ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Nursing checklists have been shown to improve communication, reduce the occurrence of adverse events, and promote safe, quality care in different care settings. However, to date, there is no validated patient care safety checklist for nurses caring for infants in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICU). AIM: To describe development and content validation of the "Safe Nursing Care Checklist for Infants Hospitalized in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit". STUDY DESIGN: Online Survey. METHODS: Based upon an integrative literature review, we developed a checklist focused on safe nursing care for infants in the NICU. Nursing experts participated in three rounds of a content validation process where they rated the items online. An agreement level ≥0.90 was required for inclusion in the checklist. Forty- three expert nurses with experience working in the NICU and who were certified in neonatal nursing or had a master's or doctoratal degree in child health provided content validation of the patient care checklist. RESULTS: The final checklist contained 45 items with content validation index scores greater than 90%. The instrument was structured into six dimensions including patient identification, effective communication, medication safety, infection prevention, fall prevention, and pressure injuries/skin injuries prevention. CONCLUSION: Content validity was established for the "Safe Nursing Care Checklist for Infants Hospitalized in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit" which can identify strengths and weaknesses in safe nursing care for infants in the NICU as well as direct educational interventions to promote nursing care based on scientific evidence. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: This checklist can potentially be used by bedside nurses to promote provision of safe care to infants in the NICU and to guide corrective strategies and encourage evidence-based decision-making. Validation in the clinical setting is needed.
Subject(s)
Checklist , Neonatal Nursing , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Child , Humans , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Surveys and Questionnaires , CommunicationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patient safety culture is influenced by factors such as professional category, experience, and age. Understanding these factors can inform initiatives to improve safety. PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship between sociodemographic and occupational characteristics on health professionals' perception of patient safety culture. METHODS: A cross-sectional study involving 514 health care professionals from Brazilian neonatal intensive care units was conducted using the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture. RESULTS: Several sociodemographic and occupational characteristics were associated with higher perceptions of safety culture, including older age and having a higher level of education. CONCLUSION: Sociodemographic and occupational factors may influence the safety culture in neonatal intensive care units and should be considered when developing and implementing strategies to improve safety.
Subject(s)
Intensive Care, Neonatal , Safety Management , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Brazil , Cross-Sectional Studies , Patient Safety , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Attitude of Health Personnel , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The risk of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) increases when preventive guidelines are not adhered to. However, studies have generally been quantitative and aimed at determining the effectiveness of CLABSI prevention bundles. Few studies have used a mixed-methods approach to investigate nursing professionals' knowledge and practices regarding CLABSI prevention. PURPOSE: To determine nursing professionals' knowledge and practices regarding CLABSI prevention and identify facilitators and barriers to adherence to CLABSI prevention strategies in a Brazilian neonatal intensive care unit. METHODS: A mixed-methods approach was used. Nursing professionals answered questionnaires regarding knowledge and practices surrounding CLABSI prevention. Semistructured interviews explored barriers nursing professionals face that hinder adherence to CLABSI preventive practices. FINDINGS: Nursing professionals had moderate knowledge regarding CLABSI prevention practices. Daily assessment of the continued need for central venous lines (CVLs), hub disinfection before and after handling, and hand hygiene before handling CVLs were practices less adhered to. Interviews revealed barriers to adherence to preventive practices included lack of adequate equipment, resources for hand hygiene, and inadequate physical structure. Increased education and awareness of safe CVL practices and accountability of the entire healthcare team may improve adherence to CLABSI prevention practices. Results of this study reinforce the importance of considering current nursing practices when developing strategies to increase adherence to CLABSI prevention guidelines. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Providing continuing education may increase adherence to CLABSI prevention strategies. IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH: Research is needed to develop strategies aimed at increasing nursing adherence to CLABSI prevention strategies.
Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections , Catheterization, Central Venous , Central Venous Catheters , Cross Infection , Brazil , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infection Control/methodsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of gastric residual aspiration and evaluation on preterm very low birth weight infants' gastrointestinal function, intestinal inflammation, and gastrointestinal mucosal bleeding. STUDY DESIGN: This single-center, randomized trial compared omission of gastric residuals vs prefeed gastric residuals in 143 infants ≤32 weeks of gestation with a birthweight of ≤1250 g for 6 weeks after birth. Serum levels of gastrin and motilin were collected between 14 and 21 days of life. Stools were collected at 3 and 6 weeks of age and analyzed for calprotectin and S100A12 levels. All stools were tested for occult blood for 6 weeks. RESULTS: Means for gastrin (P = .999) and motilin (P = .694) were similar between groups and there were no statistically significant differences in adjusted means for transformed calprotectin (P = .580), and S100A12 (P = .212). Both calprotectin (P = .003) and S100A12 (P = .002) increased from week 3 to week 6. The mean percentage of stools positive for occult blood (P = .888) were similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Gastrointestinal function, intestinal inflammation, and gastrointestinal mucosal bleeding were similar whether aspiration and evaluation of gastric residuals were eliminated or not, suggesting routinely evaluating gastric residuals before every feeding may be unnecessary. TRIAL REGISTRATION CLINICALTRIALS.GOV:: NCT01863043.
Subject(s)
Enteral Nutrition/methods , Enterocolitis, Necrotizing/diagnosis , Gastrointestinal Contents/chemistry , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/diagnosis , Infant, Very Low Birth Weight , Enterocolitis, Necrotizing/epidemiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Infant, Newborn , Male , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare mothers' own milk (MOM) consumption by infants born extremely preterm before and after implementation of a donor human milk (DHM) program and determine healthcare provider's knowledge and practices regarding DHM. STUDY DESIGN: One hundred fifty-seven infants born at <30 weeks of gestation were enrolled during 3 time-periods. Group 1: before DHM program implementation, Group 2: the year following implementation, and Group 3: the second year after implementation. The proportion of feeds consisting of MOM for 6 weeks following birth was analyzed using a generalized linear mixed model. The study's second phase surveyed healthcare providers regarding knowledge and practices concerning DHM. RESULTS: Group 1 consumed feeds with a greater proportion of MOM than Group 3 during weeks 1 (P < .001) and 3 (P = .007) and more than both Group 2 (P = .033) and 3 (P = .021) in week 4. During the first 14 days, Group 1 consumed feeds with 23.6% more MOM than Group 3 (P = .002) and had a greater odds of consuming feeds with > 90% MOM (P < .001) than Group 3. During days 1-28, Group 1 consumed feeds with 22% more MOM than Group 3 (P = .003) and had greater odds of consuming feeds with >90% MOM than Group 2 (P = .020) and 3 (P = .004). Knowledge regarding DHM was inconsistent among providers and they were unlikely to communicate potential risks and benefits of DHM to mothers. CONCLUSIONS: Following implementation of a DHM program, MOM consumption decreased over 2 years. Strategies focused on lactation success are necessary to increase MOM consumption.