Wound healing after open appendectomies in adult patients: a prospective, randomised trial comparing two methods of wound closure.

BACKGROUND: The skin is closed in open appendectomy traditionally with few interrupted nonabsorbable sutures. The use of this old method is based on a suggestion that this technique decreases wound infections. In pediatric surgery, skin closure with running intradermal absorbable sutures has been found to be as safe as nonabsorbable sutures, even in complicated cases. Our purpose was to compare the safety of classic interrupted nonabsorbable skin closure to continuous intradermal absorbable sutures in appendectomy wounds in adult patients. METHODS: A total of 206 adult patients with clinically suspected appendicitis were allocated to the study and prospectively randomized into two groups of wound closure: the interrupted nonabsorbable (NA) suture and the intradermal continuous absorbable (A) suture group. Primary wound healing was controlled on the first postoperative day, at 1 week clinically and after 2 weeks by means of a telephone interview. Follow-up data were obtained from 185 patients (90 in group NA and 95 in group A). RESULTS: Continuous absorbable intradermal suturing was as safe as nonabsorbable sutures in regard to wound infections. CONCLUSION: Continuous, absorbable sutures can be used safely even in complicated appendicectomies without increasing the risk of wound infection. Considering the benefits of absorbable suturing, we recommend this method in all open appendectomies.

A pilot study of the implementation of WHO surgical checklist in Finland: improvements in activities and communication.

BACKGROUND: World Health Organisation (WHO) has introduced a surgical safety checklist that has reduced post-operative morbidity and mortality. Prior to national checklist implementation, we assessed its possible impact on the operating room (OR) process, safety-related issues and communication among surgical staff in a high-income country. METHODS: In four university and teaching hospitals, a structured questionnaire was delivered to OR personnel involved in consecutive operations over 4-6 weeks before and after the checklist implementation. The questionnaire resembled the WHO checklist and comprised multiple-choice questions relating to performance of safety checks and communication. Anaesthesiologists (A), surgeons (S) and circulating nurses (CN) answered the questions independently. The WHO checklist was modified for national needs. RESULTS: Questionnaires were returned from 1748 operations, 901 before and 847 after the checklist. Patient's identity was more often confirmed (A: 62.7% vs. 84.0%, S: 71.6% vs. 85.5%, CN: 81.6% vs. 94.2%, P < 0.001) and knowledge of names and roles among team members (A: 65.7% vs. 81.8%, S: 71.1% vs. 83.6%, CN: 87.7% vs. 93.2%, P < 0.01) improved with the checklist. Anaesthesiologists and surgeons discussed critical events pre-operatively (A: 22.0% vs. 42.6%, S: 34.7% vs. 46.2%, P < 0.001) more frequently after the checklist. In addition, fewer communication failures (43 vs. 17, P < 0.05) were reported with checklist. CONCLUSIONS: The checklist increased OR teams' awareness of patient-related issues, the procedure and expected risks. It also enhanced team communication and prevented communication failures. Our findings support use of the WHO checklist in various surgical fields.

Towards better patient safety: WHO Surgical Safety Checklist in otorhinolaryngology.

OBJECTIVES: The World Health Organisation has developed a Surgical Safety Checklist to improve patient safety during surgery. This checklist has reduced postoperative morbidity and mortality. Prior to checklist implementation, we wanted to evaluate how it would fit into the process of otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery and whether it would have an impact on the awareness of safety-related issues. DESIGN: A structured questionnaire was addressed to the operating room team after consecutive operations during a 1-month period before and after checklist implementation. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This study was conducted at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology at the Helsinki University Central Hospital as a part of a multicentre study. Responses were received regarding 288 operations before and 412 after checklist implementation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The questions concerned patient-related safety checks, teamwork and communication. RESULTS: The checklist improved verification of the patient's identity (P<0.001). Awareness of the patient's medical history, medication and allergies increased (P<0.001). Knowledge of the names and roles among the team members improved. The otolaryngologists and anaesthesiologists discussed possible critical events more often (P<0.001), and postoperative instructions were better recorded after use of the checklist. In addition, the checklist enhanced communication between operation team members. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms that the Surgical Safety Checklist fits well into the surgical working process in otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery improving the sharing of patient-related medical information between team members. Development of a specific checklist for otolaryngology calls for further study.

Non-absorbable interrupted versus absorbable continuous skin closure in pediatric appendectomies.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: appendectomy wounds are still commonly closed with non-absorbable sutures. Stitch removal has financial costs and causes anxiety in children. Our aim was to compare interrupted non-absorbable (NA) and continuous intradermal absorbable (A) sutures in appendectomy wounds to evaluate whether absorbable suturing increases the risk of complications. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 198 children (age 4-18 years) including perforated cases were prospectively randomized into two groups (NA and A skin closure). The wounds and inflammatory markers were evaluated on the first two postoperative days. The appearance of the wound was evaluated one week postoperatively by a district nurse. Follow-up data were obtained from 166 patients (87 in NA group and 79 in A group). RESULTS: in NA group 86 % and in A group 81 % had appendicitis (8 % and 15.6 % perforated and 9.3 % and 25 % gangrenous cases in NA and A groups, respectively). The total wound infection rate was low, 1.8 % (2.3 % in NA Group and 1.3% in A Group). No differences in the inflammatory markers or the appearance of the wound were noted between the groups, but nine children in NA Group (10.3 %) had a partial wound dehiscence after stitch removal. CONCLUSION: appendectomy wounds in children can be closed with continuous, absorbable sutures, even in complicated cases.

Antegrade continence enema in the treatment of congenital fecal incontinence beyond childhood.

PURPOSE: The role of antegrade continence enema for the treatment of congenital fecal incontinence in adult patients remains unclear. MATERIALS: Twenty-seven patients, median age 19 (range, 17-43) years, with congenital fecal incontinence underwent surgery for antegrade continence enema and were prospectively followed up for functional outcome after a median of 25 (range, 3-117) months. RESULTS: The diagnoses included myelodysplasia (n = 14), anorectal malformations (n = 6), and others (n = 7). Antegrade continence enema conduits included appendicostomy (n = 22) and cecal (n = 2), ileal (n = 2), and sigmoid (n = 1) tubes. Thirteen (48 percent) patients had complications. Eighteen (66 percent) patients became fully continent, six (23 percent) had minor, and three (11 percent) major soiling. Antegrade continence enema became unnecessary in three patients (11 percent). Treatment with antegrade continence enema failed in three cases. Of the 21 patients who continued with antegrade continence enema, 16 (76 percent) are fully continent, and bowel function and quality of life was improved in 15 (71 percent) and 13 (62 percent) patients, respectively. The scores of convenience (1 = easy, 5 = difficult) and overall satisfaction (1 = poor, 10 = excellent) were median 2 (range, 1-4) and 8 (range, 3-10). CONCLUSIONS: Despite numerous complications and occasional treatment failures, 90 percent of adult patients with congenital fecal incontinence benefited from antegrade continence enema.