Outcome of primary graft dysfunction rescued by venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Primary graft dysfunction remains the leading cause of 30-day mortality after heart transplantation. Few data have been published about the clinical outcome of severe primary graft dysfunction treated with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). AIM: To evaluate the prevalence and outcome of severe primary graft dysfunction requiring VA-ECMO, and to identify factors associated with hospital mortality. METHODS: We performed an observational analysis of our institutional database of VA-ECMO for primary graft dysfunction after heart transplantation. Patients with severe primary graft dysfunction, according to the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation classification, were included. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Risk factors for in-hospital mortality were searched with multiple logistic regression analysis using backward stepwise variable elimination. RESULTS: Of the 397 patients who had heart transplantation between January 2007 and December 2018, 60 (15.1%) developed severe primary graft dysfunction requiring VA-ECMO. The median age was 52 (interquartile range 39-59) years, and 73.3% were male. Thirty-nine (65.0%) patients were weaned after a mean duration of VA-ECMO support of 7.2±6.0 days. Thirty-two (53.3%) patients were alive at hospital discharge. Inotropic support in the recipient before heart transplantation (odds ratio [OR] 3.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-14.44; P=0.04), total ischaemic time (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.99-1.00; P=0.01) and 48-hour total blood transfusion (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.04-1.26; P=0.01) were independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Severe primary graft dysfunction requiring VA-ECMO is frequent after heart transplantation. Survival to hospital discharge after VA-ECMO for severe primary graft dysfunction is satisfactory in such a critically ill population.

Prognosis of Advanced Heart Failure Patients according to Their Hemodynamic Profile Based on the Modified Forrester Classification.

INTRODUCTION: Heart transplantation (HT) remains the gold-standard treatment but is conditioned by organ shortage. This study aimed to evaluate the value of Forrester classification and determine which congestion criteria had the best prognostic value to predict cardiorenal events on heart transplant waiting list. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred consecutive patients (54 years old, 72% men) with available right heart catheterization (RHC) listed in our center for HT between 2014 and 2019 were included. Cardiac catheterization measurements were obtained at the time of HT listing evaluation. Patients were classified according to perfusion and congestion status in four groups: "warm and dry", "warm and wet", "cold and dry", and "cold and wet". pWet was used to classify patients with pulmonary congestion and sWet for systemic congestion. The primary endpoint was the rate of a composite criteria of cardiogenic shock, acute kidney injury, and acute heart failure. Secondary endpoint was the incidence of waitlist death, emergency HT, or left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation at 12 months evaluated by Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test. Only Forrester classification according to systemic congestion was associated with the primary composite endpoint (p = 0.011), while patients' profile according to pulmonary congestion was not (p = 0.331). Similarly, only the Forrester classification according to systemic congestion predicted waitlist death, emergency HT, or LVAD implantation at 12 months, with p = 0.010 and p = 0.189 for systemic and pulmonary congestion, respectively. Moreover, systemic congestion was the main driver of cardiorenal events on waitlist. CONCLUSIONS: Forrester classification according to systemic congestion is associated with cardiorenal outcomes in patients listed for heart transplant and the risk of waitlist death, emergency HT, or LVAD implantation at 12 months.

Arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy: A potentially reversible cause of refractory cardiogenic shock requiring venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

BACKGROUND: The most severe form of arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy in adults- refractory cardiogenic shock requiring mechanical circulatory support-has rarely been reported. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe the management of critically ill patients admitted for acute, nonischemic, or worsening of previously known cardiac dysfunction and recent-onset supraventricular arrhythmia who developed refractory cardiogenic shock requiring venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. RESULTS: Between 2004 and 2018, 35 patients received VA-ECMO for acute, nonischemic cardiogenic shock and recent supraventricular arrhythmia (77% atrial fibrillation [AF]). Cardiogenic shock was the first disease manifestation in 21 patients (60%). Characteristics at ECMO implantation [median (interquartile range)] were Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score 10 (7-13); inotrope score 29 (11-80); left ventricular ejection (LVEF) fraction 10% (10%-15%); and lactate level 8 (4-11) mmol/L. For 12 patients, amiodarone and/or electric cardioversion successfully reduced arrhythmia, improved LVEF, and enabled weaning off VA-ECMO; 11 had long-term survival without transplantation or long-term assist device. Eight patients experiencing arrhythmia-reduction failure underwent ablation procedures (7 atrioventricular node [AVN] with pacing, 1 atrial tachycardia) and were weaned off VA-ECMO; 7 survived. Of the remaining 15 patients without arrhythmia reduction or ablation, only the 6 bridged to heart transplantation or left ventricular (LV) assist device survived. CONCLUSION: Arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy, mainly AF-related, is an underrecognized cause of refractory cardiogenic shock and should be considered in patients with nonischemic cardiogenic shock and recent-onset supraventricular arrhythmia. VA-ECMO support allowed safe arrhythmia reduction or rate control by AVN ablation while awaiting recovery, even among those with severe LV dilation.