Physician-Modified Endografts Versus Chimney/Snorkel for Ruptured and Symptomatic Juxtarenal and Paravisceral Aneurysms in the Vascular Quality Initiative.

OBJECTIVES: Ruptured and symptomatic juxtarenal and paravisceral aneurysms present technical challenges during endovascular repair. We sought to compare physician modification and fenestrated (PMEG) versus chimney/periscope/snorkel (CHIMPS) repair techniques for the treatment of ruptured and symptomatic paravisceral and juxtarenal aortic aneurysms (r/sPJAA). METHODS: Patients in the thoracic and complex endovascular aneurysm module of the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) national registry undergoing CHIMPS and PMEG for r/sPJAA were included. Patients who underwent thoracic aneurysm repair with only celiac intervention or who had coverage or occlusion only of one renal or visceral branch vessel were excluded. One-year mortality was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included peri- and postoperative endoleak, hospital and ICU length of stay, reintervention, and other local and systemic complications. RESULTS: A total of 81 CHIMPS and 47 PMEG patients were identified. Patients undergoing PMEG were more frequently symptomatic, had a history of CHF and were taking aspirin, statin and P2Y12 antiplatelet medications. Patients undergoing CHIMPS presented more frequently with rupture. There was no significant survival advantage for CHIMPS over PMEG patients (P = 0.5). There were no apparent long-term differences in the numbers of endoleaks or in the rates of subsequent reinterventions between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: It does not appear that the procedure type (CHIMPS versus PMEG) is associated with postoperative survival in patients with r/sPJAA. Not surprisingly, survival is associated with postoperative complications, particularly myocardial infarction and intestinal ischemia. Further research should evaluate reasons for failure to rescue from and the impact of postoperative complications on the postoperative survival after endovascular repair of r/sPJAA.

A Contemporary Perspective on the Management of Post-Craniotomy Headache and Pain.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article discusses the etiology and management of post-craniotomy headache and pain. A review of available as well as investigatory treatment modalities is offered, followed by suggestions for optimal management of post-craniotomy headache. RECENT FINDINGS: There is a dearth of evidence-based practice regarding the differential diagnosis, natural history, and management of post-craniotomy headache. The etiology of post-craniotomy headache is typically multifactorial, with patients' medical history, type of craniotomy, and perioperative management all playing a role. Post-craniotomy headaches are often undertreated, yet available evidence supports a multimodal approach for both prophylaxis and management. Many therapeutic techniques that aim to treat or prevent post-craniotomy headache require more robust validation than clinical evidence currently imparts. Pre- and intraoperative locoregional anesthesia should be the mainstay of prophylaxis; the role of opiates co-administered with analgesics, corticosteroids, and antiepileptic therapy in the acute perioperative phase is of paramount importance. Treatment of chronic PCH is less well-defined but should involve trials of analgesic, antineuropathic, and antiepileptic medications before enlisting experimental treatments. Comorbid psychiatric, musculoskeletal, or seizure disorders should be managed distinctly from post-craniotomy headaches. In patients failing all extant therapies, experimental approaches should be considered. These include subanesthetic ketamine infusion or surgical site injection with local anesthetics, corticosteroids, or botulinum toxin. Post-craniotomy headache is a complex phenomenon with many underutilized treatment options available, and many more under investigation. Nonetheless, further research is required to differentiate the efficacy of contemporary treatment strategies and to elucidate the applicability of novel therapies.

Can the idealized voider derived flow indexes be a measure of voiding efficiency and how accurate are they?

OBJECTIVE: Our hypothesis was to confirm whether an idealized voider flow equation (IVFE) that we created is more accurate than trying to rely on estimated flow rates in the same patient in two consecutive voids. We also looked to confirm whether flow index (FI) can be a proxy for voiding efficiency and to identify which FI was best; those based off our own IVFE equations or those derived from the commonly used power equations. STUDY DESIGN: We used data from a previous study and calculated flow rates using our IVFE and the power equations. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests were performed along with error analysis using Bland Altman (BA) and accuracy analysis (AA). RESULTS: Bland Altman (BA) analysis revealed that flows obtained from normal voiders voiding between 100 and 200 cc as well as from 50 cc to 115% of EBC are comparable and tend to be reproducible in subsequent voids. FI derived from the IVFE exhibit less bias than Qmax making it a better way to compare these voids. A comparison of Qmax and flow index for different combinations of volumes and PVR's was done utilizing BA and accuracy measures both indicating that FI was more reproducible. CONCLUSION: The data support both of our hypothesis that flow index is a good measure of voiding efficiency. We have also shown that IVFE is a better and more accurate measure of calculating a flow index than the power equations regardless of the volume and PVR scenarios that are presented.

A quantitative approach to the interpretation of uroflowmetry in children.

PURPOSE: We hypothesized that by correcting for volume and creating a flow index (FI) we could develop a reproducible and reliable means to estimate flows in children without the use of a flow nomogram. Our second hypothesis was that this volume corrected FI could define objective parameters for the different flow curves that are described in the ICCS document. METHODS: Uroflowmetry curves of 1,268 healthy children were analyzed. Quadratic equations using nonlinear regression for both sexes were generated for each set of presumed normal voiders (learning data) (NV). The NV test data were used to verify the equations. Linear regression analysis was used to compare the variance between actual and estimated flow rates. A FI (Actual Qavg/Estimated Qavg) was created and ROC analysis for all flow types was performed. Sensitivity and specificity analysis was performed on all voids to validate the accuracy of the FI to predict flow pattern. RESULTS: Analysis of the FI from the first void to the second confirmed the accuracy and reproducibility in both males and females using various means of analysis. ROC analysis shows that there are very strong AUC's for Bell, plateau, and tower flow patterns. Sensitivity and specificity analysis reveals that defined FI parameters are able to predict the flow patterns. CONCLUSION: Our predictive formulas allow for direct comparison of one flow to the next in a single patient when the FI is used. Utilizing the FI, we can predict the type of flow pattern removing subjectivity from the analysis of uroflow patterns. Neurourol. Urodynam. 35:836-846, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.