Various Laparoscopic Techniques in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery.

In the past, transvaginal surgery, native tissue restoration, or obliterative methods have been used in the majority of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgeries. Since laparoscopy has gained popularity, other procedures have been created to provide additional POP repair alternatives. Laparoscopic technique offers many advantages compared to open or transvaginal surgery when it comes to anatomical and surgical outcomes, recurrence rates, and patient's acceptance. Furthermore, we encouraged incorporating different laparoscopic techniques into urogynecology training to attract young gynecologists. Based on our own clinical and surgical experience, we present various laparoscopic techniques for treating POP. We think that by giving patients a variety of surgical alternatives, we can treat them all more effectively.

[Pelvic Reconstruction in Abdominal Trachelectomy and Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy for Occult Uterine Endometrial Cancer Found in Specimens Removed in the Context of Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy].

In the patients undergoing pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repairs, the incidence of occult uterine endometrial cancer is low and there is no established management procedure for preoperative cancer screening. We report a case of pelvic reconstruction in abdominal trachelectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for occult uterine endometrial cancer found in specimens removed in the context of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC). A 70-year-old woman presented to our center with cystocele. She underwent LSC and laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. She had no atypical genital bleeding; and, transvaginal ultrasound, pelvic plane magnetic resonance imaging and cervical cytology showed no evidence of malignancy. However, the pathological examination showed uterine endometrial cancer. She underwent trachelectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection. A part of mesh was removed with a cervical stamp, but the remaining mesh was sewn together. At 5 months after the operation, no recurrence of uterine endometrial cancer and POP was seen.

Acute vulvar ulcer as a possible adverse event of gene-based COVID-19 vaccines: A review of 14 cases.

AIM: To evaluate whether an acute vulvar ulcer that developed after the COVID-19 vaccine administration is an adverse effect of the vaccine. METHODS: This is a descriptive study of two cases that we observed in addition to cases that have been reported in the literature. We searched for case reports in the PubMed. The consistency of clinical manifestations among cases and the association between ulceration and vaccination were assessed. RESULTS: Fourteen female patients were identified, including 12 patients from 8 literatures published in 2021 and 2022 and 2 patients from our cases. Of the 14 patients, 11 had received the BNT162b2 vaccine, 2 had received the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine, and one had received the mRNA-1273 vaccine. The patient's ages were 16.9 ± 5.0 (mean ± SD) years. Postvaccination, the disease progressed in the following sequence (time interval from vaccination): fever and other systemic inflammatory reactions (0.9 ± 0.4 days), development of vulvar ulcers (2.4 ± 1.2 days), and resolution of the ulcer (16.9 ± 7.4 days). The ulcers eventually healed in all cases, except one where the prognosis was not noted. For two-dose vaccine recipients, more patients developed the ulcer after the full vaccination (the second or third doses) compared with after the first dose: n = 10 and n = 2, respectively. CONCLUSION: The acute vulvar ulcer was closely associated with COVID-19 vaccination in terms of temporality and vaccine doses, supporting the notion that a vulvar ulcer is an adverse event of the COVID-19 vaccines.