Clinical results of pulsed signal therapy on patellofemoral syndrome with patellar chondropathy.

This study was designed to evaluate the effect of pulsed signal therapy (PST) on patellofemoral pain syndrome associated with patellar chondropathy. A prospective randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial included 25 patients (41 knees) between 20 and 50 years with pain due to isolated patellofemoral syndrome with chondropathy. PST group received nine 60-min daily sessions of PST treatment. Control group received the same protocol of blinded placebo treatment. The main outcome was change from baseline Kujala score at 3 months. After 3 months, patients in the control group received effective treatment (placebo post-treatment). All patients were then followed, for up to 12 months. Seventeen knees (5 males and 12 females, mean age 36.7 ± 7.9) received placebo and 24 knees (8 males and 16 females, mean age 35.5 ± 8.9) received PST. By the third month, PST group exhibited a mean change from baseline of 9.63 ± 7.5 Kujala points, compared to 0.53 ± 1.8 in the placebo group (P < 0.001). A significant progressive improvement was seen in the PST group between the 3rd and 6th and between the 6th and 12th month (P < 0.016). Patients initially allocated in the control group also improved at 3 months (P < 0.001) and 6 months (P = 0.005) post-effective treatment. In conclusion, PST in patellofemoral pain syndrome with chondropathy was effective compared to placebo at 3 months, showing an important improvement of Kujala score. The improvement was progressive and maintained up to 12 months. PST is safe and should be considered as a non-invasive option for management of this condition. Bioelectromagnetics. 40:83-90, 2019. © 2019 Bioelectromagnetics Society.

Translation and validation of the new version of the Knee Society Score - The 2011 KS Score - into Brazilian Portuguese.

OBJECTIVE: Translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the new version of the Knee Society Score - The 2011 KS Score - into Brazilian Portuguese and verification of its measurement properties, reproducibility, and validity. In 2012, the new version of the Knee Society Score was developed and validated. This scale comprises four separate subscales: (a) objective knee score (seven items: 100 points); (b) patient satisfaction score (five items: 40 points); (c) patient expectations score (three items: 15 points); and (d) functional activity score (19 items: 100 points). METHOD: A total of 90 patients aged 55-85 years were evaluated in a clinical cross-sectional study. The pre-operative translated version was applied to patients with TKA referral, and the post-operative translated version was applied to patients who underwent TKA. Each patient answered the same questionnaire twice and was evaluated by two experts in orthopedic knee surgery. Evaluations were performed pre-operatively and three, six, or 12 months post-operatively. The reliability of the questionnaire was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between the two applications. Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha. RESULTS: The ICC found no difference between the means of the pre-operative, three-month, and six-month post-operative evaluations between sub-scale items. CONCLUSION: The Brazilian Portuguese version of The 2011 KS Score is a valid and reliable instrument for objective and subjective evaluation of the functionality of Brazilian patients who undergo TKA and revision TKA.

OBJETIVO: Traduzir, adaptar culturalmente e validar a nova versão da escala Knee Society Score ­ The 2011 KS Score ­ para a língua portuguesa e verificar suas propriedades de medida, reprodutibilidade e validade. Em 2012, a nova versão do Knee Society Score foi desenvolvida e validada, com quatro subescalas: a) avaliação objetiva do joelho (sete itens: 100 pontos); b) satisfação do paciente (cinco itens: 40 pontos); c) expectativa do paciente (três itens: 15 pontos); e d) atividade funcional (19 itens: 100 pontos). MÉTODO: Foram avaliados 90 pacientes entre 55 e 85 anos em estudo clínico transversal. A versão traduzida pré-operatória foi aplicada em pacientes com indicação de ATJ e a versão traduzida pós-operatória foi aplicada em pacientes submetidos a ATJ. Cada paciente respondeu o mesmo questionário duas vezes, foram avaliados por dois ortopedistas especialistas em cirurgia do joelho. Foram feitas avaliações pré-operatórias com três, seis ou 12 meses de pós-operatório. A confiabilidade do questionário foi avaliada através do coeficiente de correlação intraclasse (CCI) entre as duas aplicações. A consistência interna foi avaliada através do alfa de Cronbach. RESULTADOS: O índice do coeficiente de correlação intraclasse não detectou diferença entre as médias das avaliações no pré-operatório, com três meses e seis meses de pós-operatório entre os subitens da escala. CONCLUSÃO: A versão brasileira do The 2011 KS Score mostrou-se um instrumento válido e confiável para avaliação objetiva e subjetiva da função de pacientes brasileiros submetidos a ATJ e revisão de ATJ.

Translation and validation of the new version of the Knee Society Score - The 2011 KS Score - into Brazilian Portuguese / Tradução e validação da nova versão da escala Knee Society Score - The 2011 KS Score - para a língua portuguesa

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE: Translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the new version of the Knee Society Score - The 2011 KS Score - into Brazilian Portuguese and verification of its measurement properties, reproducibility, and validity. In 2012, the new version of the Knee Society Score was developed and validated. This scale comprises four separate subscales: (a) objective knee score (seven items: 100 points); (b) patient satisfaction score (five items: 40 points); (c) patient expectations score (three items: 15 points); and (d) functional activity score (19 items: 100 points). METHOD: A total of 90 patients aged 55-85 years were evaluated in a clinical cross-sectional study. The pre-operative translated version was applied to patients with TKA referral, and the post-operative translated version was applied to patients who underwent TKA. Each patient answered the same questionnaire twice and was evaluated by two experts in orthopedic knee surgery. Evaluations were performed pre-operatively and three, six, or 12 months post-operatively. The reliability of the questionnaire was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between the two applications. Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha. RESULTS: The ICC found no difference between the means of the pre-operative, three-month, and six-month post-operative evaluations between sub-scale items. CONCLUSION: The Brazilian Portuguese version of The 2011 KS Score is a valid and reliable instrument for objective and subjective evaluation of the functionality of Brazilian patients who undergo TKA and revision TKA.

RESUMO OBJETIVO: Traduzir, adaptar culturalmente e validar a nova versão da escala Knee Society Score - The 2011 KS Score - para a língua portuguesa e verificar suas propriedades de medida, reprodutibilidade e validade. Em 2012, a nova versão do Knee Society Score foi desenvolvida e validada, com quatro subescalas: a) avaliação objetiva do joelho (sete itens: 100 pontos); b) satisfação do paciente (cinco itens: 40 pontos); c) expectativa do paciente (três itens: 15 pontos); e d) atividade funcional (19 itens: 100 pontos). MÉTODO: Foram avaliados 90 pacientes entre 55 e 85 anos em estudo clínico transversal. A versão traduzida pré-operatória foi aplicada em pacientes com indicação de ATJ e a versão traduzida pós-operatória foi aplicada em pacientes submetidos a ATJ. Cada paciente respondeu o mesmo questionário duas vezes, foram avaliados por dois ortopedistas especialistas em cirurgia do joelho. Foram feitas avaliações pré-operatórias com três, seis ou 12 meses de pós-operatório. A confiabilidade do questionário foi avaliada através do coeficiente de correlação intraclasse (CCI) entre as duas aplicações. A consistência interna foi avaliada através do alfa de Cronbach. RESULTADOS: O índice do coeficiente de correlação intraclasse não detectou diferença entre as médias das avaliações no pré-operatório, com três meses e seis meses de pós-operatório entre os subitens da escala. CONCLUSÃO: A versão brasileira do The 2011 KS Score mostrou-se um instrumento válido e confiável para avaliação objetiva e subjetiva da função de pacientes brasileiros submetidos a ATJ e revisão de ATJ.

Fish oil decreases C-reactive protein/albumin ratio improving nutritional prognosis and plasma fatty acid profile in colorectal cancer patients.

Previous studies have shown that n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids n-3 (n-3 PUFA) have several anticancer effects, especially attributed to their ability to modulate a variety of genomic and immune responses. In this context, this randomized, prospective, controlled clinical trial was conducted in order to check whether supplementation of 2 g/day of fish oil for 9 weeks alters the production of inflammatory markers, the plasma fatty acid profile and the nutritional status in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Eleven adults with CRC in chemotherapy were randomized into two groups: (a) supplemented (SG) daily with 2 g/day of encapsulated fish oil [providing 600 mg/day of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) + docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)] for 9 weeks (n = 6), and (b) control (CG) (n = 5). All outcomes were evaluated on the day before the first chemotherapy session and 9 weeks later. Plasma TNF-α, IL-1ß, IL-10 and IL-17A, the pro/anti-inflammatory balance (ratio TNF-α/IL-10 and IL-1ß/IL10) and serum albumin, showed no significant changes between times and study groups (p > 0.05). C-reactive protein (CRP) and the CRP/albumin ratio showed opposite behavior in groups, significantly reducing their values in SG (p < 0.05). Plasma proportions of EPA and DHA increased 1.8 and 1.4 times, respectively, while the ARA reduced approximately 0.6 times with the supplementation (9 weeks vs baseline, p < 0.05). Patients from SG gained 1.2 kg (median) while the CG lost -0.5 kg (median) during the 9 weeks of chemotherapy (p = 0.72). These results demonstrate that 2 g/day of fish oil for 9 weeks of chemotherapy improves CRP values, CRP/albumin status, plasma fatty acid profile and potentially prevents weight loss during treatment.

Translation and Validation of the Knee Society Score - KSS for Brazilian Portuguese.

OBJECTIVE: To translate, culturally adapt and validate the "Knee Society Score"(KSS) for the Portuguese language and determine its measurement properties, reproducibility and validity. METHODS: We analyzed 70 patients of both sexes, aged between 55 and 85 years, in a cross-sectional clinical trial, with diagnosis of primary osteoarthritis ,undergoing total knee arthroplasty surgery. We assessed the patients with the English version of the KSS questionnaire and after 30 minutes with the Portuguese version of the KSS questionnaire, done by a different evaluator. All the patients were assessed preoperatively, and again at three, and six months postoperatively. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference, using Cronbach's alpha index and the Bland-Altman graphical analysis, for the knees core during the preoperative period (p =1), and at three months (p =0.991) and six months postoperatively (p =0.985). There was no statistical difference for knee function score for all three periods (p =1.0). CONCLUSION: The Brazilian version of the Knee Society Score is easy to apply, as well providing as a valid and reliable instrument for measuring the knee score and function of Brazilian patients undergoing TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I - Diagnostic Studies- Investigating a Diagnostic Test- Testing of previously developed diagnostic criteria on consecutive patients (with universally applied 'gold' reference standard).

Tradução e validação da escala Knee Society Score: KSS para a Língua Portuguesa / Translation and validation of the Knee Society Score: KSS for Brazilian Portuguese

OBJETIVO: Traduzir, adaptar culturalmente e validar o "Knee Society Score" (KSS) para a língua portuguesa e verificar suas propriedades de medida, reprodutibilidade e validade. MÉTODO: Avaliados 70 pacientes de ambos os sexos, em estudo clínico transversal, idade entre 55 e 85 anos, osteoartrose primária submetidos a artroplastia total de joelho, com o questionário KSS pelo avaliador 1 (inglês) e após 30 minutos pelo avaliador 2 (português) no pré- operatório e após três e seis meses de pós-operatório. RESULTADOS: O índice alfa de Cronbach e a diagramação de Bland-Altman não detectaram diferença entre as médias das duas avaliações no pré-operatório (p=1,000), com três meses (p=0,991) e seis meses de pós-operatório (p=0,985) na pontuação do joelho e na nota da função do joelho, p=1,000 nos três períodos. CONCLUSÃO: A versão brasileira do Knee Society Score, o Escore da Sociedade do Joelho, mostrou ser um instrumento de fácil compreensão e aplicação; válido e confiável para medir a pontuação e função do joelho de pacientes brasileiros submetidos a ATJ. Nível de Evidências: Estudos diagnósticos - Nivel de Evidência I, Teste de critérios diagnósticos desenvolvidos anteriormente em pacientes consecutivos (com padrão de referência "ouro" aplicado).

OBJECTIVE: To translate, culturally adapt and validate the "Knee Society Score" (KSS) for the Portuguese language and determine its measurement properties, reproducibility and validity. METHOD: We analyzed 70 patients of both sexes, aged ages between 55 and 85 years, in a cross-sectional clinical trial, with diagnosis of primary osteoarthritis, undergoing total knee arthroplasty surgery. We assessed the patients with the English version of the KSS questionnaire and after 30 minutes with the Portuguese version of the KSS questionnaire, done by a different evaluator. All the patients were assessed preoperatively, and again at three, and six months postoperatively. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference, using Cronbach's alpha index and the Bland-Altman graphical analysis, for the knee score during the preoperative period (p = 1), and at three months (p = 0.991) and six months postoperatively (p = 0.985). There was no statistical difference for knee function score for all three periods (p = 1.0). CONCLUSION The Brazilian version of the Knee Society Score is easy to apply, as well providing as a valid and reliable instrument for measuring the knee score and function of Brazilian patients undergoing TKA. Level of Evidence: Level I - Diagnostic Studies- Investigating a Diagnostic Test - Testing of previously developed diagnostic criteria on consecutive patients (with universally applied 'gold' reference standard).

Avaliação isocinética em pacientes submetidos à artroplastia total de joelho / Isokinetic evaluation of patients submitted to total knee arthroplasty

OBJETIVOS: Tem-se afirmado que a via de acesso minimamente invasiva na artroplastia total de joelho (ATJ) por não agredir o músculo quadríceps femoral permite reabilitação mais precoce. A fim de verificar a influência da preservação do aparelho extensor no ato cirúrgico, avaliou-se a força da musculatura extensora e flexora do joelho em pacientes submetidos à ATJ por duas vias de acesso diferentes. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Este estudo comparou, no período de janeiro de 2005 a julho de 2006, os valores de torque máximo e de trabalho total obtidos por dinamometria isocinética aos seis meses de pós-operatório. Foram avaliados 12 indivíduos submetidos a ATJ por via de acesso minimamente invasiva e 8 indivíduos submetidos a ATJ por via de acesso transquadricipital. RESULTADOS: A análise estatística dos valores de torque máximo e de trabalho total absolutos e corrigidos pelo peso corporal não demonstrou diferença entre os dois grupos. CONCLUSÃO: Não há diferença de força da musculatura extensora e flexora do joelho aos seis meses de cirurgia.

OBJECTIVE: In total knee arthroplasty, the minimally-invasive approach has been claimed to enable earlier rehabilitation because it spares the femoral quadriceps muscle. To check the influence of preserving the extensor apparatus during surgery, the strength of knee extension and flexion muscles was evaluated in patients submitted to total knee arthroplasty with different approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The values of maximum torque and total work obtained by isokinetic dynamometry six months after surgery were compared for the Minimally invasive surgery group constituted of 12 individuals submitted to total knee arthroplasty by the minimally invasive surgical approach and the Control group, constituted of eight patients submitted to total knee arthroplasty by the transquadricipital approach, between January 2005 and July 2006. RESULTS: Statistical analysis of the absolute values for maximum torque and total work adjusted for body weights did not show differences between both groups. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in the extension and flexion strength of the knee muscles six months after surgery.

Estudo comparativo entre dois métodos de reabilitação fisioterapêutica na artroplastia total do joelho: protocolo padrão do IOT x protocolo avançado / Comparative study between two physiotherapeutic rehabilitation methods in total knee arthroplasty: IOT standard protocol and advanced protocol

Este estudo compara dois protocolos de reabilitação fisioterapêutica - um com três meses de duração (protocolo padrão IOT) e outro com dois meses (protocolo avançado) - para evidenciar a real necessidade de um tempo prolongado de reabilitação em 31 pacientes submetidas a artroplastia total do joelho. O estudo é prospectivo e randomizado e a faixa etária avaliada está entre 60 e 76 anos. As pacientes são avaliadas no pré-operatório e após o tratamento com avaliação clínica (escala de dor, Knee Society Score, SF-36 e goniometria) e avaliação de força (avaliação isocinética) para comparação dos protocolos. A análise estatística dos valores da escala de dor, do Knee Society Score, da amplitude de movimento, do pico de torque muscular e da avaliação da qualidade de vida (SF-36) demonstra que todas as pacientes obtêm melhora quando comparamos o pré e pós-operatório, independente do grupo. Conclui-se que o protocolo de reabilitação fisioterapêutica com dois meses de duração para o pós-operatório de artroplastia total do joelho mostra ser eficaz, alcançando os mesmos objetivos e resultados que o protocolo com três meses de duração.

The present study compares two physiotherapeutic rehabilitation protocols - one lasting three months (standard IOT protocol), the other lasting two months (advanced protocol) - to assert the actual need of a prolonged rehabilitation period in 31 cases of patients who went through total knee arthroplasty. The study is prospective and randomized; the age group of evaluated patients is between 60 and 76 years-old. In order to compare the two protocols, patients are evaluated before surgery and after treatment, by means of clinical evaluation (pain scale, Knee Society Score, SF-36 and goniometry) and isokinetic strength test. Statistical analyses of results from pain scale, Knee Society Score, movement amplitude, muscular torque peak and quality of life show improvement for all patients between pre- and post-operation, regardless of group. The study concludes the two months physiotherapeutic rehabilitation protocol for total knee arthroplasty is as effective as the three months protocol, as both reached the same goals and results.