal. In summary, all three dosages of inhaled FP powder were well tolerated and improved various asthma-related variables. Improvements in pulmonary function, beyond those achieved with beta 2-agonist therapy alone, were maintained for the duration of the 12-week study.

Goodpasture's syndrome--effects of plasmapheresis.

Two patients with Goodpasture's syndrome, who underwent plasmapheresis are presented. One patient received prednisone but the other patient received no concomitant cytotoxic therapy. Results indicate that plasmapheresis reduces morbidity in patients with Goodpasture's syndrome. The possible mode of action of plasmapheresis is discussed. The use of cytotoxic therapy as an adjunct to plasmapheresis may not be necessary since the anti-GBM production appears to be a self-limiting process.

Disseminated coccidioidomycosis: clinical, immunologic and therapeutic aspects.

A patient with disseminated coccidioidomycosis initially had pulmonary and skin manifestations and survived for 14 years before dying of meningitis due to Coccidioides immitis. In addition to several courses of amphotericin B therapy the patient received injections of transfer factor derived from appropriate donors and miconazole nitrate therapy. The immunologic defence mechanisms of the patient during the course of his disease were studied and the possibility of a cell-mediated immunologic defect, potentially reversible by transfer factor, was demonstrated.

Acute lindane poisoning with development of muscle necrosis.

A 35-year-old man ingested food contaminated with lindane, an insecticide containing almost pure gamma hexachlorocyclohexane. Grand mal seizures and severe acidemia developed rapidly. The seizures recurred for nearly 2 hours, then ceased. In addition, the patient had muscle weakness and pain, headaches, episodic hypertension, myoglobinuria, acute renal failure and anemia. Pancreatitis developed 13 days after the ingestion of lindane. A muscle biopsy on the 15th day of illness demonstrated widespread necrosis and regeneration of muscle fibres. The patient's condition improved and he was discharged 24 days after the onset of his illness. During the year following the poisoning the patient noted difficulty with recent memory, loss of libido and easy fatigability. One year after lindane ingestion the results of physical examination, including those for muscle power and bulk, were normal.