Challenging the dogma: Red blood cell-directed autoimmunity as risk factor for red blood cell alloimmunisation after blood transfusion.

Red blood cell autoimmunity and alloimmunity are potentially linked. Quantification of this association can tailor extensively matched red blood cell transfusions in patients with autoimmunity. Using an incident new-user cohort comprising 47 285 previously non-transfused, non-alloimmunised patients, we compared transfusion-induced red blood cell alloimmunisation incidences in direct antiglobulin test (DAT)-positive and control patients. Additionally, we performed case-control analyses to handle potential confounding by clinical immunomodulators. Among (IgG and/or C3d) DAT-positive patients (N = 380), cumulative red blood cell alloimmunisation incidences after 10 units transfused reached 4.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.5-8.2) versus 4.2% (CI 3.9-4.5, p = 0.88) in controls. In case-control analyses, alloimmunisation relative risks among DAT-positive patients increased to 1.7 (CI 1.1-2.8). Additional adjustments for pre-DAT transfusion exposure or the extent of Rh/K mismatching did not impact results. In conclusion, while patients with DAT positivity show an intrinsically increased alloimmune red blood cell response, their absolute risk is comparable to control patients due to counteracting co-existing immunosuppressive conditions. Consequently, isolated DAT positivity in patients lacking overt haemolysis or complicated alloantibody testing does not seem to warrant extended matching strategies.

The effect of extended c, E and K matching in females under 45 years of age on the incidence of transfusion-induced red blood cell alloimmunisation.

Maternal alloantibodies directed against fetal red blood cell (RBC) antigens may cause potentially life-threatening haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). Dutch transfusion guidelines therefore prescribe preventive cEK matching for all (pre-)fertile females. To quantify the impact of cEK matching, we compared overall and antigen-specific cumulative RBC alloimmunisation incidences in females and males aged <45 years. Among a multicentre cohort comprised of patients who received their first and subsequent RBC unit between 2005 and 2019, first-formed RBC alloantibodies were detected in 47 of 2998 (1·6%) females and 49 of 2507 (2·0%) males. Comparing females and males, overall alloimmunisation incidences were comparable (3·1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 2·1-4·4] versus 3·5% (95% CI 2·4-4·9, P = 0·853) after 10 units transfused). However, cEK alloimmunisation incidences were significantly lower among females (0·6% (95% CI 0·3-1.5) versus 2·2% (95% CI 1·5-3·4, P = 0·001) after 10 units transfused). Yet, despite cEK-matching guidelines being in effect, 6·5%, 3·6% and 0·2% of all RBC units remained mismatched for c, E or K antigens respectively. Most of these mismatches were almost always due to emergency settings. Even though cEK alloimmunisation was not prevented completely, implementation of cEK matching resulted in an alloantigen-exposure risk reduction of up to 98%.

Association between renal failure and red blood cell alloimmunization among newly transfused patients.

BACKGROUND: Renal failure and renal replacement therapy (RRT) affect the immune system and could therefore modulate red blood cell (RBC) alloimmunization after transfusion. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a nationwide multicenter case-control study within a source population of newly transfused patients between 2005 and 2015. Using conditional multivariate logistic regression, we compared first-time transfusion-induced RBC alloantibody formers (N = 505) with two nonalloimmunized recipients with similar transfusion burden (N = 1010). RESULTS: Renal failure was observed in 17% of the control and 13% of the case patients. A total of 41% of the control patients and 34% of case patients underwent acute RRT. Renal failure without RRT was associated with lower alloimmunization risks after blood transfusion (moderate renal failure: adjusted relative rate [RR], 0.82 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.67-1.01]); severe renal failure, adjusted RR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.55-1.05]). With severe renal failure patients mainly receiving RRT, the lowest alloimmunization risk was found in particularly these patients [adjusted RR 0.48 (95% CI 0.39-0.58)]. This was similar for patients receiving RRT for acute or chronic renal failure (adjusted RR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.46-0.75]); and adjusted RR, 0.62 [95% CI 0.45-0.88], respectively). CONCLUSION: These findings are indicative of a weakened humoral response in acute as well as chronic renal failure, which appeared to be most pronounced when treated with RRT. Future research should focus on how renal failure and RRT mechanistically modulate RBC alloimmunization.