Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
J Pediatr ; 232: 207-213.e2, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33453206

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between bacteremia and vaccination status in children aged 2-36 months presenting to a pediatric emergency department. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of children aged 2-36 months with blood cultures obtained in the pediatric emergency department between January 2013 and December 2017. The exposure of interest was immunization status, defined as number of Haemophilus influenzae type B (Hib) and Streptococcus pneumoniae vaccinations, and the main outcome positive blood culture. Subjects with high-risk medical conditions were excluded. RESULTS: Of 5534 encounters, 4742 met inclusion criteria. The incidence of bacteremia was 1.5%. The incidence of contaminated blood culture was 5.0%. The relative risk of bacteremia was 0.79 (95% CI 0.39-1.59) for unvaccinated and 1.20 (95% CI 0.52-2.75) for undervaccinated children relative to those who had received age-appropriate vaccines. Five children were found to have S pneumoniae bacteremia and 1 child had Hib bacteremia; all of these subjects had at least 3 sets of vaccinations. No vaccine preventable pathogens were isolated from blood cultures of unvaccinated children. We found no S pneumoniae or Hib in children 2-6 months of age who were not fully vaccinated due to age (95% CI 0-0.13%) and the contamination rate in this group was high compared with children 7-36 months (6.6% vs 3.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Bacteremia in young children is an uncommon event. Contaminated blood cultures were more common than pathogens. Bacteremia from S pneumoniae or Hib is uncommon and, in this cohort, was independent of vaccine status.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia/prevention & control , Haemophilus Infections/prevention & control , Haemophilus Vaccines , Haemophilus influenzae type b , Pneumococcal Infections/prevention & control , Pneumococcal Vaccines , Vaccination Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Bacteremia/diagnosis , Bacteremia/epidemiology , Bacteremia/etiology , Child, Preschool , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Haemophilus Infections/diagnosis , Haemophilus Infections/epidemiology , Haemophilus Infections/etiology , Haemophilus influenzae type b/isolation & purification , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Male , New England/epidemiology , Pneumococcal Infections/diagnosis , Pneumococcal Infections/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
3.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 16(7): 644-51, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25901545

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the ability of vital sign data versus a commercially available acuity score adapted for children (pediatric Rothman Index) to predict need for critical intervention in hospitalized pediatric patients to form the foundation for an automated early warning system. DESIGN: Retrospective review of electronic medical record data. SETTING: Academic children's hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 220 hospitalized children 6.7 ± 6.7 years old experiencing a cardiopulmonary arrest (condition A) and/or requiring urgent intervention with transfer (condition C) to the ICU between January 2006 and July 2011. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Physiologic data 24 hours preceding the event were extracted from the electronic medical record. Vital sign predictors were constructed using combinations of age-adjusted abnormalities in heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, respiratory rate, and peripheral oxygen saturation to predict impending deterioration. Sensitivity and specificity were determined for vital sign-based predictors by using 1:1 age-matched and sex-matched non-ICU control patients. Sensitivity and specificity for a model consisting of any two vital sign measurements simultaneously outside of age-adjusted normal ranges for condition A, condition C, and condition A or C were 64% and 54%, 57% and 53%, and 59% and 54%, respectively. The pediatric Rothman Index (added to the electronic medical record in April 2009) was evaluated in a subset of these patients (n = 131) and 16,138 hospitalized unmatched non-ICU control patients for the ability to predict condition A or C, and receiver operating characteristic curves were generated. Sensitivity and specificity for a pediatric Rothman Index cutoff of 40 for condition A, condition C, and condition A or C were 56% and 99%, 13% and 99%, and 28% and 99%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A model consisting of simultaneous vital sign abnormalities and the pediatric Rothman Index predict condition A or C in the 24-hour period prior to the event. Vital sign only prediction models have higher sensitivity than the pediatric Rothman Index but are associated with a high false-positive rate. The high specificity of the pediatric Rothman Index merits prospective evaluation as an electronic adjunct to human-triggered early warning systems.


Subject(s)
Critical Care/methods , Electronic Health Records , Patient Acuity , Vital Signs , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Hospitals, Pediatric , Humans , Infant , Intensive Care Units, Pediatric , Male , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Severity of Illness Index , Tertiary Care Centers , Vital Signs/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL