A real-life analysis on the indications and prognostic relevance of perioperative chemotherapy in locally advanced resectable gastric adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Perioperative chemotherapy (periCTX) based on the "MAGIC" scheme has become a standard treatment in Europe for locally advanced oesophagogastric cancer. We assessed implementation and long-term oncological outcomes of MAGIC periCTX for locally advanced gastric cancer. METHODS: Population-based cohort study of all patients with locally advanced gastric cancer undergoing surgical resection with curative intent in Catalonia and Navarra (the first two autonomous communities included in the EURECCA Upper GI Spanish Working Group) between January 2011 and December 2013. The main variable was the percentage of patients treated with MAGIC periCTX. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards model were used to assess the survival benefit of periCTX. RESULTS: Among 814 patients, 217 (26.6%) received periCTX (especially patients more likely to receive it: aged < 70 years, with proximal tumors, low anesthetic risk, and cT3-4/cN+ clinical stage). 35% did not complete perioperative chemotherapy, with no relationship with age. PeriCTX showed no effect on postoperative morbimortality. Histological tumor regression was more often absent or poor (38.2%) than total or almost total (27.8%), although clinico-pathological lymph-node downstaging was higher than expected by staging inaccuracy (38.7% vs. 24.2%). PeriCTX was associated with a better survival only in cT3-4 and cN+ patients, showing less prognostic relevance than optimal oncological surgery with D2 lymphadenectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Only 26.6% of locally advanced resectable gastric cancer patients received PeriCTX. Pathological response was poor, although some degree of nodal downstaging was observed. Survival benefit of periCTX was limited to cT3-4 and cN+ patients, being less relevant than D2 lymphadenectomy.

Postoperative intra-abdominal infection is an independent prognostic factor of disease-free survival and disease-specific survival in patients with stage II colon cancer.

BACKGROUND: Recurrence occurs in up to 20% of patients with stage II colon cancer operated on for cure. Although postoperative intra-abdominal infection has been linked with an increased risk of recurrence, the association is controversial. The aim was to investigate the impact of postoperative intra-abdominal infection on disease-free survival and disease-specific survival in patients with stage II colon cancer. METHODS: Patients undergoing elective surgery for colon cancer stage II, between 2003 and 2014, were included. Patients with anastomotic leak or intra-abdominal abscess were included in the infection group. We used the Kaplan-Meier method to represent the distribution of survival and the Cox proportional hazards model to estimate the contribution of relevant clinicopathological factors with prognosis. RESULTS: Postoperative intra-abdominal infection was diagnosed in 37 of 363 (10.2%) patients. Perioperative blood transfusion was more frequent in patients with infection (p = 0.008). Overall 5-year disease-free survival rate was 85.1%. Disease-free survival at 5 years was lower in patients with postoperative intra-abdominal infection (52.8 vs 88.7%; p < 0.001), perineural invasion (p = 0.001), lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.001), pT4 (p = 0.013), and in patients with adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.013). Multivariate analysis showed that postoperative intra-abdominal infection (HR 4.275; p < 0.001), perineural invasion (HR 2.230; p = 0.007), and lymphovascular invasion (HR 2.052; p = 0.016) were all significant independent predictors of reduced disease-free survival. Regarding specific survival, independent significant prognostic factors were the number of lymph nodes, lymphovascular invasion, and postoperative intra-abdominal infection. CONCLUSION: In this series of patients with stage II colon cancer, postoperative intra-abdominal infection has an independent negative impact on disease-free survival and disease-specific survival.

Use of a colonic pouch as a rectal substitute after rectal excision.

Mid or distal rectal resection with straight coloanal anastomosis effectively treats distal rectal cancer and avoids a permanent stoma. However, the straight colonic segment is a poor reservoir for stools, and patients usually experience varying degrees of impaired rectal function after operation, including frequent bowel movements, incontinence, tenesmus, and soiling. In contrast, a J-shaped colonic pouch provides an adequate neorectal reservoir after operation. Patients with a colonic pouch-anal canal anastomosis have fewer bowel movements per day than patients with straight colorectal or coloanal anastomosis. Furthermore, the morbidity of the colonic pouch is not greater than that of the straight coloanal anastomosis. An important technical aspect of the colonic pouch procedure is that the limbs used to form the pouch must be no longer than 5 to 6 cm. Patients with larger pouches experience emptying difficulties. Also, the level of the anastomosis between the pouch and the anal canal must be no more than 4 cm from the anal verge, again to avoid problems with defecation. With these caveats, the operation should be considered in patients who require excision of the mid and distal rectum for cancer.

[Gonococcal arthritis during pregnancy. Considerations apropos of a case]. / Artritis gonocóccica durante el embarazo. Consideraciones a propósito de un caso.

A pregnant teenager was admitted with uterine contractions, metrorrhagia, migrating polyarthralgia and left knee arthritis with effusion. Disseminated gonococcal infection and arthritis of the knee were diagnosed by bacteriologic methods. Complete recovery followed appropriate antibiotic therapy. The outcome of pregnancy was timely and uneventful.