ABSTRACT
A treatment and volume reduction process for a spent uranium-antimony catalyst has been developed. Targeted removal, immobilization and disposal of the uranium component has been confirmed, thus eliminating the radiological hazard. However, significant concentrations of antimony ([Sb] ≥ 25-50 mg L-1) remain in effluent from the process, which require removal in compliance with Korean wastewater regulations. Antimony(III/V) removal via co-precipitation with iron has been considered with optimal pH, dose and kinetics being determined. The effect of selected anions - Cl-, SO4 2- and PO4 3- - have also been considered, the latter present due to a prior uranium removal step. Removal of Sb(III) from both Cl- and SO4 2- media and Sb(V) removal from Cl- media to below release limits were found to be effective within 5 minutes at an iron dose of 8 mM (molar ratio, [FeIII]/[Sb] = 20) and a target pH of 5.0. However, Sb(V) removal from SO4 2- was significantly hampered requiring significantly higher iron dosages for the same removal performance. Phosphate poses significant challenges for the removal of Sb(V) due to competition between PO4 3- and Sb(OH)6 - species for surface binding sites, attributed to similarities in chemistries and a shared preference for an inner vs outer binding mechanism.
Subject(s)
Acrylonitrile/chemistry , Antimony/analysis , Waste Disposal, Fluid/methods , Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysis , Adsorption , Ferric Compounds , WastewaterABSTRACT
We have investigated the suitability of phosphate addition, in the form MH2PO4 (Mâ¯=â¯Na+, K+ or NH4+), for the selective removal of uranium from a complex waste effluent. The effluent in question is generated as part of a treatment strategy for a spent uranium catalyst, used in the production of acrylonitrile (Sohio process), which has been in temporary storage in Korea since 2004. Both pH (3.0-11.0) and phosphate dosages (0.25-10â¯mM) have been screened to identify the optimal conditions of 6.25 and 1â¯mM, respectively, for an initial uranium concentration of 0.16â¯mM. Precipitation kinetics have been investigated revealing the rapid removal of uranium from solution, with 30â¯min found to be optimal. The effluent was effectively decontaminated via Meta-ankoleite (K(UO2)(PO4)·3H2O) formation to uranium levels below the Korean release limit of 1â¯ppm for uranium-bearing liquid wastes, with KH2PO4 addition being chosen for the real process. Final decontamination factors of the order of ≥ 8000 were readily achieved. Aluminium, calcium and iron containing coagulants were screened for the clean-up of the remaining supernatant, post-uranium removal, ensuring the final effluent meets the relevant release criteria (pH, total suspended solids, total phosphate and turbidity) for general, non-radioactive, effluents. A process scheme is presented and discussed for adaptation to similar uranium containing effluents.