What is the early fate of adjacent segmental lordosis compensation at L3-4 and L5-S1 following a lateral versus transforaminal lumbar Interbody Fusion at L4-5?

INTRODUCTION: Degenerative spondylolisthesis causes translational and angular malalignment, resulting in a loss of segmental lordosis. This leads to compensatory adjustments in adjacent levels to maintain balance. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) are common techniques at L4-5. This study compares compensatory changes at adjacent L3-4 and L5-S1 levels six months post LLIF versus TLIF for grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis at L4-5. METHODS: A retrospective study included patients undergoing L4-5 LLIF or TLIF with posterior pedicle screw instrumentation (no posterior osteotomy) for grade 1 spondylolisthesis. Pre-op and 6-month post-op radiographs measured segmental lordosis (L3-L4, L4-L5, L5-S1), lumbar lordosis (LL), and pelvic incidence (PI), along with PI-LL mismatch. Multiple regressions were used for hypothesis testing. RESULTS: 113 patients (61 LLIF, 52 TLIF) were studied. TLIF showed less change in L4-5 lordosis (mean = 1.04°, SD = 4.34) compared to LLIF (mean = 4.99°, SD = 5.53) (p = 0.003). L4-5 angle changes didn't correlate with L3-4 changes, and no disparity between LLIF and TLIF was found (all p > 0.16). In LLIF, greater L4-5 lordosis change predicted reduced compensatory L5-S1 lordosis (p = 0.04), while no significant relationship was observed in TLIF patients (p = 0.12). CONCLUSION: LLIF at L4-5 increases lordosis at the operated level, with compensatory decrease at L5-S1 but not L3-4. This reciprocal loss at adjacent L5-S1 may explain inconsistent improvement in lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) post L4-5 fusion.

Are Variable Screw Angle Change and Screw-to-Vertebral Body Ratio Associated With Radiographic Subsidence Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion?

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Cohort. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the easily measurable radiographic landmarks of screw-to-vertebral body ratio and changes in screw angle to identify if they are associated with early subsidence following an Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients undergoing 1-3 level ACDF with allograft or PEEK cages. Preoperative, immediate postoperative, and 6-month postoperative radiographs were analyzed to measure intradiscal height (or distance between 2 vertebral bodies) as an anterior vertebral distance (AVD), middle (MVD), and posterior (PVD), screw angle, screw-to-vertebral body length ratio, and interscrew distance. Multivariate stepwise regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: 92 patients were included (42 single-level, 32 two-level, and 18 3-level ACDFs). In single-level ACDFs, a decrease in the caudal screw angle was associated with a decrease in AVD (=.001) and MVD (P = .03). A decrease in the PVD was associated with a decrease in segmental lordosis (P < .001). For two-level ACDFs, a higher caudal screw-to-body ratio was associated with a lower MVD (P = .01). CONCLUSION: Six months following an ACDF for degenerative pathology, a decrease in the caudal screw angle was associated with an increase in radiographic subsidence at the antero-medial aspect of the disc space albeit largely subclinical. This suggests that the caudal screw angle change may serve as a reliable radiographic marker for early radiographic subsidence. Furthermore, a greater screw-to-vertebral body ratio may be protective against radiographic subsidence in two-level ACDF procedures.

Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lateral Interbody Fusion for Symptomatic Pseudarthrosis in Neurofibromatosis 1-Associated Spinal Deformity.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of symptomatic pseudarthrosis via posterior-only approaches in the setting of neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) is challenging due to dural ectasias, resulting in erosion of the posterior elements. The purpose of this report is to illustrate a minimally invasive method for performing anterior thoracic fusion for pseudarthrosis in a patient with NF1-associated scoliosis and dysplastic posterior elements. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first documented case of using video-assisted thoracoscopic lateral interbody fusion to treat pseudarthrosis for NF1-associated spinal deformity. CASE DESCRIPTION: The patient underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic anterior spinal fusion via a direct lateral interbody approach with interbody cage placement at T10-T11 and T11-T12, followed by revision of his posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course. At 6 months of follow-up, the patient had complete resolution of his preoperative symptoms and had returned to full-time work with no complaints. At 3 years postoperatively, the patient reported being satisfied with the operation and had continued to work full-time without restrictions. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of pseudarthrosis in the setting of NF1-associated scoliosis treated via minimally invasive anterior thoracic fusion facilitated by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. This is a powerful technique that allows for safe access for anterior thoracic fusion in the setting of dysplastic posterior anatomy and poor posterior bone stock.

Is spinopelvic mismatch associated with increased disability at 2 years following short-segment lumbar fusions?

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the impact of pelvic incidence (PI) and lumbar lordosis (LL) matching on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes in patients undergoing one- or two-level lumbar fusions for degenerative pathology. The study also examined changes in alignment and HRQOL over a 24-month follow-up period. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study used data from a multicenter, prospectively collected database. Radiographic parameters were measured preoperatively and at 3-month and 24-month postoperative time points. Patients were categorized as having alignment (PI-LL ≤ 10°) or malalignment (PI-LL > 10°) at all time points. The Oswestry Disability Index scores were collected at the same time points. Statistical analyses assessed differences in HRQOL scores and radiographic parameters between the aligned and malaligned groups. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients were included. Both the aligned and malaligned groups showed improved HRQOL scores after surgery, but patients with proper alignment (PI-LL ≤ 10°) had significantly better HRQOL scores at the 24-month follow-up. Alignment remained stable from 3 months to 24 months postoperatively, with minimal movement between the aligned and malaligned groups. CONCLUSIONS: Proper PI-LL matching in one- and two-level lumbar fusions for degenerative pathology leads to improved HRQOL outcomes at the 24-month follow-up. Patients with maintained proper alignment after surgery experience continued improvement in disability levels. Surgeons should consider longer follow-up for patients who do not achieve proper alignment initially, as 24 months is crucial for assessing the consequences of malalignment in short-segment lumbar fusions.

Gout-Induced Cervical Deformity and Progressive Myelopathy Mimicking Infection Requiring Cervical Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: This study describes a rare case where gout, a condition primarily associated with joint inflammation, initially manifested as a progressive cervical kyphotic deformity, mimicking infection and causing myelopathy. The patient, a previously healthy 56-year-old woman, presented with severe jaw pain and a temporomandibular joint abscess, alongside 2 months of worsening balance and arm/hand tingling. Extensive clinical and radiographic assessments revealed a severe cervical kyphotic deformity with bony erosion at multiple vertebral levels, raising suspicion of an infectious cause of compressive myelopathy. METHODS: The patient underwent an urgent staged surgical intervention involving multilevel cervical decompression and fusion, coupled with cervical deformity correction. RESULTS: Post surgery, she received antibiotics for 7 days, during which pathologic analysis unveiled collections of macrophages reacting to urate crystal deposition in a pattern consistent with gouty tophus. This unexpected diagnosis marked a novel case of undiagnosed gout-induced severe cervical deformity presenting with myelopathic symptoms and successfully managed through cervical spine deformity correction. CONCLUSIONS: This report underscores the significance of considering gout as a potential cause when encountering unusual spinal pathologies, especially in cases where gout-related symptoms are atypical. The presented 540-degree surgical approach effectively addressed both the cervical deformity and gout-induced myelopathic symptoms. To the best of our knowledge, this study represents the first documented instance of a patient with undiagnosed gout-induced severe cervical deformity successfully treated through cervical spine deformity correction, emphasizing the importance of vigilance and innovative management approaches in such rare clinical scenarios. As of the 2-year follow-up, the patient exhibited significant symptom improvement and overall well-being.

Trans-sacral interbody fixation in long fusions to the sacrum for adult spinal deformity: complications and fusion rates at minimum two years follow-up.

PURPOSE: This study aims to investigate the fusion rate and complications associated with trans-sacral interbody fusion (TSIF) in long fusions to the sacrum for adult spinal deformity (ASD) over a two year follow-up period. Potential predictor variables associated with pseudarthrosis were also examined. METHODS: A retrospective clinical review was conducted on a consecutive series of ASD patients who underwent long fusions to the sacrum, with TSIF performed as a same-day or staged procedure. Patient demographics, bone mineral density, operative details, perioperative and late complications, and fusion rates were reviewed. Univariate analysis was used to identify the risk factors associated with pseudarthrosis. RESULTS: The study included 43 patients with an average age of 55.3 ± 8.9 years. The perioperative complication rate was 28%, with 12% of the complications directly related to TSIF. The late complication rate was 33%, with 16% related to TSIF. The most common complications were pseudarthrosis (14%) and postoperative ileus (7%). The overall radiographic fusion rate at two years was 86%. Univariate analysis revealed that revision surgery was significantly associated with pseudarthrosis (p = 0.027). Over the follow-up period, patients who underwent TSIF during long posterior fusions to the sacrum showed improvement in overall SRS scores, ODI scores, and SF-36 physical health and mental health (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: TSIF is a relatively safe and minimally invasive method for achieving interbody fusion at the lumbosacral junction in the treatment of ASD, with acceptable fusion rates and a low complication rate. However, TSIF is not recommended for revision reconstruction in ASD.

Monthly multidisciplinary complex spine conference: a cost-analysis utilizing time-driven activity-based costing.

PURPOSE: To understand costs and provide an initial framework associated with conference implementation as it pertains to complication prevention. METHODS: Team members' time spent on conference preparation, presentation, and follow-up tasks was recorded and averaged to determine the time required to prepare and present one patient. Using 2022 hourly wage rates based on our urban hospital setting, wage values were calculated for each personnel type and applied to their time spent. The total cost of the conference was annualized and calculated from the time spent in the three phases of the conference multiplied by the wage rate. Published data on complication rates and associated costs before and after conference implementation were used to calculate total cost reduction. RESULTS: With 3 active spine surgeons and 108 patients per year, the total time investment was 104.04 min per patient, costing $21,791 annually. Total RN equivalent value per patient was 5.25 for all three phases. Using a historical model, this multidisciplinary approach for adult spinal deformity reduced complications by 51% at 30 days, resulting in cost savings of $418,518 per year. Thus, the model demonstrates that implementation of this approach resulted in a potential total savings of $396,726/year. CONCLUSION: Implementing a cost-saving tool for managing complex spinal disorders is a responsibility of the spine team, who should lead a multidisciplinary conference. The combination of TDABC and lean methodology can effectively demonstrate the variable costs associated with this multidisciplinary effort and models provide evidence of potential cost-savings when applied to a multidisciplinary adult spinal deformity conference. These findings should encourage clinicians and administrators to allocate resources to improve patient care by reducing complications and costs.

Early Compensatory Segmental Angle Changes at L3-4 and L4-5 Following a L5-S1 Interbody Fusion for a Grade 1 Spondylolisthesis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study included patients who underwent a L5-S1 ALIF or TLIF with posterior pedicle screw instrumentation for grade 1 spondylolisthesis 2018-2022. OBJECTIVE: To compare early reciprocal changes at the L3-4 and L4-5 adjacent levels six months after anterior (ALIF) or transforaminal (TLIF) lumbar interbody fusion at L5-S1. BACKGROUND: Degenerative and chronic isthmic spondylolistheses often result in decreased segmental lordosis at L5-S1. This can lead to lordotic overcompensation at adjacent levels to maintain spinopelvic balance. However, the fate of adjacent angles following interbody fusion is not well understood. METHODS: Preoperative and 6-month postoperative measurements of segmental lordosis (L3-4, L4-5, and L5-S1), lumbar lordosis, and pelvic incidence were obtained from sagittal standing radiographs. Preliminary t-tests were performed for descriptive purposes, and multiple regression was used for hypothesis testing. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients met the inclusion criteria (50 ALIF and 48 TLIF). A greater amount of lordosis achieved at L5-S1 was significantly associated with a greater reduction of segmental lordosis at L4-5 (r=-0.65, P<.001) or L3-4 (r=-0.46, P<.001) (Fig. 3A). A greater preoperative PI was associated with a greater reduction of segmental lordosis at L4-L5 (r=-0.42, P<.001) and at L3-L4 (r=-0.44, P<.001). CONCLUSION: At six months following a lumbar interbody fusion at L5-S1, greater compensatory changes with lordosis reduction are observed at the supra-adjacent L4-5 and L3-4 levels in patients achieving greater L5-S1 segmental lordosis. Additionally, preoperative pelvic incidence (PI) played a role in influencing lordotic correction.

Clinical Guidelines for the Evaluation and Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniations: How Accurate is the Internet?

OBJECTIVE: To compare information online regarding lumbar disc herniation (LDH) on commonly searched websites and compare those findings with the evidence-based recommendations listed in the North American Spine Society (NASS) clinical practice guidelines. METHODS: NASS Clinical Practice Guidelines, Internet searches were performed utilizing three common search engines (Google, Bing, Yahoo) and keywords associated with LDH. The top 20 websites from each search were selected. The content regarding diagnosis and treatment of LDH was compared to the NASS clinical practice guidelines. RESULTS: On average, websites mentioned only 59% of recommendations supported by Level I evidence. Websites included an average of 3 recommendations not discussed in the NASS guidelines out of an average of 12 total recommendations. Muscle and sensory testing and physical therapy were the most frequent recommendations, appearing on over 80% of websites. Websites were equally likely to contain recommendations backed by high-quality evidence as recommendations not included in NASS guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that websites regarding LDH contain a mix of information, with only a fraction of recommendations aligning with NASS clinical guidelines. Patients who use these websites are presented with unsubstantiated information, conceivably impacting their understanding, expectations and decision-making in physician offices.

Personalized Medicine in Orthopaedic Surgery: The Case of Spine Surgery.

Personalized medicine has made a tremendous impact on patient care. Although initially, it revolutionized pharmaceutical development and targeted therapies in oncology, it has also made an important impact in orthopaedic surgery. The field of spine surgery highlights the effect of personalized medicine because the improved understanding of spinal pathologies and technological innovations has made personalized medicine a key component of patient care. There is evidence for several of these advancements to support their usage in improving patient care. Proper understanding of normative spinal alignment and surgical planning software has enabled surgeons to predict postoperative alignment accurately. Furthermore, 3D printing technologies have demonstrated the ability to improve pedicle screw placement accuracy compared with free-hand techniques. Patient-specific, precontoured rods have shown improved biomechanical properties, which reduces the risk of postoperative rod fractures. Moreover, approaches such as multidisciplinary evaluations tailored to specific patient needs have demonstrated the ability to decrease complications. Personalized medicine has shown the ability to improve care in all phases of surgical management, and several of these approaches are now readily available to orthopaedic surgeons.

What is the fate of the adjacent segmental angles 6 months after single-level L3-4 or L4-5 lateral lumbar interbody fusion?

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is an effective technique for fusion and sagittal alignment correction/maintenance. Studies have investigated the impact on the segmental angle and lumbar lordosis (and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch), however not much is documented regarding the immediate compensation of the adjacent angles. PURPOSE: To evaluate acute adjacent and segmental angle as well as lumbar lordosis changes in patients undergoing a L3-4 or L4-5 LLIF for degenerative pathology. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients included in this study were analyzed pre- and post-LLIF performed by one of three fellowship-trained spine surgeons, 6 months following surgery. OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient demographics (including body mass index, diabetes diagnosis, age, and sex) as well as VAS and ODI scores were measured. Lateral lumbar radiograph parameters: lumbar lordosis (LL), segmental lordosis (SL), infra and supra-adjacent segmental angle, and pelvic incidence (PI). METHODS: Multiple regressions were applied for the main hypothesis tests. We examined any interactive effects at each operative level and used the 95% confidence intervals to determine significance: a confidence interval excluding zero indicates a significant effect. RESULTS: We identified 84 patients who underwent a single level LLIF (61 at L4-5, 23 at L3-4). For both the overall sample and at each operative level, the operative segmental angle was significantly more lordotic postop compared to preop (all ps≤.01). Adjacent segmental angles were significantly less lordotic postop compared to pre-op overall (p=.001). For the overall sample, greater lordotic change at the operative segment led to more compensatory reduction of lordosis at the supra-adjacent segment. At L4-5, more lordotic change at the operative segment led to more compensatory lordosis reduction at the infra-adjacent segment. CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrated that LLIF resulted in significant increase in operative level lordosis and a compensatory decrease in supra- and infra-adjacent level lordosis, and subsequently no significant impact on spinopelvic mismatch.

Incidence, etiology and time course of delays to adult spinal deformity surgery: a single-center experience.

PURPOSE: We sought to determine the incidence, origin, and timeframe of delays to adult spinal deformity surgery so that institutions using preoperative multidisciplinary patient assessment teams might better anticipate and address these potential delays. METHODS: Complex spine procedures for treatment of adult spinal deformity from 1/1/18 to 8/31/21 were identified. Procedures for infection, tumor, and urgent/emergent cases were excluded. Operations delayed due to COVID or those that were performed outside of our established perioperative care pathway were also excluded. The electronic health record was used to identify the etiology and timeline of all pre- and peri-operative delays. RESULTS: Of 235 patients scheduled for complex spine surgery, 193 met criteria for inclusion. Of these patients, 35 patients experienced a surgical delay (18.1%) with a total of 41 delays recorded. Reasons for delay include medically unoptimized (25.6%), intraoperative complication (17.9%), patient directed delay (17.9%), patient illness/injury (15.4%), scheduling complication (10.3%), insurance delay/denial (5.1%), and unknown (2.6%). Twenty-four delays experienced by 22 individuals occurred within 7 days of their scheduled surgery date. CONCLUSION: At a single multidisciplinary center, most delays to adult spinal deformity surgery occur before a patient is admitted to the hospital, and for recommendations of additional medical workup/clearance. We suspect that the preoperative protocol might increase pre-admission delays for unoptimized patients, as the protocol is intended to ensure patients receive surgery only when they are medically ready. Further research is needed to determine the economic and system impact of delays related to a preoperative optimization protocol weighed against the reduction in adverse events these protocols can provide.

Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion for Degenerative Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Case Presentation With Surgical Technique Demonstration and Review of Literature.

Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) provides an extensive decompression and provides a large surface area for fusion in patients presenting with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Unfortunately, this procedure is a more difficult spinal surgery to perform (compared with a traditional anterior cervical discectomy and fusion) and has a higher incidence of overall complications. In literature, ACCF has functional outcomes that seem clinically equivalent to those for multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, especially when contained to 1 vertebral body level, and in cases, for which both posterior and anterior procedures would be appropriate surgical options, may provide greater long-term clinical benefit than posterior fusion or laminoplasty. In this manuscript, we summarize the indications and outcomes following ACCF for degenerative cervical spondylotic myelopathy. We then describe a case presentation and associated surgical technique with a discussion of complication avoidance with this procedure.

Use of Cannulated Reamers to Facilitate Thoracic Diskectomy Using a Minimally Invasive Retropleural Thoracotomy Approach-Surgical Technique.

BACKGROUND: The surgical treatment of symptomatic thoracic disk herniations is technically challenging. In the past decade, a minimally invasive retropleural thoracotomy approach has become more popular to treat this pathology. However, efficient bone removal to safely perform the diskectomy and spinal cord decompression is difficult with this technique because of the small incision size and long working distance in the thoracic cavity and the proximity of the compressed thoracic cord. OBJECTIVE: To describe a novel surgical technique for performing a thoracic diskectomy using a minimally invasive lateral approach using cannulated reamers to facilitate bone removal. METHODS: This technique was used in 7 consecutive patients who presented with thoracic myelopathy from a thoracic disk herniation. First, a standard lateral minimally invasive retropleural approach to the thoracic spine was performed. Partially threaded guide wires were placed in the posterior aspect of the vertebral bodies adjacent to the affected disk space, and sequential cannulated reamers were passed over the guidewires to perform partial corpectomies. The posterior annulus, posterior longitudinal ligament, and herniated disk material were then resected using Penfield dissectors and Kerrison rongeurs to complete the decompression. RESULTS: All 7 patients who underwent thoracic diskectomy using this approach had stable or improved neurologic function postoperatively. There were no complications related to the use of the cannulated reamer technique. CONCLUSION: The use of cannulated reamers provides a simple and efficient method for safe bone removal to facilitate minimally invasive thoracic diskectomy using a lateral approach. This is an easily reproducible technique using commonly available equipment.

The Impact of Surgical Approach on Sagittal Plane Alignment in Patients Undergoing One- or Two- Level Fusions for Degenerative Pathology: A Multicenter Radiographic Evaluation 6 Months Following Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Interbody fusion procedures, including transforaminal (TLIF), posterior (PLIF), anterior (ALIF), and lateral (LLIF), effectively treat lumbar degenerative pathology and provide spinopelvic balance. The objective of this study is to compare changes in spinopelvic parameters 6 months following 1-2 level TLIF, PLIF, ALIF, and LLIF. METHODS: This retrospective study included 18 centers across the United States. Patients were included in the study if they underwent a 1- or 2-level primary lumbar fusion for degenerative pathology. Preoperative and 6-month postoperative lumbar anteroposterior and lateral lumbar plain radiograph measurements included: pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, lumbar lordosis from L1-S1, and segmental lordosis of each segment between L1 and S1. RESULTS: A total of 474 patients met inclusion criteria, with 632 levels that underwent fusion. Of these, 181 patients underwent an ALIF/LLIF on 381 levels, and 188 underwent a TLIF/PLIF on 252 levels. ALIF/LLIF procedures resulted in significantly more segmental lordosis (P < 0.001) and global lumbar lordotic alignment change (P < 0.01) compared with TLIF/PLIF procedures. Whether patients' alignment was preserved versus worsened was not significantly predicted by type of procedure. Similarly, whether patients' alignment was restored versus not corrected was not significantly predicted by procedure. CONCLUSIONS: In this large-scale multicenter study of lumbar fusion patients presenting with degenerative lumbar pathology, anteriorly placed grafts (ALIF/LLIF) led to a greater likelihood of patients being preserved rather than worsened in their spinopelvic mismatch. Posteriorly placed TLIF or PLIF grafts tended to worsen lordosis both segmentally and globally, yet even the anterior grafts only modestly improved those 2 same measurements.

The impact of interbody approach and lumbar level on segmental, adjacent, and sagittal alignment in degenerative lumbar pathology: a radiographic analysis six months following surgery.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Interbody fusion, including: transforaminal (TLIF), posterior (PLIF), anterior (ALIF), and lateral (LLIF); effectively treat lumbar degenerative pathology and provide spinopelvic balance. Although the decision on surgical approach and technique are multifactorial and patient specific, the impact of the interbody approach on segmental and adjacent level lordosis could be an important factor to consider during pre-operative planning to achieve pre-specified alignment goals. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare the 6-month postoperative radiographic outcomes in the lumbar spine following 1 to 2 level transforaminal (TLIF), posterior (PLIF), anterior (ALIF), and lateral (LLIF) interbody fusions at the L3-4, L4-5, and L5-S1 levels. As our primary outcome, we evaluated the change in segmental lordosis at the level of fusion in ALIF/LLIF approaches compared to TLIF/PLIF. Secondarily, we evaluated the pelvic incidence to lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch and examined the compensatory lordotic changes at the adjacent levels 6 months following surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. PATIENT SAMPLE: This retrospective study included 18 centers of various practice settings across the United States. Patients were included in the study if they underwent a one- or two-level primary lumbar fusion for degenerative pathology. OUTCOMES MEASURES: Measurements of the pre-operative and 6-month post-operative lumbar AP and lateral lumbar plain radiographs included: pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt, lumbar lordosis from L1-S1 (LL), as well as segmental lordosis (SL) of each segment between L1-S1. METHODS: Due to there being 2 evaluated time points, patients were then grouped based on alignment into categories of preserved, restored, not corrected, and worsened. RESULTS: 474 patients underwent 608 levels of fusion. ALIF/LLIF resulted in significantly more segmental lordosis compared to TLIF/PLIF procedures at both L4-5 and L5-S1 (p<.001). Overall, ALIF/LLIF resulted in significantly more global lumbar lordotic alignment change compared to TLIF/PLIF (p=.01). Whether patients' alignment was preserved versus worsened was not significantly predicted by type of procedure. Similarly, whether patients' alignment was restored versus not corrected was not significantly predicted by type of procedure. Finally, anterior approaches resulted in decreased lordosis at adjacent levels, thus resulting in a more neutral position. CONCLUSION: In this large multicenter retrospective study of 1 to 2 level interbody fusion surgeries, we identified that A/LLIF procedures at L4-L5 and L5-S1 resulted in greater segmental lordosis restoration and PI-LL mismatch improvement compared to T/PLIF procedures. A/LLIF may also significantly reduce lordosis (compared to T/PLIF) at the adjacent levels in a fashion that serves to reduce the lumbar lordosis that may have been increased at the fused level.

Defining Cervical Sagittal Plane Deformity - When Are Sagittal Realignment Procedures Necessary in Patients Presenting Primarily With Radiculopathy or Myelopathy?

OBJECTIVE: It remains unclear whether cervical sagittal deformity (CSD) should be defined by radiographic parameters alone versus both clinical and radiographic factors, and whether radiographic malalignment by itself warrants a CSD corrective surgery in patients who present primarily with neurologic symptoms. METHODS: We administered a survey to a group of expert surgeons to evaluate whether radiographic parameters alone were sufficient to diagnose CSD, and in which scenarios surgeons recommend a CSD realignment procedure versus addressing the neurologic symptoms alone. RESULTS: No single radiographic criteria reached a 50% threshold as being sufficient to establish the diagnosis of CSD. When asymptomatic radiographic malalignment was present, a sagittal deformity correction was more likely to be recommended in patients with myelopathy versus those with radiculopathy alone. The majority of surgeons recommended deformity correction when symptoms of cervical deformity were present in addition to radiographic malalignment (85% with deformity symptoms and radiculopathy, 93% with deformity symptoms and myelopathy). CONCLUSION: There is no consensus on which radiographic and/or clinical criteria are necessary to define the presence of CSD. We recommend that symptoms of cervical deformity, in addition to radiographic parameters, be considered when deciding whether to perform deformity correction in patients who present primarily with myelopathy or radiculopathy.

Team Approach: Safety and Value in the Practice of Complex Adult Spinal Surgery.

Surgical management of complex adult spinal deformities is of high risk, with a substantial risk of operative mortality. Current evidence shows that potential risk and morbidity resulting from surgery for complex spinal deformity may be minimized through risk-factor optimization. The multidisciplinary team care model includes neurosurgeons, orthopaedic surgeons, physiatrists, anesthesiologists, hospitalists, psychologists, physical therapists, specialized physician assistants, and nurses. The multidisciplinary care model mimics previously described integrated care pathways designed to offer a structured means of providing a comprehensive preoperative medical evaluation and evidence-based multimodal perioperative care. The role of each team member is illustrated in the case of a 66-year-old male patient with previous incomplete spinal cord injury, now presenting with Charcot spinal arthropathy and progressive vertebral-body destruction resulting in lumbar kyphosis.

Helping spine surgeons detect pre-surgical psychological distress in complex spine patients: an observational pilot study.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. OBJECTIVE: Analysis of a standardized, pre-surgical psychological evaluation program for complex spine surgery. Adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients have a high rate of comorbid mental health conditions. Although there is a body of literature demonstrating the impact of psychological factors, including anxiety and depression, on spine surgery outcome, it is estimated that spine surgeons utilize a psychological assessment only about one third of the time prior to a patient's spine surgery. At this time, there is not a widely reported pre-surgical psychological evaluation program for ASD patients. METHODS: 129 consecutive complex spine surgery candidates receiving a pre-surgical psychological evaluation were analyzed between January 1st 2014 and December 31st 2018. Based on the available literature and professional experience in our facility, a color code for patients was developed from Green (low psychological or psychosocial co-morbidity) to Red (high psychological or psychosocial co-morbidity). Univariate analysis was used to evaluate between color grades and demographics, mental health disorders and outcomes. RESULTS: 83% of complex spine patients had at least one psychological disorder or psychosocial barrier. Only 17% had a combination of realistic expectations for surgery, a good support plan, and were without a history of mental illness. The pre-surgical psychological color criteria were validated in showing higher rates of major depression, anxiety disorder, and bipolar disorder in moderate to severe color grades (p < .001) in addition to higher PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores (p < .001). Patients having a more severe color grade had lower rates of a discharge home and were taking higher morphine equivalent dosages (MEDs) at their six-month follow-up, though both did not reach statistical significance (p = .07 and p = .08; respectively). CONCLUSION: A comprehensive pre-surgical psychological evaluation may be beneficial to risk stratify and counsel patients being evaluated for surgical reconstruction of adult spinal deformities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Postoperative Blood Salvage and Autotransfusion for Adult Spinal Deformity: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether postoperative blood salvage and autotransfusion versus traditional closed suction drainage reduces the rate of homologous blood transfusions in patients undergoing surgery for adult spinal deformity. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The use of intraoperative blood salvage has become commonplace in spine surgery; however, the collection and reinfusion of blood drained from the wound postoperatively have not been employed routinely because of increased cost and questionable benefit. METHODS: Adult patients undergoing long posterior fusions were randomized to either a blood salvage and reinfusion system (OrthoPat - Group 1) or a standard subfascial closed suction drain (Group 2). Blood collected in Group 1 was reinfused according to the manufacturer's protocol. Reinfusion drains were converted to standard closed suction drains when output was <50 mL during 4 hours, and drains were removed when output was minimal. Patients received autologous or homologous blood transfusions when hemoglobin (Hg) <8 g/dL or they had symptomatic anemia. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were randomized into Group 1 and 36 patients into Group 2. There were no differences in preoperative or intraoperative parameters. Patients in Group 1 had higher hemoglobin levels on postoperative day (POD) 2 and POD 3 compared to those in Group 2. However, there was no significant difference in the percentage of patients requiring homologous blood transfusion between the two groups (41% Group 1 vs. 60% Group 2, P = 0.17). Similarly a subgroup analysis in patients with estimated blood loss >2000 mL also showed no difference in homologous blood transfusion rates (67% Group 1 vs. 76% Group 2, P = 0.58). There were no differences in the rate or type of postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: Postoperative blood salvage and reinfusion result in a higher hemoglobin level in the early postoperative period, but does not significantly reduce the need for homologous blood transfusion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1.