Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Lasers Med Sci ; 39(1): 198, 2024 Jul 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39073657

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study systematically reviewed the clinical and radiographic outcomes of laser versus conventional pulpotomy in primary teeth. It also compared the success and effectiveness of different lasers to enhance the understanding and use of laser pulpotomy as an alternative treatment. METHODOLOGY: An electronic search was carried out in PubMed and Cochrane from 1st January 1999 to 31st December 2023. The published articles in the English language were searched using MeSH terms and text words. Only randomized controlled trials with a sample size of more than 10 and follow-ups over 6 months were included. Meta-analysis and forest plots were evaluated by utilizing Review Manager 5.4 software. Two reviewers assessed the risk of bias using the RoB 2 tool and discrepancies were resolved by the third reviewer. The success rates were combined using a random effects model to determine clinical and radiographic outcomes. We used risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) as the primary effect measures and set the significance level at 0.05. RESULTS: Only 18 studies met the inclusion criteria after an electronic search. Among them, 13 studies evaluated the clinical and radiographic outcomes of laser with formocresol pulpotomy, 2 studies compared with ferric sulfate pulpotomy, and the remaining studies with Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) pulpotomy. The various studies showed different levels of bias. There was no significant difference in the clinical success rate (p = 0.47; RR: 1.01; 95% CI 0.98-1.04; I2 = 0%; p = 0.70) and radiographic success rate (p = 0.94; RR: 1.00; 95% CI 0.91-1.09; I2 = 64%; p = 0.001) between laser pulpotomy and formocresol. Similarly, there was no significant difference between laser pulpotomy and ferric sulfate or MTA pulpotomy. CONCLUSION: Diode laser and LLLT can be considered as alternative pulpotomy agents to formocresol in primary teeth. However, high-quality trials are needed to confirm the accuracy and reliability of these findings.


Subject(s)
Laser Therapy , Pulpotomy , Tooth, Deciduous , Humans , Pulpotomy/methods , Laser Therapy/methods , Treatment Outcome , Formocresols/therapeutic use , Ferric Compounds/therapeutic use , Aluminum Compounds/therapeutic use , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Calcium Compounds/therapeutic use , Oxides/therapeutic use , Silicates/therapeutic use , Drug Combinations
2.
Cureus ; 16(2): e54498, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38516438

ABSTRACT

The case report describes the successful interdisciplinary management of a nine-year-old girl who suffered from traumatic intrusion and rotation of her immature teeth with 12 mm apical displacement of teeth 11 and 21 and 10 mm of teeth 12 and 22. It emphasizes the importance of a comprehensive and contemporary approach, which includes orthodontic intervention and regenerative endodontic procedures (REP). The report follows the CARE (case report) guidelines. The patient was initially observed for four weeks to see if there was potential for spontaneous re-eruption. After eight weeks of orthodontic intervention, the rotation was corrected. However, negative pulp sensitivity and external inflammatory (infection-related) resorption (EIR) occurred, which led to REP using injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF). Follow-ups over 20 months showed the favorable outcomes of the treatment. A long-term perspective is essential in understanding the outcomes and potential complications associated with traumatic dental injuries (TDI) in children. The case report highlights the importance of collaboration between orthodontists and pediatric dentists, among other specialists. It provides valuable insights into the complexities of managing TDI in children and highlights contemporary regenerative strategies as viable solutions.

3.
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent ; 12(3): 211-214, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31708617

ABSTRACT

AIM: To determine the prevalence of molar incisor hypomineralization (MIH) in 6-12 years old children of the Central Delhi area. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional descriptive short study consisted of 1,026 children aged 6-12 years selected by a random sampling procedure. The parents were interviewed and relevant prenatal, perinatal, and postnatal history was recorded. The dental examination was carried out by well-trained pediatric dentists. Full mouth examination of teeth was conducted including the European Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (EAPD) 2003 criteria for the diagnosis of MIH. The results were documented and statistically analyzed using the Chi-square test. RESULTS: The prevalence of MIH was found to be 1.17%. There was statistically significant difference in prevalence related to gender (p < 0.05) with a higher number of males affected with MIH. A total of 77 teeth (44 molars and 32 incisors) were observed with MIH. The severity of MIH was more in molars (52.27%) when compared to incisors (24.24%). All the four first permanent molars were affected in 83.3% of children with MIH. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of MIH in a small sample of 1,026 children aged 6-12 years in Central Delhi was 1.17%. A significant male predilection was reported. MIH is a developmental disturbance occurring during the maturation phase of enamel formation, which requires a multidisciplinary treatment approach. The high esthetic demand and the inability to deliver successful restorative care to the hypomineralized teeth can pose great difficulties. Hence, more studies related to prevalence, nature, and severity of MIH and awareness regarding the associated risk factors are required to reveal the hidden burden across the country and to further prevent the occurrence of MIH. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Goswami M, Bhushan U, et al. Molar Incisor Hypomineralization-An Emerging Burden: A Short Study on Prevalence and Clinical Characteristics in Central Delhi, India. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2019;12(3):211-214.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL