ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: An international multidisciplinary panel of experts aimed to provide consensus guidelines describing the optimal intratumoral and intranodal injection of NBTXR3 hafnium oxide nanoparticles in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) of the oral cavity, oropharynx, and cervical lymph nodes and to review data concerning safety, feasibility, and procedural aspects of administration. METHODS: The Delphi method was used to determine consensus. A 4-member steering committee and a 10-member monitoring committee wrote and revised the guidelines, divided into eight sections. An independent 3-member reading committee reviewed the recommendations. RESULTS: After two rounds of voting, strong consensus was obtained on all recommendations. Intratumoral and intranodal injection was deemed feasible. NBTXR3 volume calculation, choice of patients, preparation and injection procedure, potential side effects, post injection, and post treatment follow-up were described in detail. CONCLUSIONS: Best practices for the injection of NBTXR3 were defined, thus enabling international standardization of intratumoral nanoparticle injection.
Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms , Injections, Intralesional , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck , Humans , Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/therapy , Delphi Technique , Hafnium/administration & dosage , Oxides/administration & dosage , Nanoparticles/administration & dosage , Male , Consensus , Female , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/therapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Practice Guidelines as TopicABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) is a common form of liposarcoma with challenging treatment modalities. Pan-TRK immunopositivity can be often observed without NTRK gene fusion in soft tissue sarcomas with myogenic differentiation. Expression and the role of NTRK in DDLPS are under-studied. We sought to identify activating mutations of the NTRK genes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 131 DDLPS patients were selected for pan-TRK immunohistochemistry and positive cases were analyzed by Sanger sequencing for NTRK1, NTRK2 and NTRK3 genes. Functional assays were performed using a lentiviral transduction system to study the effect of NTRK variants in fibroblast, immortalized fibroblast, and dedifferentiated liposarcoma cell lines. RESULTS: Out of the 131 DDLPS cases, 75 immunohistochemical staining positive cases, 46 were successfully Sanger sequenced. A recurrent somatic mutation pair in cis position (NGS) of the NTRK1 c.1810C>T (p.H604Y) and c.1838G>T (p.G613V) was identified in six cases (13%) that have never been reported in DDLPS. NTRK fusions were excluded in all six cases by FISH and NGS. The phospho-AKT immunopositivity among the six mutated cases suggested downstream activation of the NTRK signaling pathway. Functional assays showed no transforming effects, but resistance to first- and second-line TRK inhibitors of the p.G613V and p.H604Y variant. CONCLUSIONS: We detected (de novo/somatic) missense mutation variants in cis position of the NTRK1 gene in a subset of DDLPS indicating modifying mutations that may contribute to tumorigenesis in a subset of DDLPS. These variants beget resistance to TRK inhibitors indicating an interesting biomarker for other studies with TRK inhibitors.
Subject(s)
Liposarcoma , Sarcoma , Soft Tissue Neoplasms , Humans , Liposarcoma/genetics , Mutation , Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/genetics , Receptor, trkA/genetics , Sarcoma/genetics , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/geneticsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Eftilagimod alpha (efti), a soluble lymphocyte activation gene (LAG-3) protein and MHC class II agonist, enhances innate and adaptive immunity. Active Immunotherapy PAClitaxel (AIPAC) evaluated safety and efficacy of efti plus paclitaxel in patients with predominantly endocrine-resistant, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (ET-resistant HR+ HER2- MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with HR+ HER2- MBC were randomized 1:1 to weekly intravenous paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) and subcutaneous efti (30 mg) or placebo every 2 weeks for six 4-week cycles, then monthly subcutaneous efti (30 mg) or placebo maintenance. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), safety/tolerability, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, and quality of life. Exploratory endpoints included cellular biomarkers. RESULTS: 114 patients received efti and 112 patients received placebo. Median age was 60 years (91.6% visceral disease, 84.1% ET-resistant, 44.2% with previous CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment). Median PFS at 7.3 months was similar for efti and placebo. Median OS was not significantly improved for efti (20.4 vs. 17.5 months; HR, 0.88; P = 0.197) but became significant for predefined exploratory subgroups. EORTC QLQC30-B23 global health status was sustained for efti but deteriorated for placebo. Efti increased absolute lymphocyte, monocyte and secondary target cell (CD4, CD8) counts, plasma IFNγ and CXCL10 levels. CONCLUSIONS: Although the primary endpoint, PFS, was not met, AIPAC confirmed expected pharmacodynamic effects and demonstrated excellent safety profile for efti. OS was not significantly improved globally (2.9-month difference), but was significantly improved in exploratory biomarker subgroups, warranting further studies to clarify efti's role in patients with ET-resistant HER2- MBC.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Disease-Free Survival , Lymphocyte Activation , Paclitaxel , Quality of Life , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolismABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In a previous phase 3 trial, treatment with trifluridine-tipiracil (FTD-TPI) prolonged overall survival among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Preliminary data from single-group and randomized phase 2 trials suggest that treatment with FTD-TPI in addition to bevacizumab has the potential to extend survival. METHODS: We randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, adult patients who had received no more than two previous chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer to receive FTD-TPI plus bevacizumab (combination group) or FTD-TPI alone (FTD-TPI group). The primary end point was overall survival. Secondary end points were progression-free survival and safety, including the time to worsening of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance-status score from 0 or 1 to 2 or more (on a scale from 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater disability). RESULTS: A total of 246 patients were assigned to each group. The median overall survival was 10.8 months in the combination group and 7.5 months in the FTD-TPI group (hazard ratio for death, 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49 to 0.77; P<0.001). The median progression-free survival was 5.6 months in the combination group and 2.4 months in the FTD-TPI group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.54; P<0.001). The most common adverse events in both groups were neutropenia, nausea, and anemia. No treatment-related deaths were reported. The median time to worsening of the ECOG performance-status score from 0 or 1 to 2 or more was 9.3 months in the combination group and 6.3 months in the FTD-TPI group (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.67). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer, treatment with FTD-TPI plus bevacizumab resulted in longer overall survival than FTD-TPI alone. (Funded by Servier and Taiho Oncology; SUNLIGHT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04737187; EudraCT number, 2020-001976-14.).
Subject(s)
Colonic Neoplasms , Colorectal Neoplasms , Rectal Neoplasms , Adult , Humans , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Bevacizumab/adverse effects , Bevacizumab/therapeutic use , Colonic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Drug Combinations , Pyrrolidines/adverse effects , Pyrrolidines/therapeutic use , Rectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Trifluridine/adverse effects , Trifluridine/therapeutic use , UracilABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Rogaratinib, an oral pan-fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR1-4) inhibitor, showed promising phase I efficacy and safety in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) with FGFR1-3 mRNA overexpression. We assessed rogaratinib efficacy and safety versus chemotherapy in patients with FGFR mRNA-positive advanced/metastatic UC previously treated with platinum chemotherapy. METHODS: FORT-1 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03410693) was a phase II/III, randomized, open-label trial. Patients with FGFR1/3 mRNA-positive locally advanced or metastatic UC with ≥ 1 prior platinum-containing regimen were randomly assigned (1:1) to rogaratinib (800 mg orally twice daily, 3-week cycles; n = 87) or chemotherapy (docetaxel 75 mg/m2, paclitaxel 175 mg/m2, or vinflunine 320 mg/m2 intravenously once every 3 weeks; n = 88). The primary end point was overall survival, with objective response rate (ORR) analysis planned following phase II accrual. Because of comparable efficacy between treatments, enrollment was stopped before progression to phase III; a full interim analysis of phase II was completed. RESULTS: ORRs were 20.7% (rogaratinib, 18/87; 95% CI, 12.7 to 30.7) and 19.3% (chemotherapy, 17/88; 95% CI, 11.7 to 29.1). Median overall survival was 8.3 months (95% CI, 6.5 to not estimable) and 9.8 months (95% CI, 6.8 to not estimable; hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.72; P = .67). Grade 3/4 events occurred in 37 (43.0%)/4 (4.7%) patients and 32 (39.0%)/15 (18.3%), respectively. No rogaratinib-related deaths occurred. Exploratory analysis of patients with FGFR3 DNA alterations showed ORRs of 52.4% (11/21; 95% CI, 29.8 to 74.3) for rogaratinib and 26.7% (4/15; 95% CI, 7.8 to 55.1) for chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, these are the first data to compare FGFR-directed therapy with chemotherapy in patients with FGFR-altered UC, showing comparable efficacy and manageable safety. Exploratory testing suggested FGFR3 DNA alterations in association with FGFR1/3 mRNA overexpression may be better predictors of rogaratinib response.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms , Humans , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/drug therapy , DNA/therapeutic use , Platinum/therapeutic use , Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 1/genetics , Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 1/therapeutic use , RNA, Messenger , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathologyABSTRACT
Due to the relatively high recurrence rate and the destructive nature of the tumor, the treatment of giant cell tumor is still a challenge. Denosumab appeared to be a promising candidate as a therapeutic drug. However, several studies have reported that tumors can recur during/after treatment with denosumab. Based on activated receptor tyrosine kinase signaling pattern of the stromal/tumor cells, a combination treatment with denosumab and sunitinib has recently been proposed to inhibit recurrences. This prompted us to investigate the PDGFRß expression of five denosumab treated cases using both primary and recurrent tumors during and after denosumab treatment. In addition, to recognise morphological changes, immunohistochemical analysis of H3F3A and PDGFRß was also performed. As an effect of denosumab treatment, the permanent absence of giant cells associated with severe to mild fibrosis was the most consistent morphological change, but H3F3A positive stromal/tumor cells were observed in all cases. Furthermore, an increased immunopositivity of PDGFRß in stromal/tumor cells was evident in all recurrent cases during denosumab treatment. Upon tumor recurrence (after the discontinuation of denosumab treatment) the intensity of PDGFRß immunostaining in stromal/tumor cells was restored/decreased. Our results confirm (for the first time) the activation of PDGFRß on mononuclear stromal/tumor cells at protein level as an effect of denosumab treatment, which has so far only been demonstrated by phosphoprotein array analysis (protein lysates). The decreased PDGFRß activity after the discontinuation of denosumab treatmeant and the increased PDGFRß activity during denosumab treatment underlines the need for denosumab and sunitinib combination therapy.
Subject(s)
Bone Neoplasms , Giant Cell Tumor of Bone , Soft Tissue Neoplasms , Bone Neoplasms/pathology , Bone and Bones/pathology , Denosumab/therapeutic use , Giant Cell Tumor of Bone/drug therapy , Giant Cell Tumor of Bone/pathology , Humans , Sunitinib/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are malignant mesenchymal tumors arising in the gastrointestinal tract. Their systemic treatment is based on the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with imatinib, sunitinib, and regorafenib being the preferred agents. Assessment of tumor response to TKI treatment in GISTs is traditionally done according the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), while Choi criteria have also been proposed as alternative tool assessing both volumetric and density changes on computer tomography (CT) scans. EORTC STBSG 1317 'CaboGIST' was a single-arm prospective Phase 2 trial which met its primary endpoint, as 60% of patients previously treated with imatinib and sunitinib were progression-free at 12 weeks (95% CI 45-74%) based on local RECIST assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We report here an exploratory analysis of local versus central RECIST version 1.1 assessment and a comparison of RECIST version 1.1 versus Choi criteria. RESULTS: Comparisons between local and central RECIST version 1.1 at week 12 revealed discrepancies in 17/43 evaluable cases (39.5%). When comparing Choi with local and central RECIST version 1.1, discrepancies were observed in 27/43 (62.8%) and 21/43 (48.8%) cases, respectively. A total of 68% of evaluable patients were progression-free and alive at week 12 based on local RECIST, 84% according to central RECIST analysis and 81% when applying Choi criteria. Central assessment upgraded the treatment response both with RECIST version 1.1 and Choi. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this exploratory analysis support the conclusion that cabozantinib is active in patients with metastatic or recurrent GIST after treatment with imatinib and sunitinib and confirm once again the limitations of RECIST to capture response to TKI in GIST, and the importance to include density changes in the response evaluation in this setting. Clinical trial number: EORTC 1317, NCT02216578.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors , Anilides , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/diagnostic imaging , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/drug therapy , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/pathology , Humans , Imatinib Mesylate/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Pyridines , Sunitinib/therapeutic use , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Tumor agnostic therapies target specific genomic alterations regardless of tumor localization and histological subtype. Neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor tyrosine kinase (NTRK) gene fusions are important driver gene targets in both pediatric and adult tumors. The first generation TRK inhibitors provide a rapid, effective, and long-lasting antitumor effect with a favorable side effect profile through selective inhibition of TRK fusion proteins. In the case report, we present a case of a young adult female patient with soft tissue sarcoma, in whom the multiple recurrent lower limb tumor disseminated after 3 years, but the systemic treatments used did not show a meaningful therapeutic response. Molecular diagnostic method confirmed the translocation of a very rare driver oncology target, the neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor tyrosine kinase 3 gene. We used convenient and safe inhibitor of tropomyosin receptor tyrosine kinase larotrectinib therapy with good efficacy and excellent quality of life. Larotrectinib was the first and only systemic therapy to which this metastatic soft tissue tumor responded.
Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/antagonists & inhibitors , Tropomyosin , Female , Humans , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/genetics , Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/metabolism , Quality of Life , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The randomized phase 3 CORAIL trial evaluated whether lurbinectedin improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared to pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) or topotecan in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to lurbinectedin 3.2 mg/m2 1-h i.v. infusion q3wk (experimental arm), versus PLD 50 mg/m2 1-h i.v. infusion q4wk or topotecan 1.50 mg/m2 30-min i.v. infusion Days 1-5 q3wk (control arm). Stratification factors were PS (0 vs. ≥1), prior PFI (1-3 months vs. >3 months), and prior chemotherapy lines (1-2 vs. 3). The primary endpoint was PFS by Independent Review Committee in all randomized patients. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02421588. RESULTS: 442 patients were randomized: 221 in lurbinectedin arm and 221 in control arm (127 PLD and 94 topotecan). With a median follow-up of 25.6 months, median PFS was 3.5 months (95% CI, 2.1-3.7) in the lurbinectedin arm and 3.6 months (95% CI, 2.7-3.8) in the control arm (stratified log-rank p = 0.6294; HR = 1.057). Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were most frequent in the control arm: 64.8% vs. 47.9% (p = 0.0005), mainly due to hematological toxicities. The most common grade ≥ 3 AEs were: fatigue (7.3% of patients) and nausea (5.9%) with lurbinectedin; mucosal inflammation (8.5%) and fatigue (8.0%) in the control arm. CONCLUSIONS: The primary endpoint of improvement in PFS was not met. Lurbinectedin showed similar antitumor efficacy and was better tolerated than current standard of care in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.
Subject(s)
Carbolines/administration & dosage , Doxorubicin/analogs & derivatives , Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings/administration & dosage , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Topotecan/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carbolines/adverse effects , Doxorubicin/administration & dosage , Doxorubicin/adverse effects , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Female , Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings/adverse effects , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Middle Aged , Ovarian Neoplasms/mortality , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Polyethylene Glycols/administration & dosage , Polyethylene Glycols/adverse effects , Progression-Free Survival , Topotecan/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Összefoglaló. A molekuláris diagnosztikai módszerek folyamatos fejlodésének köszönhetoen egyre több onkogén genetikai eltérést azonosítanak. A neurotrofikus tropomiozin receptor-tirozin-kináz (NTRK-) génfúziók fontos precíziós onkológiai célpontok, melyek mindhárom NTRK-génben elofordulhatnak, onkogén-hajtóeroként viselkednek. A génfúziók különbözo molekuláris diagnosztikai módszerekkel azonosíthatók, melyek közül a legpontosabb, legköltségesebb és legidoigényesebb meghatározást az újgenerációs szekvenálási technika jelenti. A tropomiozin receptor-tirozin-kináz (TRK-) fúziós fehérjék szelektív gátlása személyre szabott onkológiai kezelési lehetoséget jelent a tumor típusától, lokalizációjától és a beteg életkorától függetlenül. Az elso generációs TRK-gátlók gyors, hatékony és tartós daganatellenes hatást biztosítanak kimutatott NTRK-fúzió-pozitív daganatok esetén, alacsony mellékhatásprofil mellett. Az elso generációs TRK-gátlók mellett jelentkezo 'on target' rezisztenciát a második generációs TRK-gátlók oldják fel. Szekvenciális tirozin-kináz-inhibitor-kezeléssel tartós betegségmentes túlélés érheto el. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(34): 1362-1369. Summary. Due to the continuous development of molecular diagnostic methods, more and more oncogenic genetic abnormalities are being identified. Neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor tyrosine kinase (NTRK) gene fusions are important precision oncology targets that can occur in all three NTRK genes and act as oncogenic drivers. Gene fusions can be identified by a variety of molecular diagnostic technologies, of which next-generation sequencing is the most accurate, costly and time-consuming determination. Selective inhibition of tropomyosin receptor tyrosine kinase (TRK) fusion proteins represents a personalized oncology treatment option regardless of tumour type, localization and patient age. First-generation TRK inhibitors provide rapid, efffective and long-lasting antitumor activity in NTRK fusion-positive tumors with a low side-effect profile. On target resistance to first-generation TRK inhibitors is resolved by second-generation TRK inhibitors. Durable disease-free survival can be achieved with sequential tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapies. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(34): 1362-1369.
Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Tropomyosin , Humans , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Oncogene Proteins, Fusion , Precision Medicine , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Tropomyosin/geneticsABSTRACT
Negative predictive markers of the anti-EGFR antibody therapies are RAS or BRAF mutations, while left sidedness can be considered as a positive predictor. Here we analyzed 97 wild type RAS metastatic colorectal cancers looking for the prognostic and predictive roles of EGFR protein expression. We found that right-sided colorectal cancers are characterized by significantly higher EGFR protein expression as compared to left-sided ones, irrespective of the primary or metastatic tissue analysis. Furthermore, tumors with multiple organ involvement are characterized by significantly higher EGFR protein expression as compared to single organ ones. In the homogenous cetuximab treated cohort (n=90) we have found that lower than the applied EGFR protein expression cut-off was associated with favorable survival. In the multivariate analysis only sidedness proved to be a strong independent predictor, however sidedness is an EGFR-dependent predictor of anti-EGFR therapy.
Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Cetuximab , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , ErbB Receptors/genetics , Humans , Mutation , Prognosis , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)/geneticsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Locally advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) management may include neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment by radiotherapy (RT), chemotherapy (CT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by wide surgical excision. While pathological complete response (pCR) to preoperative treatment is prognostic for survival in osteosarcomas, its significance for STS is unclear. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of pCR to pre-operative treatment on 3-year disease-free survival (3y-DFS) in STS patients. METHODS: This is an observational, retrospective, international, study of adult patients with primary non-metastatic STS of the extremities and trunk wall, any grade, diagnosed between 2008 and 2012, treated with at least neoadjuvant treatment and surgical resection and observed for a minimum of 3 years after diagnosis. The primary objective was to evaluate the effect of pCR. (≤5% viable tumor cells or ≥95% necrosis/fibrosis) on 3y-DFS. Effect on local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant recurrence-free survival (MFS) overall survival (OS) at 3 years was also analyzed. Statistical univariate analysis utilized chi-square independence test and odds ratio confidence interval (CI) estimate, multivariate analysis was performed using LASSO. RESULTS: A total of 330 patients (median age 56 years old, range:19-95) treated by preoperative RT (67%), CT (15%) or CRT (18%) followed by surgery were included. pCR was achieved in 74/330 (22%) of patients, of which 56/74 (76%) had received RT. 3-yr DFS was observed in 76% of patients with pCR vs 61% without pCR (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that pCR is statistically associated with better MFS (95% CI, 1.054-3.417; p = 0.033), LRFS (95% CI, 1.226-5.916; p = 0.014), DFS (95% CI, 1.165-4.040; p = 0.015) and OS at 3 years (95% CI, 1.072-5.210; p = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: In a wide, heterogeneous STS population we showed that pCR to preoperative treatment is prognostic for survival.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Sarcoma/therapy , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Disease-Free Survival , Extremities/pathology , Extremities/surgery , Female , Humans , Leiomyosarcoma/pathology , Leiomyosarcoma/therapy , Liposarcoma/pathology , Liposarcoma/therapy , Liposarcoma, Myxoid/pathology , Liposarcoma, Myxoid/therapy , Male , Margins of Excision , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Proportional Hazards Models , Radiotherapy/methods , Retrospective Studies , Sarcoma/pathology , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/pathology , Surgical Procedures, Operative , Torso/pathology , Torso/surgery , Young AdultABSTRACT
Pevonedistat (TAK-924/MLN4924) is an investigational small-molecule inhibitor of the NEDD8-activating enzyme that has demonstrated preclinical and clinical activity across solid tumors and hematological malignancies. Here we report the results of a phase I trial characterizing the mass balance, pharmacokinetics, and clearance pathways of [14C]-pevonedistat in patients with advanced solid tumors (NCT03057366). In part A (n = 8), patients received a single 1-h intravenous infusion of [14C]-pevonedistat 25 mg/m2. In part B (n = 7), patients received pevonedistat 25 or 20 mg/m2 on days 1, 3, and 5 in combination with, respectively, docetaxel 75 mg/m2 or carboplatin AUC5 plus paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks. Following the single dose of [14C]-pevonedistat 25 mg/m2 in part A, there was a parallel log-linear decline in plasma and whole blood pevonedistat concentration, with systemic exposure of unchanged pevonedistat representing 41% of drug-related material (i.e., unchanged pevonedistat and its metabolites). The mean terminal half-life of pevonedistat and drug-related material in plasma was 8.4 and 15.6 h, respectively. Pevonedistat distributed preferentially in whole blood with a mean whole-blood-to-plasma ratio for pevonedistat AUC∞ of 40.8. By 1 week post dose, the mean recovery of administered radioactivity was 94% (41% in urine and 53% in feces). The pevonedistat safety profile during both study parts was consistent with previous clinical experience, with no new safety signals observed. In part B, pevonedistat in combination with docetaxel or carboplatin plus paclitaxel was generally well tolerated. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03057366 .
Subject(s)
Cyclopentanes/pharmacokinetics , Enzyme Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics , NEDD8 Protein/antagonists & inhibitors , Pyrimidines/pharmacokinetics , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Area Under Curve , Cyclopentanes/therapeutic use , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Female , Half-Life , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pyrimidines/therapeutic use , RadiopharmaceuticalsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare primary neuroendocrine cutaneous tumor, rarely metastasizing to the brain. Chronic lymphoid leukemia (CLL) is a disease predisposing to MCC. According to previous reports, headache and focal neurological deficits suggest disease progression to the brain. We present a patient with MCC whose seizure was not elicited by a cerebral metastasis, but by bone metastases compressing the brain. Case Presentation. A 62-year-old female patient had a history of CLL. A lesion with the appearance of an atheroma was removed from the right upper arm. Histology confirmed the diagnosis of MCC. She was admitted to the neurology department with her first GM seizure. The cranial MRI/MRA showed bone metastases in the right parietal and both frontal areas, compressing the brain. Flow cytometry of CSF did not reveal metastasis of MCC. CONCLUSIONS: The case history of the patient was unique even among the rare cases of MCC with neurological involvement. The seizure was not elicited by a cerebral metastasis, but by bone metastases compressing the brain. In addition to patient history, clinical presentation and radiological findings enabled a suspected diagnosis of skull metastasis of MCC compressing the brain, causing symptomatic epileptic seizures.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) is commonly treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), but most patients ultimately develop secondary resistance. Cabozantinib, a multi-targeted TKI inhibitor, has activity in patient-derived GIST mouse xenograft models and can overcome compensatory MET signalling occurring on TKI treatment. European Organisation for Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 1317 'CaboGIST' assessed the safety and activity of cabozantinib in patients with GIST who had progressed on imatinib and sunitinib. METHODS: In this multi-center, open label, single arm phase II study, eligible GIST patients received oral cabozantinib (60 mg) once daily. Primary end-point was the progression-free survival rate at 12 weeks assessed by the local investigator per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours 1·1. If at least 21 of the first 41 eligible and evaluable patients were progression-free at week 12, the activity of cabozantinib was sufficient to warrant further exploration according to the A'Hern one-stage study design. FINDINGS: A total of 50 eligible patients started treatment between 02/2017 and 08/2018, including four (8%) still continuing cabozantinib at clinical cut-off (09/2019). The number of 3-weekly treatment cycles ranged from 1 to 30. Among the first 41 eligible and evaluable patients, 24 were progression-free at week 12 (58·5%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 42·0-74·0%). Among all 50 patients, 30 were progression-free at week 12 (60%, 95% CI 45-74%). Seven patients achieved a partial response (14%, 95% CI 6-27%), and 34 had stable disease (68%, 95% CI 53-80%) as best response. Progression was seen in eight patients (16%, 95% CI 7-29%), and one was not evaluable. Disease control was achieved in 41 patients (82%, 95% CI 69-91%). Median progression-free survival was 5·5 months (95% CI 3·6-6·9). The most common adverse events were diarrhoea (76%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (60%), fatigue (50%), hypertension (42%), weight loss (40%) and oral mucositis (30%), with 32 (64%) patients requiring dose reductions, 27 (54%) having treatment interruptions and no cabozantinib-related deaths observed. INTERPRETATION: EORTC 1317 met its primary end-point, with 24/41 patients being progression-free at week 12 of treatment. The objective response was 14% with an encouraging disease control rate of 82%. Results of this trial confirm preclinical findings and warrant further exploration of cabozantinib in GIST. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBERS: EORTC 1317, NCT02216578, EudraCT 2014-000501-13.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/drug effects , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/drug therapy , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Salvage Therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anilides/administration & dosage , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/pathology , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/secondary , Humans , Imatinib Mesylate/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Pyridines/administration & dosage , Sunitinib/administration & dosage , Survival RateABSTRACT
Importance: Patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) have a median overall survival of less than 2 years. In a phase 2 study, an overall survival benefit in this population was observed with the addition of olaratumab to doxorubicin over doxorubicin alone. Objective: To determine the efficacy of doxorubicin plus olaratumab in patients with advanced/metastatic STS. Design, Setting, and Participants: ANNOUNCE was a confirmatory, phase 3, double-blind, randomized trial conducted at 110 sites in 25 countries from September 2015 to December 2018; the final date of follow-up was December 5, 2018. Eligible patients were anthracycline-naive adults with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic STS, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1, and cardiac ejection fraction of 50% or greater. Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive doxorubicin, 75 mg/m2 (day 1), combined with olaratumab (n = 258), 20 mg/kg in cycle 1 and 15 mg/kg in subsequent cycles, or placebo (n = 251) on days 1 and 8 for up to 8 21-day cycles, followed by olaratumab/placebo monotherapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Dual primary end points were overall survival with doxorubicin plus olaratumab vs doxorubicin plus placebo in total STS and leiomyosarcoma (LMS) populations. Results: Among the 509 patients randomized (mean age, 56.9 years; 58.2% women; 46.0% with LMS), all were included in the primary analysis and had a median length of follow-up of 31 months. No statistically significant difference in overall survival was observed between the doxorubicin plus olaratumab group vs the doxorubicin plus placebo group in either population (total STS: hazard ratio, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.84-1.30], P = .69, median overall survival, 20.4 months vs 19.7 months; LMS: hazard ratio, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.69-1.31], P = .76, median overall survival, 21.6 months vs 21.9 months). Adverse events of grade 3 or greater reported in 15% or more of total patients with STS were neutropenia (46.3% vs 49.0%), leukopenia (23.3% vs 23.7%), and febrile neutropenia (17.5% vs 16.5%). Conclusions and Relevance: In this phase 3 clinical trial of patients with advanced STS, treatment with doxorubicin plus olaratumab vs doxorubicin plus placebo resulted in no significant difference in overall survival. The findings did not confirm the overall survival benefit observed in the phase 2 trial. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02451943.
Subject(s)
Antibiotics, Antineoplastic/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Doxorubicin/administration & dosage , Sarcoma/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antibiotics, Antineoplastic/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Doxorubicin/adverse effects , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Placebos/therapeutic use , Proportional Hazards Models , Sarcoma/mortality , Sarcoma/secondary , Survival Analysis , Young AdultABSTRACT
Based on our current knowledge, 5-10% of all malignancies are part of hereditary cancer syndromes. Although the increasing diagnostic role of molecular genetic testing makes us able to recognize more hereditary cancer patients, the careful exploration of family and clinical history by physicians is still the most important step for the diagnosis. In our review we deal with mesenchymal tumours associated with hereditary syndromes. Sarcomas comprise only 1% of all malignancies, but they often associate with familiar diseases so they can serve as an indicator of these syndromes. The diagnosis of hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes is essential to ensure appropriate therapy and follow-up for our patients.
Subject(s)
Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Neoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary/genetics , Sarcoma/genetics , Genetic Testing , Humans , Mesenchymoma/diagnosis , Mesenchymoma/genetics , Neoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary/diagnosis , Sarcoma/diagnosisABSTRACT
The selection of colorectal cancer patients for anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody therapy is based on the determination of their RAS mutation status-a strongly negative predictive factor-since the protein target, EGFR, is not a reliable predictor of therapeutic response. In this study, we revisited the EGFR protein issue using a cohort of 90 patients with KRAS exon2 wild-type colorectal cancer who have been treated with cetuximab therapy. Twenty-nine of these patients had metastatic tissue available for analysis. The level of EGFR protein expression in the patients was determined by immunohistochemistry and evaluated by H-score (HS) methodology. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the patients were determined according to the EGFR-HS ranges of both the primary and metastatic tissues using Kaplan-Meyer statistics. In the case of primary tumors, EGFR scores lower than HS = 200 were associated with significantly longer OS. In the case of metastatic tissues, all levels lower than the EGFR-HS range chosen were associated with significantly longer OS. These results are explained by the fact that metastatic tissues rarely maintained the expression levels of the primary tumors. On the other hand, high EGFR expression levels in either primary tumors or metastatic tissues were associated with multiple metastatic disease. This suggests a negative prognostic role of EGFR expression. However, in a multivariate analysis, one-sidedness remained a strong independent predictive factor of survival. Previous studies demonstrated that the EGFR expression level depends on sidedness. Therefore, a subgroup analysis of the left- and right-sided cases was performed on both primary and metastatic tissues. In the case of metastic tissues, an analysis confirmed a better OS in low EGFR protein-expressing cases than in high EGFR protein-expressing cases. Collectively, these data suggest that EGFR protein expression is another negative predictive factor of the efficacy of cetuximab therapy of KRAS exon2 wild-type colorectal cancer.
ABSTRACT
Vemurafenib is a BRAF kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of patients with BRAFV600 mutation-positive unresectable or metastatic melanoma and Erdheim-Chester disease. This phase 1, open-label, single-arm study was designed to estimate absolute bioavailability of oral vemurafenib at steady state and to characterize the pharmacokinetics of a single intravenous microdose of 14 C-labeled vemurafenib in patients with BRAFV600 mutation-positive malignancies. Patients received oral vemurafenib 960 mg twice daily on days 1 through 28, with a single intravenous infusion of 14 C-labeled vemurafenib solution (3 mL, corresponding to a radioactive dose of 18.5 kBq and a vemurafenib dose of 20 µg) given on the morning of day 21, immediately following the morning dose of oral vemurafenib. A total of 6 patients were enrolled. Four patients who received 14 C-labeled vemurafenib infusion were included in the pharmacokinetic and bioavailability analyses. Geometric mean absolute bioavailability of oral vemurafenib at steady state, calculated as the ratio of dose-normalized area under the curve during the dosing interval (AUCτ ) following oral vemurafenib dose to dose-normalized AUC from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-inf ) following vemurafenib intravenous dose, was 57.8%. The majority of radioactivity (geometric mean 41%) was recovered in feces, and a small proportion (geometric mean 1.4%) was recovered in urine. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 5 of 6 (83%) patients and were all grade 1/2 in severity, except for 1 grade-4 anaphylactic reaction occurring during infusion of 14 C-labeled vemurafenib, which was thought to be related to the excipient polysorbate 80 in the intravenous formulation.
Subject(s)
Melanoma , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf , Biological Availability , Humans , Melanoma/drug therapy , Melanoma/genetics , Melanoma/pathology , Mutation , Protein Kinase Inhibitors , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/genetics , Vemurafenib/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: More than half of patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) are aged ≥65â¯years (older), however contemporary data on the efficacy/safety of anthracycline chemotherapy in older patients with STS are lacking. METHODS: SARC021 randomized patients to receive first-line doxorubicin or doxorubicin plus evofosfamide. The main aim of this study was to compare the outcome and safety of first-line anthracycline-based therapy in older patients compared with those <65â¯years. IRB approval was obtained at all participating sites and this research meets requirements for protection of human subjects. RESULTS: Of 640 patients, 209 (33%) were older, with a median age 70 (range 65-89) years. The median overall survival (OS) was 16.7â¯months (95%CI: 13.2-20.0) in older patients compared to 20.1â¯months (95%CI: 16.9-23.2) in those aged <65â¯years (nâ¯=â¯431), HR 1.21 (95%CI: 0.99-1.48), pâ¯=â¯.057. The median progression-free survival (PFS) in older patients was 6.3â¯months (95%CI: 5.8-7.2) compared to 6.0 (95%CI: 5.1-6.4) in those <65â¯years, HR 0.86 (95%CI: 0.70-1.05), pâ¯=â¯.14. Older patients had significantly more hematological (141 [67%] versus 208 [48%], pâ¯<â¯.0001), non-hematological (131 [63%] versus 215 [50%], pâ¯=â¯.0097) andâ¯≥â¯Grade 3 adverse events (178 [85%] versus 299 [69%], pâ¯=â¯.0002), compared to younger patients. More older patients (30, 14%) stopped treatment due to adverse events compared to younger patients (22, 5%), pâ¯=â¯.0001. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of first-line anthracycline-based chemotherapy did not differ significantly between older and younger advanced sarcoma patients. Significantly more older patients stopped chemotherapy due to adverse events. These results provide a benchmark for daily clinical practice and future trials in older patients.