Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 13060, 2023 08 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37567956

ABSTRACT

Blood pressure (BP) is a typical complex trait, and the genetic susceptibility of individuals to changes in BP induced by air pollution exposure is different. Although interactions of exposure to air pollutants with several candidate genes have been identified, genome-wide interaction studies (GWISs) are needed to understand the association between them with BP. Therefore, we aimed to discover the unique genetic loci for BP that interact with exposure to air pollutants in Korean adults. We ultimately included 1868 participants in the discovery step and classified them into groups of those with low-to-moderate exposure and high exposure to average annual concentration of particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter ≤ 10 µm (PM10). Because none of the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) achieved a genome-wide level of significance of pint < 5 × 10-8 for either systolic BP (SBP) or diastolic BP (DBP), we considered the top 10 ranking SNPs for each BP trait. To validate these suggestive SNPs, we finally selected six genetic variants for SBP and five variants for DBP, respectively. In a replication result for SBP, only one SNP (rs12914147) located in an intergenic region of the NR2F2 showed a significant interaction. We also identified several genetic susceptibility loci (e.g., CHST11, TEK, and ITGA1) implicated in candidate mechanisms such as inflammation and oxidative stress in the discovery step, although their interaction effects were not replicated. Our study reports the first GWIS finding to our knowledge, and the association between exposure to PM10 and BP levels may be determined in part by several newly discovered genetic suggestive loci, including NR2F2.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants , Air Pollution , Humans , Adult , Blood Pressure/genetics , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Genotype , Air Pollutants/analysis , Particulate Matter/adverse effects , Particulate Matter/analysis , Air Pollution/analysis , Republic of Korea , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Environmental Exposure/analysis
2.
Am J Clin Oncol ; 43(9): 654-659, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32889836

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: By using the Korean Pancreatic Cancer (K-PaC) registry, we compared the clinical outcomes of FOLFIRINOX (FFX) and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GNP) in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC). METHODS: We constructed a web-based database of 3748 anonymized patients diagnosed with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. MPC patients who received first-line FFX or GNP were enrolled. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, grade III to IV toxicity, and cross-over treatment were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 413 patients (232 vs. 181, FFX vs. GNP; all data are presented in this sequence) were eligible. Median age was 63 years (60 vs. 69 y) with 43% (39% vs. 47%) comprising female individuals. The major metastatic sites were the liver (64%), peritoneum (25%), and distant lymph nodes (18%). The median OS was 11.5 versus 12.7 months (hazard ratio [HR]=0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.68-1.12, P=0.286), and median progression-free survival was 7.5 versus 8.1 months (HR=0.92, 95% CI: 0.70-1.20, P=0.517), respectively. The frequency of grade III to IV febrile neutropenia was higher in the FFX group (18% vs. 11%, P=0.040), and that of peripheral neuropathy was higher in the GNP group (8% vs. 14%, P=0.046). The chance to receive second-line chemotherapy was higher in the GNP group (45% vs. 56%, P=0.036). In the cross-over treatment, the median OS of the FFX-GNP group (n=43) and the GNP-FFX group (n=47) was 16.8 versus 17.7 months (HR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.44-1.41, P=0.425). CONCLUSIONS: FFX and GNP showed similar efficacy and comparable toxicity in MPC patients. Although the GNP group had a higher chance to receive second-line chemotherapy, they did not have improved overall survival.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/drug therapy , Liver Neoplasms/secondary , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Peritoneal Neoplasms/secondary , Aged , Albumins/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/secondary , Cross-Over Studies , Deoxycytidine/administration & dosage , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Febrile Neutropenia/chemically induced , Female , Fluorouracil/adverse effects , Fluorouracil/therapeutic use , Humans , Irinotecan/adverse effects , Irinotecan/therapeutic use , Leucovorin/adverse effects , Leucovorin/therapeutic use , Lymphatic Metastasis , Male , Middle Aged , Oxaliplatin/adverse effects , Oxaliplatin/therapeutic use , Paclitaxel/administration & dosage , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/chemically induced , Progression-Free Survival , Registries , Republic of Korea , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome , Gemcitabine
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL