ABSTRACT
Importance: Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) living in rural settings often have worse clinical outcomes compared with their urban counterparts. Whether this discrepancy is due to clinical characteristics or delays in timely reperfusion with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) or fibrinolysis is unclear. Objective: To assess process metrics and outcomes among patients with STEMI in rural and urban settings across the US. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional multicenter study analyzed data for 70â¯424 adult patients with STEMI from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Chest Pain-MI Registry in 686 participating US hospitals between January 1, 2019, and June 30, 2020. Patients without a valid zip code were excluded, and those transferred to a different hospital during the course of the study were excluded from outcome analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures: In-hospital mortality and time-to-reperfusion metrics. Results: This study included 70â¯424 patients with STEMI (median [IQR] age, 63 [54-73] years; 49â¯850 [70.8%] male and 20â¯574 [29.2%] female; patient self-reported race: 6753 [9.6%] Black, 60â¯114 [85.4%] White, and 2096 [3.0%] of another race [including American Indian, Alaskan Native, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander]; 5281 [7.5%] individuals of Hispanic or Latino ethnicity) in 686 hospitals (50â¯702 [72.0%] living in urban zip codes and 19â¯722 [28.0%] in rural zip codes). Patients from rural settings were less likely to undergo PPCI compared with patients from urban settings (14â¯443 [73.2%] vs 43â¯142 [85.1%], respectively; P < .001) and more often received fibrinolytics (2848 [19.7%] vs 937 [2.7%]; P < .001). Compared with patients from urban settings, those in rural settings undergoing PPCI had longer median (IQR) time from first medical contact to catheterization laboratory activation (30 [12-42] minutes vs 22 [15-59] minutes; P < .001) and longer median (IQR) time from first medical contact to device (99 minutes [75-131] vs 81 [66-103] minutes; P < .001), including those who arrived directly at PPCI centers (83 [66-107] minutes vs 78 [64-97] minutes; P < .001) and those who transferred to PPCI centers from another treatment center (125 [102-163] minutes vs 103 [85-135] minutes; P < .001). Among those who transferred in, median (IQR) door-in-door-out time was longer in patients from rural settings (63 [41-100] minutes vs 50 [35-80] minutes; P < .001). Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest was more common in patients from urban vs rural settings (3099 [6.1%] vs 958 [4.9%]; P < .001), and patients from urban settings were more likely to present with heart failure (4112 [8.1%] vs 1314 [6.7%]; P < .001). After multivariable adjustment, there was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between rural and urban groups (adjusted odds ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.89-1.06). Conclusions and Relevance: In this large cohort of patients with STEMI from US hospitals participating in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Chest Pain-MI Registry, patients living in rural settings had longer times to reperfusion, were less likely to receive PPCI or meet guideline-recommended time to reperfusion, and more frequently received fibrinolytics than patients living in urban settings. However, there was no difference in adjusted in-hospital mortality between patients with STEMI from urban and rural settings.
Subject(s)
Myocardial Infarction , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction , Adult , Chest Pain , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/drug therapy , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Registries , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Time FactorsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: We sought to derive and validate a model to predict inpatient mortality after veno-arterial extracorporeal life support (VA-ECLS) based on readily available, precannulation clinical data. BACKGROUND: Refractory cardiogenic shock supported by VA-ECLS is associated with high morbidity and mortality. METHODS: VA-ECLS cases at our institution from January 2014 through July 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Exclusion criteria were cannulation: (1) at another institution; (2) for primary surgical indication; or (3) for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Multivariable logistic regression compared those with and without inpatient mortality. Multiple imputation was performed and optimism-adjusted area under the curve (oAUC) values were computed. RESULTS: VA-ECLS cases from August 2019 through November 2020 were identified as a validation cohort. In the derivation cohort (n = 135), the final model included Lactate (mmol/L), hemoglobin (g/dl; Anemia), Coma (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] < 8) and resusciTATEd cardiac arrest (LACTATE score; oAUC = 0.760). In the validation cohort (n = 30, LACTATE showed similar predictability [AUC = 0.710]). A simplified (LACT-8) score was derived by dichotomizing lactate (>8) and hemoglobin (<8) and summing together the number of components for each patient. LACT-8 performed similarly (derivation, oAUC = 0.724; validation, AUC = 0.725). In the derivation cohort, both scores outperformed SAVE (oAUC = 0.568) and SOFA (oAUC = 0.699) scores. A LACT-8 ≥ 3 had a specificity for mortality of 97.9% and 92.9%, in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The LACT-8 score can predict inpatient mortality prior to before cannulation for VA-ECLS. LACT-8 can be implemented utilizing clinical data without the need for an online calculator.
Subject(s)
Catheterization , Shock, Cardiogenic , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Lactic Acid , Retrospective Studies , Shock, Cardiogenic/diagnosis , Shock, Cardiogenic/therapy , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hemodynamic values from right heart catheterization aid diagnosis and clinical decision-making but may not predict outcomes. Mixed venous oxygen saturation percentage and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure relate to cardiac output and congestion, respectively. We theorized that a novel, simple ratio of these measurements could estimate cardiovascular prognosis. METHODS: We queried Veterans Affairs' databases for clinical, hemodynamic, and outcome data. Using the index right heart catheterization between 2010 and 2016, we calculated the ratio of mixed venous oxygen saturation-to-pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, termed ratio of saturation-to-wedge (RSW). The primary outcome was time to all-cause mortality; secondary outcome was 1-year urgent heart failure presentation. Patients were stratified into quartiles of RSW, Fick cardiac index (CI), thermodilution CI, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure alone. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models related comparators with outcomes. RESULTS: Of 12 019 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 9826 had values to calculate RSW (median 4.00, interquartile range, 2.67-6.05). Kaplan-Meier curves showed early, sustained separation by RSW strata. Cox modeling estimated that increasing RSW by 50% decreases mortality hazard by 19% (estimated hazard ratio, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.79-0.83], P<0.001) and secondary outcome hazard by 28% (hazard ratio, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.70-0.74], P<0.001). Among the 3793 patients with data for all comparators, Cox models showed RSW best associated with outcomes (by both C statistics and Bayes factors). Furthermore, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was superior to thermodilution CI and Fick CI. Multivariable adjustment attenuated without eliminating the association of RSW with outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In a large national database, RSW was superior to conventional right heart catheterization indices at assessing risk of mortality and urgent heart failure presentation. This simple calculation with routine data may contribute to clinical decision-making in this population.
Subject(s)
Heart Failure/physiopathology , Hemodynamics/physiology , Oxygen Saturation/physiology , Pulmonary Wedge Pressure/physiology , Aged , Cardiac Catheterization/methods , Cardiac Output/physiology , Female , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Assessment , VeteransABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: There is paucity of data on the outcomes of hospitalization for bicuspid aortic valve (BAV)-related aortopathies. METHODS: We queried the NIS database (2012-2016) for hospitalizations for elective thoracic aortic repair or acute aortic syndrome (AAS) among those with BAV versus trileaflet aortic valve (TAV). RESULTS: Our analysis yielded 38,010 hospitalizations for elective aortic repair, of whom 34.4% had BAV, as well as 81,875 hospitalizations for thoracic AAS, of whom 1.1% had BAV. Hospitalizations for BAV were younger and had fewer comorbidities compared with their TAV counterparts. The number of hospitalizations for BAV during the observational period was unchanged. After propensity matching, elective aortic repair for BAV was associated with lower mortality (0.5% versus 1.7%, odds ratio = 0.28; 95% CI 1.5-0.50, p < 0.001), use of mechanical circulatory support, acute stroke, and shorter length of hospital stay compared with TAV. After propensity matching, AAS among those with BAV had a greater incidence of bleeding events, blood transfusion, cardiac tamponade, ventricular arrhythmias, and a longer length of hospital stay compared with TAV. Among those with BAV, predictors of lower mortality if undergoing elective aortic repair included larger hospitals and teaching hospitals. Predictors of higher mortality in patients with AAS included heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and coronary artery disease. CONCLUSION: Data from a national database showed no change in the number of hospitalizations for BAV-related aortopathy, with relatively lower incidence of AAS. Compared with TAV, elective aortic repair for BAV is associated with lower mortality, while BAV-related AAS is associated with higher in-hospital complications.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data on the contemporary outcomes and trends of elective thoracic aortic aneurysm repair and aneurysm-associated acute aortic syndrome. METHODS: We queried the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database years 2012-2016 to identify hospitalizations for elective thoracic aortic aneurysm repair and aneurysm-associated acute aortic syndrome. The main study outcome was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: The analysis yielded 24,295 hospitalizations for elective thoracic aortic aneurysm repair and 8875 hospitalizations for aneurysm-associated acute aortic syndrome. The number of hospitalizations for elective aortic repair significantly increased from 4375 in 2012 to 5450 in 2016 (Ptrend = .01). The number of hospitalizations for acute aortic syndrome numerically increased from 1545 in 2012 to 2340 in 2016 (Ptrend = .10). Overall in-hospital mortality for elective aortic repair was 2.4% with no change over time. In-hospital mortality for acute aortic rupture was 39.4% and for acute aortic dissection was 6.2% with no change over time. Hospitalizations for elective aortic repair had lower incidence of complications compared with those for aneurysm-associated acute aortic syndrome, including cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, acute stroke, and shorter length of stay. Factors associated with higher mortality among admissions undergoing elective aortic repair included older age, heart failure, valvular disease, and chronic kidney disease. Older age, coagulopathy, and fluid/ electrolytes disorders were associated with increased mortality among those with acute aortic syndrome. CONCLUSION: Contemporary elective thoracic aortic aneurysm repair is associated with lower in-hospital mortality and morbidity when compared with a clinical presentation for an aneurysm-associated acute aortic syndrome. This should be taken into account when deciding the timing of elective aortic aneurysm repair and balancing the risks and benefits.
Subject(s)
Aorta, Thoracic/injuries , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/surgery , Aortic Rupture/surgery , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aorta, Thoracic/abnormalities , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/epidemiology , Aortic Rupture/epidemiology , Female , Hospital Mortality/trends , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data regarding the outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) versus surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) among solid-organ transplant recipients. METHODS: Temporal trends in hospitalizations for aortic valve replacement among solid-organ transplant recipients were determined using the National Inpatient Sample database years 2012-2017. Propensity matching was conducted to compare admissions who underwent TAVR versus SAVR. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: The analysis included 1,730 hospitalizations for isolated AVR; 920 (53.2%) underwent TAVR and 810 (46.7%) underwent SAVR. TAVR was increasingly utilized for solid-organ transplant recipients (Ptrend = 0.01), while there was no change in the number of SAVR procedures (Ptrend = 0.20). The predictors of undergoing TAVR for solid-organ transplant recipients included older age, diabetes, and prior coronary artery bypass surgery, while TAVR was less likely utilized in small-sized hospitals. TAVR was associated with lower in-hospital mortality after matching (0.9 vs. 4.7%, odds ratio [OR] 0.19; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.11-0.35, p < .001) and after multivariable adjustment (OR 0.07; 95% CI 0.03-0.21, p < .001). TAVR was associated with lower rate of acute kidney injury, acute stroke, postoperative bleeding, blood transfusion, vascular complications, discharge to nursing facilities, and shorter median length of hospital stay. There was no difference between both groups in the use of mechanical circulatory support, hemodialysis, arrhythmias, or pacemaker insertion. CONCLUSION: This contemporary observational nationwide analysis showed that TAVR is increasingly performed among solid-organ transplant recipients. Compared with SAVR, TAVR was associated with lower in-hospital mortality, complications, and shorter length of stay.
Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Organ Transplantation , Aged , Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve/surgery , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Humans , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the trends and outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) versus surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) among patients with prior mediastinal radiation from a national database. BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data about the temporal trends and outcomes of TAVR versus SAVR in patients with prior mediastinal radiation. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample database years 2012 to 2017 was queried for hospitalizations of patients with prior mediastinal radiation who underwent isolated AVR. Using multivariable analysis, the study compared the outcomes of TAVR versus SAVR. The main study outcome was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: The final analysis included 3,675 hospitalizations for isolated AVR; of whom 2,170 (59.1%) underwent TAVR and 1,505 (40.9%) underwent isolated SAVR. TAVR was increasingly performed over time (ptrend = 0.01), but there was no significant increase in the rates of utilization of SAVR. The following factors were independently associated with TAVR utilization: older age, chronic lung disease, coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease, prior cerebrovascular accidents, prior coronary artery bypass grafting, and larger-sized hospitals, while women were less likely to undergo TAVR. Compared with SAVR, TAVR was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (1.2% vs. 2.0%, adjusted odds ratio: 0.27; 95% confidence interval: 0.09 to 0.79; p = 0.02). TAVR was associated with lower rates of acute kidney injury, use of mechanical circulatory support, bleeding and respiratory complications, and shorter length of hospital stay. TAVR was associated with higher rates of pacemaker insertion. CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide observational analysis showed that TAVR is increasingly performed among patients with prior mediastinal radiation. TAVR provides an important treatment option for this difficult patient population with desirable procedural safety when using SAVR as a benchmark.
Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Aortic Valve/surgery , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Male , Postoperative Complications , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeSubject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/drug therapy , Thrombolytic Therapy/trends , Aged , COVID-19 , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Thrombolytic Therapy/methods , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data regarding the contemporary changes in the uptake and outcomes of transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR) and surgical mitral valve repair/replacement (SMVR). METHODS: We queried the NIS database (2012-2016) to identify hospitalizations for TMVR and SMVR. We reported the temporal trends for uptake of TMVR and SMVR and their in-hospital outcomes. RESULTS: The analysis included 77,645 hospitalizations: 8760 (11.3%) for TMVR and 68,885 (88.7%) for SMVR. Those undergoing TMVR were older and had a higher prevalence of comorbidities, but shorter length of stay (5.5 ± 8.8 vs. 14.3 ± 13.8, p < 0.001) compared with SMVR. There was a marked increase in the number of TMVRs over time (from 420 in 2012 to 3850 in 2016; +917%; Ptrend = 0.008) but a modest increase in the number of SMVRs (+117%; Ptrend = 0.02). Overall, TMVR was associated with low in-hospital mortality (2%) and favorable safety profile. After adjusting for clinical and hospital variables, there were non-significant trends towards lower adjusted mortality among TMVR and SMVR (Ptrend = 0.16 and Ptrend = 0.13, respectively). Notably, among TMVR patients, female sex was associated with lower in-hospital mortality while CKD was associated with increased in-hospital mortality. There was a significant downtrend in the incidences of cardiac arrest, hemodialysis and length of stay in TMVR patients. CONCLUSION: Real world data showed a steady increase in the number of TMVR and SMVR procedures. Overall, TMVR was associated with low in-hospital mortality and complications rates. Despite older age and increased comorbidities, TMVR patients had lower in-hospital mortality and shorter length than their SMVR counterparts.
Subject(s)
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Mitral Valve Insufficiency , Cardiac Catheterization , Female , Humans , Male , Mitral Valve/surgery , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Background There is a paucity of data on the trends and outcomes of reoperative coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery during the current decade in the United States. Methods and Results We queried the National Inpatient Sample database (2002-2016) for all hospitalizations with isolated CABG procedure. We reported the temporal trends and outcomes of reoperative CABG versus primary CABG procedures. The main outcome was in-hospital mortality. Among 3 212 768 hospitalizations with CABG, 46 820 (1.5%) had reoperative CABG. Over the 15-year study period, there were no changes in the proportion of reoperative CABG (1.8% in 2002 versus 2.2% in 2016, Ptren=0.08), and the related in-hospital mortality (3.7% in 2002 versus 2.7% in 2016, Ptrend=0.97). Reoperative CABG was performed in patients with increasingly higher risk profile. Compared with primary CABG, hospitalizations for reoperative CABG were associated with higher in-hospital mortality (3.2% versus 1.9%, P<0.001), cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock, vascular complications, and respiratory complications. Among hospitalizations for reoperative CABG, the predictors of higher mortality included history of heart failure and chronic kidney disease. Conclusions In this 15-year nationwide analysis, reoperative CABG procedures were increasingly performed in patients with higher risk profile. In-hospital mortality rates were relatively low and did not change during the examined period. Compared with primary CABG, reoperative CABG is associated with higher in-hospital mortality.
Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Bypass/trends , Reoperation/trends , Aged , Cohort Studies , Coronary Artery Bypass/mortality , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reoperation/mortality , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There is paucity of data regarding the temporal trends and outcomes of coronary atherectomy in the United States. METHODS: We queried the National Inpatient Sample database (2011-2016) for hospitalizations of patients undergoing coronary atherectomy procedures. We also compared outcomes of non-orbital vs orbital coronary atherectomy in a more contemporary cohort. RESULTS: Our analysis included 2,990,223 hospitalizations with PCI, of which 114,462 (3.8%) included an atherectomy procedure. A significant increase in coronary atherectomy procedures was observed over time (0.66% in 2011 vs 8.9% in 2016; Ptrend=.04). There was an increase in in-hospital mortality associated with atherectomy procedures from 3.2% in 2011 to 4.7% in 2016 (Ptrend=.04), which paralleled the increase in patient comorbidities, use of mechanical circulatory devices (Ptrend<.001), and procedural complications. While several predictors of increased mortality after an atherectomy procedure were identified, the use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) was associated with lower mortality during atherectomy procedures (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42-0.89), although its overall use was low (10.4%). Compared with other atherectomy procedures, orbital atherectomy was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (3.2% vs 4.7%; adjusted OR = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.30-0.81). CONCLUSION: Our large national database analysis demonstrates an increase in the number of coronary atherectomy procedures and in their in-hospital mortality and complications over time. Orbital atherectomy appears to be associated with favorable outcomes compared with non-orbital atherectomy, and IVUS use was associated with lower mortality during atherectomy procedures. These associations do not necessarily imply causality and need to be confirmed in future randomized clinical trials.
Subject(s)
Atherectomy, Coronary , Coronary Artery Disease , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Atherectomy/adverse effects , Atherectomy, Coronary/adverse effects , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnosis , Coronary Artery Disease/surgery , Humans , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology , Vascular CalcificationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Women are undertreated and have worse clinical outcomes than men after acute myocardial infarction. It remains uncertain whether the sex disparities in treatments and outcomes persist in the contemporary era and whether they affect all age groups equally. METHODS: Using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) registry, we evaluated 1,260,200 hospitalizations for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) between 2010 and 2016, of which 32% were for women. The age-stratified sex differences in care measures and mortality were examined. Stepwise multivariable adjustment models, including baseline comorbidities, hospital characteristics, and reperfusion and revascularization therapies, were used to compare measures and outcomes between women and men across different age subgroups. RESULTS: Overall, women with STEMI were older than men and had more comorbidities. Women were less likely to receive fibrinolytic therapy, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and coronary artery bypass surgery across all age subgroups. Women with STEMI overall experienced higher unadjusted in-hospital mortality (11.1% vs 6.8%; adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.039, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.003-1.077), which persisted after multivariable adjustments. However, when stratified by age, the difference in mortality became non-significant in most age groups after stepwise multivariable adjustment, except among the youngest patients 19-49 years of age with STEMI (women vs men: 3.9% vs 2.6%; adjusted odds ratio = 1.259, 95% confidence interval: 1.083-1.464). CONCLUSIONS: Women with STEMI were less likely to receive reperfusion and revascularization therapies and had higher in-hospital mortality and complications compared with men. Younger women with STEMI (19-49 years of age) experienced higher in-hospital mortality that persisted after multivariable adjustment.
Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Bypass/statistics & numerical data , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Mortality , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/statistics & numerical data , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Thrombolytic Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Acute Kidney Injury/epidemiology , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Blood Transfusion/statistics & numerical data , Comorbidity , Female , Heart Arrest/epidemiology , Hospital Bed Capacity/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Rural , Hospitals, Teaching , Hospitals, Urban , Humans , Ischemic Stroke/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Sex Factors , United States/epidemiology , Young AdultSubject(s)
Heart-Assist Devices/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Mortality , Hospitals, High-Volume/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Low-Volume/statistics & numerical data , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , Humans , Multivariate Analysis , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data on the outcomes of acute myocardial infarction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the contemporary era. METHODS: We queried the National Inpatient Sample database (2002-2016) for hospitalizations with acute myocardial infarction. We described the trends and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction-rheumatoid arthritis compared with acute myocardial infarction-no rheumatoid arthritis. RESULTS: The analysis included 9,359,546 hospitalizations with acute myocardial infarction, of whom 123,783 (1.3%) had rheumatoid arthritis. There was an increase in the number of hospitalizations with acute myocardial infarction-rheumatoid arthritis (Ptrend < .001). There was an observed downtrend in mortality rates for acute myocardial infarction-rheumatoid arthritis (5.8% in 2002 vs 5.2% in 2016, Ptrend = .01) corresponding to an increase in the utilization of percutaneous coronary intervention (Ptrend < .001). In the overall cohort of acute myocardial infarction, rheumatoid arthritis was independently associated with lower rate of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.99, P = .03). Compared with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)-no rheumatoid arthritis, STEMI-rheumatoid arthritis was associated with lower in-hospital mortality and cardiac arrest, while it was associated with higher discharges to nursing facilities. No difference in mortality was observed among non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI)-rheumatoid arthritis and NSTEMI-no rheumatoid arthritis, while NSTEMI-rheumatoid arthritis was associated with lower cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock, and hemodialysis, at the expense of higher bleeding events and discharges to nursing facilities. CONCLUSION: In this nationwide analysis, we found an increase in hospitalizations for acute myocardial infarction-rheumatoid arthritis. Among patients with acute myocardial infarction, rheumatoid arthritis was independently associated with lower in-hospital mortality, particularly in cases of STEMI.
Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid/epidemiology , Hospital Mortality/trends , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/therapy , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Acute Kidney Injury/epidemiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Assisted Circulation , Blood Coagulation Disorders/epidemiology , Blood Transfusion/statistics & numerical data , Chronic Disease , Comorbidity , Coronary Artery Bypass/statistics & numerical data , Coronary Artery Bypass/trends , Female , Heart Arrest/epidemiology , Heart Arrest/etiology , Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Hemorrhage/therapy , Hospitalization , Humans , Lung Diseases , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/complications , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/complications , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Patient Discharge , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/statistics & numerical data , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/trends , Renal Dialysis/statistics & numerical data , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/epidemiology , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/complications , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Shock, Cardiogenic/epidemiology , Shock, Cardiogenic/etiology , Skilled Nursing Facilities/statistics & numerical data , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major risk factor for stroke. The CHA2DS2-VASc score is used to risk stratify patients, and the score includes known coronary artery disease (CAD) as a variable. The aim of this study was to assess if the presence of incidental coronary artery calcification (CAC), without known CAD, is associated with stroke independent of CHA2DS2-VASc variables. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A retrospective review of health records was performed for patients who had AF, a chest CT scan performed within 1 year, and a subsequent visit for stroke. Patients with CAD and other vascular disease, a mechanical valve, or who were older than 74 years old were excluded. Included patients were one-to-one matched by age and CHA2DS2-VASc risk factors to patients who had had similar follow-up but who did not have a stroke. Nongated CT images were reviewed for CAC. Univariate and Cox regression analyses were performed. RESULTS. A total of 203 patients met the study criteria, and 203 matched patients without stroke were identified. Median age was 61 years old with stroke and 62 years old without stroke (p = 0.99). In both groups, 82 (39.0%) were women and the median CHA2DS2-VASc was 2 (interquartile range, 1-2). Anticoagulation medication was prescribed to 46 (22.7%) patients in the group who had had a stroke and 52 (25.6%) in the group without stroke (p = 0.49). On Cox regression analysis, CAC was associated with stroke (hazard ratio [HR], 1.47; 95% CI, 1.10-1.97; p < 0.01) and mortality (adjusted HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.02-1.95; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION. Patients with AF and incidental CAC depicted on chest CT have an increased risk of stroke and mortality beyond established risk factors.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Coronary Artery Disease/complications , Stroke/epidemiology , Stroke/etiology , Vascular Calcification/complications , Aged , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Incidental Findings , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Vascular Calcification/diagnostic imagingABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have reported lower rates of coronary angiography and revascularization, and significantly higher mortality among patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) presenting with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This observational study was designed to evaluate characteristics and inpatient outcomes of patients with seropositive HIV infection presenting with AMI. METHODS: Using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, we identified patients (admissions) with a primary diagnosis of myocardial infarction and a co-occurring HIV. We described baseline characteristics and outcomes. Our primary outcomes of interest were prevalence of coronary angiography, revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or CABG), and mortality. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2014, of about 2,977,387 patients with a primary diagnosis of AMI, 10,907 (0.4%) were HIV seropositive. Patients with HIV were younger and more likely to be African American or Hispanic. Coronary angiography and revascularization were performed more frequently in the HIV population. The higher prevalence of revascularization was driven by a higher incidence of PCI. In a multivariable model, patients with HIV were no more likely to undergo revascularization than the general population. This was also the case for PCI. Unadjusted all-cause mortality was lower among patients with HIV. After controlling for confounders, this finding was not significant (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.75-1.25, p = 0.79). The length of stay between both groups was comparable. CONCLUSION: In this current analysis, we did not note any treatment bias or difference in the rate of in-hospital total mortality for HIV-seropositive patients presenting with AMI compared with the general population.
Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Myocardial Infarction , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , HIV Infections/complications , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/therapy , Hospital Mortality , Hospitalization , Humans , Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The outcomes of transfemoral (TF) compared with transapical (TA) access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in diabetics are unknown. METHODS: We queried the NIS database (2011-2014) to identify diabetics who underwent TAVR. We performed a propensity matching analysis comparing TF-TAVR versus TA-TAVR. RESULTS: The analysis included 14.555 diabetics who underwent TAVR. After matching, in-hospital mortality was not different between TF-TAVR and TA-TAVR. (3.5 vs. 4.4%, p = 0.11). TF-TAVR was associated with lower rates of cardiogenic shock (2.7 vs. 4.7%, p = 0.02), use of mechanical circulatory support (2.0 vs. 2.9%, p = 0.03), acute renal failure (17.8 vs. 26.5%, p < 0.001), major bleeding (35.8 vs. 40.7%, p < 0.001) and respiratory complications (1.1 vs. 4.4%, p < 0.001) compared with TA-TAVR. However, TF-TAVR was associated with a higher rate of vascular complications (2.9 vs. 0.9%, p < 0.001), cardiac tamponade (0.5 vs. 0.0%, p < 0.001), complete heart block (10.8 vs. 7.7%, p < 0.001) and pacemaker insertion (11.8 vs. 8.3%, p < 0.001). There was no difference between both groups in acute stroke (1.8 vs. 2.2%, p = 0.39), hemodialysis (2.0 vs. 2.2%, p = 0.71), and ventricular arrhythmias (4.9 vs. 4.2%, p = 0.19). Notably, TF-TAVR was associated with higher mortality, acute stroke, AKI, hemodialysis, PCI, and respiratory complications in complicated diabetics compared with non-complicated diabetics. CONCLUSIONS: This observational analysis showed no difference in-hospital mortality between TF-TAVR and TA-TAVR among diabetic patients. Studies exploring the optimal access for TAVR among diabetics are recommended.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data regarding the outcomes of transcatheter valve replacement (TAVR) performed in an urgent clinical setting. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database years 2011-2014 was used to identify hospitalizations for TAVR in the urgent setting. Using propensity score matching, we compared patients who underwent TAVR in nonurgent versus urgent settings. RESULTS: Among 42,154 hospitalizations in which TAVR was performed, 10,114 (24%) underwent urgent TAVR. There was an uptrend in the rate of urgent TAVR procedures (p = .001). The rates of in-hospital mortality among this group did not change during the study period (p = .713). Nonurgent TAVR was associated with lower mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69-0.89, p < .001) compared with urgent TAVR. Nonurgent TAVR was associated with lower incidence of cardiogenic shock (OR = 0.46; 95%CI: 0.40-0.53 p < .001), use of mechanical circulatory support devices (OR = 0.69; 95%CI: 0.59-0.82, p < .001), AKI (OR = 0.60; 95%CI: 0.56-0.64 p < .001), hemodialysis (OR = 0.67; 95%CI: 0.56-0.80 p < .001), major bleeding (OR = 0.94; 95%CI: 0.89-0.99 p = .045) and shorter length of stay (7.08 ± 6.317 vs. 12.39 ± 9.737 days, p < .001). There was no difference in acute stroke (OR = 0.96; 95%CI: 0.81-1.14, p = .636), vascular complications (OR = 1.07; 95%CI: 0.89-1.29, p = .492), and pacemaker insertions (OR = 0.92; 95%CI: 0.84-1.01, p = .067) between both groups. Among those undergoing urgent TAVR, subgroup analysis showed higher mortality in patients ≤80 years (p = .033), women (p < .001), chronic kidney disease (p = .001), heart failure (p < .001), and liver disease (p = .003). CONCLUSION: In this large nationwide analysis, almost a quarter of TAVR procedures were performed in the urgent settings. Although urgent TAVR was associated with higher mortality and increased complications compared with nonurgent TAVR, the absolute difference in in-hospital mortality was not remarkably higher. Thus, urgent TAVR can be considered as a reasonable approach when indicated.
Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Aortic Valve/surgery , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve/physiopathology , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Stenosis/mortality , Aortic Valve Stenosis/physiopathology , Databases, Factual , Elective Surgical Procedures , Female , Hospital Mortality , Hospitalization , Humans , Inpatients , Male , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/mortality , Treatment Outcome , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the temporal trends of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with bicuspid aortic stenosis (AS), and to compare the outcomes between TAVR and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in this population. BACKGROUND: Randomized trials comparing TAVR to SAVR in AS with bicuspid valve are lacking. METHODS: The study queried the National Inpatient Sample database (years 2012 to 2016) to identify hospitalizations for bicuspid AS who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement. A propensity-matched analysis was used to compare outcomes of hospitalizations for TAVR versus SAVR for bicuspid AS and TAVR for bicuspid AS versus tricuspid AS. RESULTS: The analysis included 31,895 hospitalizations with bicuspid AS, of whom 1,055 (3.3%) underwent TAVR. TAVR was increasingly utilized during the study period for bicuspid AS (ptrend = 0.002). After matching, TAVR and SAVR had similar in-hospital mortality (3.1% vs. 3.1%; odds ratio: 1.00; 95% confidence interval: 0.60 to 1.67). There was no difference between TAVR and SAVR in the rates of cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock, acute kidney injury, hemopericardium, cardiac tamponade, or acute stroke. TAVR was associated with lower rates of acute myocardial infarction, post-operative bleeding, vascular complications, and discharge to nursing facility as well as a shorter length of hospital stay. On the contrary, TAVR was associated with a higher incidence of complete heart block and permanent pacemaker insertion. TAVR for bicuspid AS was associated with similar in-hospital mortality compared with tricuspid AS. CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide analysis showed similar in-hospital mortality for TAVR and SAVR in patients with bicuspid AS. TAVR for bicuspid AS was also associated with similar in-hospital mortality compared with tricuspid AS. Further studies are needed to evaluate long-term outcomes of TAVR for bicuspid AS.
Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Aortic Valve/abnormalities , Heart Valve Diseases/surgery , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/trends , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/trends , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve/physiopathology , Aortic Valve/surgery , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Stenosis/mortality , Aortic Valve Stenosis/physiopathology , Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease , Databases, Factual , Female , Heart Valve Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Heart Valve Diseases/mortality , Heart Valve Diseases/physiopathology , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Hospital Mortality/trends , Humans , Incidence , Inpatients , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/mortality , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the temporal trends and outcomes of mechanical complications after myocardial infarction in the contemporary era. BACKGROUND: Data regarding temporal trends and outcomes of mechanical complications after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) are limited in the contemporary era. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample database (2003 to September 2015) was queried to identify all STEMI and NSTEMI hospitalizations. Temporal trends and outcomes of mechanical complications after STEMI and NSTEMI, including papillary muscle rupture, ventricular septal defect, and free wall rupture, were described. RESULTS: The analysis included 3,951,861 STEMI and 5,114,270 NSTEMI hospitalizations. Mechanical complications occurred in 10,726 of STEMI hospitalizations (0.27%) and 3,041 of NSTEMI hospitalizations (0.06%), with no changes in trends (p = 0.13 and p = 0.83, respectively). The rates of in-hospital mortality in patients with mechanical complications were 42.4% after STEMI and 18.0% after NSTEMI, with no significant trend changes (p = 0.62 and p = 0.12, respectively). After multivariate adjustment, patients who had mechanical complications after myocardial infarction had higher in-hospital mortality, cardiogenic shock, acute kidney injury, hemodialysis, and respiratory complications compared with those without mechanical complications. Predictors of lower mortality in patients with mechanical complications who developed cardiogenic shock included surgical repair in the STEMI and NSTEMI cohorts and percutaneous coronary intervention in the STEMI cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Contemporary data from a large national database show that the rates of mechanical complications are low in patients presenting with STEMI and NSTEMI. Post-myocardial infarction mechanical complications continue to be associated with high mortality rates, which did not improve during the study period.