Prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder, depression and somatisation in recently arrived refugees in Germany: an epidemiological study.

AIMS: Despite recent worldwide migratory movements, there are only a few studies available that report robust epidemiological data on the mental health in recent refugee populations. In the present study, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression and somatisation were assessed using an epidemiological approach in refugees who have recently arrived in Germany from different countries. METHODS: The study was conducted in a reception facility for asylum-seekers in Leipzig, Germany. A total of 1316 adult individuals arrived at the facility during the survey period (May 2017-June 2018), 569 of whom took part in the study (N = 67 pilot study and N = 502 study sample; response rate 43.2%). The questionnaire (11 different languages) included sociodemographic and flight-related questions as well as standardised instruments for assessing PTSD (PCL-5), depression (PHQ-9) and somatisation (SSS-8). Unweighted and weighted prevalence rates of PTSD, depression and somatisation were presented stratified by sex and age groups. RESULTS: According to established cut-off scores, 49.7% of the respondents screened positive for at least one of the mental disorders investigated, with 31% suffering from somatisation, 21.7% from depression and 34.9% from PTSD; prevalence rates of major depression, other depressive syndromes and PTSD were calculated according to the DSM-5, which indicated rates of 10.3, 17.6 and 28.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The findings underline the dramatic mental health burden present among refugees and provide important information for health care planning. They also provide important information for health care systems and political authorities in receiving countries and strongly indicate the necessity of establishing early psychosocial support for refugees suffering from psychological distress.

[Communication with Migrant Patients and their Parents in Inpatient General Pediatric Care]. / Verständigung mit Patienten und Eltern mit Migrationshintergrund in der stationären allgemeinpädiatrischen Versorgung.

OBJECTIVES: Depending on the ethnic background of patients, the quality of communication between the parents of pediatric patients and clinicians, as well as the type and frequency of interpreter services was studied in an inpatient setting. METHODS: As part of a questionnaire-based survey, data from parents, doctors and nurses with reference to 220 pediatric patients treated in the Department of Pediatrics at the University Hospital Leipzig from February to May 2013 were analyzed; 18,2% of patients were migrants. RESULTS: No differences were found in the assessment of the quality of communication with clinic staff by migrant and non-migrant parents. Physicians as well as nurses rated the communication with migrant parents compared to non-migrant parents significantly lower. In up to 19,2% (data provided by nursing staff) and 15,3% (data provided by doctors) of the cases characterized by insufficient language skills on the part of migrant parents, interpreter services had to be procured. No professional interpreters were used. CONCLUSION: The results highlight once more the difficulties in communication between clinicians and migrant patients with insufficient language skills. More attention should be paid to the impact of the use of professional interpreters in the health care services.