Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Crit Care Med ; 50(9): 1296-1305, 2022 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35607975

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of daily written updates on the satisfaction and psychologic symptoms of families of ICU patients. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Single, urban academic medical center. SUBJECTS: Surrogates of nondecisional, critically ill adults with high risk of mortality ( n = 252) enrolled from June 2019 to January 2021. INTERVENTIONS: Usual communication with the medical team with or without written communication detailing the suspected cause and management approach of each ICU problem, updated each day. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Participants completed surveys at three time points during the ICU stay: enrollment ( n = 252), 1 week ( n = 229), and 2 weeks ( n = 109) after enrollment. Satisfaction with care was measured using the Critical Care Family Needs Inventory (CCFNI). The presence of anxiety, depression, and acute stress were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Impact of Events Scale Revised (IES-R). CCFNI, HADS, and IES-R scores were similar among participants assigned to the intervention group and control group upon enrollment and during the first week after enrollment ( p > 0.05). From enrollment to the second week after enrollment, there was an improvement in CCFNI and HADS scores among participants assigned to the intervention group versus the control group. At week 2, CCFNI scores were significantly lower among participants in the intervention group versus the control group, indicating greater satisfaction with care: 15.1 (95% CI, 14.2-16.0) versus 16.4, (95% CI, 15.5-17.3); p = 0.04. In addition, 2 weeks after enrollment, the odds of symptoms of anxiety, depression, and acute stress among participants assigned to the intervention versus control group were 0.16 (95% CI, 0.03-0.82; p = 0.03); 0.15 (95% CI, 0.01-1.87; p = 0.14); and 0.27 (95% CI, 0.06-1.27; p = 0.10), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Written communication improved satisfaction and the emotional well-being of families of critically ill patients, supporting its use as a supplement to traditional communication approaches.


Subject(s)
Critical Illness , Intensive Care Units , Adult , Anxiety/etiology , Critical Care/psychology , Critical Illness/psychology , Critical Illness/therapy , Depression/etiology , Humans
2.
Patient Educ Couns ; 105(2): 297-303, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34507866

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To understand how surrogates of critically ill patients adjusted to challenges that resulted from the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Participants (N = 62) were surrogates of critically ill adults with COVID-19 in the ICU at an urban, academic medical center from March to June 2020. Participants were recruited using convenience sampling and took part in one-time qualitative individual interviews via telephone. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Qualitative analyses yielded four types of challenges: Communication with the medical team, communication among family members, understanding and tracking medical information, and distress related to visitor restrictions. To adjust to challenges related to communication, participants developed routines for receiving updates from the medical team and providing updates to other family members. To adjust to the challenge related to comprehension, participants sought information from external sources such as family members in healthcare fields. To adjust to the challenge related to visitation, participants found some comfort in video calls with the patient. CONCLUSIONS: Surrogates of critically ill patients with COVID-19 faced multiple types of challenges yet adjusted to those challenges. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Future research should focus on ways to support the wellbeing of surrogates during times of restricted hospital visitation. Clinical trial registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03969810).


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adult , Critical Illness , Family , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
3.
BMC Med Educ ; 19(1): 476, 2019 Dec 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31888607

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To determine whether gender-based differences may be present in letters of recommendation written for ophthalmology residency applicants. METHODS: All applications submitted through SF Match to the UCLA Stein Eye Institute Residency Training Program from the 2017-2018 application cycle were analyzed using validated text analysis software (Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (Austin, TX)). The main outcome measures were differences in language use in letters of recommendation by gender of applicant. RESULTS: Of 440 applicants, 254 (58%) were male and 186 (42%) were female. The two gender groups had similar United States Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) Step 1 scores, undergraduate grade point averages (uGPA's), proportions of underrepresented minority (URM) applicants and Gold Humanism Honor Society members, numbers of academic and service activities listed, and gender distributions of their letter writers (all P values > 0.05). However, letters written for male applicants were determined to use more "authentic" words than those written for female applicants (mean difference, 0.800; 95% CI, 0.001-1.590; P = 0.047). Letters written for male applicants also contained more "leisure" words (mean difference, 0.056; 95% CI, 0.008-0.104; P = 0.023) and fewer "feel" words (mean difference, 0.033; 95% CI, 0.001-0.065; P = 0.041) and "biological processes" words (mean difference, 0.157; 95% CI, 0.017-0.297; P = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: There were gender differences detected in recommendation letters in ophthalmology consistent with prior studies from other fields. Awareness of these differences may improve residency selection processes.


Subject(s)
Internship and Residency/standards , Ophthalmology/education , Personnel Selection/standards , School Admission Criteria , Sexism , Correspondence as Topic , Female , Humans , Male , United States , Writing
4.
Tree Physiol ; 20(8): 503-510, 2000 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12651430

ABSTRACT

Rubber (cis-1,4-polyisoprene), an important raw material for many industrial uses, is synthesized in the latex of Hevea brasiliensis (Willd. ex A. Juss.) Müll. Arg. We postulated that the genes uniquely or preferentially expressed in the latex may be important for rubber biosynthesis. We constructed cDNA libraries from the latex of H. brasiliensis to investigate the genes expressed in the latex by single-run partial sequencing of the cDNA clones. Sequence analyses identified 245 expressed sequence tags (ESTs), of which 57% showed homology to previously described sequences in public databases. About 16% of the database-matched ESTs encode rubber biosynthesis-related proteins such as rubber elongation factor (REF) and small rubber particle protein (SRPP). The second most frequent transcripts next to rubber biosynthesis-related genes were defense genes and protein metabolism-related genes (12.6% each). About 27% of the database-matched ESTs had sequence homology with genes of unknown function. Among the redundantly expressed genes, REF was the most frequently expressed (6.1%), followed by SRPP (3.7%) and HbLAR (2.9%). Northern blot analyses showed that ten (71%) of the 14 ESTs studied were expressed at a higher level in latex than in leaves.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...