ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of three film-speed/collimator combinations on image quality, based on reviewer preference and diagnostic quality, based on caries detection. METHOD: Two hundred sixteen proximal surfaces were evaluated for the presence and severity of carious lesions on bitewing-simulated projections using D-speed film/circular, E-speed film/rectangular, and E-speed film/circular collimation. Matched films by model type were ranked, based on reviewer preference. Preference data were analyzed using Friedman's test, while the caries detection data were analyzed using a 3 x 3 x 3 x 6 ANOVA model and the kappa statistic. Variability components of the ANOVA were used to determine inter- and intra-rater reliability. RESULTS: Inter- and intra-rater reliability were 90.9 and 98.7%, respectively. Each of the film-speed/collimator combinations had average preference rankings that were significantly different from one another for each criteria (p < 0.001), with E-speed film/rectangular collimation consistently ranking highest and E-speed film/circular collimation consistently ranking lowest. There was excellent agreement in caries detection among the three film-speed/collimator combinations (kw = 0.92, kw = 0.94). CONCLUSION: Results from the subjective comparison indicated that E-speed film with rectangular collimation ranked highest for film resolution, overall appearance, and choice for caries diagnosis, while E-speed film with circular collimation ranked lowest. Caries diagnosis was comparable among the three film-speed/collimator combinations.
Subject(s)
Radiographic Image Enhancement/standards , Radiography, Bitewing/standards , Analysis of Variance , Dental Caries/diagnostic imaging , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Humans , Models, Dental , Observer Variation , Radiography, Bitewing/statistics & numerical data , X-Ray Film/standards , X-Ray Film/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
Producing radiographs of good diagnostic quality while keeping the dose as low as possible is the goal of the dental radiographer. Rare earth compound filters reduce the dose, but few clinical studies have evaluated the diagnostic yield. The diagnostic quality of a samarium compound filter used with E-speed film was compared with that of a conventional aluminum filter used with E-speed film. Bitewing projections with the test and standard filters were exposed for 39 patients. Agreement was evaluated with kappa statistics. The results indicated a substantial level of agreement between the two filter types. The combination of samarium compound filter and E-speed film appears to be a good mechanism for achieving dose reduction without compromising the diagnostic yield of the film.
